<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Whitechapel - Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:45:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
			<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>
				Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.4 &amp; Feed Publisher
			</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310477#Comment_310477</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310477#Comment_310477</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:27:27 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ For those who want to see unmediated footage of NY's Occupy Wall Street protest, go <a href="http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution" >here</a>. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310492#Comment_310492</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310492#Comment_310492</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:52:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oldhat</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Man, I am so cynical towards protest culture in North America... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310496#Comment_310496</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310496#Comment_310496</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:36:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>roadscum</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I for one am scared shitless about this whole western economic collapse business. Trouble is, apart from that i see little practical that i can do apart from stocking up on tinned food and cigarettes (useful as barter goods). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310556#Comment_310556</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310556#Comment_310556</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:14:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ There are some real problems with protests in the US. They almost never work anymore.<br /><br />It is institutionally well known how to weather them. Just let people protest, control the movement of people through the area with permits and police. If anyone tries to move outside then sanctioned zone, arrest them, and occasionally use excessive but not lethal force in doing that. You can always paint that later as: "the protest was peaceful until some bad elements caused trouble" and no one will seriously challenge that.<br /><br />Eventually the protest will peter out because:<br /><br />1) only kids, people on welfare or the unemployed can afford to stay in the streets, and that ultimately doesn't amount to a lot of people. Also, the rest of the country doesn't believe anyone in these groups has any idea what they really want.<br /><br />2) all protests in the US become magnets for every random grievance or bizarre political idea in the world. There is never a clear message, never a definite goal, never any message discipline, no coherence at all. <br /><br />Institutions just have to wait this out for a few days. It always blows over. Nothing comes of it.<br /><br />The people who participate think they are doing something, but really they are just doing the lazy thing. It's easy to run out into the street for a few days. It's hard to get a law degree, or launch a political career, or found and run a business, and use your position afterward as a broker of strength in your community for the betterment of people's lives.<br /><br />Only something like the latter option actually stands a chance of making any kind of difference.<br /><br />Protests in the US are just poorly rehearsed, badly written theater. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310560#Comment_310560</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310560#Comment_310560</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:47:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Rachæl Tyrell</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I was down by Wall Street a few days ago, and caught some minor protesting going on. It was ridiculous and embarrassing. A large woman wandering about in a hippy skirt and totally topless, yelling at people "STAY TOGETHER! NOBODY ALONE! NO ONE ALONE!!!" and stomping about, while people just banged on bongos. <br /><br />In my mind, a true protest should be done in the manner of the early Civil Rights protests: wear your Sunday best, and act with poise and courtesy. American protesters are most often not the people who are being most effected. It's the equivalent of Green Peace ramming whaling boats instead of actually working at passing laws and altering the approach of governments to come to a long term agreement that will actually effect change. (in other words: what oddbill said) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310561#Comment_310561</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310561#Comment_310561</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:00:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oldhat</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ And that's it.  I just roll my eyes when I see another protest with vague and scattered goals and no clear resolution to the problem they're even protesting.  It's why the G20 here in Toronto bugged me.  It's why a lot of protests bug me.  They somehow assume that if they gather outside and chant a couple of words that the people inside (who apparently have power) will suddenly realize that "my god..poverty IS wrong! Let's get to work, folks. We have a world to save!".<br /><br />Last week here in Toronto there was an Executive Committee meeting over the proposed cuts to services that the city funds (libraries, theatres, parks, services for elderly etc.).  Over 366 people, from teenagers who go to the library to the guy that cuts the grass in parks showed up and each one got to talk directly to the mayor of the city and city councillors who are undecided on where to vote in regards to the cuts. THAT, to me, made a difference.  Each person got a say and the people in charge LISTENED. <br /><br />But protests like this on Wall Street...eh.  I really don't see it doing anything other than annoying people who want to get to work and make a few kids feel important for a while. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310566#Comment_310566</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310566#Comment_310566</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:28:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ On the other hand.<br /><br />The rich in this country are the guy in the first few seconds of this video:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyTT7eyMCsg" >He prefers to be captain of his ship</a><br /><br />And America is their mail order bride, and they're just a bit less satisfied when she acts out, I think. And when the jobless numbers come out month after month and the streets are empty and the audience on TV is booing their own children for being gay soldiers, I think the captain really must have the sweetest, pleasedest chuckle. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310573#Comment_310573</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310573#Comment_310573</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:35:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Fishelle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I have to agree with what's been said. If one is going to protest something, the goal should be clear. This sort of thing doesn't make a difference.<br /><br />Since the title of the thread includes "and elsewhere" I'll mention a sort of protest that happened recently just down the street from where I live, where a ton of people <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/utah-underwear-run-held-to-protest-laws-that-are-uptight-photos-video/2011/09/26/gIQAbJkAzK_blog.html" >ran around in their underwear to protest Utah's "uptight" laws</a>. I don't really think it <em >helped</em> anything by any means. But I guess it gave people an excuse to run around in their underpants. And in that way, it's better than the Wall Street protests.<br /><br />Seriously, though. I don't understand why people are raising money for this Occupy Wall Street thing. If someone could explain it to me so it makes sense, that would be welcome. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310576#Comment_310576</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310576#Comment_310576</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:53:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Rachæl Tyrell</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ (Oh, I should mention that the protest that I witnessed, while on Wall Street, was about Troy Davis, not the financial melt down. Pointless and scattered and lame it was.) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310578#Comment_310578</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310578#Comment_310578</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:15:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Also the fact that participants and supporters keep referring to it as "<a href="http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/668305/%22american_tahrir_square%22_hundreds_of_young_people_descend_on_wall_street_(and_remain_there)/" >the American Tahrir Square</a>" just reeks of tone-deaf entitled appropriation. In Tahrir Square a massive cross-section of the whole civil society of Egypt demanded a dictator step down and stayed until that happened, in the face of possible massacre. In Wall Street, Anonymous calls out a band of kids to, what? Who knows. Demand that money stop influencing politicians, or something. Nothing specific. But srsly, it's totally <em >just like</em> the Arab Spring, but here in America, because we're also cool and can have cool things like that too.<br /><br />We've had a peppering (pun intended) of videos of police brutality. If the point of this protest were to peacefully goad abusive cops to demonstrate abuses on camera, after which there would be a sustained and focused effort to have each of those recorded abuses prosecuted, in an attempt to call attention to the degree to which police are not held accountable for excessive force and flagrant violations of law and public trust, it would be a <strong >very useful effort</strong>.<br /><br />It's one way I think some value could be wrung out of an otherwise sloppy exercise of public narcissism. But I don't think that's going to happen, because I don't think anyone involved has that much focus, or enough influence to inspire that kind of focus in the group. There are huge disadvantages to leaderless efforts. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310583#Comment_310583</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310583#Comment_310583</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:39:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've always wondered why protest culture seems to view getting one's ass kicked by a cop as a sign of virtue. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310604#Comment_310604</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310604#Comment_310604</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:52:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ Jon Wake--Probably because that's a physical sign that one is willing to put one's body on the line when it counts.  The trouble is, there's a difference between getting one's ass kicked to achieve a greater goal and getting one's ass kicked just to score lefty karma points.<br /><br />@Oddbill--True.  Your points coincide with <a href="http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/09/occupy-wall-street" >these points</a> raised by a Mother Jones blogger. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310609#Comment_310609</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310609#Comment_310609</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:21:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WINDtlPXmmE" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310615#Comment_310615</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310615#Comment_310615</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:04:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ So apparently, last week, people showed up to protest at my job, at the Federal Detention Center in downtown Houston.  <a href="http://www.houstonunido.org/" >The group was protesting immigration and deportation (and racial profiling?)</a><br /><br /><img src="http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/297570_260786290627590_170174393022114_763047_1390323184_n.jpg" alt="Down with... stuff?" ><br /><br />Now, while we do have illegal immigrants incarcerated at FDC Houston, they are in for the myriad other crimes they committed whilst here illegally, not because of their immigration status.<br /><br />So my Captain went out to speak with them, and inform them that the agency that they would be more appropriate to protest would be ICE (Immigration Customs Enforcement), and where their nearest detention facility is located.<br /><br />Their response was pretty much something to the effect of "SO!! We can protest where ever we want, you... Stupid MAN, Stupid FED MAN!!"<br /><br />Within a couple of hours the protest consisted on one angry lady and her kid. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310616#Comment_310616</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310616#Comment_310616</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:19:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Oddbill<br /><br />Your summation of US protests reminds me of those online petitions people pass around. They give people a happy feeling that they've accomplished something without actually doing anything. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310617#Comment_310617</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310617#Comment_310617</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:23:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've had my ass kicked by a bunch of cops before, but it was because I was acting like a jackass.<br /><br />Edited to add: I just watched the Lawrence O'Donnell piece on the cops in the protests, and I want to emphatically state that there is no excuse for police brutality. I wish I could be appalled by what I just watched but we've always known it was there. I get defensive any time people just bash police like we're all monsters like that. <br /><br />Every day, I am surprised by the amount of co-workers I have that are actually decent people who care about treating the criminals under our watch with actual dignity and respect. <br /><br />There are violent assholes out there and they are a minority. But it's like the old saying, that the greater evil are those of us that are aware of the evil that is being done and do nothing about it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310629#Comment_310629</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310629#Comment_310629</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:28:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Glenn Greenwald offers <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/wall_street/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2011/09/28/protests" >this cogent defense</a> of the Wall Street protests and criticizes their critics. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310638#Comment_310638</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310638#Comment_310638</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:26:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @government spy, <br />your addition to your last post is a very good point, because if the protest gets traction it could be given a large boost by winning over the very people you mention.<br /><br />As for every criticism of these protests, not having direction, yadda yadda. Has it escaped everyones attention that the protest is called "Occupy Wall Street"? and they may be protesting the fact that there has been large-scale fraud committed for which no-one had been convicted of anything, possibly? Or how about the widening gap between the rich and the poor, nationally and worldwide, or the plethora of other social ills connected with large financial institutions.<br /><br />I don't think it takes a genius to figure out what they are protesting. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310640#Comment_310640</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310640#Comment_310640</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:42:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ A question that will hopefully lead to some useful discussion: what does it even mean to protest those things? What sort of action might actually effect a reduction of the gap in wealth? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310641#Comment_310641</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310641#Comment_310641</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:53:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >2) all protests in the US become magnets for every random grievance or bizarre political idea in the world. There is never a clear message, never a definite goal, never any message discipline, no coherence at all.</em><br /><br />When illegal immigrants were protesting a few years ago I was really impressed by how they held their protests together. They managed to get hundreds of thousands of people to show up and stick to the issue. I did not see a single person protesting to free Mumia, abolish Israel, legalize pot, or replace the US Government with a Maoist dictatorship. The protestors actually protested; nobody was getting high or playing hackey-sack. And the stage was mostly serious speakers; it never turned into a free indie rock festival. Everything was well planned and legal, and when the permit ended everybody went home without pulling stupid stunts to intentionally get arrested.<br /><br />I don’t really understand why these differences exist between protests consisting mostly of barely-literate domestic laborers and protests put together by well educated children of the (relatively) well-off. But if the American left is ever going to be relevant again, they need to learn from their nannies and housekeepers. Occupy Wall Street seemed to start as a step in the right direction—show up on Wall Street, protest, repeat. But after five days they suddenly switched to deliberately fucking up traffic and antagonizing cops and generally wrecking Saturday afternoon in my neighborhood, which is nowhere near Wall Street.<br /><br />If they had just ignored the random cranks who suddenly decided to march in traffic with no plan or permit they could still be out there. They crowds might even be growing. It’s a shame that they were too stupid to do so. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310644#Comment_310644</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310644#Comment_310644</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:24:42 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Oddbill<br /><br />first you need to identify what is driving wealth inequality, it would probably be placed at the reality that wealth gives one an disproportionate influence in the politics and society, and the means to influence it to for your own benefit. This has been taken to quite an extreme in the developed west and drives inequality worldwide.<br /><br />This is a systemic problem.<br /><br />You said earlier:<br /><blockquote >The people who participate think they are doing something, but really they are just doing the lazy thing. It's easy to run out into the street for a few days. It's hard to get a law degree, or launch a political career, or found and run a business, and use your position afterward as a broker of strength in your community for the betterment of people's lives.</blockquote><br />What if the energy that you put into holding these positions exacerbate the problem because you must support the very system that you profess to be working to fix?<br /><br />This is definitely a problem that I struggle with on a daily basis. Yet does my job give me the time I need to for all the social causes I want to help, no it doesn't, and I don't see the changing any time soon through conventional means.<br /><br />Do you want a solution? What we are dealing with is a living system and any changes may have a beneficial or detrimental effect on the system. Now a group of people who have wealth and can use that wealth to influence th system to their advantage, will always win against a the poor and disenfranchised. Hell just listen to some Goerge Carlin, he can put it better than I ever could, and how many years has he or others pointed out these problems, and we still don't seem to get it.<br /><br />I can also point you back to the Howard Beale clip above. My answer is I don't know. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310649#Comment_310649</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310649#Comment_310649</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:57:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >wealth gives one an disproportionate influence in the politics and society, and the means to influence it to for your own benefit. This has been taken to quite an extreme in the developed west</blockquote><br /><br />I would argue that you are being extremely myopic in thinking that somehow this is a worse problem in the "developed west" than it is anywhere else in the world, or even anywhen else in time.<br /><br />Wealth <em >is</em> influence. It just <em >is</em>. You can't stop it from being that. It is that by definition. People who have the ability to influence will do it, people in positions to be influenced will be, that is not a changeable fact. It is a <em >feature</em> of human communal existence, not a bug. It cannot be fixed without scrapping humanity altogether.<br /><br />You cannot stop wealth from influencing politics. It always, always has. In all times and everywhere. In every sort of society, whether there is a system of currency, or system of reputation wealth, or simply the rule of the strongest, whoever holds whatever equals wealth in that society runs things.<br /><br />Currency as wealth as influence is actually a more democratized medium than, for example, brute strength, or charisma. In practice, more people can gather wealth, and therefore influence their government, than can exert brute strength, or sway large numbers of others with their personalities. Currency as wealth is a <em >better option</em> than most others because it is fluid and can be accumulated in so many different ways.<br /><br />When you argue about not putting energy into the system to try to accumulate influence, I wonder what you are proposing as an alternative. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310653#Comment_310653</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310653#Comment_310653</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:04:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >When illegal immigrants were protesting a few years ago I was really impressed by how they held their protests together. They managed to get hundreds of thousands of people to show up and stick to the issue. I did not see a single person protesting to free Mumia, abolish Israel, legalize pot, or replace the US Government with a Maoist dictatorship. The protestors actually protested; nobody was getting high or playing hackey-sack. And the stage was mostly serious speakers; it never turned into a free indie rock festival. Everything was well planned and legal, and when the permit ended everybody went home without pulling stupid stunts to intentionally get arrested.</blockquote><br />It is good that the protests passed without people getting beat up or making messes. But in terms of results measurement, how well were their specific causes advanced (I don't recall which protests you are referring to, so I don't know what to measure)? Was it related to:<br /><br /><blockquote ><strong >Obama set to outpace Bush on deportations</strong> <br />President Barack Obama says he backs immigration reform, announcing last month an initiative to ease deportation policies, but he has sent home more than 1 million illegal immigrants in 2 1/2 years — on pace to deport more in one term than George W. Bush did in two.<br /><br />The Obama administration had deported about 1.06 million as of Sept. 12, against 1.57 million in Bush's two full presidential terms.<br /><br />This seeming contradiction between rhetoric and reality is a key element of debate over U.S. immigration policy, and stakes are high for 2012's presidential election as Obama faces criticism from both conservatives and liberals.<br /><br />In 2008, 67 percent of Hispanics voted for Obama over Republicans John McCain and Sarah Palin.<br /><br />But Obama fell short on his promise to have a comprehensive reform bill in Congress in his first year. And despite his push of the DREAM Act in 2010, that bill failed in the Senate at the end of the Democrat-run 111th Congress. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44599016/ns/politics-more_politics/t/obama-set-outpace-bush-deportations/#.ToOtTE-bsdM" target="_blank" >(source: msnbc)</a></blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310654#Comment_310654</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310654#Comment_310654</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:22:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I would argue that you are being extremely myopic in thinking that somehow this is a worse problem in the "developed west" than [...] anywhen else in time.</blockquote><br />er?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3220" target="_blank" ><img src="http://www.cbpp.org/images/cms//6-25-10inc-f1.jpg" ></a><br /><br /><blockquote >[or] anywhere else in the world</blockquote><br /><br />err?<br /><a href='http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gini_Coefficient_World_CIA_Report_2009.png' ><img width='800' title='Gini Coefficient World CIA Report 2009' src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Gini_Coefficient_World_CIA_Report_2009.png/800px-Gini_Coefficient_World_CIA_Report_2009.png" border="0" ></a><br />"Differences in national income equality around the world as measured by the national Gini coefficient. The Gini coefficient is a number between 0 and 1, where 0 corresponds with perfect equality (where everyone has the same income) and 1 corresponds with perfect inequality (where one person has all the income, and everyone else has zero income)."<br /><br />(blue is more equal than purple) (egypt is blue)<br /><br /><br /><blockquote >When you argue about not putting energy into the system to try to accumulate influence, I wonder what you are proposing as an alternative.</blockquote><br />Revolution is logistically difficult. Suicide shootout of a packed wall street building, or in-house murder of your nearest local rich dude, would be logistically easy, but for whatever reason people on the left don't do it at all. Obviously, disenfranchisement is not something most people are willing to die over. It is more common on the right (see: right-wing terrorism), because I think right wing political ideas after 1960 are increasing couched in absolutism). So, for the less absolutist left, protests are if nothing else an outlet of that same energy after deciding not to become a murderer. They are also possibly a water-testing. A lets-see-what-happens move, an attainment of poise. Like going to a bar in the hopes of magically scoring. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310656#Comment_310656</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310656#Comment_310656</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:40:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It's that philosophical absolutism coupled with the stupidity of the left that has been giving the right all of the leeway it needs to completely dismantle the New Deal and restructure the American political machine to make it near impossible to undo their changes. Their current tactic is to make it very difficult to vote if you're likely to not vote for them. <br /><br />They need not worry since lefties are such a bunch of whining pussies they think stamping off in a huff and not voting will magically solve the problems cause by the statistical minority of people who<strong > are</strong> voting. <br /><br />So, basically, the last few decades has been the fault of the left and the moderates, not the right. And I'd be okay with this is the damage caused stayed in America. But it doesn't. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310658#Comment_310658</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310658#Comment_310658</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:50:21 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>dorkmuffin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I... I can't take any of this seriously. Yeah, boooo, booooo Wall Street, but also, allllllll the people I know who would be interested in protesting at this thing are... Well. They're not adults. They might be older than me but they hold a lot of incredibly naive beliefs about how people are and how government should work.<br /><br />Or maybe I'm a serious pessimist. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310659#Comment_310659</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310659#Comment_310659</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:52:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yes, I get the fact that income differences in the purple and blue areas are more extreme than the green areas, but look at that map, that is hardly "the developed west". Look at Brazil, China, Africa. And the point I was actually making in response to this:<br /><br /><blockquote >wealth gives one an disproportionate influence in the politics and society, and the means to influence it to for your own benefit. This has been taken to quite an extreme in the developed west</blockquote><br /><br />is that wealth conferring "disproportionate influence" is not more of a problem now than it ever has been, or ever will be. It's the wrong thing to focus on, it's like saying water makes things "disproportionately wet".<br /><br /><blockquote >Like going to a bar in the hopes of magically scoring.</blockquote><br /><br />Exactly, and my argument is that recognizing this is a very poor strategy for romance is part of growing up.<br /><br />I know it sucks to watch idealism waved away by cynicism, but honestly I have seen these kinds of protests over and over and over again over the last 20 years, over elections and executions and college fee increases and land seizures and globalization and wars and on and on. When they look like this one does, with drum circles and topless girls and anger over the economy one day and a death sentence the next and are full of open mic committees about what the protest should be about, they just don't work. They never work. They don't change anyone's opinions. They are a waste of time.<br /><br />What would make an impression? Suppose, as Rachael suggested above, everyone showed up dressed in work clothes, or they way they would dress at a job interview, and all carried signs that said simple, on message things like "Tax the Rich", "Pay your Share", "No Free Ride", "Not Above the Law" and "You are Responsible" - and these messages were clearly aimed at the financial industry. And these people stayed there. And left the "Free Speech Zones" but did it slowly and deliberately, so that police would be arresting parents and middle aged office workers holding signs and moving calmly, instead of kids who come across on TV as aspiring hippies taunting and dodging the cops. It is two completely different faces, and the former one would be far more effective in getting across a message.<br /><br />The Wall Street Occupation self-identifies as the 99%, but they do not look, feel or behave like the 99%, they are <em >the other</em> 1% and that is the real image they are putting out.<br /><br />I know I am an old cynical asshole, but I've seen this futile posturing so many times, and no matter how many times all the cliched observations I am making now are made, the angry white urban college kids who do these things never seem to hear it or learn a thing. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310661#Comment_310661</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310661#Comment_310661</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:03:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Rachæl Tyrell</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ So, perhaps a protest towards the end goal of shutting down the acceptance of lobbying and as a legal means to earn votes and representation would be more direct and worthwhile? Perhaps placing a cap on the duration and expense of campaigns, as well? Those would be direct ways to make politicians more beholden to those they were supposed to represent and protect, instead of big money, no? <br /><br />How does one lobby to eradicate lobbying? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310662#Comment_310662</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310662#Comment_310662</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:03:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.thirteen.org/metrofocus/news/2011/09/observations-of-a-jailed-journalist/" >Very good article from a citizen journalist about the way the NYPD are (mis)handling things.</a><br /><br />Oddbill, whilst it seems a touch jaded, your viewpoint is a sound one I think. Just maybe this kind of citizen journalism can lift the veil on things for some of the population who otherwise wouldn't be made aware of important events that the mainstream media doesn't cover. <br /><br />New media is always (and has been, historically) at the forefront of social revolution since time began. Discuss. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310664#Comment_310664</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310664#Comment_310664</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:40:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>dorkmuffin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Follow up:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zgr3DiqWYCI&feature=share" >Mainstream media covering police brutality.</a><br /><br />I'm having a really hard time watching this, honestly. It's pretty appalling.<br /><br />EDIT: Regardless of whether this is biased, the footage they show is really disgusting. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310667#Comment_310667</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310667#Comment_310667</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:08:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Damn, that's a good piece. Was that on US TV? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310669#Comment_310669</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310669#Comment_310669</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:16:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Obama set to outpace Bush on deportations…</em><br /><br />At that time the big issues seemed to be cutting off illegals from various state services, along with right-wing plans to make employers check new employees Social Security numbers to identify people working illegally. The protests seemed to scuttle those plans in some states and at the federal level. There have been a lot of deportations under Obama, but many of them are of immigrants who broke the law while here. Obama’s high deportation numbers might also be the result of immigrants choosing to just leave the US without a fight because they can’t find work here anyway. <br /><br /><em >What would make an impression?</em><br /><br />Leadership. The right have a plethora of leaders. They established entire colleges just to crank out right-wing extremist leaders. Fundamentalist and LDS churches raise their kids to speak and lead. Liberals have raised kids to play kickball and get high or something. And the liberals who really do get fired up to lead are usually cranks who end up organizing A.N.S.W.E.R. rallies. Part of this is probably due to partisan/religious divides over gay rights, abortion, gun rights, etc.. The Churches and Boy Scouts and so on almost always side with the GOP. We need a big liberal wing of civil society producing the next John and Bobby Kennedys. <br /><br /><em >How does one lobby to eradicate lobbying?</em><br /><br />A massive campaign to amend the Constitution is necessary. That was how prohibition was swept in. Just remember that “big money” is still just groups of lots of people. Having a society in which people who form a group suddenly have their rights to petition government curtailed might not work out so well. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310675#Comment_310675</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310675#Comment_310675</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:29:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >The right have a plethora of leaders. They established entire colleges just to crank out right-wing extremist leaders. Fundamentalist and LDS churches raise their kids to speak and lead. Liberals have raised kids to play kickball and get high or something. </blockquote><br /><br />Yes. A thousand times yes. <br /><br />They're just better at democracy. That doesn't mean they're not human shit. But at least they work hard at it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310677#Comment_310677</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310677#Comment_310677</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:03:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Can we not use the word "illegals?"  Maybe I'm just being overly PC here but I find that term incredibly dehumanizing, and the immigration issue is huge for me.  That said, the Obama admin has also been deporting many immigrants who have absolutely no criminal record, or only minor offenses such as traffic violations.  The Obama admin. has also been deporting DREAM act eligible youth who had no say in coming to states in the first place when their parents brought them as children.  In a related to Occupy Wall Street issue, did you know that people can pay $500k for an investor's visa?  Kinda fucked up considering we won't give DREAM act eligible college graduates who have been here the majority of their lives temporary residence and a work permit.  But if you have the money, no prob. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310683#Comment_310683</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310683#Comment_310683</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:59:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Rachæl Tyrell</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I feel the same way about people complaining about the deportation of illegal immigrants as I do about people complaining about being arrested for smoking weed. <br /><br />It's illegal. The role of the government is to uphold law, no? Complaining that the government is following it's own edicts makes no sense. People who are living illegally in ANY country are deported. People using illegal substances are arrested. To fault the law enforcers for enforcing the law seems ... weird.<br /><br />A friend of mine was upset because they passed a new legal precedent recently, where a fellow was being chased by police for having commited a robbery or something, they followed him in an apartment building, but then, when inside, they smelled marijuana and heard something suspicious from a different apartment, entered the apartment, and arrested the potheads inside. The actions were defended by a judge. My friend was angry that this means that if a cop smells weed, he can just bust down your door. But that's not the point. If I were being raped, I sure as hell hope that a police officer would come to my aid even if that's NOT why he was in the area. The problem is that weed is illegal, not that police are given the power to pursue illegality when they come across it.<br /><br />The laws should be changed. Giving people who are fucking INDIGENOUS TO THIS CONTINENT the opportunity to legally reside in the United States should be allowed. However, I can understand why having thousands of humans without any knowledge of who they are or where they came from is not something that can just be let go. Much like the failure of alcohol prohibition, where people went blind from moonshine, crime was rampant, and the police were warring on the streets, so is the modern American drug war, and so is the modern American attack on Mexican immigration.<br /><br />And gosh, that investor's visa is som serious bullshit. Wasn't there going to be a reality game show and the winner would get a green card? I swear that was in pre-production until someone decided it would be a terrible and illegal idea. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310703#Comment_310703</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310703#Comment_310703</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:06:27 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Can we not use the word "illegals?" Maybe I'm just being overly PC here but I find that term incredibly dehumanizing, and the immigration issue is huge for me.</em><br /><br />And that is one more huge reason the American left is going nowhere. Conversations about serious issues get derailed to avoid offending easily offended people. “Illegal immigrant” is not dehumanizing, it is a statement of fact. They immigrated, and did so illegally. Thus they are illegal immigrants. Trying to make up new words for it does not make their immigration status any less illegal. Referring to them as “undocumented workers” or some other such silliness just makes people stop taking you seriously. Political correctness turns good conversations into the scene from “Life of Brian” where they have to argue over whether or they need to protect the right of men to have babies despite men not having wombs. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310704#Comment_310704</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310704#Comment_310704</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:22:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Bill<br /><br />I don't believe it is myopic to understand that influence of the west over the rest of the world is greater than at any time in history. nor is it myopic to realize there is escalating inequality in the major industrialised countries of the west, see Brian's post above.<br /><br /><blockquote >Wealth is influence. It just is. You can't stop it from being that. It is that by definition. People who have the ability to influence will do it, people in positions to be influenced will be, that is not a changeable fact. It is a feature of human communal existence, not a bug. It cannot be fixed without scrapping humanity altogether.</blockquote><br />This probably comes to the crux of our difference, You have put what I believe to be an learned social trait into human nature, We do not always act like this and what causes us to act like this is a system which rewards these types of behavior. Your and others view of the immutability of this 'feature', I would say supports my point that wealth as influence has been taken to an extreme in the developed west.<br /><br />The system that we currently use to organize society is not and never will be a perfect model for human nature. The global economic system currently seems to dictate the way that society is organized. Is this system just one part of society that we use or is this system a functionally perfect system that dictates how society should be organized. I would go with the former and therefore we are free to make other requirements of this system. But because of the prevalence of ideas that support the current view of society it makes it very difficult to have change enacted in any meaningful sense.<br /><br />Back to Occupy Wall street, what I believe the people there are fighting is the idea I outlined above. if the people protesting remove the influence of wealth from politics they can influence politics in what ever way they want, how about the best dancers dictate policy? Isn't that just as arbitrary as the greatest wealth accumulators. EDIT: I don't think anyone who believes in the fundamental ideas of democracy can fail to notice the problem here.<br /><br /><blockquote >If I can't dance, it's not my revolution!<br />If I can't dance, I don't want your revolution!<br />If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution.<br />A revolution without dancing is not a revolution worth having.<br />If there won't be dancing at the revolution, I'm not coming.</blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310705#Comment_310705</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310705#Comment_310705</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:27:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >And that is one more huge reason the American left is going nowhere. Conversations about serious issues get derailed to avoid offending easily offended people.</blockquote><br />I would be interested in research that demonstrates the idea you are asserting.<br /><br />When the right and Frank Luntz re-word every issue to vector their epistemological framework into media and water-cooler conversations of issues (eg "cap and tax", "obamacare", "job creators" instead of "rich people") it is usually recognized as part of their good strategy.<br /><br />If someone wants to reword "illegals" to insert a more progressive framework into the conversation, you assert it is some liberal-owned emotional compulsion that destroys credibility.<br /><br />So, what is the research that supports there being different results to the same idea. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310706#Comment_310706</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310706#Comment_310706</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:35:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I feel the same way about people complaining about the deportation of illegal immigrants as I do about people complaining about being arrested for smoking weed. </blockquote><br />Both issues are complicated by scale. The government's interest in how these laws are applied goes beyond the moral appropriateness of the ideas behind the laws -- it goes to the economic cost of enforcing them, which is huge for both, compared to the social impacts and civic policy results, which are astoundingly negative rather than positive. This is why support for immigration reform is bipartison until conservative voter backlash makes Republicans flop on the final vote. This is why the most leniant governor RE immigrant work policies and conditions in the American South is none other than Texas's Rick Perry, the current front-runner in the REPUBLICAN presidential polls.<br /><br />But complaining is different from advocating for change. It doesn't <em >substitute </em>advocation, but it isn't <em >rendered an invalid mode of thought</em> by the fact that advocation is needed or already happening.<br /><br />In other words it would be like if the govenrment suddenly ordered the evacuation of Richmond, VA, for the reason of it was going to become permanently flooded. However people didn't evacuate, and since this is a metaphor for immigration we'll say that their issue with evacuating was the HEAD-CHOPPING DRUG LORDS IN THE WOODS OUTSIDE TOWN. Now the flood happened and the residents of Richmond who are alive ("illegal non-evacuees") are being thrown into the woods by police every day, even though they're chill in Wet Richmond and the new Wet Richmond Outsourcing is getting lots of contracts and making tax money. The politicians of both parties agree it's a problem and a mess and the illegals need a path to becoming not thrown into Decapitation Forest. But ten years later it is still happening.<br /><br />One day you fell in love with a person on the Bank of America helpline who works in Wet Richmond Outsourcing Nexus 156, and a week later they are decapitated.<br /><br />Don't complain. The government's JOB is to enforce the law. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310712#Comment_310712</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310712#Comment_310712</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:38:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @James Puckett, then say "illegal immigrant".  Just "illegal" is really offensive.  It's like the person themselves is illegal contraband that you're forbidden by law to converse with because of their actions. And I didn't say anything against the term "illegal immigrant" to begin with, I agree with you there that that's what they are, there's no avoiding that.  But you initially just said "illegals."<br /><br /><br />And like i said earlier, not all illegal immigrants entered illegally.  Some entered with work visas that the U.S. decided not to renew it (this is where the idea of a "line" starts to break down) because the homeland is so bad (take the drug cartels murdering people who post news about the drug cartels on their facebook back in Mexico, for example).  Some are people who came legally seeking asylum but their paperwork got fucked up.  And many, many of them are people who were brought as children and didn't even <em >know</em> they were here illegally, either through entering illegally to begin with or because their parents overstayed their visas, until they were entering college.  For many people, it's a bigger issue than just "I jumped the border and I want to be pardoned for it."  For some, it's "well, I was dragged into this situation and this is the only country I ever known.  It's home, and I work hard to help my community."  I sure as hell know a lot of immigrants who are better community members than some natural born citizens I've met who live contently on food stamps, so long as they don't have to do any work.<br /><br />It's a much, much more complicated issue than simply "well they immigrated illegally because they wanted to cut the line," but that's what everyone wants to reduce it to.  A lot of it is a humanitarian issue as well. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310724#Comment_310724</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310724#Comment_310724</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:38:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ James Puckett--Words matter.  The reason "illegal immigrant" is so effective as a catchphrase is that it's based on the unspoken cultural assumption that if somebody did something that's against the law (i.e. illegal), then that person needs to be punished for it.  Conceiving of extenuating circumstances that resulted in those peoples' current legal status (See Argos' examples) becomes that much harder for the listener. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310725#Comment_310725</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310725#Comment_310725</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:46:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Incidentally, if one needs a good summation of what the Occupy Wall Streeters are fighting for and why, <a href="http://www.inthesetimes.com/working/entry/12016/occupy_wall_street_spotlights_turbulent_economic_state_of_youth" >this summation</a> might be a good place to start.<br /><br />I'm surprised the Occupy Wall Streeters, though, aren't citing the UK struggles earlier this year against university fee hikes and the whole Tory dismantle the social contract agenda. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310726#Comment_310726</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310726#Comment_310726</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:48:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ My other argument is that is overshadows the merits they DO have.  Some of them have college degrees and volunteer whenever they can to improve their community, where some natural born citizens just their unemployment money to buy more drugs.  By using the term "illegal," you strip them of the contributions they DO make to the community to define them by that one detail in their lives, criminalizing them to the degree where being an illegal immigrant is just inexcusable, even in the cases of leaving a dangerous and life-threatening home country.<br /><br />I'm not saying there aren't illegal immigrants who aren't criminals, there are many.  And yes, the fact that someone immigrated illegally isn't something to take lightly, it's a huge offense.  BUT, sometimes there are other good merits to the person that can define them, besides just that one act.  And like I said, in the case of DREAM act eligible youth, they never consciously made the decision or consciously made the action to immigrate illegally, or overstay their visa, or whatever.  Sometimes it's imposed upon them by their parents.  Does that really make them a criminal?  Illegal/undocumented immigrant, yes, but criminal? No. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310727#Comment_310727</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310727#Comment_310727</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:34:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Rachæl Tyrell</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ But here's why I'm confused. It's not like there's a cooking show, and the best chef is being referred to as "an illegal". When the term "illegal" is used, it's in reference to the population of people who have immigrated illegally as a demographic. It's not discussing whether someone has a college education, or has any other merit. That's not the focus of the conversation. If I am talking about people in prison, I'd call them "inmates" or "criminals" because they live in a prison and have commited crimes. That's not to say that they might not be wonderful parents, have a fabulous education, or were forced into a situation where they'd little opportunities other than to turn to illegal activities. When you are talking about a group of people, you will refer to them by the term that groups them. Sure, many immigrants are well educated and contributing members of society, but by using the term "illegal" that's not being stripped away. <br /><br />If I were to refer to ex-convicts in a discussion about job placement, or regarding the population of people who'd been incarcerated as a large percetnage of the American population, using the term "ex-con" would be totally applicable. "The ability for ex-cons to find jobs is depressingly daunting." That doesn't mean ex-convicts have no merits, nor that there aren't a HUGE number of ex-convicts that were wrongfully incarcerated, nor that most ex-convicts were put in jail for victimless crimes of drug possession and are wonderful human beings. I'd still refer to them, as a group, as "ex-cons."<br /><br />Honestly, I think the abbreviation of "illegal immigrant" to simply "illegals" has more to do with the new-speak land of twitter and newsbites than it has to do with slander or an anti-Mexican outlook. When listening to the BBC, illegal immigrants in Holland, France, England, are referred to as "illegals". Not liking the way a group of people is represented, feeling they are being shown in a one-dinemsional manner, doesn't make the word used to refer to them as inappropriate.<br /><br /><blockquote >And like I said, in the case of DREAM act eligible youth, they never consciously made the decision or consciously made the action to immigrate illegally, or overstay their visa, or whatever. Sometimes it's imposed upon them by their parents. Does that really make them a criminal? Illegal/undocumented immigrant, yes, but criminal? No.</blockquote><br /><br />But those individuals you'd mentioned are still in the United States illegally. The issue, which does have merit, is that it is important to know who is coming in and out of the country's borders, and know who is staying. Living in the United States without being a citizen, permanent resident, or visa holder, etc is a crime, so people who are doing so are technically criminals, even if they didn't do so knowingly. If I threw a piano out my window without knowing that someone was standing below, I'd kill someone unknowingly. I could still go to jail for it, even though I didn't know. I'd still be a convicted of a crime.<br /><br />Smoking marijuana is illegal. By smoking mariuana I am taking part in criminal activity, so I a criminal for smoking weed. I might think that's stupid, and that the laws should be changed, but that is how the laws are structured at the moment.<br /><br />I'm not trying to be insensitive, I just think that the problem has nothing to do with the words used, but rather, the attitude and misconceptions of the people who are loudest and most offensive. The term "woman" can sound slanderous when coming out of the wrong mouth. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310729#Comment_310729</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310729#Comment_310729</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:21:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>icelandbob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Meanwhile <a href="http://forums.officer.com/forums/showthread.php?171023-Dirty-stinky-hippies-in-NY-dont-like-how-theyre-treated-when-they-azz-up.." >on the Forum for US police officers...</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310740#Comment_310740</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310740#Comment_310740</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:30:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>256</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Miranda<br /><blockquote >I'm surprised the Occupy Wall Streeters, though, aren't citing the UK struggles earlier this year against university fee hikes and the whole Tory dismantle the social contract agenda.</blockquote><br />Perhaps best not to, since those protests met with absolute failure. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310746#Comment_310746</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310746#Comment_310746</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:51:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Bankara</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I live in NYC and I keep getting asked by folks what is going on down there and I have to answer that I haven't gone down to check it out in person because I am pretty jaded with protest culture in general because it just seems ineffective.  People go, march, yell, and carry a million different signs protesting everything unrelated to the actual professed cause of the day and go home feeling better about themselves and nothing seems to change.  The system in place just doesn't register the protest, it is a feel good measure at best, a societal release valve at worst.  These people are perceived as being not worth listening to here in NYC because they are not seen as voters or people worth listening to.  They are the fringe.  I agree that it would be a hell of a lot more effective if it was masses of families, workers, and regular folks.  It could be like the Velvet Revolution if it was because the cops could not dismiss them as being social invalids, malcontents, cranks, or hippies.  They would see them on equal terms and perhaps respect them more or at lest think twice before cracking skulls.  The NYPD has a pretty bad track record with this type of thing.  I was at the RNC protests and the March 15 protests agaginst the war in Afghanistan after 9/11 and the police simply created a maze that was impossible to navigate, corralled people into pens, and then came in swinging on horseback.  During the RNC they appropriated the fucking Fuji blimp to act as 'eyes in the skies' above midtown.  An airborne command center to more perfectly see the movements of crowds and contain them.  I had a lot of friends who were arrested, most of them were legal observers, photojournalists, and uninvolved parties.  The NYPD does not care, they are interested only in dissuading people from protesting or even observing the protests.  In my case, I suppose it worked since I no longer see the point of protesting in NYC due to these back-handed tactics they use to intimidate, arrest, and abuse people who are otherwise peacefully exercising their rights to assembly.  <br />I wish this thing would begin to attract a crowd of the disenfranchised republicans who were fucked by Bush's disastrous policies.  Then maybe we would have something, if there were elements from both sides of the political spectrum here in the states who have been hurt by Wall Street's single minded pursuit of profit at all costs. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310762#Comment_310762</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310762#Comment_310762</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:16:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KeeperofManyNames</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Here's a thought:<br /><br />Maybe the problem with the American Left is the fact that people who seem to consider themselves leftists do absolutely nothing but discuss the problems with the American Left.<br /><br />I have to wonder where the line is between realism, cynicism, and a rationalization for complacency.<br /><br />I never would have expected Whitechapel to be a place where such a question was even relevant, though. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310768#Comment_310768</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310768#Comment_310768</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:52:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I never would have expected Whitechapel to be a place where such a question was even relevant, though.</blockquote><br /><br />Why? This has never been a forum dominated by unthinking agreement to any political ideology. This, and the comments of <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/ta-nehisi-coates/" >Ta-Nehisi Coates' blog</a> are the only two places I know of online where I can actually engage in discussions with people who have different opinions that don't devolve into ideological blusterfests.<br /><br />It is not surprising to me at all the street protests are not automatically romanticized here. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310789#Comment_310789</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310789#Comment_310789</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:34:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KeeperofManyNames</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It surprises me because this strikes me as an astonishing amount of cynicism for cynicism's sake. Again, I would ask: at what point does cynicism become simply a rationalization for a total lack of will to do anything? That isn't ideological bluster at all; I think it's a concept that really isn't being discussed at all in our culture, despite its pervasive effects--see: widespread voter apathy. <br /><br />It's not a question of whether or not the protests are being automatically romanticized. Some of the criticisms are quite valid, and it's important to analyze the protests as the complex entity they are. But what I have widely observed is outright dismissal, often for rather spurious reasons. That is what I'm surprised to be seeing here. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310790#Comment_310790</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310790#Comment_310790</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:13:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Artenshiur</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >. Living in the United States without being a citizen, permanent resident, or visa holder, etc is a crime, so people who are doing so are technically criminals, even if they didn't do so knowingly.</blockquote><br /><br />This may sound like a nitpick, but I think it's one worth making: living in the US illegally is not per se a crime.  Illegal entry is a crime, but outstaying your visa is a civil violation of federal law.  They are not criminals. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310794#Comment_310794</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310794#Comment_310794</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:55:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ RE: Unjust Laws<br /><br />It should surprise no one that many of the laws in the United States and abroad are unjust, that is to say, saddled with a punishment that far outstrips the damage caused.  To simply turn a blind eye to these laws, to let those in authority abuse their power is nothing more than social cowardice.  Sometimes violating a law is an act of civil disobedience, as is drawing attention the unjust nature of that law.<br /><br />RE: Police Brutality <br /><br />Power, in and of itself, does not always corrupt.  Power, combined with unaccountability, always leads to corruption.   I wish I could say that there was once a golden time when police brutality was rare, but in all likelihood it's better now than it has been for a hundred years.  This should not make you feel good.  The problem is essentially the same as in gang culture: policework is a genuine subculture with mores and values that are not in line with the mainstream.   Penetrating that culture is far more daunting that with a gang, however, as that there is a official bureaucracy dedicated towards the preservation of the 'thin blue line', as well as a huge population of people who sincerely believe that hordes of crack addicts are waiting to rape and murder them if the police can't carry M16s.   <br /><br />Re: The Fall of the Left<br /><br />The popular perception that the Left is a divided, unfocused and childish collection of weekend warriors is partly an invention and partly a self-fulfilling prophecy.   Clinton was the final nail in the coffin, pushing neo-liberalism, dismantaling the social safety net and squeezing out the trade unions under the auspice of Modern Liberalism, which looked suspiciously like Conservatism.  When Milt Freidman became the go to guy for fiscal policy, the real Left, that motley collection of unions, intellectuals and bleeding hearts essentially gave up on the political process.  The Media finished it off by openly mocking any attempt to point out the flaws in neo-liberalism.  It was supposed to make us all rich, right?  When one of the largest mass protests in history is dismissed as a bunch of hippies having a riot in Seattle, you've effectively neutered the entire idea of a protest.   <br /><br />It also doesn't help that liberals are all too aware at how powerful the wealthy have become. Knowing that the Koch brothers can buy whole elections, that lobbyists can write laws and bankers can rob wantonly and get away with it fills you with impotent anger that is too easily masked with effete cynicism.<br /><br />I am a Marxist, of a reformed sort.  I think that workers should own the means of production, that capital is intrinsically exploitative, and free markets tend towards monopolies.  I believe that we have been hoodwinked into thinking that vicious competition is the natural order of things when science and history tells us otherwise.   I think the left has lost its center, but that center can return when the need is great.  I believe that protests disrupt, and we can have a revolution of conscience without a shot being fired.  <br /><br />I'm not young enough to by cynical anymore. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310798#Comment_310798</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310798#Comment_310798</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:28:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Suppose we start from the premises that:<br /><br />1) The financial industry as currently composed values ever increasing short term monetary returns over long term gradually increasing general prosperity<br />2) For humanity at large, General Prosperity > Monetary Returns<br />3) Prosperity also encompasses, to a large degree, many scales of wealth other than monetary, for example: health, companionship, joy, meaningfulness<br />4) Assignment of primacy to monetary scales in social interactions is generally destructive of parallel scales of value<br />5) Our society currently assigns primacy to the monetary scale<br /><br />What is the best way to counter this?<br /><br />I don't have pat answers to this. One of the things I think:<br /><br />Start a business and own it. DO NOT SELL IT. Run a business in your community with the goal of making a living for yourself and employing a couple of your neighbors. Make decisions in your business that favor the long term prosperity of you and your employees first, and the community in which you are located second. RETAIN OWNERSHIP!<br /><br />As soon as you sell for a payout, or sell shares in order to raise money to expand, you have yoked your endeavor to the legally enforced treadmill of always increasing shareholder value. Don't have shareholders. FUCK Shareholders. Make something cool, sell it for a profit, hire some people to make more of it and pay them from the profit. Rinse, repeat.<br /><br />It is not a sexy or glamorous life, but it works.<br /><br />If a lot of people would just do that, the gdp would probably suffer, but the effective prosperity of people in the US would probably increase. Economists would pretend they predicted that all along. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310801#Comment_310801</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310801#Comment_310801</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:46:24 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>voyou</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Start a business and own it. DO NOT SELL IT. Run a business in your community with the goal of making a living for yourself and employing a couple of your neighbors. Make decisions in your business that favor the long term prosperity of you and your employees first, and the community in which you are located second.</blockquote>Go out of business when Walmart opens a store down the street.<br /><br />TBH, this strikes me as more naive than the Occupy Wall Street protesters. They are, albeit vaguely and without much thought for strategy, trying to do something about the way the current emphasis on money and profits is enforced (through the power of the law or of money). Your suggestion reads like you think that you can ignore or opt out of these enforcement mechanisms, but that doesn't seem realistic to me. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310803#Comment_310803</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310803#Comment_310803</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:25:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Hello again Cynicism.<br /><br />How about analyzing Bill's post on it's merits, and not on the reaction it will get from an unrepresentative society. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310804#Comment_310804</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310804#Comment_310804</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:28:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >They are, albeit vaguely and without much thought for strategy, trying to do something about the way the current emphasis on money and profits is enforced (through the power of the law or of money).</blockquote><br /><br />But, even vaguely, what are they doing? Really? In what actual way are they doing anything about the way the current emphasis on money and profits is enforced? Do you even know what you mean in saying that phrase? Who is enforcing what emphasis on money or profits?<br /><br /><blockquote >Your suggestion reads like you think that you can ignore or opt out of these enforcement mechanisms, but that doesn't seem realistic to me.</blockquote><br /><br />Do you live in a community? Are there businesses there that are not large chain stores? It is almost certain that those businesses are <em >not</em> traded on the stock market and <em >do</em> employ local people.<br /><br />There are <em >hundreds of thousands</em> of private companies in the United States. Almost all the job growth that occurs happens in small businesses, which are mostly privately owned companies. A privately owned company is not traded on any public stock market. It does not have shareholders, and is not beholden to them by law. It can make long term strategic decisions that cause it to suffer flat or negative growth in short term cycles without going under or having to sell in order to avoid legal liability.<br /><br />This is not radical or even unusual. It is so realistic that it is in fact the way most businesses run.<br /><br />Pretty much the best thing you can do for your community economically is to start a business, nurture it to profitability, retain ownership and employ a couple of people. Walmart does not do everything people need, much as it might like to. <em >Thousands and thousands</em> of active, profitable local businesses prove otherwise <em >every day</em>.<br /><br />When you are a generator of local wealth and prosperity, DO NOT SELL. It isn't that hard not to sell, and nobody can force you to. Really, they can't. Band together with other local businesses and promote political action together that will benefit your community.<br /><br />The fact that what I've described above even sounds naive to you is a testament to how little anyone actually pays attention to how the economy actually works. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310812#Comment_310812</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310812#Comment_310812</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 07:55:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Sonny</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I live in NYC and I keep getting asked by folks what is going on down there and I have to answer that I haven't gone down to check it out in person because I am pretty jaded with protest culture in general because it just seems ineffective. People go, march, yell, and carry a million different signs protesting everything unrelated to the actual professed cause of the day and go home feeling better about themselves and nothing seems to change.</blockquote><br /><br />When my mom was in the hospital in St. Paul, after having her stroke, the Republican 2008 convention was going on.  Between them and the massive amounts of protesters (some of whom classified themselves as "anarchists"; oh... the bleeding, dripping irony) it was honestly hard to get into the hospital to see her.  Then, once you were there, it would sometimes take hours to get out of the city because so many streets were blocked off.  It was a really unique experience for me because I came out of it hating protestors (not all, mind you) AND Republicans.  Everyone has their pet fucking causes.  And when two large groups of jackasses get together with opposing views they can effectively shut a city down.  Sorry, but there's a fucking society that has to run here.  There's people who need to use the hospitals and buses and markets.<br /><br />Granted, obviously I was not an impartial observer there.<br /><br />And in general I'm all for peaceful protests.<br /><br />I think a bigger issue here is that we don't really live in a democracy, which is why protesting never seems to do anything.  When corporations write your tax code, essentially, not your politicians, democracy left the room.  Much of the way the United States, and World, works is all about money.  Nothing more or less. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310824#Comment_310824</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310824#Comment_310824</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:33:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Steven Thomas</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ For starters, regardless of the message or goal of the protest, they should dress themselves in such a way as to be taken seriously.  Drop counter-culture fashion statements because that's what people expect to see and they've already established preconceptions. Besides, that fashion stopped being a statement long ago.  Even the look of punk rock quickly became a fabrication and a style void of meaning.  And no Guy Fawkes masks.  Discard the Anon imagery.<br /><br />CO-OPT and SUBVERT the image of Wall Street.  Wear suits and ties. <br /><br />Or as stated here on Reddit: <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/kw3fx/to_all_occupy_wall_street_participants_here_is/" >wear khakis and polos</a>.  Personally, i think a <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/kw3fx/to_all_occupy_wall_street_participants_here_is/" >protest gathering of suits and ties</a> would be far more visually <a href="http://www.history.com/images/topic/content/mlk-1965-selma-montgomery-march.jpg" >impressive</a>.  <br /><br />I both support the Occupy movement but I'm also skeptical of its longevity.  There's a big difference between skepticism and cynicism.  If the Occupy movement continues to be nothing more than just one more stop on an activist bandwagon where new passengers keep piling more luggage on to it, it will not go anywhere.<br /><br />It needs direction and leadership and focus and that's not going to come from Anonymous.  I know they're the darling digital folk-heroes of the internet, but the reality of romanticized folk heroes are that they are rarely heroic or even for the folk.  I realize that's a whole other discussion, but I can't help notice how attention has bounced from one thing to another in the past year.  In just the past month it's jumped from BART to the OCCUPY movement.  It looks like playing media hopscotch from one social issue to the next to keep their name in the press and leading a bunch of folks along for the ride.  I'd like to find out that I'm wrong about that because I initially supported the idea of Anon but not anymore given some of the tactics they embraced in the past year.<br /><br />Regardless, I do think it's still important to protest and march...but do it with pride and a strong visual presence.  It's VERY easy for the press and politicians to make protesters and marchers look irrelevant, aimless, pointless, or violent and scary.  Take that away from them and it's a step closer to getting a message heard. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310828#Comment_310828</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310828#Comment_310828</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:42:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Bankara</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ^*THIS*^<br /><img src="http://i.imgur.com/4miTZ.jpg" alt="" title="Hosted by imgur.com" ><br /><br />Frank Zappa will show you how it is done. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310829#Comment_310829</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310829#Comment_310829</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:44:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KeeperofManyNames</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Sonny:<br /><br />I think that might be part of the point, actually--to shut society down. This is why the Wallstreet protest strikes me as such a radical departure from the protests we've seen so far--it's [intended to be] a long scale occupation not of a governmental institution but a financial one. Which makes sense, since it's the financial sector that seems to be really calling the shots. So, shutting down that society makes sense.<br /><br />I wonder if there is a way to effectively shut down just Wallstreet while allowing the rest of New York to go about its business, though. I think your reaction to having the city deadlocked by protests is probably a common and totally reasonable one, and it really does work against the goal of elevating the regular schmucks. After all, I imagine it's difficult to run your Small Local Business if the entire city is kind of shut down. That's just counterproductive.<br /><br />With that in mind...<br /><br />@Oddbill:<br /><br />That's the kind of creative solution I come here to see.<br /><br />How about this thought, expanding off of your point:<br /><br />I know these guys are getting donations so that they can keep occupying the street, but where does that money go? Where does food come from, for example? If the protestors are buying food individually, where are they going? I've seen the charge leveled at the protest that people are funding the corporations they're protesting against. In some cases that's inevitable--they're going to depend upon things like camera companies no matter what.<br /><br />But food is a different story.<br /><br />What if someone set up a simple, easily readable map of local stores and restaurants in New York? I mean, surely there are people that don't have the tech to just look this stuff up, and I'm willing to bet that people would rather be grabbing their food and getting back to the protest rather than wandering around New York looking for someplace they can eat without instantly turning into a flaming hypocrite.<br /><br />One of the interesting facets of this, I think, is that in the absence of central organization, anyone can step in and introduce improvements to the methods. It's just a matter of putting the ideas out there and trying them out. If this remains long-term, we may see a sort of protest darwinism at work, with the best ideas slowly rising to the top. That, alone, is kind of exciting. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310831#Comment_310831</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310831#Comment_310831</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:50:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KeeperofManyNames</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Also, totally in agreement that people need to start wearing more suits. The irony alone makes it worthwhile, and I know, for a fact, that it is not hard to find decent looking jackets at virtually any thrift store. If you're not overly concerned about style it really shouldn't be difficult to gentrify things a bit.<br /><br />Again, though, I wonder if this is an opportunity to actively revise how people are doing things--what if someone went in and bought a bunch of cheep thrift store or pawn shop and just started... handing them out? Maybe they could take donations along the lines of the internet model--pay what you can, maybe a dollar minimum, ten dollars minimum, whatever works. Something small. Keep that process going, start actively changing the aesthetic of the protest. It would, at the very least, make for an interesting experiment. I have absolutely no idea if it would be feasible or successful, but the point is that there's an opportunity to take this kind of action. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310836#Comment_310836</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310836#Comment_310836</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:08:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I recall  this from last year that hit the nail on the head regarding my feeling about the current crisis.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOP2V_np2c0" >RSA Animate - Crises of Capitalism </a><br /><br />As he said, near the end of this video I don't hear this discussion being held even a year after this video.<br /><br />Regarding the Protests.<br />A lot of the criticism of the protesters are not taken seriously because of their dress, their vocabulary, how they are approaching the protest, the fact they do not have a single distinct message, as I said earlier I don't think anyone who takes a minute will be in any doubt as to their message, this is what matters. and to think that they have to be dressed is a certain way to be taken seriously misses the point. This is who these people are, the majority of them have been marginalized out of society is it any wonder that they don't look like your average respectable schmo?<br /><br />The reason they look like they do is because that is what the excluded from society looks like, If you think that these people will have to dress to impress to get their voices heard, do they need to couch their terms in current political rhetoric which has been developed to marginalize their position. We need to start looking at this diversity  with wonder and hope because this mixing pot is where the new ideas will come from.<br /><br />If you want to approach the current masters of the universe on their terms you will loose, there is no question of that, to get the money to lobby government to halt the current crisis you will probably have to be more ruthless that the most ruthless banker/businessman. And once you stop they will be 10 more who will be more ruthless than you because you have just raised the bar.<br /><br />I for one love, respect and hope protests like these all the best with no discouragement, or ill will, they are at least trying in whatever little way they can to change things, the very act of not conforming is probably the most hopeful thing I can think of, and if you think these people are doing it wrong, well maybe you should spend a little more time doing it yourself in what ever way you feel is best, and a little less time criticizing their form. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310838#Comment_310838</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310838#Comment_310838</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:19:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ My boyfriend suggested that I watch "Der Baader-Meinhof" yesterday and now all I can think about this morning is "welp, at least they're doing it peacefully and not resorting to terrorism like the RAF did."  Seeing as the RAF were also claiming to be fighting "for the people."<br /><br />I fully support the idea of the protest.  I also question whether it will actually get anything done.  My university had a some protests two years ago over an issue of racism that was brought up, as well as protests over the tuition fee increase, and well, neither of them accomplished anything in terms of changing any school legislature. BUT, they did get people to come together and engage in dialogue, which is exactly what this protest is doing out on wall street.  People are getting together and talking, some of them left wingers, some right wingers, young and old (albeit not in a balanced way, but it is).  I think it helps build a sense of community, even if it's temporary (kinda like how Burning Man does).  <br /><br />Will Occupy Wall Street change anything?  As much as I want it to, I think it probably won't.  <br /><br />I like Oddbill's plan of action of not selling out your store to bigger companies and shareholders, problem is you need the community to take part as well, buying primarily from small, local businesses, instead of say, Walmart.  But when you're poor, sometimes that's all you can afford, especially for bigger families.  <br /><br />My other issue with the protest is the mere fact that at first no one was talking about it but Al Jazeera.  Whether you look at it as a productive protest or just kids making a ruckus, I think it should be acknowledged, even if to talk about why it's ineffective.  I wanted to bring to people's attention (and I did this mostly on twitter and facebook) that Americans live in a country where you CAN deliver the news via social media, which I think is fucking fantastic.  Meanwhile, in Mexico, people are getting  murdered by the drug cartels for delivering the news via social networking.  If anything, I want people to talk about it because they can, regardless of whether they're supporting it or think its ineffective, because, well, people in other countries can't, else they get silenced.  It's really an very nice privilege. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310847#Comment_310847</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310847#Comment_310847</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:58:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>sellmeyoursoul</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Doc - Very interesting video. I'd say the conversation is taking place. We're having it right now. It's not taking place in the echo chambers of Fox News or MSNBC, but is that really a surprise to anyone? This is something that is going to have to build to critical mass before politicians care more about reform than they do campaign funds.<br /><br />@Argos - I agree. It's great that we can have this conversation with minimal fear.<br /><br />Personally, I'm pretty much a moderation in all things sort of guy. Capitalism is good. Greed is a great motivator when all else fails. That said, it's not a good way to organize society. Socialism is. Provided you find a way to keep people actually working (see greed is good). The left (at least in the US) has to take back the conversation. The fact that you won't find a politician who will say that socialism might be good is an example of how they just gave ground and aren't fighting to get it back.<br /><br />Occupy wall street isn't going to make the bankers any less evil. Nothing will. You don't get to be that successful in that vile an industry without completely selling your soul (but I don't hold any strong feelings or anything). If this and things like it can succeed in changing the conversation to the point that politicians won't say things like "social security is a ponzi scheme" because they know that would alienate the majority of voters, then it will be successful. It's easy to marginalize a bunch of hippies, but putting them into suits wouldn't radically change the outcome. Either they can stay and get enough attention/spark similar protests elsewhere that the conversation changes or this is all just a waste of a bunch of people's time.<br /><br />I also agree that starting your own small business and not selling/having an IPO is a great way to fight the inherent power structure. Just like making an effort to avoid large chains when there is a locally owned alternative. It costs a bit more, but that's the point. Walmart subsidizes the costs on the backs of the less fortunate while working to annihilate their local competition. We live in a society where we've been raised to confuse need with want. What we need to do is focus less on spending money on things we want (media, toys, etc) and more on things we need. Of course even that will hurt before it feels better, because it will drive the large corporation to downsize.<br /><br />Catch-22 ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310849#Comment_310849</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310849#Comment_310849</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:08:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >We need to start looking at this diversity with wonder and hope because this mixing pot is where the new ideas will come from.</blockquote><br /><br />There's an interesting paper I had to read for one of my classes regarding this statement, called "The Rise of the Creative Class."  It's basically about how a lot of the new ideas that have been coming out, ideas that will help our society progress and continue to be successful, are coming from these people who don't always dress in a business suit, have crazy hair and tattoos in some cases, etc. etc.  <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0205.florida.html" >here's the link</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310854#Comment_310854</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310854#Comment_310854</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:39:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oldhat</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Out of curiosity, are there national or state sponsored entrepreneur grants available to people looking to start a private business that would back a select amount or even up to 50% of the start up costs?  While it would of course have to be limited to a few a year, it could provide a great incentive for people looking to start up a business which could lead to more jobs.<br /><br />Regardless, it seems that the message that a company can only be successful if it goes public should be beaten with a club.  Take Dogfish Head Brewery, the owner Sam Calagione is proud as hell that his company never went public and recently got recognition for hiring on average one person a week to their ever expanding company.  It DOES work.  Yes, big businesses will be a competitor, and there's no doubt that the price factor will be a deal breaker for many.  But that to me provides more of a drive to not be one of the herd in the field that you get in to and do something different with excellent quality so you can still get a good amount of loyal customers.  This leads to gradual expansion and thus more jobs and so on... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310855#Comment_310855</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310855#Comment_310855</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:42:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jay Kay</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ While I sympathize and agree with the protesters to a certain degree, I think their scope is very limited. I think <a href="http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/tgif/occupying-wall-street/" >this article</a> said it best using a lot more interesting facts and figures, but the basics of it is this--if you want to get rid of big business, you're going to also have to occupy the Fed, because big business can't exist without big government. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310859#Comment_310859</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310859#Comment_310859</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:27:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ From that article: <blockquote >Through most of American history, banks and other financial institutions have operated in league with government...</blockquote><br /><br />Bringing the conversation back to beer for a second, part of the reason it's so hard for small brewing businesses to expand is because the law states that the breweries themselves can't distribute their beers, only the distributors can.  Who runs the distributors? The big beer companies, mainly.  If the government would change their laws to help small businesses to get a foot in, instead of accommodating the big businesses, maybe some change can happen.<br /><br />Maybe we should be occupying the Capitol instead... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310860#Comment_310860</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310860#Comment_310860</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:39:21 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oldhat</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Argos, that's the same deal with here in Ontario.  Our only beer export store (aptly named The Beer Store) is currently run by Molson Coors, our biggest beer company which has every reason to refuse craft breweries provincial distribution.  I can't go on enough about how horrible it is that a big beer company is in charge of what beers the province drink.  They shouldn't have been given that kind of power.<br /><br />The other store, the LCBO (Liquor Control Board of Ontario) is government run, but often overlooks craft brews on a provincial, national and international level in favour of the big beer company's stuff.  Improvements are being made, but it's hard. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310862#Comment_310862</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310862#Comment_310862</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:43:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Through most of American history, banks and other financial institutions have operated in league with government...</blockquote><br /><br />You will actually find that there had been a lot of conflict between banks and government in the US as in a lot of other countries. You should look at the documentary <a href="http://www.themoneymasters.com/" >The Money Masters</a>. The UK and their banking magnates worked very hard to force the US onto a debt based currency, finally succeeding, the Government may be hand in hand with the large banks, but that has not and hopefully will not always been the case.<br /><br />EDIT:<br /><blockquote >I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.</blockquote>   <strong >-- Thomas Jefferson,</strong> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310865#Comment_310865</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310865#Comment_310865</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:54:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/09/matt-stoller-occupywallstreet-is-a-church-of-dissent-not-a-protest.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29" >This article</a> does a pretty good job of expressing how I feel about Occupy Wall Street.  In the long run, it might not get anything done, but there's a really cool sense of community going on there right now.  It reminds me a lot of Burning Man actually, a community that is put together and run by its participants (for the most part, Burning Man still has leaders and organizers whereas the protestors claim to be leaderless, but generally it exists because of the participants).  You can see this sense of community in the livestreams.  I especially like how they devised the "human amplification system" to make sure everyone hears what a speaker is saying (since they have no bullhorns or anything), where a speaker says half a sentence and the people repeat it in unison.  I think it's neat.<br /><br />edited to add: <br />The other day on the livestream they were inviting people who work at Wall Street to come down and engage in a dialogue with them about how things can change.  The guy with the mic who was gonna be talking to whomever came down was wearing, as people here said they should, slacks, a button up shirt, and a tie.  Granted, no one from Wall Street ever came down, of course, but my point is that this protest might not have a clear goal, it's asking people to engage in discussion about possible solutions.  I mean, hell, here we are discussing what we think would be better solutions.  I think it's easy to look at the protest and go "well you guys are just causing a ruckus and and have no clear goal, go home," <em >but</em>, it's getting people to talk.  And for those who want to say "well we've already done this before," a lot of the protestors are young adults who haven's talked about it before.<br /><br />So, I dunno, I agree it's not the best way of getting actually change to occur, but I don't think the protest is bad, either.  It's not counter-productive.  Not like the Baader-Meinhof group who were committing terrorist crimes, and in the process, hurting the very people they were claiming to be fighting for (in my opinion).  I certainly think that inciting discussion is a form of progress, and the protest seems to be doing just that.  Is the protest good or bad? Why? How can this be done more effectively? Etc. etc.<br /><br />edited again to add:<br />Actually, the more I think about, it, the more I realize it really is like Burning Man.  For a week you're camping out in the desert amongst a participant driven community, where the only economy is a gift economy, and you go home thinking about how you're going to change the world because of this amazing experience you had, and the world needs to be more like Burning Man where people are friendlier and everyone just <em >gifts</em> each other things instead of always wanting money.  Then a few weeks later you're back to your normal routine having not actually changed how society works, just trying to pay your bills each week, but that week you were camping out was still amazing because of the sense of community it gave you. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310889#Comment_310889</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310889#Comment_310889</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:01:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Steven Thomas</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Here's the live feed for OccupyBoston - <a href="http://www.livestream.com/occupyboston" >http://www.livestream.com/occupyboston</a><br /><br />Edit to add: Erm..well it WAS up and running but offline now.<br /><br />They've been doing quite a bit of organizing the past few nights.  Today, they gathered in Boston Common and marched through downtown to Dewey Square at South Station.  It was an impressively large and ethnically diverse march with young and old.  We could see it from our office and I had to explain what it was about to my coworkers.  None of them had any clue about what was going on and only a few were aware of OccupyWallStreet.  Unfortunately, my explanation didn't seem to help with the mixed messages they saw among the crowd's banners.  There were groups distinguished by colored t-shirts, red green and blue and orange vests:  each with their own message.  I fear the only memorable banner to my coworkers was the one proclaming "No Whole Foods in Jamaica Plain"  (one of the neighborhoods).  <br /><br />I went down there after work as they were getting settled in but it was much much smaller. I suspect a large majority of the varying other groups that marched were just there to march and not to occupy.  I didn't see any of the colored t-shirts but perhaps they had taken them off upon arrival.  Regardless, it's still an impressive group.  Would like to have stayed longer but I have to pack for a land of no cellphones and computers for a week, just bluegrass and maybe some bourbon. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310894#Comment_310894</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310894#Comment_310894</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:27:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Maybe it'll turn into a liberal version of the Tea Party. That could work, if it can actually prove voting influence. The Tea Party was viewed as a comical joke until they started spoiling Republican elections for various state offices. Of course, if the Occupiers turn into a liberal Tea Party with voting power they'll be flexing it by spoiling democratic state candidates' bids for office and handing power over to actual Tea Party supported Republicans.<br /><br />If they can turn into a liberal tea party that doesn't increase the number of Republicans in state executive offices and legislatures, then that might be something. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310897#Comment_310897</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310897#Comment_310897</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:04:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/09/30/333038/mayor-bloomberg-wall-street-make-ends-meet/" >Let's not forget the real victims here: The Bankers?!</a><br /><br /><blockquote >BLOOMBERG: The protesters are protesting against people who make $40-50,000 a year and are struggling to make ends meet. That’s the bottom line.</blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310911#Comment_310911</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310911#Comment_310911</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 02:30:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ If the goal of occupying Wall Street is to stop bankers being able to do their jobs... well, then the banks haven't really got their backup second-site policy worked out very well.<br /><br />In London, every firm that has offices in the City has entire backup offices elsewhere (some in Canada Water, some outside London altogether) that just sit empty all the time. If something bad goes down (and London is quite used to people trying to blow up it's financial institutions) then a switch is flipped and everyone just goes to work in a different building for a while. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310916#Comment_310916</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310916#Comment_310916</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 04:20:50 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>256</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Flabyo - It seems obvious now, but I'd never heard that before. Cheers for the fakt.<br /><br />@magnus - aka Mike Bloomberg Once Again Proves Himself To Be A Raging Doucher. <br />It's also exactly the standard line I'd expect conservatives to take when they haven't got any better material. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310918#Comment_310918</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310918#Comment_310918</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 04:48:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>JP Carpenter</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Flabyo - yeah, slightly off topic but my firm rents space in one of those Docklands sites, I've been down there on many occasions to test that our systems work as I'd be part of the communications team if it all kicked off. We have a trading suite set aside for my team, with TV screens for rolling news and it's hugely fun to play with the silly phones that they have and pretend to be Gordon Gekko. I need to grow up a bit sometimes... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310936#Comment_310936</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310936#Comment_310936</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:44:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well, the protest is on Wall Street not to actually make it hard for bankers to go to work, but for the symbolism of being on Wall Street itself, as the New York Stock Exchange is there. It's not a strike to stop an activity, it's a protest that wants to be seen. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310939#Comment_310939</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310939#Comment_310939</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:22:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @oddcult - yup, the protest is really about the symbolism of it, but I have seen people elsewhere who did seem to think the goal was to stop the bankers getting to work. <br /><br />I'm reading today that the protestors have decided to march on the NYPD HQ to protest the policing of the protesting. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310962#Comment_310962</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310962#Comment_310962</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:29:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Free mace in the face for everyone! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310977#Comment_310977</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310977#Comment_310977</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:49:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jay Kay</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It's truly the gift that keeps on giving <del >you tears</del>! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310990#Comment_310990</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310990#Comment_310990</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:23:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ScottBieser</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ For those with eyes to see and ears to hear, a different analysis of Occupy Wall Street and what they should really be protesting:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/tgif/occupying-wall-street/" >http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/tgif/occupying-wall-street/</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310992#Comment_310992</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=310992#Comment_310992</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:29:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jay Kay</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ScottBieser:<br /><br />I actually posted that last page. :P ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311001#Comment_311001</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311001#Comment_311001</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 01:19:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Libertarian poppycock. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311009#Comment_311009</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311009#Comment_311009</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:20:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>gzapata</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Sooooo it wasn't the progressive era that saw massive changes and developments in the growth of the middle class...it was la la land before then that was so great and the progressive era that screwed it up for all of us? Does anyone other than conservative think tanks really view our history this way? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311050#Comment_311050</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311050#Comment_311050</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:20:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Things really went downhill once we made all that child labor illegal. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311072#Comment_311072</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311072#Comment_311072</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 18:49:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.dangerousminds.net/comments/first_official_statement_from_the_occupy_wall_street_movement/" >First official statement from Occupy Wall Street</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311077#Comment_311077</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311077#Comment_311077</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 20:02:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ScottBieser</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Jay Kay -- Sorry, I missed your posting.<br /><br />gzapata  and Jon -- Cling to your pet monster all you like, just don't be surprised when it winds up eating you. You've been warned. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311084#Comment_311084</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311084#Comment_311084</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 21:28:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Oh, sweet electric bullshit.<br /><br />I'd rather have a vote than a dollar.<br /><br />Libertarians think they're the same thing. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311086#Comment_311086</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311086#Comment_311086</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 22:23:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Things really went downhill once we made all that child labor illegal.</blockquote><br />Well, the Progressive Era kind of <em >was </em>followed by decadence and depression, if your going to talk about hills...<br /><br />As far as the article, It is certainly not false that one hundred percent of business influence on government is motivated by desire to reduce new entrants (competition) and subsidize risk. However the article doesn't lay an argument about how this is bad (also, the article forgets to define what it thinks is "bad" -- just that there is government ever, or some specific array of social outcomes?). If the proposition is that every government act that came out of business desire harmed economic growth, it isn't in the article. If the proposition is that just in broad strokes having business-designed regulations will always lead to less growth and fairness than free market (presumably, a democracy which is constitutionally proscribed from passing laws about money), the article doesn't offer an argument why.<br /><br />But I think the point that most government laws regarding money are shaped by efforts of existing businesses to reduce competition and risk is good for liberals to incorporate into their worldview. A conception of a democracy that achieves progressive goals through government actions would need to have a mechanism for correcting or minimizing that problem.<br /><br />Also, a libertarian willing to write articles in that framework is rejecting the Randian theory of an ether made of awesome perfectly reasonable and self-interested rich-people-decisions, so I am not sure why the response here is being unrestrainedly hostile.<br /><br />Typed on mobile ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311090#Comment_311090</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311090#Comment_311090</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 23:17:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Can anyone confirm or deny this?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/10/01/semper-fi-marines-coming-to-protect-protesters-on-wall-street/" >Army and Marine veterans marching to Wall Street to "protect the protesters."</a><br /><br />Wonderful if true, but it's almost too good to be true. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311091#Comment_311091</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311091#Comment_311091</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 23:29:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It's just a handful of guys. It's not an official armed forces stance or anything. But it won't be a bad thing to have six or ten vets in uniform there. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311093#Comment_311093</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311093#Comment_311093</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 23:44:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Right, but just the fact that a few of them are doing it is awesome. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311109#Comment_311109</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311109#Comment_311109</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 05:44:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote ><a href="http://www.jpmorganchase.com/corporate/Home/article/ny-13.htm" >JPMorgan Chase recently donated an unprecedented $4.6 million to the New York City Police Foundation. The gift was the largest in the history of the foundation and will enable the New York City Police Department to strengthen security in the Big Apple. The money will pay for 1,000 new patrol car laptops, as well as security monitoring software in the NYPD's main data center.</a></blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311111#Comment_311111</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311111#Comment_311111</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 06:30:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >"If they want to get to some protesters so they can mace them, they will have to get through the Fucking Marine Corps first. Let’s see a cop mace a bunch of decorated war vets"</blockquote><br /><br />I truly hope this is legit.  If the US really wants to be a world leader, they could do a lot worse than lead us to revolution. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311124#Comment_311124</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311124#Comment_311124</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 08:55:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >...I am not sure why the response here is being unrestrainedly hostile</blockquote><br /><br />Weakened government oversight and letting "job creators" do what they pleased is what allowed the problem to happen in the first place. Freemarket Fundamentalism claims that the best way to get out of the hole you find yourself in is to get more shovels. Even if people can't articulate why, they know a fundamentally stupid position when they see it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311138#Comment_311138</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311138#Comment_311138</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 10:08:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Sometimes it's okay to point out that something's pretty fucked up, without actually having a solution to it or offering an alternative. That can be enough to get other people who do have solutions and alternatives involved and as many people as possible thinking about it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311145#Comment_311145</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311145#Comment_311145</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:25:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>JP Stargazer</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Oddcult: At last!!! Your's has been, so far, the most intelligent  and sensitive opinion on this matter, on this thread. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311147#Comment_311147</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311147#Comment_311147</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:57:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Sonny</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >For those with eyes to see and ears to hear, a different analysis of Occupy Wall Street and what they should really be protesting:<br /><br />http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/tgif/occupying-wall-street/</blockquote><br /><br />"...many people across the political spectrum seem to think the Pentagon is not part of the government."<br /><br />What?  Where's he getting this from?  Simply untrue.  Me, a lot of Americans, and (perhaps more so) many of the six billion people out there see that building as an imposing, often-times threatening bureaucratic symbol representing the US Government's will to do as it pleases.<br /><br />A trivial complaint, I know.  But you can't just make up shit and put words in millions, or billions, of mouths.<br /><br />THE BIGGER POINT.  While I think the article has some important points to make, there should be a distinction between government and corrupt government.  It is true that the United States government, for decades now, has covered the asses of big business: its influence, its CEO's, its cash.  To me that is obvious if one invests any time at all investigating the connections between Wall Street and cabinet members, corporations and campaigns, etc.  And it's Democrats and Republicans.  But to take that very valid point and jump to the conclusion that government, in general, is half of the problem is silly.  THIS government, perhaps.  CORRUPT government.  A government where damn near every <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_the_Treasury" >Secretary of Treasury</a> of the past 30 years has been a CEO, Chairman, or board member of a very powerful financial institution.  Yes, perhaps that version of "government".  But actually we need government more now than ever... just not that one.  We need good government.  Free of corruption and cash.  Whether or not that happens is another story, another article, another debate.  But if Sheldon Richman believes that a dissolved and tiny government, or none at all, will somehow make the corporate world, the world of big business, a more honest and altruistic place then he is just as naive as he claims these protesters to be. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311164#Comment_311164</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311164#Comment_311164</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:03:36 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Hey NY, one of your guys got lost, can you please come and pick him up.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.robedwards.com/2011/10/inside-story-trumps-difficult-relationship-with-grampian-police.html#more" >Trump’s “difficult” relationship with Grampian police</a><br /><br /><blockquote >A series of memos marked “restricted” show that the police have struggled to resist this pressure, and have become worried that their impartiality would be damaged. Trump had “unrealistic expectations” that Grampian police would behave like the New York Police Department (NYPD), police officers said.</blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311179#Comment_311179</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311179#Comment_311179</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:40:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Sometimes it's okay to point out that something's pretty fucked up, without actually having a solution to it or offering an alternative. That can be enough to get other people who do have solutions and alternatives involved and as many people as possible thinking about it. </blockquote><br /><br />This, exactly this. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311199#Comment_311199</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311199#Comment_311199</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:53:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm really coming around to this protest, if for no other reason than the asinine way the police have been handling it. If it persists and does nothing more than remind police that they really truly do have to allow people to demonstrate, even that will have been worthwhile. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311200#Comment_311200</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311200#Comment_311200</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:55:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2394071,00.asp#fbid=By1D_RLw4nq" >Just what the protest needs: MOAR TROLLS!</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsLuYnEyFLw&feature=player_embedded" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311232#Comment_311232</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311232#Comment_311232</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:35:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jay Kay</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >It is true that the United States government, for decades now, has covered the asses of big business: its influence, its CEO's, its cash. (snip) But if Sheldon Richman believes that a dissolved and tiny government, or none at all, will somehow make the corporate world, the world of big business, a more honest and altruistic place then he is just as naive as he claims these protesters to be.</blockquote><br /><br />But how would any would-be crony fat-cats be able to create big business if it didn't have the huge, powerful, big government to grease palms and influence? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311248#Comment_311248</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311248#Comment_311248</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 05:33:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ How would the population be able to resist the exploitation of large profit seeking businesses if they didn't have government that can challenge these organizations? <br /><br />The major problem with governments is not the fact that they are large but the lack of democratic representation, This lack of representation, has a number of causes but they can all be traced in part to the effect and influence of large corporations: Consolidation of corporate power in the media, the rise in think tanks and lobby groups largely funded by business groups, forms of economic blackmail practiced by the banking sector.<br /><br />The government has been largely co-opted by these private organizations. I am actually for the devolving of the power of government, because I believe that the larger the government the more unrepresentative it will be, but the source of the protection that these companies have came from them influencing government, that influence will have to broken if we want change.<br /><br />If we leave the corporations unchecked and reduce the size of government we may be in a worse position to resist them. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311254#Comment_311254</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311254#Comment_311254</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 07:18:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Sonny</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >But how would any would-be crony fat-cats be able to create big business if it didn't have the huge, powerful, big government to grease palms and influence? </blockquote><br /><br />Swap out "the huge, powerful, big government" with "a regulatory system" and that question looks a little silly doesn't it?  See, you've done to me here what Richman has done with his article.  You've totally removed the distinction between working government and corrupt/broken government.  That distinction is one that is largely going ignored by many, many people in this country right now.  And I'm not quite sure why because that is at the heart of what's going on, and it's something everyone can agree on. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311293#Comment_311293</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311293#Comment_311293</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:35:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The lesson I'm learning with this protest seems to be this: When a bunch of freaks, geeks, losers and hippies get together to protest a dozen things at once, nobody cares. When the police start arresting and brutalizing them for doing it, that's when people start to take notice. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311298#Comment_311298</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311298#Comment_311298</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:26:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yeah, when I used to do the protesting thing, the best way to get that to happen was to take your clothes off. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311304#Comment_311304</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311304#Comment_311304</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:38:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Works for selling beer ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311312#Comment_311312</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311312#Comment_311312</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:19:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Nygaard</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Lost track of the discussion; will try to pick up the thread later. Meanwhile: did anyone post this yet? <a href="http://wearethe99percent.tumblr.com/page/4" >The 99% tumblr</a>. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311315#Comment_311315</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311315#Comment_311315</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:28:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>roadscum</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Government is an obstacle corporations must overcome with lobbying, bribes and blackmail.<br />No government is corporate heaven where the only obstacles are other corporations.<br /><br />I was discussing this with my little brother the other day, he lives in Alabama which, i suppose, gives him a slightly better perspective on the whole thing. In his opinion, Wall Street is occupied by incompetents at every level. I can't find fault with that.<br /><br />Oh and @ BrianMowrey: depends on who's taking their clothes off...<br /><br /><img src="http://www.freewebs.com/violetbrator/Tesco%20Value%20Porn%20Beryl.jpg" alt="My eyes! My eyes!" > ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311322#Comment_311322</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311322#Comment_311322</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:55:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DC</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ John Robb's (from Global Guerrillas) <a href="http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-the-theory.html" >take</a> on #OccupyWallStreet and a <a href="http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/2011/10/journal-a-note-from-the-nyc-front-lines.html" >response</a> that echoes John's analysis. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311335#Comment_311335</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311335#Comment_311335</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:51:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Government is an obstacle corporations must overcome with lobbying, bribes and blackmail.</blockquote><br />So, the thing is,<br /><br />1 everyone is a special interest. The US Federal government is built on Madison's ideas of empowering and protecting minority interests. The way corporations influence government comes through <em >using </em>democracy, not subverting it. Liberal ideas about democracy need to take this into account. The first amendment wants to give the 1% their voice.<br /><br />2 The story about business and legislative outcomes (that laws protect existing entities from competition) isn't just a story of corporations it is a story of smaller companies as well. Why do we have laws in this country that <a href="http://www.ehow.com/how_4854123_become-a-hairdresser.html" target="_blank" >hairdressers must be licensed</a>? Because existing hairdressers don't want competition. Why do we have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-fructose_corn_syrup%23United_States" target="_blank" >sugar tariffs</a>? Why does the government have thousands of ways to give small farmers money? Why do prison guards in California get full-salery pensions if they were <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2011/11/michael-lewis-201111" target="_blank" >hired at age 45 and retire at 50</a>? Why did California <strong >fail </strong>to pass a law that would simplify taxpayer responsibilities by stating <a href="http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2009/09/turbotax.html" target="_blank" >what the government already knew about each person's taxes each year</a>?<br /><br />Every business looks for laws that move the ax of free market a few inches further from their neck. They do this because going out of business isn't fun! Yes, the influence of the financial sector <em >in practice </em>has a lot more undesirable (from a citizen's perspective) outcomes because of their scale and power, but the mechanism at work here is the same one used by the vaunted imaginary small-business owner from a few pages back in this thread, who would have used his local influence to hand himself a tax credit for "tortilla redistribution", or used it to move police patrols out of poor neighborhoods and to the street that his insured store sits on, or ran for city councilman to help pass Jim Crow laws that let him keep black people out of his restaurant. The point is that small businesses are just as frequently a font of illiberal legislative outcomes as Exxon and Goldman Sachs -- and the actions of big corporations often hold as many progressive credentials as small businesses. See Walmart's offering of check cashing <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2010/03/payday_lending" target="_blank" >which gives low income people an alternative to rip-off payday loan firms</a>.<br /><br />3. We need lobbyists. The US congress has 535 voting members. Only 535! The US economy has 6 million companies that employ at least one person and another 21 million non-employer firms (self employed people). These companies need a way to influence laws that impact them. A congressperson isn't going to take up a college course and do weeks of self-research every time they need to vote on a bill, but these bills all affect the 99.8 percent of the economy that the average cogressperso has absolutely no expertise in. Would you self-research, if you were in congress? Or just vote on your gut, and fuck what happens to those 27 million companies? How would you get appraised on the business impacts of the bill currently before your committee? The answer is special interest groups and lobbyists.<br /><br />All of this doesn't have a lot to do with OWS. Just pointing out how the libertarian article from a few pages back contains a more nuanced treatment of government realities than has been credited to it in the reax here -- and the perspective it takes -- that democracy does a lot to enable protectionist legislative outcomes -- is one a liberal should keep in mind if they want to provide useful ideas about government.<br /><br />Typed on mobile ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311337#Comment_311337</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311337#Comment_311337</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:59:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ScottBieser</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ "I'd rather have a vote than a dollar.<br /><br />Libertarians think they're the same thing."<br /><br />No, we don't. A vote is a gun in your hand, pointed at the head of a neighbor who disagrees with you. Your neighbor also has a gun pointed at yours. A democratic polity is hundreds, thousands, or millions of people each holding a gun pointed at someone else's head. A count is taken, and whichever side of a debate has the most guns wins. Then the guns are lowered (but not given up) until the next election. The losers must then obey the commands of the winners, until they can get more guns on their side in the next go-around.<br /><br />A dollar (or pound, or shilling, or Euro, or gram of silver), on the other hand, is an offer of cooperative exchange. I have a dollar, you have a loaf of bread. Shall we trade? You might refuse. I might offer two dollars, or you might offer half your loaf, or we both just might walk away. No threats involved.<br /><br /><br />Also, considering government a countervailing power against corporations is silly. Corporations are CREATED by governments, and cannot long survive without governments shielding stockholders from liability, or rescuing them from their own stupid mistakes. "Good government" may pop up once in a long while in this place or that place, but otherwise is a fantasy, and more likely an illusion. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311341#Comment_311341</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311341#Comment_311341</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:17:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Scott<br /><br />You have some very interesting ideas about political philosophy. Unfortunately, they're wrong. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311347#Comment_311347</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311347#Comment_311347</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:28:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>roadscum</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ BrianMowrey:<br /><br />I don't know or understand much about the US political situation, i don't understand much about the situation in the UK and i live there.<br /><br />From what i do know, those of the population entitled to vote get to do so every four years or so in the hope of getting their preferred candidate elected from the choices offered to them. In between they get to influence their elected representatives by using such means as may be available to them. Certainly over here a company the size of Tescos (i suppose that would be Walmart where you are) has a lot more in the way of means available to it than someone such as myself, which is why my ideas for say, food labelling or the location of new supermarkets don't seem to carry much clout. You get what you pay for and that applies to government as much as anything else. <br /><br />However, without government, Tescos still has just a teeny bit more in the way of means and resources than the likes of lowly vermin such as myself and my associates, except that now, they no longer have the mess of inconvenient laws and regulations that they previously had to divert valuable assets into overcoming or subverting. Good for Tescos, not so good for the cornershop down the road. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311348#Comment_311348</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311348#Comment_311348</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:35:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DC</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >No, we don't. A vote is a gun in your hand, pointed at the head of a neighbor who disagrees with you. Your neighbor also has a gun pointed at yours. A democratic polity is hundreds, thousands, or millions of people each holding a gun pointed at someone else's head. A count is taken, and whichever side of a debate has the most guns wins. Then the guns are lowered (but not given up) until the next election. The losers must then obey the commands of the winners, until they can get more guns on their side in the next go-around.</blockquote>I was writing something big and way above my argument skills in English but then I found what I think is a definition for this mindset:<br />dictatorship of the majority (plural dictatorships of the majority)<br />(politics) A situation in which a government or other authority democratically supported by a majority of its subjects makes policies or takes actions benefiting that majority, without regard for the rights or welfare of the rest of its subjects. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311349#Comment_311349</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311349#Comment_311349</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:53:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @DC Which is exactly what Mr. Mowrey was talking about. Madison had a lot of influence over ensuring the minority had a voice as much as the majority, and that through disagreement there could be mutually beneficial compromise. Seeing democracy as simple majority rule is ignoring 250 years of political history and philosophy.<br /><br />The idea was to reduce disenfranchisement, but it's been corrupted by some very smart, very immoral people.<br /><br />Also, people with more resources have a distinct advantage when entering contracts, especially when they have all of what someone else needs, like property or money (when money = food). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311351#Comment_311351</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311351#Comment_311351</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:04:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ScottBieser<br /><br /><i >The losers must then obey the commands of the winners, until they can get more guns on their side in the next go-around.</i><br /><br />No, no they don't. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311358#Comment_311358</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311358#Comment_311358</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:08:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yrT-0Xbrn4&feature=player_detailpage" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311367#Comment_311367</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311367#Comment_311367</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:07:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db_P0wHsSz0&feature=player_detailpage" ></a>I wonder if this is connected...<br /><br />EDIT: "UPDATE: October 4, 2011 ; 16:30<br />It has come to our attention that this video was originally published in August of this year, thus is not a reflection of OccupyProtests currently taking place in New York and the rest of the U.S. We apologize to our readers for the mistake and inconvenience. While not exactly timely, the video nonetheless reflects what we believe will be the response by police departments the country over if bank runs were to become reality. " - from <a href="http://www.shtfplan.com/" >www.shtfplan.com/</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311370#Comment_311370</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311370#Comment_311370</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:18:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.politicususa.com/en/glenn-beck-occupy-wall-street" >You know what this debate needs more of?  Glenn Beck!</a><br /><br /><blockquote >On his radio show today, Glenn Beck claimed the Occupy Wall Street protesters are going to commit a terrorist act, collapse the nation, and kill millions of Americans.</blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311394#Comment_311394</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311394#Comment_311394</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 01:32:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I guess there's nothing that legitimises a protest more quickly than Glenn Beck opposing it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311498#Comment_311498</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311498#Comment_311498</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:21:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ScottBieser</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Oh, I think the cops are doing a pretty good job of that all by themselves.<br /><br />Interestingly, George Soros (himself a principal beneficiary of the bankster bailouts) has now endorsed OWS. Not sure what that means. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311514#Comment_311514</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311514#Comment_311514</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:32:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Ok, firstly <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/05/opinion/rushkoff-occupy-wall-street/index.html?hpt=hp_c1" >Douglas Rushkoff tells the media how it is.</a><br /><br />And second: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzbTlY1uOJk&feature=player_detailpage" ></a><br /><br />Anonymous (allegedly) is getting better at video making. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311550#Comment_311550</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311550#Comment_311550</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:38:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>jonah</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.jwz.org/blog/2011/09/wall-street-mocks-protesters-by-drinking-champagne/" >wall-street-mocks-protesters-by-drinking-champagne</a><br />Has it been determined if this is real?<br />-----<br /><br />I think it's ironic that people on an internet forum are poo-pooing people gathering to communicate and possibly accomplishing nothing! :) Isn't it nice that people are getting together and bonding over thoughts and not consumable goods?<br /><br />I actually appreciate the disorganized malarky that modern protests have become. There are no powerful leaders that go on to become yuppies/corrupt politicians or get murdered. I'm open to the possibility that it's a slow burn situation. Maybe for once "new boss, same as the old boss" won't be the outcome?  Come on spider-fans, power corrupts, etc.<br /><br />The only real "problem" I have with protests is that many people use them as a way to let off steam rather than as motivation to keep up with the more mundane day to day stuff. <br /><br />@magnusisasillyname Haha, "jesus stuff". That video was refreshing, as I had just watched a damn jean company advertisement that tried to use protest imagery to sell its product. I remember after the Seattle protests another large clothing store used mock broken glass, spray-paint and boards in their store front windows. Capitalism is one smart cookie. I wonder who the first advertiser will be to use anonymous-style imagery?<br /><br />"Masters of information" is kinda wanky......and also "citizens of the united states" rather than fellow citizens is kinda telling, no?<br /><br />Although, in regard to "masters of information" cheap consumer (video) cameras and high speed internet have taken citizen reporting to a very exciting place!* Every protest I've been to has always had police using excessive force and stealing your documentary tools. This protest doesn't seem to have more police brutality, it's just that there are now enough cameras to capture it. It I had the money to travel I would go solely to take pictures.<br /><br />Hmm...now, I'm thinking, could something along the lines of we "We Are The News" be a meme? Needs a better marketing slogan... Imagine if in Fight Club instead of "project mayhem," (which turned into a meaningless frat-bro rallying point) which focused on the plebs getting access to positions of power, then breaking shit, the focus was on documenting corruption, hypocrisy and abuses of power? Or if say Global Frequency wasn't about kick 'sploding, but about documenting? Turn surveillance culture back on its head. I dunno.<br /><br />*Thank you, China and sweatshop labour for giving democracy the opportunity to flourish once more! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311555#Comment_311555</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311555#Comment_311555</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:33:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @BrianMowrey<br /><br />Your post previously has good analysis for people if a liberal ideological viewpoint, and the freeman article previously has depth but there is a fundamental problem, which can be identified from this quote.<br /><br /><blockquote >The way corporations influence government comes through using democracy, not subverting it.</blockquote><br />Actually subverting it is exactly what it is. Democracy is, as a basic principle, that all people should have an equal say in their environment. Where there is a decision making structure and some type of governance, an organisation/business/corporation, irrespective of the legal fluff. is not a person and does not have the right to vote. If the people involved in the business feel they have more of a right to influence government then their one vote, then they do not understand the principles of democracy.<br /><br />Just because you have a position in a profitable business, doesn't give you the right to influence policy more than someone in a weaker position, because this will end up with power being consolidated in the hands of the few at the detriment of the many. Taking away the freedom and representation of the poor to benefit the wealthy. as we have all seen first hand.<br /><br />This is an aspect of democracy that libertarians need to understand, if you accept disproportionate power through wealth it flies in the face of individual liberty. Don't think that I am being naive with my idealism of democracy, I understand that this not the way things are, nor the way things have ever been, and a there is no unified perfect system of democracy but if we approach this current crisis without the basic understanding of problems that we face. We will never have the ability to enact the solutions necessary. These problems may not be readily identifiable, but the feeling of dis-empowerment is not easy to mistake.<br /><br />A major difference between small business and large is the respect that small businesses have for their local community, because they are generally tied to the community and the community may have the power to reject the business if they do things that the community doesn't like. Larger businesses don't have this same constraint and may be less profitable if they care, but they will make great pains to seem like they do. <br /><br />Democracy also needs an informed population, if you cut out the population from the decision making process and push influence directly onto the representatives you are missing out an important part of the system. An important distinction must be made between influence and inform. If these same representatives approach the task of election aiming themselves at an uninformed population, using fear and threat with opposition to another group, you are subverting even more the principles of democracy. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311562#Comment_311562</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311562#Comment_311562</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 04:12:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Jonah - V for Vendetta, Global Frequency and The Invisibles were MASSIVE influences on the folk who started this kind of distributed open source protest. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311668#Comment_311668</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311668#Comment_311668</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:26:36 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I have come around completely on this. This is a good protest. I'm an old fucker who doesn't see things very clearly anymore. This seemed unserious to me, but its persistence is giving the lie to that impression. The focus I thought it lacked seems to be coalescing. I think there is genuine potential for influence in this movement if it can sustain itself over a span of months.<br /><br />What could be a bad outcome: If the movement becomes an actual left leaning tea party, driving the Democratic party into rigid ideological stances that cement a permanent state of warfare between the only two viable parties in the American electoral system.<br /><br />What could be a good outcome: Market and governmental forces are leveraged to actually, really weaken the role corporate entities play in legislation. Also it would be nice to see a really egregiously irresponsible large financial institution either fail from public shunning, or be vigorously disciplined by the federal government.<br /><br />Could be nice if the whole movement kick starts a higher profile thread of thinking about the role of the consumer market in a good life. As in, where is a good balance that keeps material well being improving without yoking the whole culture to an impossible treadmill of debt.<br /><br />Also, a bit of pressure to the Democratic Party to bend them a bit left of their current position would be nice. Not so far that the culture war becomes absolutely intractable, but far enough that it actually means something to have elected government server as a public champion against organized corporate excesses.<br /><br />I'm liking the whole thing more the longer it keeps. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311682#Comment_311682</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311682#Comment_311682</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 23:49:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The only thing that I hope to see is if this protest can keep the youth invigorated and voting by the time the 2012 elections roll around.  The youth vote was instrumental in 2008 and lazy and apathetic by the time the 2010 elections arrived.  You need shit like this keeping them active and interested. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311688#Comment_311688</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311688#Comment_311688</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 02:25:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oneVFYeMHjU" >A Warning to the 'Occupy' Movement</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311708#Comment_311708</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311708#Comment_311708</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:46:21 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/07/opinion/krugman-confronting-the-malefactors.html?_r=2" >Paul Krugman supports OWS</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311772#Comment_311772</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311772#Comment_311772</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 00:12:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2011/10/independent-reporting-of.html" >Independent reporting of #OccupyWallStreet<br />Posted by Robert David Graham</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311792#Comment_311792</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311792#Comment_311792</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 06:38:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <img src="https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/309711_10150312437021722_500886721_8360826_1129376272_n.jpg" alt="Basez!" ><br /><br />OK, I'll shut up for a while. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311794#Comment_311794</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311794#Comment_311794</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 08:33:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Morac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Jonah: <blockquote >"citizens of the united states" rather than fellow citizens is kinda telling, no?</blockquote><br />Not really. Anonymous is an international group, and citizens of the United States are only one part of it (albeit a large one, presumably).<br /><br /><span style="font-size:9px" >The ninja nitpicker strikes, then vanishes</span>. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311796#Comment_311796</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311796#Comment_311796</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 08:45:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>city creed</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ^^^That is a great article by Robert David Graham and meshes closely with my own recent experience of occupation, thanks for posting Doc Ocassi.<br /><br /><blockquote >The Central Committee has many subcommittees, like the “Media Team” responsible for recording the proceedings or the “Arts and Culture Committee”, responsible for making signs and running the drum circle, and the "Sanitation Committee" team keeping the park clean. They have organized the park into specific areas, dedicated to different tasks.</blockquote><br /><blockquote >The question is, as time goes on, will the movement be lead by the hard-core who slept night after night on the cold hard ground and who have worked to create their own organization, or will it cede control to established political operatives?</blockquote><br /><br />It is inspiring to see people, mostly strangers, spontaneously organising with each other to deal with the practical stuff they need to deal with. It probably shouldn't be so affecting, but it's heartwarming and hopeful to see that people don't need to be bossed to get things done. And when the reporters are all gone and it's the middle of the night, there are very real, strong bonds that form between those left guarding the trenches. Camaraderie and solidarity become much more than mere abstractions.<br /><br />But the first quote above shows that hierarchical authority is already emerging in NY, and the second quote tells (me anyway) of leadership based on identity as a "hardcore occupier" rather than leadership of ideas that can stand up to analysis in open debate. It doesn't matter what sort of contribution you feel like you want to make, if you weren't there from the start, sleeping on the ground every night, then you are just a follower/supporter and it's your moral duty to obey and promote the ideas of the truly dedicated, early-adopting hardcore folks. You'll be able to identify them easily because they are the ones selected to be "responsible" for the operation of the Media Team, and the Arts and Culture Committee, et al.<br /><br />There's a lot of talk about OWS being co-opted by this or that outside group. It might be more appropriate to worry about them being co-opted by their own sentimentality and failure to recognise that defensive dependence on mawkish in-group loyalty will inevitably lead to the same kinds of problematic cronyist power structures and opaque personal fiefdoms that were arguably instrumental in creating the situation that they are protesting against in the first place.<br /><br />At the (lengthy) occupation I was involved in here, there came an explicit recognition that there were "key people" whose views carried more weight simply because of the number of nights they had spent in the occupation or because of the vehemence of their opinions or the credibility of their activist track record. This eventually led to many excluded individuals taking more and more extreme, inflexible positions during discussions and meetings and doing stupider and stupider shit during protests, becoming more aggressive and threatening because they wanted to prove they were the most hardcorest ever. There was an almost bi-polar duality between the overtly welcoming "hyper-tolerance" and the pure hostility and paranoia which spurted out when you scratched at the veneer of consensus. I had a few conversations with hardcore occupiers where I was genuinely unnerved by wild swings in demeanour from smiley-sweet to red-faced rage-spitting and back to smiley-sweet again in a matter of moments.<br />There are real problems with making identity the currency of power, mainly because of what it does to the unstable egos that then end up in positions of power.<br /><br />Sorry, I'm a bit jaded. Over the space of a few months I saw a broad-based, vibrant and well-supported occupation turn into a depressing, disregarded pissing contest between competing cliques and tendencies. The overwhelming goodwill and excitement generated in the early days and weeks was squandered by those who insisted on using the occupation as a platform for their own specific ideological certainties. Lists of demands were drawn up and delivered, behaviour and language were carefully monitored and analysed for the taint of un-solidarity. Certain rooms were locked and key privileges jealously guarded. Secret meetings were held. One kind of corrupt, unaccountable and destructive administration was replaced by another.<br /><br />Here is Laurie Penny writing about occupation in February this year: (emphasis mine)<br /><blockquote >Occupations are just as important as marches and strikes in the context of resistance movements. <strong >They allow us to redraw the physical contours of our political reality.</strong> They provide people with centres to share skills and build links in spaces that are truly common, <strong >spaces that we do not have to enter under sufferance.</strong> They respond to a government seeking to turn every public asset into a private revenue stream, by turning private assets into public resources.</blockquote><br /><br />The act of occupation is a powerful statement in and of itself. Once that occupation becomes "for" a specific political ideology driven by a core group of True Believers then the cenote starts filling with cadavers. I've been watching OWS with interest and hope from the start, aware that I don't really have any idea what's actually going on down there but being broadly supportive. I think that any form of challenge to privilege is probably A Good Thing. Pollenation is widespread now, maybe some people somewhere will figure out how to make it work without drowning in their own hypocrisy.<br /><br />Having said that, I reckon all that NY's (and other cities') authorities need to do here is play nice. It looks to doomy old me like this movement will shortly implode in acrimony if allowed to run its natural course. Unless, that is, police go in heavy-handed and ruthless (as police so often seem to end up doing in these situations) in which case they create a compelling moral rallying point for resistance. Macing teenagers and hauling them off in handcuffs on primetime is just recruiting more supporters to the cause, however you think you can spin it.<br /><br />Apologies, bit of a cynical rant, that... Haters gon' hate, Occupy On! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311805#Comment_311805</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311805#Comment_311805</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 10:07:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Not at all city creed, I like, it sounds realistic enough,<br /><br />I don't think co-opt makes a clear distinction between the two definitions you put forward. Hopefully the ego-taming and decentralization that anonymous seems to systematize into their organizations can come into it's own there, maybe they won't get it right this time, but it doesn't mean we can't try again.<br /><br />Nice post. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311814#Comment_311814</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311814#Comment_311814</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 11:55:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Anonymous tames egos? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311827#Comment_311827</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311827#Comment_311827</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:54:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I guess "taming" is probably not the right word, basically the group will throw anyone who shows signs of ego or self promotion to the wolves, it is a self defense mechanism in the group. anons will out other anons and ridicule/attack any personality, the only way to stay in anonymous is to be anonymous,  it will destroy all perceived/visible power structures. This is my impression but it may not be accurate or the whole story.<br /><br />Hope that makes sense.<br /><br />Probably look at this girls work for more analysis.<br /><a href="http://gabriellacoleman.org/" >Gabriella Coleman<br />Anthropology of digital media, hackers and the law</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311828#Comment_311828</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311828#Comment_311828</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:03:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ My impression of the way people who act through the anonymous label behave, though, is that the group supports an almost unlimited inflation of ego. The members of anonymous position themselves as omniscient, omnipotent puppeteers. By not using their names they are able to deflect culpability or responsibility while at the same time continuing to view themselves as better than everyone else.<br /><br />The anonymity is very shallow on a psychological level. They haven't subsumed their egos to a larger group identity. They use the superficial anonymity of the group to allow their egos unchecked free reign. <br /><br />The ridicule directed at people who grandstand identifiably is more of a defense mechanism to keep the walled in ego playground from being invaded by authorities and shut down. It is not some kind of zen ego-negating ideal being enforced. <br /><br />Anonymous are interesting tricksters. Like all tricksters, they think very highly of themselves. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311832#Comment_311832</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311832#Comment_311832</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:28:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yes that does sound more reasonable.<br /><br />It was probably the fact that the individual ego was being incorporated into the group that I was referring to as the taming of the ego, but specifically meaning the in individual ego being somewhat lost.<br /><br />I don't think it helps against invasion but it may help in terms of stopping consolidation of power and co-option. The original reason would seem to be to deflect culpability. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311856#Comment_311856</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311856#Comment_311856</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 21:02:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Artenshiur</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Having just been to a session of the New York City General Assembly (the OWS deliberational body, that is to say, everybody who shows up), I am incredibly impressed by their organizational structure. The establishment of the working groups is not the arrival of leadership, I don't think, and concerns about leadership may be misplaced.  While there are people who are more influential than others, the structure of the thing quite actively prevents anyone from taking control.  It is very horizontal direct democracy.<br /><br />The dialogue going on there is remarkably in-depth, and surprisingly positive.  All voices are heard.  The problem with such discussions is that their meaning and purpose can not be easily summarized.  I certainly can't answer in a sentence or two what OWS is about.  But engaging in discussions like this one, about what it's about, seems to be how it's spreading. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311887#Comment_311887</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311887#Comment_311887</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 07:08:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Nygaard</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Interesting to watch the decision making process in action. Tea partiers have been sharing a<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaBFhRsi4Gw" > clip of the Atlanta occupiers</a> deciding not to let congressman John Lewis give a speech during the general assembly (apparently, he was free to speak afterwards, but had to leave due to his schedule; watching the clammy Teabagger outrage on behalf of a black democrat civil rights movement hero is kind of cute). Not sure I understand everything that's going on here. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XCLBNkBvL0" >But Lewis himself does not seem to mind</a>. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311928#Comment_311928</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311928#Comment_311928</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:44:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well, they're going to <a href="http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/09/8234525-occupy-wall-street-style-protests-spread-to-britain" >have a crack at it in London.</a><br /><br />Best of luck to them, but the British public seem to not be in the mood for this kind of anarchic sit-in protest after the riots earlier this year, still too raw in the minds of a lot of Londoners. And the City of London is a much harder place to 'occupy', it's a real sprawl over a pretty large area. And we're due a *really* cold end to autumn again if they manage to stick it out until mid November. The police won't be keen on it either, last time there were protestors down in the City it turned pretty ugly, and after the riots the public sympathy might well be more with the coppers than it would normally be.<br /><br />(Most protests here tend to be small and pre-organised with police permission, there was a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15234631" >pretty good one today about NHS cuts</a> that went off with no issues as far as I can tell) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311952#Comment_311952</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311952#Comment_311952</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:22:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Oh, my:<br /><br /><a href="http://my.firedoglake.com/cgrapski/2011/10/09/american-standard-editor-admits-to-being-agent-provacateur-at-d-c-museum/" >American Spectator Editor Admits to Being Agent Provocateur at D.C. Museum</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311965#Comment_311965</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=311965#Comment_311965</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:19:11 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBK4DsDsEMU" >Michael Hudson</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312032#Comment_312032</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312032#Comment_312032</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:05:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhrwmJcsfT0&feature=player_detailpage#t=0s" ></a><br /><br />This guy gets it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312088#Comment_312088</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312088#Comment_312088</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:43:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Tweets are rolling in of police raiding Occupy Boston and Occupy Seattle. Boston movement has been hit hard, clubs have reportedly come out, and anyone with a camera, so the police have said, is in danger of being arrested. Seattle mayor's office has apparently sent a legal team to call off the PD, no word yet on how effective it's being. There was talk of Atlanta being raided as well, but now it's looking like that was a false alarm.<br /><br />Bad night. Have to wonder what set things off.<br /><br />Edit: Sorry I don't have any hard links for this stuff, I'm getting most of it off twitter and a few Livestreams at the sites.<br /><br />Edit 2: Best I can do at the moment - <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/special/2011/10/11/340186/boston-police-throw-american-flag-to-ground-arrest-veterans-trash-property-to-protect-green-space-from-99-percent/" >Boston police making their first arrests, members of Veterans for Peace among them.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312091#Comment_312091</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312091#Comment_312091</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:58:50 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/special/2011/10/11/340186/boston-police-throw-american-flag-to-ground-arrest-veterans-trash-property-to-protect-green-space-from-99-percent/" >Here's a Thinkprogress summary of the arrests in Boston along with video.</a><br /><br />It literally shows Boston police arresting people who are standing still and shouting "we are veterans of the United States of America". The police, in arresting them cause their flags to be dropped to the ground. Among the Veterans for Peace flags are also at least one American flag. Following that, and what looks like the police pushing a man down, are widespread shouts of "shame! shame!"<br /><br />Video of police arresting non-resisting armed services veterans while allowing an American flag to lay on the ground and be walked is going to play on a lot of newscasts tomorrow, I suspect. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312127#Comment_312127</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312127#Comment_312127</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:50:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pupato</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ #15oct events all over the world<br /><br />There are events planned in 670 cities in 69 countries already!<br /><br /><a href="http://15october.net/where/" >united for global change</a><br /><br /><br /><br />,,, ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312128#Comment_312128</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312128#Comment_312128</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:06:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pupato</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ...<br /><br /><a href="http://youtu.be/4y3X2VFruLM" >it´s time for us to unite<br /><br />it´s time for them to listen<br /></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312129#Comment_312129</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312129#Comment_312129</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:13:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pupato</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y3X2VFruLM&feature=youtu.be" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312142#Comment_312142</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312142#Comment_312142</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:17:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.indiegogo.com/Wall-Suits" >Tactical Image Consultants</a><br /><br />A group of tailors, barbers, and other fine people are planning to transform as many Occupiers into sharp-looking dudes y duderinas on October 15. I believe this topic was discussed earlier in the thread? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312167#Comment_312167</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312167#Comment_312167</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:43:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Taste the irony - <a href="http://www.boston.com/Boston/metrodesk/2011/10/boston-mayor-says-sympathizes-with-protesters-but-they-can-tie-the-city/GFmOU1qwApiGhBNsNSzMIL/index.html" >Boston mayor, home of the most famous act of American civil disobedience, says civil disobedience will not be tolerated.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312203#Comment_312203</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312203#Comment_312203</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:32:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DistractDelude</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I certainly can't answer in a sentence or two what OWS is about.</blockquote><br /><br />Herein lies the problem. I think that Occupy Wall Street is a fantastic idea in theory. But starting a protest without direction or a defined purpose is ultimately pointless. Not to mention it also gives free ammunition to the people that mock this kind of civil action in the first place. <br /><br />So far the main achievement of the occupation has been to take a valuable social tool with the power to create real & positive change and turn it into little more than an open public forum for civilised debate. Whilst an open forum for intelligent discussion is a wonderful thing, I can't escape the feeling that all the publicity being generated at the moment is just one, big, missed opportunity. For true changes to happen, whether they be to the regulation of the financial system, health care, or any one of a million other good causes, you need to come to the table with a solution, or at the very least an idea of how to practically effect a positive change.<br /><br /><blockquote >Video of police arresting non-resisting armed services veterans while allowing an American flag to lay on the ground and be walked is going to play on a lot of newscasts tomorrow, I suspect.</blockquote><br /><br />This is another major issue - the desperate scrabble by the media to find images that 'define' what is happening. We are all aware of definitive images of the past century, but a definitive image devoid of a meaningful context is just a good picture. <br /><br />Truth be told, little is actually happening. <br /><br />These protests have been a brilliant display of the need for things to change. But this is a fact the vast majority of people have been well aware of for (at least) the past two decades. It has also highlighted the sad fact that, whilst everyone wants things to change for the better, no-one really has any idea of how to do it.<br /><br />Sound-bites and images can speak to those that want to listen, but without real, planned action and changes to legislation and social attitudes, they don't do a thing.<br /><br />I'm not a defeatist, or a cynic, but too many people seem to be turning up or organising their own protests just to feel like they're part of something significant. To those people all I have to say is: <br /><br />1. Go home and make a viable plan for changes to specific organisations or pieces of legislation; Changes that could be practically implemented using the existing systems. <br />2. Come back and let's do this properly.<br /><br />That's how you change things. That's how you become part of something significant.<br /><br /><em >Edited to add half a sentence that vanished</em> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312204#Comment_312204</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312204#Comment_312204</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:50:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Nygaard</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @RenThing - (I think it was) the Daily Show which pointed out that, the Boston Tea party was an actual felony, not just a misdemeanor or act of civil disobedience. :) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312210#Comment_312210</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312210#Comment_312210</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:59:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The chaps over at the <a href="http://www.virtualshackles.com/255" >Virtual Shackles webcomic </a>summarise my own thoughts pretty well.<br /><br />And I appreciate that it's a simplification of the issues, and that it makes me a bad person etc... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312222#Comment_312222</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312222#Comment_312222</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:36:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Bankara</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I shot a portrait series last night in Zucotti Park.  Going back today and as often as I can to do more.  <br /><br /><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/macdawg/6238122344/" title="The Occupiers by MacDawg, on Flickr" ><img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6040/6238122344_c3d4fb5bcd_z.jpg" width="427" height="640" alt="The Occupiers" ></a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/macdawg/sets/72157627753926729/with/6238122344/" >Shameless Plug</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312227#Comment_312227</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312227#Comment_312227</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:20:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Artenshiur</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Mhengla: I can understand your skepticism, but I think using this public discussion to come up with that answer rather than "going home" to do so is really valuable, because once a purpose is found everyone is behind it.  It's about doing the right thing, rather than just doing for the sake of doing.  Having talked to visitors from Tahrir square at OWS, this is how what they did started.  Everyone came out knowing they needed change, but not sure what kind, and then collectively they came to a conclusion.  Now I don't think OWS will be bringing down governments, but my hope is that they will in fact come to a conclusion, and as a result of this deep discussion it will be a solid, important one. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312232#Comment_312232</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312232#Comment_312232</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:27:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KeeperofManyNames</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Meanwhile, in Washington:<br /><br /><img src="http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/313003_203300846406569_100001799648253_438047_464543618_n.jpg" alt="Our Congress, Ladies and Gentlemen" ><br /><br />I don't understand why these protesters don't simply go through our long-established, efficient, reasonable political process to get their goals accomplished! It's almost like they think the system is a ridiculous mess or something. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312233#Comment_312233</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312233#Comment_312233</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:34:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pupato</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Artenshiur, completely d´acord<br /><br /><blockquote >starting a protest without direction or a defined purpose is ultimately pointless.</blockquote><br /><br />@Mhengla, that´s not true! There´s a very well defined planing of things that should be changed, despite the lack of options that the Sistem allows. There´s a very well defined purpose. Oh, yes it is! ...  Do you want me to tell you what to demand in your country & how to do it?<br /><br /><br /><blockquote >Truth be told, little is actually happening.</blockquote><br /><br />What?! are you serious?  We are living in Planet Earth, man, & people are learning how to use the web, & the first world is thrilled because of their own gobernments , & the rich people are growing stronger & they want more & more, & they have taken control over Democracy... its inmigration time, & so is fascism time : ( ...  & there are people deceived & robbed by the banks, whithout home, withoutwork, etc, etc,  This has already happen at SouthAmerica & Asia & Africa... & now is getting worst...<br /><br /><blockquote >Truth be told, little is actually happening.</blockquote>  <br /><br />that´s always the message from the Mass Media, thats their propaganda. Is what they want the people to think. Politicians & Mass Media have killed the Spanish Movement "15M" (thats its name here) thousands of times, they said "are only a few", they have criminalized it, they said they were terrorists, they said they were comunists (hahaha), they said they should dress better... they have said that they were just a bunch of young people that were there because they had nothing else to do, etc, etc... LiES LiES & MORE LiES...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUb8RAyLf80&feature=player_embedded" ></a><br />Pete Seeger/ The Ross Perot Guide<br /><br />... & you know what? i don´t matter who they are, i don´t matter where are they going, i don´t give a fuck about how they dress or about their hair... the main thing is that WE ARE BEING GOBERNED BY THIEFS. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312238#Comment_312238</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312238#Comment_312238</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:49:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>cjstevens</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Hey WC<br /><br />I've been following this since it broke and also started watching <a href="http://rt.com/programs/keiser-report/keiser-report-195-max/" >The Keiser Report</a> in which Max seems to nail most of the financial corruption behind many of 'Occupiers' grievances. <br /><br />I've read different opinions on what the groups are calling for, mostly a removal of the economic 'terrorists' who essentially run the world -a cause I wholeheartedly support.<br /><br />Initially the media associated it with a almost socialist hippy movement. I think its is the opposite, not in any way 'anti-capitalist' as certain political puppets have denounced, but a global network of switched-on taxpayers who are desperately trying to apply some pressure to a cabal of untouchable and sickeningly greedy bastards and demanding a fairer and more publicly controlled monetary system.<br /> <br />I'm considering going to the Stock Exchange on Saturday in a purely journalistic capacity and posting any details on a site. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312241#Comment_312241</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312241#Comment_312241</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:18:36 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DC</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qA1py9erpVk" >Victoria Jackson goes to Occupy Wall Street</a><br />I think I never heard about this woman and I only have to say is *facepalm*. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312242#Comment_312242</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312242#Comment_312242</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:26:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William Joseph Dunn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ turns out the dumb act that Victoria Jackson was doing on SNL, wasn't an act. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312243#Comment_312243</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312243#Comment_312243</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:31:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ And now, the conservative (and clueless) <a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/12/the_tragic_hilarious_we_are_the_53_percent_movement/" >counter-movement to OWS.</a>  Before you ask, this is not a gag. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312258#Comment_312258</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312258#Comment_312258</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:38:24 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Fishelle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ One of my friends* on facebook posted this today.<br /><br /><a href="http://s51.photobucket.com/albums/f366/fernandi/?action=view&amp;current=stupid.jpg" target="_blank" ><img src="http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f366/fernandi/stupid.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket" ></a><br /><br />Now, I'm not super into this protest. I get why people are doing it, and I think that's cool and all. But it's not my thing. I'm not about to leave the print studio to protest much of anything, really.<br /><br />But this image pisses me off.<br /><br />I am currently in my 4th year at school, also completely debt free. I have had scholarships that covered all of my tuition every single year, and this year I even have another scholarship on top of that. My GPA doesn't really exist right now because I just transferred from a 2 year school and that makes things wonky, but it would be around 3.8, I think. I spend nearly all my waking hours working on homework if I can manage it.<br />I pay half of what I should for rent living with my sister. I do not own a car of any sort. My parents pay my phone bill, and the phone I am using now was one discarded by my sister when she got a nicer one. In the past year, the only clothes I have bought for myself are 2 dresses and one shirt, and each were under $30. I sometimes eat out because I do not have time to make food, or because that's how I can be around the few friends I have. But more often than not my lunch is a package of fruit snacks or something I can take with me in my backpack so I can stay in the studio without a break.<br />I have been trying to find a job and failing. I worked over the summer at the one job I could get and saved all the money from it for school, even though the job was something I hated and I ended up so depressed I wanted to kill myself working it.** I'll probably work there again next summer. I have also tried to sell my art to get money to buy food, and failed at that as well. Today I printed some obviously fake money and I am going to see if I can exchange it for things because I feel so poor.<br />I work my ass off for everything I have too. But I still don't have enough. My money from my summer job is almost gone. This is not because I'm lazy or not looking for work. It is because there's just not a whole lot for me to apply to, and the few things there are haven't called me back.<br />If I were working 30+ hours in my major with my credits, I would fail everything. I can't do my homework at any workplace, since generally workplaces don't have printing presses sitting around. I could survive on $300 a month the rest of the school year though, easy. Minimum wage, 10 hours a week would be grand. But, as I mentioned, I cannot find a part time job.<br />I think that certainly some of the billionaires in this country could have a bit higher taxes so my income tax could have been less, and I could still have money from that summer job I had. Among other things.<br /><br />Sometimes, no matter how hard you work, things just don't pan out the way you want them to. Belittling those that haven't had things work out for them doesn't help anyone.<br /><br /><br />*Well, not anymore. This was one of several right wing stupid posts in a row and it just wasn't worth how angry it made me.<br />**I wish this was an exaggeration. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312259#Comment_312259</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312259#Comment_312259</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:14:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ If I were to post my 99% life story, it would look very similar to this:<br /><img src="http://copymattt.tumblr.com/post/603930556/i-have-seen-a-hooker-eat-a-tire" alt="Tracy Jordan&#39;s repressed childhood memories" > ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312268#Comment_312268</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312268#Comment_312268</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:30:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DistractDelude</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Artenshiur and @Pupato:<br /><br />I'm not cycnical of these protests, changes need to be made and it's good that people are finally exercising their social voices in public again. But turning up without a defined plan only works if you are in a genuine Tahrir Square moment where the underlying feeling is that the government is to blame and the natural progression is to then use your voice to call for their removal.<br /><br />This is a completely different beast to Tahrir Square. Whilst there is a vague, underlying similarity insofar as people want <em >change</em>, the problems being debated relate in the main to the financial sector and it's multiple abuses of influence and power. Therefore, a definite plan is required in order to of succeed in bringing about a positive change to society as a whole. Also, the chances of being  killed your government are much, much lower than they were in Egypt. The whole media comparison with Tahrir Square does not sit well with me since people in Egypt were actively putting themselves in physical danger to demand a better future, whereas across the US there are people just turning up to watch the protests for fun. To compare the two on any level is rather insulting in my eyes.<br /><br /><blockquote >Do you want me to tell you what to demand in your country & how to do it?</blockquote><br /><br />No, I don't. I am well aware of how to do this having attended & helped in the organisation of protests for different causes since my mid-teens, varying from small scale animal welfare protests to the (more self-serving) tuition fees protests as well as various (much larger) anti-war sit-ins/marches. However, I have also seen the difference between a successful protest and a media spectacle and currently OWS is sitting in the second of those two brackets due to the nature of its genesis.<br /><br />I completely agree that what happened in Spain was a tragedy. It looked for quite a while like they couldn't fail until the media started to listen to the politicians over the people and that is what ultimately destroyed what could have been a brilliant change for the better for all. <br /><br />But OWS is happening in America. Despite all the right-wing nut-bags you wonderful people have over there, you also have access to one of the more liberal news media in the world. If you know your mind you <em >can</em> effect a real change; but on the reverse-side of the coin, if you turn up shouting, "Change now! Somehow!" they will very publicly rip you to shreds whilst secretly hoping that you get your act together and come up with a solution to all the issues they have no idea how to fix. If OWS <em >does </em>come up with the answers it is looking for I have absolutely no doubt that the media will pull a switch and brag about how they were really on the protesters side the whole time. It's just the nature of mainstream media.<br /><br /><blockquote >my hope is that they will in fact come to a conclusion, and as a result of this deep discussion it will be a solid, important one.</blockquote><br /><br />And I sincerely hope they do too. My original point, as obscured as it may have been, is that changes could have been implemented a lot faster if people had actually turned up with a plan. If they manage to come up with viable solutions from this open discourse then that is a beautiful thing and I whole-heartedly hope for such an outcome. <br /><br />My main issue with the current protest is the way it was organised and the botched approach it had at the beginning. As Pupato pointed out, people are coordinating via means previously unavailable to them. The fact that we now have these methods of instant communication/co-ordination is great, but it also means that people have a chance to discuss what they want to coordinate prior to the event, thus leaving less excuse for an undefined sit-in that will instantly draw criticism from the mainstream media & politicians due to it's lack of focus.<br /><br />All that said - this is how it's happened, so hopefully they can now get their act together and say/do something meaningful before the world shifts its gaze. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312270#Comment_312270</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312270#Comment_312270</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 01:10:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Fishelle - you think *thats* right wing? This is why I don't understand US politics at all.<br /><br />@Mhengla - the comparisons with the arab spring make we want to strangle someone. How anyone thinks this is comparable to a populace wanting to oust hereditary dictatorships is beyond my understanding. And as for 'before the world shifts its gaze', if the coverage of it here in the UK is anything to go by, noone is actually gazing at it in the first place. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312276#Comment_312276</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312276#Comment_312276</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 04:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It's lovely that these people have got scholarships, but by definition, they're not available for everyone.<br /><br />and:<br /><br />"I don't understand why these protesters don't simply go through our long-established, efficient, reasonable political process to get their goals accomplished!"<br /><br />If I had a penny for everyone that's said this when I've been involved with a protest, I'd have about 30p. If I had a penny for every time I'd been called a '<em >terrorist</em>' for not doing so and protesting (fully within the law, I should add) instead of obeying and being a good little boy and doing as I'm told, I'd have three pee. <br /><br />33p isn't enough to get me to change. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312293#Comment_312293</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312293#Comment_312293</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:46:42 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Solario</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Tell your "friend" that a schoolarship is a hand-out. It's not your money, and you didn't produce anything and you didn't act as a middleman for anyone or anything. You weren't rewarded for work, you did, because other people did the same work, and they weren't rewarded for it.<br /><br />And here's some statistics! (I haven't looked into the sources and parameters that deeply, so, as always with statistics, use reason and critical thinking.)<br />http://www.businessinsider.com/what-wall-street-protesters-are-so-angry-about-2011-10?op=1 ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312298#Comment_312298</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312298#Comment_312298</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:52:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>allana</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Is anyone going to the Toronto protest on Saturday? I was thinking of stopping by for a few pictures, but it's probably going to be the smallest group of protesters with the largest group of media witnesses, ever. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312341#Comment_312341</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312341#Comment_312341</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:17:42 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>phill_sea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/163978/stop-nyc-evicting-occupy-wall-street" >A phone  call or two may need to be made.</a><br /><br />TLDR: The mayor seems to be planning to evict the protestors so the city can clean the park. <br /><br />Those in favor of the protest should call (212-639-9675) now and tell him: "Respect the First Amendment. Don't evict 'Occupy Wall Street'." ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312356#Comment_312356</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312356#Comment_312356</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:42:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've been thinking about Adam Smith.  He's the father of Capitalism--and I don't mean market economies.  Market economies have existed, truly existed since the late Middle Ages.  They have their excesses, but on the whole work pretty well for most goods.  That's not capitalism.  Capitalism is when the means of production are owned privately, and profits are reinvested into capital markets.  If you're a private business owner who buys all her material, builds something with it, sells that thing and then re-invests the profits into more goods, congratulations, you're not a capitalist.  <br /><br />Now if you hire someone and they work for you while you make the profit, you're a capitalist.  Adam Smith felt that if people act with rational self interest and everyone pursues their own ends, this system would be stable, relatively predictable and create maximum liberty for everyone involved.  With the growing industrialization of the world and the shrinking of the rural classes, his ideas made sense of a changing world and were essentially optimistic.<br /><br />Marx thought otherwise.  He took the same assumptions Smith (and Ricardo) had and arrived at another conclusion: because money is not like any other commodity and can be gathered essentially infinitely, money would accumulate in the Capitalist classes, subvert democracies, lead to a perpetual cycle of catastrophic collapse and recovery, and prevent the laboring classes from achieving independence.   Marx said that monopolies are not an aberration, but the inevitable conclusion to the Capitalist system, that a company will pay its workers as little as possible and work them as hard as possible or else be out-competed by the rival that will.  <br /><br />He even pointed out that it will pervert morality, as that every person becomes viewed as a commodity, and judged depending on their productivity, that human cooperation and collusion would become mocked and demonized.  <br /><br />Capitalism is the system we're stuck with, but it's not sustainable, not in the long run.  <br /><br />So here I am looking at the Occupy protests, looking at things like bittorrent and bitcoins, reading Global Guerrillas and thinking that something is changing on a fundamental level.  There are social forces at work that are going to make the 20th century look like the a leisurely stroll through the park. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312376#Comment_312376</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312376#Comment_312376</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:40:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Bankara</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I just came back from my second day of being down at Zucotti Park and I had an odd thought on the subway back about how this entire thing is maybe fallout from the Obama campaign.  Shepard Fairy, an self-admitted propagandist, made campaign images of Obama with impossibly high-value words like 'Hope' and 'Change' and 'Progress'. We young folk in America are pretty goddam cynical but we reacted to it, thinking that maybe, just maybe, THIS time it would be different.  and then it wasn't.  We saw a continuation and indeed an expansion of all of the policies that Bush instituted.  We saw nothing change.  We saw business as usual.  That is not what we were promised.  This may be idealism turning to righteous indignation in the face of one final and unforgivable deception.  This system is broken.  We have admitted its shortcomings in the same way that we are accustomed to forgiving the predictable shortcomings of a familiar partner.  Then one day they do something unforgivable that lays bare the fact that they never really cared about us at all.  Obama, for all the good will that has been given him, has not delivered even one of the progressive goals that he campaigned on.  I feel cheated.  I always knew that he was a politician, and I tried to protect myself from his charms but I finally feel as though I am done with him.  Now, all I feel is bad for the guy.  He got handed a flaming bag of dogshit by GWB.  He has done a tolerable job of ensuring that the country has not gone down in  flames, and believe me when I say this, I would like to give the man as much credit as i can but I am finding it difficult to credit him with much of anything.  Most politicians make concrete promises and then don't deliver on them.  No new taxes.  Peace and prosperity.  whatever.  Obama made campaign promises that were intangible concepts ( Justice!  Flying shoes for all!  Magical uncorns!)  and now, when after nearly four years they fail to materialize it becomes apparent that they never will. somehow,  we are now expected to vote for the guy AGAIN under exactly same pretense and I have to admit that I feel the load of horseshit in my bloodstream reaches toxic and potentially fatal levels.  <br />It is bloody pouring rain and the occupiers are being forced to leave the park under a shaky truce with City Hall.  Tomorrow will define how this movement either evolves or dies. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312380#Comment_312380</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312380#Comment_312380</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:41:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>D.J.</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @allana<br />I might follow a friend there, but I will not be protesting. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312392#Comment_312392</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312392#Comment_312392</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 04:26:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pupato</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @John Wake, Thanks... That´s the picture! you´re totaly right.  Marx was a visionary. Then you put Capitalism along with Globalization together & we have people at one corner of the planet working as slaves for other people on the other can brush their thooth with the water running & have better batteries for their laptops (let pass through those who make more than 15000 euros per month). As the water was still running for us we were okey with the situation, but when the tap got closed we´ve started to revolve. Its human nature & better later than never. Its a wicked system that can´t exist without limits & here´s one of the main problems now. Corporations have taken control over gobernments turning democracy into a farse because political parties can´t reach the people without money wich is provided by unscrupulous corporations. At the end, the gobernments "democratically elected" have become just puppets of the monsters... <br />& the worst is that we are monsters too because we knew who the monsters were & what they were doing. <br /><br />@Bankara, it´s astonishing how the responsibles continue to sell themselves as the saviors of the desaster!  & i´m even more amazed of the people who belive it & vote for them again : (<br /><br />@Mhengla<br /><br /><blockquote >what happened in Spain was a tragedy. It looked for quite a while like they couldn't fail until the media started to listen to the politicians over the people and that is what ultimately destroyed what could have been a brilliant change for the better for all.<br /></blockquote><br /><br />You are very mistaken again, the Main Medias have never listen to the people, they´ve acted as if they did but it was an strategy (there were elections coming & they knew that people in general were pissed off with everything) & that´s because the media are sustained with the Corporations money, those for wich the politicians work for.  The movement been destroyed? (that´s another huge lie) NOTHING HAVE BEEN DESTROYED... on the contrary, the Movement has been divided itself into groups working from the neighborhoods, organizing a civil society net, & spreading this net over all the country (in the summertime groups of "outraged" have been visiting little villages, talking to the people & giving them some political education, traveling by foot & camping at the main squares of cities & villages.<br /><br /><br /><blockquote > is that changes could have been implemented a lot faster if people had actually turned up with a plan. <br /></blockquote><br /><br />I´m telling you again there´s a plan & this fight is going to be a long one. Why it has to be done in a month? Not at all, this is going to take years, even decades, that´s for sure & this concept has to be clear in our minds if we want to achive even a 10% of the original demands. Why everything has to be right here, right now? That´s another lie & a very dangerous trap for discourage our spirits.<br /><br /><blockquote >if you turn up shouting, "Change now! Somehow!" they will very publicly rip you to shreds whilst secretly hoping that you get your act together and come up with a solution to all the issues they have no idea how to fix<br /></blockquote><br /><br />when are you going to understand that they are going to publicly rip our shreds no matter what we say or do... & we have no delusions of grandeur, ¡¿came up with a solution to all the issues?! i don´t belive in God but, Jennifer López ass... hmmm! it will make my sadness go away (-it would be an imposible task too... <br />make my sadness go away i mean- : )   ... & they know how to fix it, yes they do... & how to broke it for selling it cheaper.<br /><br /><br /><br />PS. Forgot to say that in Spain this Protest Group includes a lot of diferent civil & political asociations. In spite of the apolitical attitude sustained by some (wich i see totaly quimerical unless you have arms & the will to start & armed revolution), there´s a general conviction that political representation is needed through the democratic stablished courses (the electoral law wich benefits the two main political powers has to be changed: that´s the first demand of the spanish movement "MAY, THE FIFTH" (15M). For me the only hope is the 3erd option, the ancient Comunist Party united whith other little options, now called UNITED LEFT...  UNITED LEFT has been triying to introduce a much more humanistic aproach to this agresive & deshumanized capitalist system long ago before this protests start. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312396#Comment_312396</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312396#Comment_312396</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 05:42:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ There's actually a few bits about this on the BBC news site today, first I can recall of them covering it at all.<br /><br />Even then it seems only cause they were expecting the 'clean up' in NYC to kick off into something. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312398#Comment_312398</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312398#Comment_312398</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 06:11:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ You know the freeloading tax-evading 47% that the GOP and other conservative sock-puppets are railing against?  Well, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/10/chart-of-the-day-these-are-the-47-percent.php?ref=fpa" >here's who they are</a>.  The GOP has to be given credit for making demonizing old people, the working poor, and students socially acceptable ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312400#Comment_312400</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312400#Comment_312400</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:56:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>phill_sea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/14/cleanup-of-zuccotti-park-cancelled/?smid=fb-nytimes&WT.mc_id=NY-SM-E-FB-SM-LIN-CZP-101411-NYT-NA&WT.mc_ev=click" >Occupy Wall Street Eviction called off</a><br /><br />Postponed, actually, but better than nothing. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312403#Comment_312403</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312403#Comment_312403</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:21:42 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>andycon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Miranda's Eyes<br /><br />Yeah the thing I LOVE so much about being unemployed isn't the nights I spend crying myself to sleep or the deep depression that comes around when being told that despite my college degree I wasn't what they were looking for with that janitor position I applied for.<br /><br />No I love not paying federal income taxes. Yeah... Its TOTALLY the left and Obama who are causing class warfare. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312411#Comment_312411</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312411#Comment_312411</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:42:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pupato</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ They call themselves LEFT but they aren´t.  For me LEFT are those who has the smaller part of the pie, therefore they want things to change (real changes). SOCIAL DEMOCRACY was born with the intention of transforming CAPITALISM, but they got carried away by the power of the money to the dark side of the political game. The worst is that SOCIALISTS(Spain) & DEMOCRATS(USA) have literally killed the TRUE LEFT... All of them? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312414#Comment_312414</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312414#Comment_312414</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:57:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pupato</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ "OCTOBER 15TH<br />UNITED FOR #GLOBALCHANGE<br /><br />On October 15th people from all over the world will take to the streets and squares.<br /><br />From America to Asia, from Africa to Europe, people are rising up to claim their rights and demand a true democracy. Now it is time for all of us to join in a global non violent protest.<br /><br />The ruling powers work for the benefit of just a few, ignoring the will of the vast majority and the human and environmental price we all have to pay. This intolerable situation must end.<br /><br />United in one voice, we will let politicians, and the financial elites they serve, know it is up to us, the people, to decide our future. We are not goods in the hands of politicians and bankers who do not represent us.<br /><br />On October 15th, we will meet on the streets to initiate the global change we want. We will peacefully demonstrate, talk and organize until we make it happen.<br /><br />It’s time for us to unite. It’s time for them to listen.<br />People of the world, rise up on October 15th!"<br /><br /><a href="http://15october.net/" ><br />http://15october.net/</a><br /><br /><br /><br />... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312415#Comment_312415</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312415#Comment_312415</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:04:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ On another board, I've been talking about this and posing the question: how bad is it in the US? It seems difficult to come up with an answer, everybody has another idea, another bit of anecdotal evidence, another stat that shows that either it's really bad or that it really isn't bad at all. It seems that more people are becoming impoverished or are having trouble making ends meet, but how acute is the problem? Is it an emergency yet?<br /><br />I've got a suspicion that the Western economy is bumping against the boundries of its possibilities; real growth has become an impossiblity. But the entire system is based on the premise that growth will last forever. Every little disturbance of the system now causes a complete crisis because it immediately nixes what growth may otherwise have occured. It's visible in the Tea Party, which is really a small group but managed to bring the US to the brink of bankruptcy. It's visible in Greece, which isn't allowed to go bankrupt by the other EU nations because that would fuck the banks in the entire EU up real good. Every natural disaster, every terror attack, every tiny screw up seems to have reverberations that causes problems around the world. <br /><br />i think we need to work towards a system that is based on equilibrium rather than a need for growth. Maybe it is time to see if Amazon still sells Das Kapital. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312417#Comment_312417</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312417#Comment_312417</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:13:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Verus: <br /><br />Depends on what you mean by growth.<br /><br />There is a <em >lot</em> of shit that needs doing in this country that <em >isn't</em> being done because of misplaced emphasis on consumer-driven purchasing of crap. Roads, bridges, railways, and water systems could all use a thorough rebuild. The electrical grid needs to be built out and made more reliable and responsive.<br /><br />This work would sure as hell <em >look</em> like growth, and a damn good way to spend money, unless you're in the small fraction of unduly-influential people in whose interest it is that as much money as possible be freed up to feed the Great Casino. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312420#Comment_312420</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312420#Comment_312420</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:47:40 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ To expand on Jon's evaluation of common political philosophy...<br /><br />It's good that you invoke Smith to describe our extant capitalist system, but it should be noted that both Locke and Hume were also instrumental in the political ideologies of the U.S. from very early. And those guys are slowly becoming out of fashion as well.<br /><br />Hume informed the individualism that we are now slowly moving away from. As more people see themselves as parts of the natural world, British Empiricism loses its grasp on the common consciousness. Marxism, like you said, and the ecology movement are very counter to the 17th century conclusions about being in the world, and I feel like we will, consciously or not, move to a more German, mid-19th century common idea of what makes a person as an actor in nature.<br /><br />Locke's Proviso (his summed up views of property rights) falls apart without the Christian notion that God gave man the world and its plenty. We're finding that there isn't plenty. There's a lot less than plenty for the amount of people we have now. Many are finding that there isn't a God, or at least the Christian God isn't who we thought it was.<br /><br />As these notions die, they are replaced by Marxism, existentialism, egalitarianism, feminism, ecology--things that place a person in the world as an actor, an able member of a natural landscape, and while we can't prove that anything outside ourselves exists, it's better to assume that it does and not be a piece of shit than it is to give it up and be a giant asshole. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312423#Comment_312423</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312423#Comment_312423</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:54:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Stefan:<br /><br />You are right, of course technological improvement and updating is a genuine and beneficial form of growth. <br /><br />Still, there seems to me to be something completely unsustainable and unnatural about the constant demand for growth. We live on a pretty tiny world of finite resources. Ignoring that fact I think is screwing the world up, and like a boomerang it's rebounded and coming back to hit us in the face.  The rich have to put money in mango trees and coconuts and rice fields in order for people to be able to fix dinner. But if palm oil plantations bring more benefit in the short term, if it brings a larger return on their investment, they'll turn the whole damn world into a monoculture. Forty years or so down the line they'll be out of the last mangos they saved for themselves on their own private plots, and it's game over.<br /><br />I know that's an oversimplification, but I don't have the economic expertise to put it in other terms. I think we desperately need to look at scenarios in which an equilibrium is reached, where humanity's real<em > needs</em>, not perks or luxuries, can be sustained for the long term. If we don't do that, it will probably happen anyway, but in a far more violent, painful manner, like rats in a cage fighting over a tiny bit of food. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312434#Comment_312434</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312434#Comment_312434</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:29:24 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I can tell you now, this global 15th protest will have no impact at all in the UK unless they decide to smash a few windows.<br /><br />I'm willing to lay a few quid that it doesn't even make the evening news. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312470#Comment_312470</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312470#Comment_312470</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:55:40 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>256</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Various Twitter bods report that Julian Assange turned up at the "Occupy London Stock Exchange" protest, and was subsequently taken aside by police although apparently not arrested. <br /><br />Wonder if that makes it more likely to make the evening news. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312482#Comment_312482</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312482#Comment_312482</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 12:39:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Osmosis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I was about three metres from Julian Assange when he spoke on the steps of St. Paul's cathedral.  It was bizarre.  He was loudly heckled by several people who called him a rapist.  He gave a short speech, flanked by earpiece-wearing besuited minders.  There was some applause and excitement.  He ended by throwing handfuls of sweets into the crowd like a pantomime dame.  Apart from the loose affiliation with Anon (who were out in number), I couldn't work out why he was there.  <br /><br />(although the candy-throwing led to one of my better puns of the day: "Whose sweets?  Our sweets.")<br /><br />Edit: And, I had forgotten until now: a young lady in a fur coat threw her (pink, polka-dot) knickers at him. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312494#Comment_312494</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312494#Comment_312494</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:23:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Osmosis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Reporting back, team.<br /><br />I was at the Occupy London protest today from 12 noon to 5pm.  I wandered down by myself from St. Paul's tube, through Paternoster Square where there were several policemen and high-vizzed security men, and then to the steps of St. Paul's Cathedral.  I had a wander around looking at how the streets were laid out around there and trying to figure out where to go if it turned nasty.  Then I met my friends on the steps.  By half twelve, when a few hundred people had assembled, the rentacops had disappeared and the police had organised line defences around all entrances to Paternoster Square and the entrance to the London Stock Exchange.  These included mounted officers and dog handlers.  <br /><br />The "march", such as it was, was from St. Paul steps to Paternoster entrance (about thirty metres), a bit of handbags with the officers there, then around the square anti-clockwise to each entrance in turn.  My friends and I were in front of most of the crowd, using Google Maps and avoiding the pointless shoving that happened when exitable types reached the police lines.  Procuring cardboard for placards from an obliging bookshop, my friend and I returned to St. Paul's steps by about 1pm. (Mine read "Can I have my bailout back?")<br /><br />From 1 to 5, numbers of protestors grew, and police continually changed their minds about whether or not people were allowed in or out of the yard.  There was strong, bright sunshine and a good atmosphere.  Via the People's Mic different working groups split off around 3 or 4 to discuss practicalities of police liaison, medics, food and water, and so on.  I spent time talking to people, being interviewed (I think by NBC?), painting banners, and actually having a pretty nice time.  The other protestors were mainly young, with many from overseas.  There were many Anons in evidence, besuited and Guy Fawked.  <br /><br />At five on the dot, large numbers of public order-equipped police formed lines and moved into the crowd.  As police were allowing people to leave at that point, I chose to leave.  It seems <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/OccupyLSX/status/125279770899525632" >this was the right decision</a>.  Sitting in the pub and watching CO11 <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/CO11MetPolice/status/125255013051285505" >tweet that they were clearing the square for Sunday services</a>, we called the Archbishop of Canterbury and Bishop of London's offices to see if they could intervene.  From the painful tweets coming from <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/OccupyLSX" >@OccupyLSX</a> it doesn't seem so. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312502#Comment_312502</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312502#Comment_312502</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:23:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It did make the news, but only as a footnote to the 'bigger' story of the protest in Rome which was subverted by people who just wanted to smash shit up.<br /><br />Water cannons, tear gas, the whole works.<br /><br />Middle England *wants* to see the police cracking people over the head with batons right now. They equate any 'anarchist' demonstration with the mindless rioting of a few months back, regardless of how incorrect that view is, and will be cheering on any scenes they see in the papers tomorrow of 'scum blocking access to our great cathedral getting their just desserts'.<br /><br />Right now is a poor time to be doing this kind of protest in the UK, the bulk of public opinion will NOT be on your side. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312515#Comment_312515</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312515#Comment_312515</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:54:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RandomEntity</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ How about <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-run-on-citibank-ends-in-arrests/" >these arrests of protesters for trying to close their citibank accounts?</a><br />Apparently taking your money out of the banks is now illegal. I read that they were charged with "criminal trespass". That's funny, because they were LOCKED IN the building.<br />This is getting ridiculous. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312518#Comment_312518</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312518#Comment_312518</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:54:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ "I've got a suspicion that the Western economy is bumping against the boundries of its possibilities; real growth has become an impossiblity. "<br /><br />Unless, you live in Spain, Germany, Canada, Poland, Australia... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312519#Comment_312519</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312519#Comment_312519</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:58:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I have to admit I jumped here from the first page.<br /><br />My initial reaction was much the same as many others: "it's all empty theatre. What are they hoping to achieve? The protesters have no positive agenda."<br /><br />But stuff like the "Occupy the Polls" campaign and the Citibank and Chase boycotts has changed my mind to some extent.<br /><br />The sit-ins and marches serve a useful purpose if they motivate people to take other more practical actions. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312558#Comment_312558</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312558#Comment_312558</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:27:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Mass arrests in Chicago, people being pulled and carried into police vans, tents being broken up, but not confiscated. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312564#Comment_312564</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312564#Comment_312564</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 00:11:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Adam Smith felt that if people act with rational self interest and everyone pursues their own ends, this system would be stable, relatively predictable and create maximum liberty for everyone involved. </blockquote><br /><br />Actually he didn't, although it suits various interests that you believe that that was Smith's view.<br /><br />Smith actually felt that high taxes on the wealthy and strict regulation of the abuses of capitalism were required. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312569#Comment_312569</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312569#Comment_312569</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:25:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ According to Mer's re-tweet, police have killed power and cell towers at Occupy Phoenix.  I wouldn't have expected the crowds to stick around long enough for it to come to that.  I'm only about half a mile away, and I can't hear any sirens.<br /><br />[edit]According to <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/DowntownDevil" >this feed</a> the cell tower info is BS.  Around 40 or so protesters were taken into police custody.<br /><br />[edit2]<a href="http://downtowndevil.com/2011/10/15/15082/phoenix-occupy-protest/" >Full timeline of occupy Phoenix</a>.  So apparently an admitted neo-Nazi with an AK-47 was there 'to keep the peace.'  WTF Arizona. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312578#Comment_312578</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312578#Comment_312578</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 05:33:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>lazarus corporation</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Interesting blog post from Paul Mason (Economics Editor of the BBC "Newsnight" programme): <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15326636" >http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15326636</a><br /><br />Interesting because:<br /><ol ><br />	<li >he "gets it"</li><br />	<li >he's starting to look deeper into the way people's ways of thinking have changed (and what wider socio-cultural factors caused this)</li><br /></ol><br />On point (2) it's a little light, and he admits that he is "still struggling to get [his] own head around it", but it's worth a read. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312584#Comment_312584</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312584#Comment_312584</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:37:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Unless, you live in Spain, Germany, Canada, Poland, Australia...</blockquote><br /><br />@Kosmopolit; I don't believe any of that is real significant growth. Have people in Spain, Germany, Canada or Australia, on average, significantly increased their material welfare? Can people afford to buy more and better quality goods than 10 years ago?<br /><br />Poland I may agree with, and it's the only country in Europe that never went into recession. But people there are still gaining lost ground from the period that the country was communist. Eastern Europe went through a huge economic jump since that period. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312586#Comment_312586</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312586#Comment_312586</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:08:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ "I don't believe any of that is real significant growth." <br /><br />you are, of course, free to believe or not believe whatever you choose.<br /><br />But 3% growth per annum sounds pretty real to me.<br /><br />Germany also has the lowest unemployment in decades which suggests that quite a lot of Germans have "increased their material wellbeing".<br /><br />Sorry if I'm sounding crabby here - coming down with the flu amongst other things - but people seem to proclaim the final death throes of capitalism every time there's a recession. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312588#Comment_312588</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312588#Comment_312588</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:57:21 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Eastern Germany had zero unemployment during communism, was that an indication that their material wellbeing was high? No.<br /><br />See, those figures don't necessarily give the whole picture. Germany has a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_Germany" >pretty substantial problem with poverty</a>, and overall GDP growth does not mean the average person is better off. You also have to factor in inflation, I think.<br /><br />You are right in that there's a certain degree of belief involved in this. But I'm seeing around me here in the Netherlands that many people have more trouble getting a house and paying the bills and paying education for their kids than the previous generation had. That may inform my belief  - my own circumstances, which is a kind of anecdotal evidence. But it's still my belief.<br /><br />I'm not declaring the end of capitalism (yet) btw. It's done a good job overall, especially when compared to communism. But I don't believe it is realistic to expect infinite growth in a world of finite resources. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312605#Comment_312605</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312605#Comment_312605</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:29:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Capitalism, invoked as some type of ideology, is abhorrent to my understanding of society.<br /><br />The OED defines Capitalism as thus:<br />"an economic and political system in which a countries trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state"<br /><br />It is a system that favours this private control, and supports the profit of these private owners. The system's emphasis is on recording and analysis in monetary terms, and disregards any aspects of society that cannot be defined in these terms. Because of the power that capital owners receive in society it ultimately results in a rise in inequality.<br /><br />It is really not surprising for a rise in this ideology to result in a rise in inequality and drop in social mobility. If you analyse your country in terms of GDP:<br /><img src="http://filipspagnoli.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/gdp-per-capita-vs-gini-inequality.png" ><br /><br />When attempting to develop a society that is fair and where equality is a basic principle, I cannot find a reason to think that capitalism as an ideology can deliver this. The belief that people are self-interested  has come about because of the effect that imposing a system like this has on society, and the feedback created when analysing people on these terms. As far as defending capitalism goes I don't think you have to be a capitalist to run a small business and balance your books, because your core business will be sustainability and not the acquisition of wealth for it's own sake.<br /><br />I am not naive enough to think that we can change this by just willing it, there is a lot in our current societies, especially the west, that has been built to support this system, and act against it at your own peril, but if you want the lesser of horrors, action really has to be taken.<br /><br />There is a reason why the people at the top of society seem to unable to see the problem, and that is because the people who benefit from this type of system can see it is not in their interest to leave the decision making in the hands of a structure that may not entirely share their interest. Because the system is designed to value personal wealth as the signifier of success it leaves people in power in a very vulnerable position, especially if their position does not have the acquisition of wealth as part of the job description.<br /><br />Another reason that there has been no action regarding these issues from the top, and it is something that more people are coming round to, what is happening is a change in consciousness, the old methods of political rhetoric are utterly unable to express or define where we need to go. I may go as far as to say they have become stale. There is a lot of need to change all parts of society regarding this, and to have a formation of a new narrative that will work better.<br /><br />Here is another video for you:<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7AWnfFRc7g" >A new narrative</a><br /><br />EDIT: sorry for the shitty English, I am not a writer. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312621#Comment_312621</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312621#Comment_312621</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:40:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ NYPD apparently now using stobe lights when arresting people in order to prevent themselves being filmed. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312622#Comment_312622</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312622#Comment_312622</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:44:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oddbill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It would be interesting for someone to sue to find out if it is legal for uniformed police officers acting in the open in public to attempt to conceal their identities. It seems like that goes against the precedent of having to give name & badge number upon request. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312640#Comment_312640</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312640#Comment_312640</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:58:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Kosmopolit<br /><br />Absolutely true about Smith.  One of the downfalls of trying to sum up a few thousand pages of political discourse in an internet post is simplifying things to an almost absurd level.  Does anyone know where that straw man came from?  I hear it from neo-liberals constantly, but it seems to be a pretty recent, post Ayn Rand view of Smith. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312649#Comment_312649</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312649#Comment_312649</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:14:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'd guess it was during the 1950's when American business and the government was trying to come up with anticommunist memes.<br /><br />That's wen the "American Revolution" and "Revolutionary War" started being replaced by "American War of Independence". ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312652#Comment_312652</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312652#Comment_312652</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:27:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Oh you wanna play the RSAnimate game...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpAMbpQ8J7g" >Zizek On Charity</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312667#Comment_312667</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312667#Comment_312667</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:01:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I didn't realise it was a game ;) I am fond of zizek.<br /><br />About half an hour!<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vY4VZr8Ox94" >Generation OS13: The new culture of resistance </a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312672#Comment_312672</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312672#Comment_312672</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:58:42 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oldhat</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ While my opinion on the concept of the protests has turned over and I am for them...I really have to say that after all this time the majority of the protesters I've seen are still bugging the hell out of me with how they're doing things.  A couple of things of note:<br /><br />- Seeing a sign reading "Tax the 1%, put the 99% on welfare"<br />- Garbage bins in the park being occupied filled to the brim with coffee cups from a huge national franchise that has been responsible for more than a lot of local independent coffee shops going out of business.<br />- Friends seeming to focus more on how artistic their protest is rather than the protest itself.<br />- The fucking CONSTANT comparisons the protesters are giving themselves to the protests in Egypt and Libya.<br /><br />These things piss me off.  These things make me feel that the majority of the protesters, like we speculated on early on with this thing, are a bunch of stupid kids who don't want to work and yet still be paid a high salary. As I said, I do agree with the protest in principle, but I'm just not liking that I'm seeing more first world privileged kids who don't want to work, fighting some vague notion of "The Man" and almost instinctively putting up a peace sign when a cameraman walks by. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312674#Comment_312674</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312674#Comment_312674</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:02:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @oldhat<br /><br /><i >- The fucking CONSTANT comparisons the protesters are giving themselves to the protests in Egypt and Libya.</i><br /><br />This. This times 1000%. I'm sorry, are some things fucked in this country? Yes, but I'm pretty sure they aren't anywhere close to being <i >that</i> fucked. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312675#Comment_312675</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312675#Comment_312675</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:04:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Anon insisting on wearing their V masks means there's now a section 66aa in place in London which empowers the police to force people to remove masks (and hoodies, bandanas, anything else they're using to conceal their faces).<br /><br />And it wouldn't surprise me at all if they don't lift that once the protest is done. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312681#Comment_312681</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312681#Comment_312681</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:32:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ One of the big things that currently has my tits in a bunch is the monopoly that ISPs have over the web.  Any attempt to start something new online is now, at best, a sort of digital manorialism, where your existence is regulated by an unaccountable boss who can at any time cut you off.  Why do I care about this?  Call it my suspicious nature.<br /><br />Imagine, if you will, that the Occupy protests grow larger, that people start using Twitter and Tor and all the other tools of the web to really start disrupting systems.  Imagine then that the FBI, in their chummy collusion with Comcast, decides to start selectively blocking access to these sites.  It happened in Egypt, and the US has already prosecuted Twitter protest organizers, so this isn't just my lefty paranoia talking.  <br /><br />Furthermore, I've been thinking a lot about implementations of direct democracy, particularly over the internet.  Any such implementation must be transparent, distributed, anonymous, and secure.  No matter how clever people are (and at this stage, I'm imagining something that melds the robustness of a bittorrent client with the anti-authoritarian resilience of bitcoin), it won't matter if the gatekeepers are passing info to unaccountable bodies.  Instead, anonymity and security need to be built into a system--make the law enforcement arm of the state jump through some legal and technical hoops to gather intel. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312689#Comment_312689</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312689#Comment_312689</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:44:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pupato</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >These things make me feel that the majority of the protesters, like we speculated on early on with this thing, are a bunch of stupid kids who don't want to work and yet still be paid a high salary.</blockquote><br /><br />@oldhat,  i have the impression that you are missing the point here. This is the first global protest in the history. The first time that countries all over the world have put themselves in agreement for fighting the system (with all the lacks & failures this is going to carry). <br />You can´t  disqualify a whole global movement nor the protest in your place because a bunch of idiots, although they are adolescents & supposed to be that way, drink coffee from a Starbucks & want to be artistically inspired when writing a slogan.<br /><br />There´s a lot more behind, for ex. i imagine that there are associations fighting for a Public Health System in the USA, as they are people fighting in my country against the dismantling of our Public Health System (which has been almost sold already) … Those people & associations they are part of the protests too, they are the genesis, & they´re fighting against Banks & Corporations.<br /><br /><br />Groups like <br /><br /> "attac"  , created in France & forming now a global net all over the world<br /><br /><a href="http://www.attac.org/" >http://www.attac.org/</a><br /> <br /><br />"Real Democracy Now" (Spain) , makers & organizers of the protests here in Spain<br /><br />here you have the link for     DRY-International Manifesto<br /><br /><a href="http://international.democraciarealya.es/manifesto/" >http://international.democraciarealya.es/manifesto/</a><br /><br />& another group here in Spain fighting against the banks & the police when they want to execute an eviction (this is how you name it in english? i´m not sure), getting out entire families out of there homes because they can´t afford to pay the house. These group makes publics calls in the web for people to go & STOP the eviction of the family out of his home. For me this one is an example of how people united can, at least, try to fight against the system injustices which politicians wont change.   <br /><br />"Affected by Mortgage" the page is only in spanish but you can see there at the begining the calls with date, time & place of the anounced evictions.<br /><br /><a href="http://afectadosporlahipoteca.wordpress.com/" >http://afectadosporlahipoteca.wordpress.com/</a><br /><br />here´s a video from Aljazeera in english:   <br /><br /><a href="http://vimeo.com/16869618" >http://vimeo.com/16869618</a><br /><br />& another in which we can see the police doing his social service work<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl2GyFDH4lM&feature=related" >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl2GyFDH4lM&feature=related</a><br /><br />im afraid this is happening all over the world, & in some places the situation is even worst, wich leads me to talk about Egypt & Libya. You are totally right we can´t  compare the risks of dead & torture that the protesters there sufers with the risks of facing european or northamerican police, but those protests are linked to the occidentals ones, i think, because the dictators & there corrupts systems over there have been & are supported by our gobernments & the corporations that we suport with our votes, work & money... <br /><br />... so i think you´re being a little bit unfair here by only showing a face of the coin & using it to descualifie the whole. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312703#Comment_312703</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312703#Comment_312703</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:05:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >The fucking CONSTANT comparisons the protesters are giving themselves to the protests in Egypt and Libya.<br /><br />...I'm sorry, are some things fucked in this country? Yes, but I'm pretty sure they aren't anywhere close to being that fucked.</blockquote><br />For most Americans, the comparison is weird.<br /><br />But the comparison becomes less weird when you remember that America <em >contains lots of people</em>, and not all of them are white twenty year-olds.<br /><br />For some more comparisons,<br /><br />The population of Libya is 6.5 million.<br /><br />The prison population of the United States is 2.3 million, with an additional 4.9 million on parole or probation, and an additional 40 million out of the justice system but still holding criminal records that prevent employment for which they would otherwise be eligible, or limit their access to government assistance, or legally forbid them from voting in many states*. The United States has something like two Libyas-worth of disenfranchised citizens who will never break out of poverty.<br /><br />Back to the original 2.3 million actually in jail:<br /><br />905,000 are black.<br />475,000 are Hispanic.<br /><br />500,000 are awaiting trial at any given moment. The United States has a rolling population of .5 million untried prisoners at all times.<br /><br />Out of the 1.5 million in state and federal prison, 12ish percent, 180,000 people, are there for pot. The percentage within local jails and the parole/probation population is harder to find out.<br /><br /><br />Of course, this isn't largely what the white kids in the 99% are protesting. They're protesting inequality. <strong >Clearly America's inequality problem should never be compared to Egypt or Libya.</strong><br /><br /><br /><em >*All states except Maine and Vermont take away voting rights upon felony conviction. 2,000,000 Americans who have completed applicable prison and parole sentences are ineligible to vote due to prior convictions. Millions more fail to re-register to vote after becoming eligible due to confusion over their state's re-registration laws.<br />Source for prison population statistics: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_the_United_States" target="_blank" >Wikipedia</a><br />Source for post-prison and disenfranchisement statistics: <a href="http://www.aclu.org/racial-justice-voting-rights/voting-criminal-record-executive-summary" target="_blank" >ACLU: Voting With A Criminal Record - Executive Summary</a></em> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312712#Comment_312712</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312712#Comment_312712</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:31:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ (One more tidbit: The population of Egypt, 80 million, is <a href="https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/eg.html" target="_blank" >43% urban</a>. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Egypt#Secondary_Education" target="_blank" >30% of all Egyptians enroll in some amount of post-secondary education, 15% graduate</a>. 2/3rds of the population of Egypt is under 30. The median age of Egypt is 24. No resemblance to the Western underemployed post-college middle class can possibly be found here.) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312713#Comment_312713</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312713#Comment_312713</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:58:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>LokiZero</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Pupato:<br /><blockquote >This is the first global protest in history.</blockquote><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_of_1968" >Are</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_the_Iraq_War" >you</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_the_U.S._involvement_in_the_Vietnam_War" >fucking</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_the_War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80%93present)" >kidding</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989" >me?</a><br /><br />You can say it's on a larger scale and that it's easier to organize these days because of the internet, but hold the hyperbole please. It makes you sound 5 years old. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312716#Comment_312716</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312716#Comment_312716</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:07:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmEHcOc0Sys&feature=player_detailpage" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312719#Comment_312719</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312719#Comment_312719</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:40:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pupato</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Lokizero,  ok, you can call it "one of the first" if you want...  you have a very interesting point of view about the subject ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312720#Comment_312720</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312720#Comment_312720</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:50:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>LokiZero</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Pupato I'm just saying, know your history. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312723#Comment_312723</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312723#Comment_312723</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:58:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pupato</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @LokiZero, & i´m just saying you´re speaking about nothing ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312727#Comment_312727</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312727#Comment_312727</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:24:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Alright kids, I smell eels.  We need to police ourselves a bit here. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312728#Comment_312728</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312728#Comment_312728</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:29:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pupato</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ok, gov, you´re right, thanks : ) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312731#Comment_312731</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312731#Comment_312731</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:49:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>LokiZero</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @government spy sorry. no more troll feeding. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312734#Comment_312734</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312734#Comment_312734</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:14:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ... and that's what I love about this place. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312736#Comment_312736</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312736#Comment_312736</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:51:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>trini_naenae</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @BrianMowrey: Thanks for bringing up the population comparisons.  I was thinking much of the same stuff, but it's hard for me to not get ranty when talking about those things (it's related to one of my biggest pet peeves in terms of misconceptions about non-western countries). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312739#Comment_312739</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312739#Comment_312739</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:16:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ See if the OWS people are saying "Our grievances are as serious as those of the Arab spring protesters" they're being absurd but if they're saying "We're inspired by the Arab spring protests who are taking action in the face of far greater danger than we could imagine" that's fair enough. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312740#Comment_312740</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312740#Comment_312740</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:32:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ So there are states in the US where prisoners are allowed to vote? Interesting. The EU says all felons should vote. The UK is very much against that, anyone in jail here is barred from voting and always has been.<br /><br />There's no doubt that this is an interesting movement, but I don't think it counts as global if noone in Russia, China or Japan seems interested in joining in. It's very much a 'western' protest movement at the moment. And even then, the actual grievances being protested are not common across all the countries.<br /><br />In Italy it's about government corruption, they have one of the worst in the EU. In Belgium they'd just like to *have* a government, they've failed to form any kind of parliament since the elections 18 months ago. The Greeks just want to know where all their money went. The Germans don't understand why they should pay for Greece's problems. The British want to show solidarity with the Americans, but their situation isn't as bad as the colonials. And so on.<br /><br />It's interesting from a sociology point of view, but can it last in the face of the coming winter? It's not going to be much fun camping in tents outside St. Pauls once it drops below freezing overnight. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312743#Comment_312743</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312743#Comment_312743</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:43:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Prisoners can vote here in the Feds until they've been convicted.  Innocent until proven guilty actually matters when it comes to voting in prison. Now, I've seen them vote here; I've seen the ballots, but I don't know who is responsible for getting them from the prison to the voting commission.<br /><br /><a href="http://felonvoting.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=286" >This seems to answer some questions better than I could.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312744#Comment_312744</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312744#Comment_312744</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:54:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jamie Heron</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I don't know whether this should go here or in the Informus thread, I'm hoping it's appropriate here (please tell me if it isn't): <a href="http://occupywriters.com/by-lemony-snicket" >Thirteen Observations made by Lemony Snicket while watching Occupy Wall Street from a Discreet Distance </a><br /><br />Incidentally, this thread is awesome, both in its informativeness and its politeness. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312745#Comment_312745</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312745#Comment_312745</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >There's no doubt that this is an interesting movement, but I don't think it counts as global if noone in Russia, China or Japan seems interested in joining in. It's very much a 'western' protest movement at the moment. And even then, the actual grievances being protested are not common across all the countries.<br /><br />In Italy it's about government corruption, they have one of the worst in the EU. In Belgium they'd just like to *have* a government, they've failed to form any kind of parliament since the elections 18 months ago. The Greeks just want to know where all their money went. The Germans don't understand why they should pay for Greece's problems. The British want to show solidarity with the Americans, but their situation isn't as bad as the colonials. And so on.</blockquote><br /><br />And here in Australia they really don't seem to be sure what they're doing other than showing solidarity with the people protesting in Europe and the US.<br /><br />Occupy Sydney lost most of its participants Sunday because they had to get ready for work on Monday. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312768#Comment_312768</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312768#Comment_312768</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:43:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ "Anon insisting on wearing their V masks means there's now a section 66aa in place in London which empowers the police to force people to remove masks (and hoodies, bandanas, anything else they're using to conceal their faces)."<br /><br /><br />Sauce? That should be challengable if they're claiming Anon constitutes a terrorist threat now. But let's face it, they were always going to slap a section 60 on this one. And it doesn't mean you're not allowed to wear a mask or face covering, it means a policeman can ask you to remove it for the purposes of checking your identity. Which you don't have to provide unless arrested. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312806#Comment_312806</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312806#Comment_312806</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:10:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ There are some things that make the Occupy protests in Western countries similar to the protest in the Middle East but there are also huge differences. I'd say they are similar in that they are a sign of dissatisfaction with the regular political process and the behavior of politicians or the rich "upper layers" of society. They are also both a consequence of the economic downturns that we've seen. They are dissimilar in that the scale of the abuse of power, the repression, and the suffering of the population is much greater in the Middle East. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312823#Comment_312823</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312823#Comment_312823</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:43:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I don't think it's a contest in terms of who is suffering more. The differences in the protests in the middle east, the protests in the US and the riots in the UK is clear to anyone with half a brain. What interests me far more is what connects them. I see them as slightly differing symptoms of the same malaise, which is: Globalisation + Corporate Capitalism = Massive Underclass.  <br /><br />I hope and pray that OWS and their like will stimulate conversation amongst all members of society. Once everyone is aware that there is a problem and is talking about it, we will be on the path to finding a solution. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOP2V_np2c0&feature=player_detailpage" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312879#Comment_312879</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312879#Comment_312879</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:17:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RandomEntity</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Oddcult, according to the FBI Domestic Terrorist Awareness Handbook, which I have a copy of, it's available /somewhere/ on the internet because it was leaked. Anon is actually listed as a domestic terrorist threat. Along with a number of other groups, like, um, "fringe" media, as in, any news source that is not considered mainstream. So yeah, it's ridiculous, but they have a whole profile and a few pages dedicated to them. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312904#Comment_312904</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312904#Comment_312904</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:54:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Every activist group gets a secret service profile in the UK. If you're not watching them, how can you tell when they've gone bad? (yes, I know, but we're more used to being surveiled all the time over here) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312931#Comment_312931</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312931#Comment_312931</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:37:36 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.theroot.com/buzz/barney-frank-occupy-wall-street-vote" >Here's Barney Frank telling some truth that will probably get ignored</a>. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312938#Comment_312938</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312938#Comment_312938</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:08:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ There's something iffy with that. He says: <blockquote >I don’t know what the voting behavior is of all these people, but I'm a little bit unhappy when people didn't vote last time blame me for the consequences of their not voting.</blockquote><br /><br />So he's blaming people of not voting while admitting he doesn't know if they voted or not. That's all wrong.<br /><br />Another thing is where he says <blockquote >...we had an election last year in which people who disagree with them, and disagree with me and with you, got elected.</blockquote><br /><br />While that may be true, it's not like the <em >other guys</em> achieved very much that might have assuaged the protestors dissatisfaction before that election. So he's creating a false dichotomy between Republicans and Democrats there, and what he's really saying is "they are against you, but we're with you. Vote for us and all your problems will be solved." While most of the protestors actually have very real issues with both the Democrats and the Republicans. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312976#Comment_312976</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312976#Comment_312976</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:32:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jamie Coville</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yeah, I suspect the vast majority of those occupying wall street did vote democrat and Obama in particular. Has Washington filed any charges against the fraudsters that caused the economy to collapse? Did the bailouts stop them from foreclosing on peoples homes? Or was it just billions of dollars of free public money in their pockets because they cried poor? Are the super rich treated the same as anybody else when it comes to the law or are they above it?<br /><br />I could be wrong, but I'm guessing the general feeling is it doesn't matter who the fuck gets elected, the democratic system is rigged. They already did vote for and elect a left wing democrat president and what does it get them? The super rich are what feeds the politicians in both parties (and control the media to keep them in line) and nobody is going to bite the hand that feeds them (and can destroy them). It appears they can do whatever they want and are untouchable. <br /><br />I'm not sure what Occupy Wall street can do about it, but they are voicing their displeasure. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312978#Comment_312978</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312978#Comment_312978</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:46:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Look, you get the democracy you deserve. Liberals and moderates haven't been involved in the democratic process much since the 70s and have allowed things to fall into the hands of the far right. Voting numbers bear this out. Only the far right go vote. <br /><br />Politicians are cowards.They will take on whatever position they need to in order to stay in power. Do you really think Mittens, or Perry believe half the bullshit they've been spouting? Not at all. They're trying to make the FoxNews-loving far right lunatics happy when they say they'll electrocute illegal immigrants. And they know, that since most of the 99% do not fucking vote at any level of government because "Obama, I am disappoint", they turn to Wall Street and the Koch Brothers because the voters have abandoned their duty to keep them in line. Yeah, those pieces of shit at "I'm the 53%" and that piece of shit Herman Cain are absolutely wrong about the reasons, but at the core they are right: It's the 99%'s fault. They let the bad members of society take control and those guys gleefully proceeded to fuck over everyone.<br /><br />America isn't much of a democracy. It's stuck with two parties. That's one party away from communist China. But one party is openly working against the 99%. The other is dragging it's feet, but it is not actively working against their interests. Do you understand what he's saying now? You vote for your interests even if that means you need to hold your nose. Democracy goes to the people who show up on election day. That is flat out the bottom line.<br /><br />The far right play long term and they play for keeps. Barney Frank knows this. He's trying to tell you that you can beat them at their own game.<br /><br />The protests will mean <strong >nothing</strong>, otherwise. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312979#Comment_312979</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312979#Comment_312979</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:52:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ For those taking part in the #Occupy protests or know people taking part in them, <a href="http://roguepriest.net/2011/10/17/winter-camping-for-occupy-protesters/" >here</a> is some practical advice for protesters camping outside during the winter. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312989#Comment_312989</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=312989#Comment_312989</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:24:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The approximate math for voter turnout in 2008 and 2010.<br /><br />2008 Obama beats McCain 70 million to 60 million<br /><br />2010: Republican votes in Congressional elections: 45 million, Democrats 35 million.<br /><br />(From memory - may be off a few million.) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313023#Comment_313023</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313023#Comment_313023</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:18:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Morac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I swung by OccupyVictoria a few days ago. They seem to be doing well, and the local police have made official statements to that effect. It was a nice counterpoint to all of the videos of craziness that have been popping up online. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313037#Comment_313037</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313037#Comment_313037</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:46:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>lampcommander</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ (inserts opinion)<br /><br />Voting isn't the only way to get your voice heard, even in America where we're not fighting oppressive regimes. One thing the Occupy movement has in common with protests in Egypt, Libya, etc., is harnessing the power of communications technology for organization and info dissemination. From what I can tell, the only reason the Occupy demonstrations haven't yet accomplished much is because they aren't focused enough yet in what kind of reform they want--they're expressing frustration at a great number of things, many of which are valid, but (imo) need to start talking about specific policies one by one to attack and reform. It's a good way to separate their goals and the broad, uncohesive grouping of ideological beliefs that is the Tea Party.<br /><br />(scurries away) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313039#Comment_313039</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313039#Comment_313039</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:12:36 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Obama being described as left wing amuses me greatly for some reason. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313123#Comment_313123</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313123#Comment_313123</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:35:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The British protest has now succeeded in closing something down.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-15406865" >St. Pauls cathedral.</a><br /><br />Somehow I suspect that wasn't their intention, and you can guarentee the press will love spinning this one in the morning papers. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313138#Comment_313138</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313138#Comment_313138</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:28:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Finagle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Interesting little story here...Nearly 40% of financial advisors SUPPORT the Occupy movement. <br /><br /><blockquote ><br />According to the results of an exclusive InvestmentNews online survey of 350 advisers, 58.2% said they disagree with the views expressed by the Occupy Wall Street protesters. Meanwhile, 38.8% of advisers said they agree with the views of the protesters and 3% said they were unfamiliar with Occupy Wall Street.<br /><br />The survey, conducted last week, also found that 46.3% of advisers support tax reform that ultimately would lead to higher taxes on the wealthy, while 43.6% are against it. Additionally, the survey revealed that 41.6% of advisers are in favor of tougher government regulation of banks and Wall Street firms and 45.9% are against it.<br /><br />Among respondents, 39% characterized themselves as Republicans, 37% as independents and 9.8% as Democrats.<br /><br />It would be very tough for a financial adviser or wealth manager to align with the OWS protesters on an issue like taxation. We see firsthand the sheer dollar amounts of taxes taken from our clients. Head over for the rest of what my colleagues in the business had to say</blockquote><br /><br />http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/The-Reformed-Broker/2011/1021/40-percent-of-financial-advisers-support-Occupy-Wall-Street ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313205#Comment_313205</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313205#Comment_313205</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:53:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ As predicted, there were a few lurid headlines about the closure of St. Pauls in the papers this morning. Seems the protestors have decided to find themselves another site elsewhere in the city. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313307#Comment_313307</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313307#Comment_313307</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:19:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Okay, there seems to be a bit of a thing going round to sneer at 'anti-capitalists' who wear V masks, which are 'made my Warner Brothers'.<br /><br />Warner Brothers gets approximately 17p or 30c from each one. So, you know, fuck that negligible noise. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313350#Comment_313350</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313350#Comment_313350</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:17:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KeeperofManyNames</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/occupy-wall-street-rally-in-tehran/2011/10/23/gIQAfjvZ9L_video.html" >I honestly have no idea what to make of this.</a> I checked around the web, and both blatantly pro-Israel papers AND blatantly pro-Iranian newspapers are saying basically the same thing: this rally was attended by a lot of people that really, legitimately seem to loath both America and Israel, and think that religious unity is the only path to true democracy. Huh.<br /><br />Does this reflect at all upon the actual Occupy Wall Street movement over here? I'm inclined to say no.<br /><br />Is it still weird, and a little unsettling? I think so.<br /><br />Is the rightwing media going to have a heyday with this one? <br /><br />Almost certainly. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313359#Comment_313359</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313359#Comment_313359</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:35:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ St. Pauls has asked the protestors to move on, as the loss in revenue from being closed is going to hurt them soon. The protestors so far are refusing to do so.<br /><br />How long before this becomes the main news story of their protest? Not much longer I suspect. If you're protesting the bankers, then blocking access to a cathedral just seems utterly counter-productive to me, regardless of the fact it's close to the stock exchange building. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313364#Comment_313364</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313364#Comment_313364</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 02:11:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIBkTW8kupI" >Money Lenders</a><br /><br />So Christ threw the money lenders out of the temple. and now a Christian is complaining his temple will close because because it cannot get money due to people,  most of whom are probably not Christian, protesting the money lenders outside his Temple. That is either damn prophetic or is there another word for it? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313374#Comment_313374</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313374#Comment_313374</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:20:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @keeperetc - Now compare the official response to this to the response usually met with any unsanctioned protest in Iran. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313379#Comment_313379</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313379#Comment_313379</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:18:42 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KeeperofManyNames</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Oddcult:<br /><br />It's pretty interesting, considering how happy the Iranian newspapers are about these criticisms of "the Zionist regime."<br /><br />But what I found most intriguing, <a href="http://tehrantimes.com/index.php/politics/3816-students-hold-demo-in-sympathy-with-wall-st-protests-" >from this article in the Tehran times</a>, was the last statement:<br /><br /><blockquote >Mahdi Firouzkouhi, also a participant at the demonstration, said the history of the U.S. is associated with the murder of thousands of people across the world, an indirect reference to the U.S. wars in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. <br /><br />Firouzkouhi added, “Today we are witnessing the collapse of dictators allied to the United States… and this country has not option other than acknowledging defeat in the face of people’s vigilance.”</blockquote><br /><br />The implication there, as far as I can tell, is that the Iranian protestors <em >do</em> view Occupy Wall Street as an extension of the protests in Egypt, Tunisia, &c., but only because they view those countries as being held by dictators propped up by the US. So, it makes sense for them to view Occupy Wall Street as fundamentally anti-American. It certainly does put a very different interpretive spin on the Arab Spring, and possibly one closer to reality than a lot of Western commentary. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313419#Comment_313419</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313419#Comment_313419</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:45:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Watching the livestream right now, there are people who flew in from Egypt to hang out at OWS, and they just gave them "a gift from Tahrir Square." (It was an Egyptian flag signed by various people).<br /><br />People who went through the Arab Spring support OWS. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313424#Comment_313424</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313424#Comment_313424</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:17:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Keeperofmanynames: At this point in time I don't think any protest in Tehran that goes out of its way to express anti-American sentiments should necessarily be taken seriously. I assume the majority of serious protesters in Iran are much more preoccupied with changing their own predicaments than lamenting the lack of a "religious democracy" in the US...<br /><br />If anything this just seems like a staged demonstration to try to divert the attention from their own internal problems. The Iranian authorites are scared to death that the Arab Spring protests will spread to Iran and turn against them, rekindling the passion of the anti-government demonstrations that were brutally suppressed there a while back. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313427#Comment_313427</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313427#Comment_313427</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:37:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The protest in Iran is probably are closer to the general view of most of the citizens than we can perceive through a western media lens, Iran is probably more scared of suffering the same fate as Libya, than having a popular revolt like occurred in Tunisia or Egypt.<br /><br />We have seen the ramping up of tensions on the country for years and the gradual dismantling of countries who could be allied with them. I doubt much of this is purely organic, there are forces at work, in a direction that doesn't bode well for Iran, and I'm sure they understand that. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313432#Comment_313432</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313432#Comment_313432</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:09:27 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ There's only about 30 people protesting in that video, and the Iranian authorities have always had a penchant for staging anti-Western demonstrations that the majority of the people there don't give a crap about...really, most Iranians don't care all that much about the US, they just want Ahmadinejad to go.<br /><br />Again, this protest seems like a farce. They claim solidarity with the OWS protests and simultaneously yell "down with America..." I bet it's just a nice little stunt organized by Khamenei or the Revoltuionary Guard to say "Fuck You" to the US. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313433#Comment_313433</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313433#Comment_313433</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:15:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KeeperofManyNames</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Verissimus and Doc Ocassi:<br /><br />See, that view of it as probably staged makes a lot of sense to me. That said, I'm not sure how to really tell. I'm honestly a little frustrated by how distant I am from the actual events over there, because I find it difficult to get a sense of the feeling on the ground. For all I know, the popular opinion of the other Arab Spring countries could very well be the ideas expressed in that article. I kind of doubt it, but I'm hesitant to assume anything about the beliefs of the revolutions, if only because I'm so far from the action and so embedded within the network of Western news sources and biases and so on.<br /><br />Still, yeah, upon reflection I can't help but agree that the protest seems more than a little fishy on a number of levels, especially considering the info Argos just posted. That doesn't seem like an attempt to get us to convert to Islam, somehow... <br /><br />I find it interesting, though, that even if it is a staged protest, it serves the jingoistic rhetoric against the Arab nations and the OWS protestors just as much as it serves the jingoistic rhetoric of the Iranian government. There's kind of a bizarrely hostile symbiosis there.<br /><br />With all of that said (and apologies for going off topic)... is there a good source of information for the sort of general zeitgeist of the Arab Spring? Like I said, it bothers me that I'm getting so much of my information from almost certainly biased Western sources, and I would love to say with authority that no, the Arab Spring doesn't want to start a new theocracy, and so on. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313435#Comment_313435</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313435#Comment_313435</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:44:21 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The Arab Spring is a very broad phenomenon, it's not guided by one predominant philosophy or denomination. It almost seems like a kind of open source protest where everyone who has some sort of axe to grind with their government can join in. Since it is such a wide coalition of diverse interests there are also a number of Islamic fundamentalists who are part of the Arab Spring and who probably do want to establish some sort of theocracy, but it seems they are a minority. Anyway, I think the wikipedia article gives a pretty good overview, and you can follow many links from the wiki page to articles that were written about the movement.<br /><br />Overall it seems to me that the Arab Spring protests aren't particularly fundamentalist Islamic or anti-Western. The Iranian authorities have tried to twist the narrative their way and emphasized the fundamentalist aspects of the movement, probably in order to try to gain influence. Iran had pretty bad relations with most other Middle Eastern nations before the protests began and they may see this as an opportunity to get more influence in countries like Egypt, or Bahrain which has a Shia majority but is led by an authoritarian Sunni government. Syria is an exception because Iran has good relations with Syria, and therefore Iran is actively supporting Assad's bloody crackdown. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313451#Comment_313451</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313451#Comment_313451</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:05:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ If people watch Press TV - the Iranian government's English-language mouthpiece - the government supports the Arab Spring pretty much everywhere except Syria - and are keen to paint it as an Islamist anti-western phenomenon.  <br /><br />Their coverage of Libya was  - odd. They supported the rebels but ran every story from the Gaddafi side about alleged civilian casualties from NATO air attacks as fact. The pro-western statements and demonstrations by the leaders of the NTC and their supporters just didn't get mentioned. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313463#Comment_313463</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313463#Comment_313463</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:34:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Finagle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/foreignc/2011/06/v-for-vendetta.html" >The Arab Spring / Tahrir Square occupation was in fact explicitly identified, in part, with Anonymous/V from Vendetta.</a><br /><br />So yes, there are in fact explicit political links to the open-source sort of coalition of Anonymous - Wikileaks - global anarchists movements of various stripes that go beyond just casual comparisons and Guy Fawkes masks. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313475#Comment_313475</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313475#Comment_313475</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 01:09:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8846402/Only-one-in-10-St-Pauls-protesters-stay-overnight.html" >Seems a lot of the UK protestors don't actually camp out overnight after all.</a><br /><br />This is pretty typical of how it's being reported here in the UK. Ignoring the actual thing they're protesting in favour of sniping and generally undermining it.<br /><br />I still think they need to shift from St. Pauls. It's in the way of the point they're actually trying to make now, and if they aren't gone by Remembrance Sunday they'll lose even more sympathy.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.express.co.uk/ourcomments/view/279460/Fold-up-your-tents-and-go" >I'm impressed that the Express manage to get in a Nanny State jibe as well. </a><br /><br />Loving this quote in the comments as well:<br /><br /><i >"Don't hate them. At least they are doing something. I thank them for representing me while I stay out of trouble, avoid the chance of arrest and look for a job."</i><br /><br />Ah, the British wit. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313484#Comment_313484</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313484#Comment_313484</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:02:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ So St Pauls  is prevented from making money? <br /><br />And here I was thinking the Church shouldn't be about making money. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313486#Comment_313486</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313486#Comment_313486</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:30:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It isn't about making money. It's about having the money to pay the cleaners, the bills, the ground rent. Costs about 20 grand a week to run the place apparently, and that mostly comes from donations from tourists, like most public attractions in London.<br /><br />Only in Utopia can a church be ran for free.<br /><br />It's more that this isn't even a protest *about* the church, yet the only people their protest is affecting is the people involved with the cathedral. Noone else in the city even notices they're there, cause you don't actually need to walk anywhere near the place to get to the LSE or any of the other financial buildings in the area. They're protesting in the wrong sodding place, and can't seem to see that it's a free pass for the press to mock them.<br /><br />Now it's out that hardly anyone is even staying there overnight, the council will no doubt say the empty tents are 'litter' and clear them out one night. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313497#Comment_313497</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313497#Comment_313497</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:48:36 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I don't know, I just think it's funny it has to be the Church that makes such a fuss about their business being disrupted.<br /><br />Seriously, the Church isn't rich enough to pay the rent for a few weeks when there are no incoming donations from visitors? That surprises me. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313502#Comment_313502</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313502#Comment_313502</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:33:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>roadscum</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I believe, though i cannot vouch for the truth of it, that St Pauls gets a significant chunk of its income from corporate donations made by City institutions. If true that would go some way to explaining their change of attitude toward the protesters.<br /><br />In general, i suspect that when it comes to governments, you get what you pay for. With all this civic unrest and financial turmoil going on, i wouldn't mind betting that the 'Western Democracies' are in for a bit of a paradigm shift in the visible government department. Anyone remember Anarcho-capitalism? Surely it would be much more efficient for the rich and powerful to run things directly through their respective corporate interests rather than having to manipulate events remotely through figurehead 'Democratic governments' as is now the case. Admittedly the general populous would no longer have the illusion of a representative government to keep them docile and relatively quiet, but, as the actions of the Police in recent UK riots showed to good effect, if you allow things to get bad enough, people will put up with the most authoritarian and draconian measures if only they calm things down and make the streets safe again for decent folk.<br /><br />Right, get yer teeth into that you lot, i'm off to polish me tinfoil hat... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313504#Comment_313504</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313504#Comment_313504</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:59:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Representative government is an illusion...nah. Democracy does work, government is representative, but even they have to admit that money is where the real power is. Money = Power. There is nothing that can change that, and what's more, there is nothing that<em > should</em> change that. You can really only change that by making money worthless, and that's the end of economy as we know it. We'd be back to forming gangs and marauding the streets. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313506#Comment_313506</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313506#Comment_313506</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:07:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>roadscum</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ We'd be back to forming gangs and marauding the streets.<br /><br />Or even worse, the horrors of Socialism. Heavens forfend! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313507#Comment_313507</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313507#Comment_313507</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:10:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Socialism runs on money. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313517#Comment_313517</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313517#Comment_313517</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:22:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ That's like saying that cars run on dinosaurs.  It's technically true, but it doesn't actually have any predictive power.  Not that I think you're trying to do anything other than sound worldly and pithy.<br /><br />Now, saying that making money worthless would end the economy as we know it is true, but that isn't the same as saying it will end the economy. Even a cursory examination of anthropology will show that Capitalist economies like ours are in the distinct minority over the history of civilization.  But again, you're not concerned with veracity.<br /><br />Thirdly, and because I feel like beating a dead horse, Socialism does not mean an end to a market, it means the those who produce the goods own the means of production and benefit from that profit and have voting rights within that economic unit.  A Credit Union is a socialist institution, as is a union.  A socialist institution relies on direct democracy and a plurality of voices.  A capitalist business, on the other hand, is a dictatorship. Your boss tells you what to do and you have no option but to do it or quit and starve. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313523#Comment_313523</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313523#Comment_313523</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:57:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Exactly...I'm in favor of socialism, as long as it's a social democracy.<br /><br />But even in a social democracy society is very dependent on where the money is coming from, in most socialist systems you'll still see companies that wield a lot of power and influence. Even in most systems that are communist that is still the case in a way, except all "business" and production is controlled by a small group of people in power.  <br /><br />Big companies are not the evil they're sometimes purported to be. They can be, but that's not always the case, not by a long shot. Free enterprise is the engine behind the world economy and it has brought the world a lot of good. You do need regulations, companies have to operate within a framework of regulations to prevent abuse. Also, in order to have a well functioning system you need social mobility; people have to be able to get the education and opportunities to get ahead in life, and that is often a problem. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313529#Comment_313529</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313529#Comment_313529</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:03:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Wot Jon Said. I don't think we have make this a choice between one ism and another, we need to decide what we want to be and work towards that, and I don't see why breaking the tie between wealth and power is something that can't happen. As I have said before I believe it must happen.<br /><br />Tenuously related to the occupy movement but it amused me.<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRmZ9zH-mYM" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313531#Comment_313531</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313531#Comment_313531</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:10:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Free enterprise has also brought a lot of misery and inequality to people.  Has it done more good than harm?  That's impossible to answer. What we can answer is that the post WWII economic bump is over, and our globalist Capitalism is finally showing its age. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313535#Comment_313535</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313535#Comment_313535</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:57:11 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I don't see why breaking the tie between wealth and power is something that can't happen.</blockquote><br /><br />In short: because money gets people off their asses. If you have a lot of money you can get people to do the things you want, by paying them living wages, and that is pretty much the definition of power. In that way money can be used to build infrastructure, buy fuel, fund armies, whatever it its that power entails. But you can also use it to grow food, build schools, hospitals etc. so that power can be a positive thing. <br /><br />Taking it to the extreme, if you really want to break the tie between wealth and power you have to get people to stop doing labor for money, and find a way to ensure people keep doing work, beign productive, for free. While I think it might be nice if that happens, I'm not sure if it's realistic. It would be an entirely selfless, altruistic society where people produce goods and deliver services for others without any other remuneration than the happy feelings it gives them.<br /><br /><br /><blockquote >Free enterprise has also brought a lot of misery and inequality to people. Has it done more good than harm? That's impossible to answer. What we can answer is that the post WWII economic bump is over, and our globalist Capitalism is finally showing its age.<br /></blockquote><br /><br />I'm certainly not a proponent of absolute free-market capitalism, there have to be checks and balances. The companies and the rich need to be taxed and the poor need to be supported so that they can afford healthcare and a suitable education that is commensurate to their capacities. I am not sure if education and healthcare should be free, but I'm not against it. A capitalist society where there can be no upward mobility, where the poor are doomed to stay poor forever, and the rich can just sit back and stay rich without using their money for the common good, is a terrible thing, and eventually you will probably end up at a point where people revolt anyway. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313543#Comment_313543</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313543#Comment_313543</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:01:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >A capitalist society where there can be no upward mobility, where the poor are doomed to stay poor forever, and the rich can just sit back and stay rich without using their money for the common good,</blockquote><br />Surely this would be the ultimate state of any capitalist society, If you take Marx's view of capitalism where the people sell their labour to a property owner you essentially become subservient to that owner. If you have some community decision making process where one person has disproportionate power over the rest, you will end up with inequality. The use of money to get people to do what you want, will end in the the use of money to make people do what money wants, It has been proven that in cognitive tasks giving financial rewards actually decreases performance, and giving people time to do what they want will increase performance.<br /><br />Money is just a means of exchange, you can still do work for money but that money must be distributed and controlled throughout society, not by a small number of organizations at the top, this is what I am referring to as the tie. I don't think we should get rid of all means of exchange, it is very useful, well, probably necessary, we just need to decide how this system has to be organised, and that is something we should be able to do while promoting equality and stability in society. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313548#Comment_313548</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313548#Comment_313548</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:10:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Money is one of those systems like the eye: it's evolved independently so many times that it's probably the most efficient way to transfer ownership amongst people.  The same with markets.  Anytime you get more than a couple hundred people together, a market forms.   However, an early Renaissance village market and Costco are about as different as you can get when you chart the flow of money. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313556#Comment_313556</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313556#Comment_313556</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:44:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RandomEntity</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuQIShEVNRE<br /><br />THIS is what people need to understand. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313559#Comment_313559</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313559#Comment_313559</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:51:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jamie Coville</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think a money free society could work, but it depends on society making/wanting it to work. I've done some thinking about it here and there and while I think I know how a society without money would work I'm not 100% sure human nature would let it work.<br /><br />The idea is pretty simple, everybody keeps doing what they're doing. They just stop the money game. Don't get paid, don't need to pay bills or for anything. Just take what you need/want for food & entertainment.<br /><br />Of course a lot of people will want to quit the job they hate. This would be a good thing for them as human beings, it sucks being in a job you hate and it's probably bad for your psychological and physical health. Society may not like it at first and will have to re-evaluate how much they really want things. People might like fast food enough to pay the cheap prices for it, but do they like it enough to get behind the counter and try and cook up the food to serve other people that want it? Suddenly what's important isn't decided by how much your willing to pay for it, but how many people are willing to devote how many hours to meet the demand. Or the desire of people with engineering skills to figure out a way to automate the creating/servicing of things to the point very little human interaction is needed to meet the demand. I think that will be quite eye opening and some folks will be pissed that things they were willing to pay for (but not get off their ass and do) will no longer be as easily available to them as it was before. Lots of whining on that end. <br /><br />Asshole bosses will suddenly find very few people willing to volunteer for them, which I wouldn't cry about. Without the need to make money (thus killing the Money is more important than everything else mindset) they might learn to not be assholes, but who knows. Case by case basis on that one. Financial sector would be wiped out though. Ability to get things started would likely depend on the charisma of the people trying to start them. Every new business would almost be election like in trying to convince people give you their time/work for a greater good. It be like Kickstarter but with volunteers. Gone will be the days where all you needed was enough money to pay people to get something going, personality be damned.<br /><br />The real human nature tricky part will be high demand goods. Suddenly a lot of people will want a new car and other luxury items. Waiting lists will have to be created and if your the one who's in charge of dispensing with the items all sorts temptations and problems will occur. People are going to want to be bumped up the list. Say they want a new computer and the guy in charge of that wants a new car, a back end tit for tat deal will likely occur. Some folks might offer sex, others violence, others sob stories, long time buddies in exchange for helping you with home renovations or crap volunteer work, all in an effort to get what they want and get it quicker. Suddenly there is a two tier system in place. Some might argue their status as a Doctor, Firefighter, Veteran, Famine relief worker, Toxic waste handler, etc.. means they shouldn't have to wait as long. <br /><br />To combat the stealing of these items there would have to be some very strong and extremely meticulous serial/bar-coding and tracking of everything, even more extreme than we have now and it would need to be transparent.I suspect there would be enough interest in people wanting this stuff to form and maintain watchdog groups to ensure dispersion is being handled fairly (at least until they get theirs, then new folks wanting their stuff will join to ensure they aren't waiting longer than they have to would join). We'd still have to watch out for black market unbar-coded goods from the manufacturing level. If there is a serious need to crack down on it regular scanning for stuff without proper coding would be everywhere to ensure the black market stuff would be useless. This w/could get very big brother-ish though. Even then somebody would try and figure out a way to copy/generate coding as to get by the system. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313560#Comment_313560</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313560#Comment_313560</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:52:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jamie Coville</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Labour shortage lists would be created by the government. We need coal miners, cotton pickers and other unpleasant jobs. Immigration could help with this, in return for immigrating to the country you agree to do one of these jobs for X amount of months (which is almost how it works now, except financial hardships and illegal entry keeps them at those jobs.) <br /><br />Crime for money would go away, but theft for things (like cars, Electronic goods) would likely be there and perhaps even rise. Home arrest/gps ankle monitoring would probably rise just due to the lack of volunteer prison guards. I could see some gangsters forcing people to get hooked on designer drugs and through addiction and threats to keep people working for them. Without the need for money, criminal organizations would radically change. They might even try creating their own currency and trying to force people to use it. Pray to god that people don't overlook psychological evaluations in face of lack of volunteers for security type jobs.<br /><br />And we'd have to change our education system so that the next generation just doesn't sit on it's ass and expect everything for free, thinking doing a blog with a movie review now and then is a real contribution to society. Sure intelligent, critical essays or reviews are worthwhile, but we wouldn't need 100,000 people doing that job. Hammer down too much on that point will cause a backlash though. A whole lot of starving artists won't be starving anymore. As a result there will likely be more art in the world and people choosing to be writers & artists (and probably a lot of it crap) but I'm not so sure that's a bad thing. It'll be like webcomics but with some bad artists never going away.<br /><br />And then there is international trade. Be great if the whole world agrees to a money free society all at once and operates its without corruption but that's just not likely. Most likely being 1 country doing it and bartering goods via trade negotiations (and getting the producers of those goods to comply with the amounts needed). Your Sugar for our Corn. And eh, I don't think we can give you computers because we've got huge waiting lists for our own people who want them, or do we need the sugar so bad we'll have to bite the bullet? <br /><br />International vacations is something else that would have to be worked out too otherwise people will only be able to go visit family/friends/volunteers wealthy enough to support them. One solution is people that want to visit here will have to pay the government for the privilege and that money gets put on to CC/Debit Cards distributed to our citizens wanting to travel (and that itself is whole 'nother can of worms). Unless agreements can be made to allow citizens to visit here freely in return for the government giving cards to our citizens in which that countries government pays for everything. I'm sure each gov't will have it's own restrictions on that too and may cut it off entirely in times of economic stress. Hopefully this will lesson overtime as more counties adopt a money free societies and allow unfettered traveling/vacationing between each countries citizens.<br /><br />In all it would take a whole lot of people deciding to do what's best for society as a whole vs. whats good for them. I think sheer selfishness/greed/stupidity and just society brainwashing against that ideal would make it extremely difficult.<br /> <br />It's possible, but it would most definitely not be a perfect world. We'd have to figure out if we want a world with those benefits and flaws vs the one we have now. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313580#Comment_313580</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313580#Comment_313580</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:24:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.ktvu.com/video/29587140/index.html" >Oakland police fire tear gas and, reportedly, flashbangs.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313582#Comment_313582</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313582#Comment_313582</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:43:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Vornaskotti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Alan Tyson:<br /><br />Oh, another video of government troops attacking the rebels in the Middle-Eas... wait, what?<br /><br />Edit: Looks like Oakland Mayor has a <a href="https://www.facebook.com/MayorJeanQuan" >Facebook profile</a> where she congratulates the police. The comments are still unmoderated. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313583#Comment_313583</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313583#Comment_313583</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:03:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ You make it sound like flashbangs are worse than tear gas.  If I were a protester, I would much rather the police were using flashbangs instead of tear gas...<br /><br />... then again, I guess the point would be that it would be better if the police were using neither, so I'll shut up now.  Video won't load where I'm at, so I'm spouting off without knowing what I'm talking about. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313586#Comment_313586</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313586#Comment_313586</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:06:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Every time I read about the police opening up with excessive force like this I can't help thinking 'Didn't you people learn anything from Spider Jerusalem?  Why don't you have people with cameras on the rooftops around where the protests are taking place?  Get some long lenses and high ISOs and document this shit from above the fray.'  And then part of me thinks that potential lens glint on a rooftop from a 500+mm lens is probably the last thing that you want when there are trigger happy cops gassing people in the streets. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313587#Comment_313587</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313587#Comment_313587</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:10:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @govspy: Yeah, I probably could have worded it better. I meant that the use of tear gas was confirmed, but we're not certain flashbangs were actually being thrown into the crowd, there are some people saying what they heard and saw were just the gas canisters exploding.<br /><br />Although it seems like (and, full disclosure, this is just speculation on my part - I don't know the exact protocol for the use of flashbangs in police work) if tear gas is used to disperse a crowd, flashbangs would only disorient and, temporarily, immobilize same crowd - people under the effects of a flashbang grenade don't tend to go anywhere for a while, as it's most people's instinct to go prone and cover themselves up when their senses are cut off, rather than run around blind and deaf. Flashbangs would only be useful if the police were going in for a mass arrest, which doesn't seem to have happened tonight. Now that I've cooled off a bit, that, combined with the gas canister theory, makes me doubt flashbangs were actually in use tonight.<br /><br />@David: Some people were doing just that, actually. There's a long, long list of OPD badge numbers floating around, and the Occupy Oakland Livestream has been running through the entire event (which is damn impressive, considering that the stream I was watching is being run off a laptop's built-in webcam). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313590#Comment_313590</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313590#Comment_313590</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:46:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Alan  Yeah, pretty much.  Flashbangs are a useful <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stun_grenade#Lethality_of_stun_grenades" >"non-lethal" </a>tool that cops use to disorient and distract mass targets.  For the most part, the negative affects of flashbangs are much less severe than those of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CS_gas#Toxicity" >tear gas</a>, but If I knew cops were using flashbangs, I'd be much more likely to stick around than if they were tossing tear gas.<br /><br />Wouldn't you know it? This conversation has reminded me of a <a href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10288&page=1#Comment_313592" >story</a>. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313605#Comment_313605</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313605#Comment_313605</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:33:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RandomEntity</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Unless you WANTED the people to go prone in the middle of a tear gas cloud. Which maybe it's just my general theory that way too many cops are high school bullies that never did anything with their lives so they became cops to get that same mightier than thou feeling, that brought me to that conclusion. I mean, if I WAS  a psychopath, that seems like a pretty good tactic. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313608#Comment_313608</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313608#Comment_313608</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:54:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @jamie coville:<br /><br />Thanks that was an interesting read...you put a lot of thought into that.<br /><br />I am not sure how the distribution of the necessities of life, like food first and foremost, would work in such a society. If it's free, then how do you avoid people from going to the shops and buying everything so that there's nothing left for anybody else?<br /><br />You'd probably need introduce rationing...would everybody be entitled to the same amount of stuff? <br /><br />Ideally I think money should work in such a way that people who contrubute most to the common good get the most money. The problem is that it just hasn't worked that way so far, people find ways to work around that so that they get an unfair share...nepotism, corruption, crime always creep into the system. People are greedy...or some of them, anwyay. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313621#Comment_313621</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313621#Comment_313621</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:03:50 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>rickiep00h</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Just saw this from Twitter: Officers throw a grenade into a group tending to a wounded protester.<br /><br />www.ktvu.com/video/29587714/index.html<br /><br />I have literally never been so angry as to be incapacitated. I don't even know what to say to something like this. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313628#Comment_313628</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313628#Comment_313628</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:52:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RandomEntity</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Verissimus <br />I'm a huge proponent of the Resource Based Economy. There would need to be a huge shift in our culture and way of thinking for it to work. I hate to use the word but, "re-education" is really the only way to explain it, and it would be more like true education about the world we live in. The facts are that NO ONE should be withheld food, clean water and a place to live. There's no reason why banks should demolish homes that are sitting on the market because no one can afford them when there are millions of homeless people. It doesn't make sense. We shouldn't be throwing away good food, when there are billions of hungry people in the world. In no way does that make sense.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUvCJA4dAWU" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313629#Comment_313629</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313629#Comment_313629</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:01:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>icelandbob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Some real good brain fuel/arguments on here. there's nothing much i can add to it all. <br /><br />Now for some slight light relief...<br /><br /><img src="http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/296636_813260213228_37701946_38255838_196439377_n.jpg" alt="" > ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313631#Comment_313631</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313631#Comment_313631</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:04:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>lampcommander</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @rickiep00h: mother FUCKER. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313632#Comment_313632</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313632#Comment_313632</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:05:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @rickiep00h: that's so fucked beyond belief.  Just tweeted and facebook posted that video.  people need to see that ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313640#Comment_313640</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313640#Comment_313640</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:25:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>roadscum</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @rickiep00h, Argos, Billy Bragg has that clip up on facebook, i was just coming over here to share it. At least it's being widely shown. Some people really do enjoy their jobs a bit too much. And i bet the bastard gets off scot free with it.<br /><br />(edited to fail miserably at embedding the vid clip), <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZLyUK0t0vQ" >here's a link instead.</a><br /><br />Ok, i don't know how that worked but it did. I'm off to sacrifice a beer in thanks to Ariana, goddess of the Whitechapel interwebs. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313643#Comment_313643</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313643#Comment_313643</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:52:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>andycon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Guy was an Iraq Vet that got hit with the tear gas can and is in serious/critical condition<br />http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/26/iraq-vet-oakland-police-tear-gas_n_1033159.html ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313646#Comment_313646</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313646#Comment_313646</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:07:50 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RandomEntity</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ RE: Cop throwing flashbang/tear gas grenade at people HELPING a wounded vet:<br />There aren't words for how that makes me feel. Who wants to bet NOTHING happens to that cop? I can't tell if that's a flash bang or a tear gas canister that goes off. Seems like a flash bang, either way, I just can't believe anyone would do that. I just..I don't even know. It makes me angry and sad and just goes to show the hell of a world we live in. I know it's not a "real" grenade and at least they were using rubber bullets. But what happens when an officer "forgets" to load the rubber ones instead of his usual ammo? Then what do we do? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313648#Comment_313648</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313648#Comment_313648</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:21:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>taphead</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ After a few minutes of quiet contemplation, I think I'll let Madeline Kahn describe how I feel.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Raf5JdFecPQ" ></a><br /><br />And now some more screaming at a wall for a few minutes. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313697#Comment_313697</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313697#Comment_313697</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:55:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The term 'rubber bullet' is a bit of a misnomer, they're really more the size of grenades, and they're fired from a hand held launcher not a pistol. And I'd hope the police don't have actual frag grenades to load into the launchers instead.<br /><br />Weapons like these are properly referred to as 'less lethal', because you can still quite easily kill someone by hitting them in the face with a kilogram chunk of plastic. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313701#Comment_313701</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313701#Comment_313701</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:05:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Let me start off by saying I'm not defending the actions of the above police officers.  I'm only trying to correct information about the intended use of non-lethals, or more appropriately, less-than-lethals..<br /><br />Rubber bullets aka baton rounds come in various sizes, either fired from a grenade launcher, or in rubber flechette rounds fired from a shotgun.  The grenade launcher type is the one I've dealt with the most, and you would use the same device to fire bean bag rounds (aka flexible baton rounds) as well.  Both are designed in several types depending on range.  Technically, the long range rounds are considered lethal if used for shorter range.  For example, the 100 yd round is considered a lethal round if used for distances under 50 yds.<br /><br />Police are not authorized to have fragmentation grenades.  Period.<br /><br />Yes, less-than-lethals have caused fatalities.  The term less than lethal, or non-lethal is applied in reference to how the device is intended to be used, under appropriate circumstances, before resorting to using lethal weapons.  The few fatalities resulting from less-than-lethals are far less than if less-than-lethals were not used at all.<br /><br />These officers are obviously acting outside their authority, and I personally feel ashamed for the law enforcement community that this behavior is being allowed to continue.  It seems as if the worst possible staff are working the protests across the country in some sort of misguided attempt to intimidate protesters and keep them off the streets.  There is really no defense against an enemy with the full force of the law behind them.  The best advice I can give would be to keep distance, document as much as possible, and when given orders by police, show reluctant compliance.  By that I mean, when given instructions or orders, you can refuse, but as officers increase aggressive actions, backing up or giving small amounts of ground may prove wise in the long run.  Having a picture of yourself face to face with a cop in riot gear might look great on your Facebook page; but you're still going to jail.  Granted, a lot of the things these protestors are fighting for may be considered worth it, but nine times out of ten, unless you have some spectacular evicence of police wrongdoing, when you go to court, the cops usually win.  I may sound cynical, but I call it realism.  It doesn't make it fair, but that doesn't make it any less true. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313703#Comment_313703</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313703#Comment_313703</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:33:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ...and then you have shit like this...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/25/border-agent-jaile-arrest-teen-drug-smuggler/" >U.S. border agent jailed for improper arrest of suspected drug smuggler</a><br /><blockquote >A U.S. Border Patrol agent has been sentenced to two years in prison for improperly lifting the arms of a 15-year-old drug smuggling suspect while handcuffed — in what the Justice Department called a deprivation of the teenager’s constitutional right to be free from the use of unreasonable force.<br /><br />The defense claimed that the smuggling suspect was handcuffed because he was uncooperative and resisted arrest, and that the agent had lifted his arms to force him to the ground — a near-universal police technique — while the other agents looked for the drugs.</blockquote>So you have an officer doing standard procedure to arrest an illegal immigrant bringing in illegal drugs, and you arrest the officer? And then Oakland police are acting insanely, apparently with their local government's blessing.  Fucking upside down. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313706#Comment_313706</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313706#Comment_313706</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:57:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Cameras are why we will win. Not guns. Cameras. The USA needs to include cameras in its second amendment as the best tool against tyranny and militias. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313718#Comment_313718</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313718#Comment_313718</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:34:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>bjacques</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Government Spy:<br /><br />I was curious about this and searched for details. Sweet Raptor Jesus the wingnuts are all over this! The story you link to is by Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Washington Times, and it has no links anywhere outside itself. The reporter seems to have a hardon for AG Holder and the "Fast and Furious" arms-to-Mexican-drug-gangs fiasco.<br /><br />Searching for "Jesus E. Diaz Jr." on Goggle I got 12 pages--and counting--of rightwing blogs and "news services" and a few spiderbot-driven news aggregators before giving up. The DOJ's national web page doesn't have anything except the Dept of Justice <a href="http://www.justice.gov/usao/txw/press_releases/2009/Diaz_ind_DR.pdf" >announcing the original indictment in *2009*</a>.<br /><br />The story could be true as written, but so far it looks like outrage bait or medication for rightwingers whose blood pressure is too low. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313736#Comment_313736</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313736#Comment_313736</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:17:11 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ At work, in the DOJ BOP intranet, we have this daily info dump called news clips that collects prison and related law enforcemt news from all over the country. That's where I was originally made aware of the news article. Ugh. I'd hate to think I'm perpetuating wingnut conspiracy bs. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313758#Comment_313758</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313758#Comment_313758</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:18:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.baycitizen.org/occupy-movement/story/quan-shunned-reverses-occupy-ban/" >Oakland's Mayor Reverses Stance on Occupation</a>.<br /><br />At least for now. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313760#Comment_313760</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313760#Comment_313760</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:37:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Now that you're all terrified that the police will at a moment's notice come to brutalize you in your sleep and throw tear gas at your children, come back and protest! Your rights haven't been marginalized and trampled, your human moral standing has been degraded, and your livelihood hasn't been threatened by the government that's supposed to be your advocate <em >against the people that you are protesting</em>. NO BIG DEAL. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313765#Comment_313765</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313765#Comment_313765</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:18:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jamie Coville</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/owss-beef-wall-street-isnt-winning-its-cheating-20111025" >Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone on OWS protests</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313772#Comment_313772</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313772#Comment_313772</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:45:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This, by <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2011/10/how_ows_confuses_and_ignores_fox_news_and_the_pundit_class_.html" >Dalia Lithwick,</a> <i >utterly nails it</i>:<br /><blockquote >For the past several years, while the mainstream media was dutifully reporting on all things Kardashian or (more recently) a wholly manufactured debt-ceiling crisis, ordinary people were losing their health care, their homes, their jobs, and their savings. Those people have taken that narrative to Facebook and Twitter—just as citizens took to those alternative forms of media throughout the Middle East as part of the Arab Spring. And just to be clear: They aren’t holding up signs that say “I want Bill O’Reilly’s stuff.” They aren’t holding up signs that say “I am animated by toxic levels of envy and entitlement.” They are holding up signs that are perfectly and intrinsically clear: They want accountability for the banks that took their money, they want to end corporate control of government. They want their jobs back. They would like to feed their children. They want—wait, no, we want—to be heard by a media that has devoted four mind-numbing years to channeling and interpreting every word uttered by a member of the Palin family while ignoring the voices of everyone else.</blockquote><br /><strong ><em >DING DING DING!</em></strong> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313798#Comment_313798</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313798#Comment_313798</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:33:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Alan Tyson:  The scariest things about that article are the police quotes that are all 'We had to do SOMETHING.  They weren't taking us SERIOUSLY!' ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313803#Comment_313803</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313803#Comment_313803</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:58:40 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm still uncertain when, how, and even if, Occupy Oakland turned violent. The cops and mayor keep talking like they were forming a militia, but I haven't seen anything that says they were even moving from their encampment until the police forced them to move. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313804#Comment_313804</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313804#Comment_313804</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:20:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Unfortunately the Bay Area PD's are fairly well known for disproportionate response.  It seems entirely likely that it was a case of them ordering the Occupiers to clear out in an hour, and then started dropping tear gas as soon as the hour was up.  And that's kind of the impression I got from the quotes in the article. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313825#Comment_313825</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313825#Comment_313825</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:48:27 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RandomEntity</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Here's the full video of Scott Olsen being hit. It shows him before, just standing there calmly at attention. People seemed pretty peaceful, and I'm impressed someone had the balls to throw one of the tear gas canisters back. <br />http://vimeo.com/31187119 ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313836#Comment_313836</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313836#Comment_313836</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:16:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>rickiep00h</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ RandomEntity: Throwing the tear gas can back is actually the best plan from a damage standpoint. Sure, you're personally gonna get fucked up, but you'll be lessening the propagation in the rest of the crowd, and the cops are already equipped to handle gas (usually). While it's probably going to be construed as an act of violence itself, and grounds for escalation on the scene, things are already fucked if they're shooting tear gas at you. You could theoretically claim self-defense if they even catch you for it. (I AM NOT A LAWYER.)<br /><br />It's a pretty common thing in "protest handbooks".<br /><br />edit: @AlanTyson - The current boilerplate answer is that the occupation was having issues with sanitation and assault and were not allowing emergency personnel into the group. How true that is is up for debate, but that's the answer they're going with right now. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313838#Comment_313838</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313838#Comment_313838</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:37:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ... so lend them some freakin' port-o-johns. If the standard response to a dirty bathroom is tear gas, then two of my roommates from college should STILL be having asthma attacks. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313883#Comment_313883</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313883#Comment_313883</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:07:11 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ As long as there is no bathroom-related mustard gas, I'm fine with it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313895#Comment_313895</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313895#Comment_313895</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:07:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Vornaskotti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/owss-beef-wall-street-isnt-winning-its-cheating-20111025" >Wall Street Isn't Winning – It's Cheating<br /></a><br /><em >"When you take into consideration all the theft and fraud and market manipulation and other evil shit Wall Street bankers have been guilty of in the last ten-fifteen years, you have to have balls like church bells to trot out a propaganda line that says the protesters are just jealous of their hard-earned money."</em> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313898#Comment_313898</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313898#Comment_313898</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 06:17:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>roadscum</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Hard earned money? Hmmm, exactly where does this money come from? Eh? You know, ultimately come from? <br /><br />A while ago now, there were these people out in Greece called Spartans. They made slaves out of the people they conquered and treated them horribly. It took, if I remember correctly, the labours of some 200 Helots (slaves) to support one Spartan.<br /><br />How many of us does it take to support one banker? One company director? One billionaire? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313971#Comment_313971</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=313971#Comment_313971</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 06:16:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>icelandbob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Reykjavik is holding a downtown<a href="http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=268930823152062" > "Occupy" protest tonight</a>. It will be the second one they've held. If it goes well, they expect about 1000-1500 people.... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314004#Comment_314004</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314004#Comment_314004</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:32:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNif3r8sOO4" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314059#Comment_314059</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314059#Comment_314059</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:05:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-15524483" >The London protestors have been told they can stay</a>, but they have to get rid of all the tents and equipment as it falls foul of laws to do with 'use of the highway'. I suspect the reason it's taken this long to serve is because they've had to spend a while digging through the ancient lawbooks to find something they can use that doesn't require any change to the law. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314101#Comment_314101</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314101#Comment_314101</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:43:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ScottBieser</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I thought Iceland had pretty much kicked out the foreign bankers and let their own banks fail. And now their economy (or so I've heard) is starting to recover. What is Occupy Reykjavik protesting? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314104#Comment_314104</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314104#Comment_314104</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:53:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ A more accurate statement of the situation Scott would be that Iceland has decided to fuck over millions of British and Irish citizens who had money on deposit with Icelandic banks. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314144#Comment_314144</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314144#Comment_314144</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 02:25:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Some of the London protestors have decided to cross Millennium bridge and set up a new camp outside the Tate Modern.<br /><br />Which isn't even IN the City of London. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314169#Comment_314169</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314169#Comment_314169</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:40:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/31/us/tennessee-occupy-protests/index.html?hpt=ju_c2" >Judge tells TN to stop arresting protesters.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314191#Comment_314191</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314191#Comment_314191</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:52:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150363929990017" >A nice summation of things so far from a member of Occupy San Diego.</a><br /><br />Not sure how linking to Facebook notes works on here, so let me know if the link is broken. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314209#Comment_314209</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314209#Comment_314209</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:34:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>icelandbob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @scottbieser<br /><br />that is only partially true. We didn't kick out any foreign bankers. all of the bad boys were homegrown. Alas a lot of foreign based madia have portrayed Iceland as this wonderful utopia that has done everything right. alas it's done nothing of the sort.<br /><br />Here are two articles to read - <a href="http://www.grapevine.is/Author/ReadArticle/A-Deconstruction-of-Icelands-Ongoing-Revolution" > A Deconstruction of “Iceland's On-going Revolution"</a> which takes to task the portrayal of Iceland in the foreign media.<br /><br />The other one -<a href="http://uti.is/2011/04/icelands-way-the-right-way/" > Iceland’s way – the right way or no way?</a> I very much recommend this site (by the UK correspondent to the State Broadcaster and one of the few people who knows what she is talking about) for a lot of background info on what happened in Iceland.<br /><br />TL:DR  - Icelandic bankers and politicians practically drove the country into the ground with reckless decision making, cronyism, and criminal banking and lending practices. And NONE of them have faced a day in court, while the nation has had to should a lot of the debt and hassle. In fact, some of them are thriving! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314237#Comment_314237</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314237#Comment_314237</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 23:49:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>roadscum</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ My earlier cynicism about St Paul's <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15550015" >may have been undeserved.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314388#Comment_314388</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314388#Comment_314388</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:57:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ScottBieser</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @icelandbob<br /><br />Thanks for the clarification. Quite a different situation than most people here think has been going on. States should never assume private debts, it creates a "moral hazard" among bankers, thinking that they can assume as many risks in pursuit of higher profits as they like, for if things go tits-up then their friends in the government will save their sorry asses.<br /><br />Someone recently pointed out to me that in 18th-Century England, if a bank failed, not only did it not get bailed out, but the bank's owners could go to debtor's prison. That didn't eliminate skulduggery but it did put a damper on risk-taking. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314452#Comment_314452</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314452#Comment_314452</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:13:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>lampcommander</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Let's stir this pot a little.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/the_great_corporate_tax_scam/" >America’s corporate tax obscenity</a> on Salon.com:<br /><br /><blockquote >Altogether, according to “Corporate Taxpayers & Corporate Tax Dodgers 2008-10,” a blockbuster new report  put together by the Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy that will have you reaching for your hypertension medicine before you finish reading the third page, 37 of the United States’ biggest corporations paid zero taxes in 2010. The list is a blue-chip roll-call.</blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314454#Comment_314454</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314454#Comment_314454</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:59:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @lampcommander: But, but, but, they're JOB CREATORS and if we don't do everything to make them happy they won't give us jobs and maybe they'll come home smelling funny and get angry and start hitting mommy again and coming into our rooms at night so STOP ATTACKING THE CORPORATIONS! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314462#Comment_314462</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314462#Comment_314462</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:07:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I remember on one news bulletin around 2008, when someone what preaching how stable and secure the current financial institutions were, one response was, to paraphrase:<br /><blockquote >Well, If you are so sure, then become unlimited liability.</blockquote>Why not call for that! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314463#Comment_314463</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314463#Comment_314463</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:11:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clVseL4nm9U&feature=share" ></a><br /><br />Oakland Protestors trying to work against black bloc agitators. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314478#Comment_314478</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314478#Comment_314478</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:46:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>voyou</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @RenThing - this isn't protestors vs. non-protestors, though - it's a disagreement about tactics between two groups of protestors. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314479#Comment_314479</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314479#Comment_314479</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:58:21 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Ah, anarchists.  Fucking it up for the left since 1854. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314480#Comment_314480</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314480#Comment_314480</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:00:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Voyou<br /><br />I never said that it was. However, I do think that while there might be a place for black bloc's tactics, it's not making the Occupy Movement's message A) any clearer and B) doesn't really do anything to change anyone's minds, ESPECIALLY people from the Bay Area. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314484#Comment_314484</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314484#Comment_314484</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:18:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Peter Kelly</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ okay, I'm really just starting to get read up on the whole movement. I'm sitting in a hotel room after having a couple of beers (Vanilla Porter, thank you Alan for introducing that wonderful beverage to me), so please excuse me if this is a completely ignorant comment.<br /><br />Seems to me, the movement as a whole just wants everyone, people and corporations, treated the same. And the overall arguement is that the 1% must be held to the same standard as the 99%. Which seems shockingly reasonable.<br /><br />But What if it was turned around? I know the line is "Where's My bailout?" but has anyone actually explored that option. What would it take for an individual to be treated like a corporation? (Obviously that won't happen, cause then the system falls apart....but it is kinda doing that already)<br /><br />Has anyone seriously explored that option? Cause I'm thinking even just the attempt to do so would worth it. It would pove the movement's point that the treatment is unfair (and potentially be a good subject for a documentary) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314505#Comment_314505</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314505#Comment_314505</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:28:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/01/occupy-oakland-police-scott-olsen?newsfeed=true" >Looks like OPD is going to get investigated over Scott Olesen's injury.</a><br /><br />Likelihood of anything changing? Zilch. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314509#Comment_314509</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314509#Comment_314509</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:52:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Peter: Well, if the point of the bailouts was to keep the financial system from unraveling because too many of the underlying assets of a rat's nest of insanely leveraged financial instruments had gone bust . . . you could conceivably had paid off the underlying assets -- mortgages -- rather than the insanely overpriced instruments.<br /><br />It might have cost less, kept home values from collapsing, and kept millions of people in their homes.<br /><br />But, you know, paying off the mortgages of poor blacks and hispanics would just encourage them to make bad financial choices in the future. Unlike investment bankers, who after getting bailed swore off basing their businesses on over-leveraged complex financial instruments and promised not to take huge bonuses out of respect for all of the people hurt by their past misdeeds. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314511#Comment_314511</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314511#Comment_314511</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:02:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>andycon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ how much of your tongue is left after typing that post up? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314514#Comment_314514</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314514#Comment_314514</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:17:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Peter: First off, not a problem sir. If you come to the next meet, I'll see about getting you some more of Breckenridge's Finest.<br /><br />Bailouts in general do tend to encourage bad behavior. It's like a dog stealing food off the table and not only not getting punished for it, but being given a treat soon afterwards. I know that people's livelihoods and jobs stood in the balance with the bailouts, and I think that's what pushed a lot of people in government to go through with it, but it did send the message that no matter how badly you screw up, it's fine because you never really have to assume the risk. It's bad enough when corporations do it - if ordinary citizens were treated the same way, not only would governments go bankrupt trying to bail them out, but it wouldn't fix the underlying problem that the people who "need" the bailout are suffering from. That, and only that, is what's going to fix the financial crises.<br /><br />I really don't think corporations should be treated as legal persons anymore. That seems to be the root cause of almost all of the financial and legal problems that have sprung up from this. Corporations are, in a sense, a form of self-given bailout - the people who make up a corporation assume all the risk together, and in a way, that means that none of them have to assume any risk at all, it's assumed by this non-entity called the corporation. If every citizen were treated equally, with no legal umbrellas like corporations to hide under, I think we'd have a better country, and better businesses, as well!<br /><br />@andycon: I don't entirely agree with Stefan's post or the way he wrote it either, but let's keep our comments civil, please? The protesters aren't sniping at each other, the least we can do is emulate that. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314519#Comment_314519</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314519#Comment_314519</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:54:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Alan<br /><br />And Whitechapel is better than that regardless. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314520#Comment_314520</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314520#Comment_314520</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:50:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Cunningham</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I sense broken sarcasm detectors.  I'm not 100% positive, but I think Andy was just impressed by how far into his cheek Stefan's tongue had to go to type that up. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314523#Comment_314523</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314523#Comment_314523</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:32:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ...<br /><br />*goes back, re-reads Stefan's post. Re-reads it again. Once more.*<br /><br />Ah. Ah-huh. That... makes a bit more sense. Look, I've been drinking tonight, okay?<br /><br />Sorry to jump on you there, Andy! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314524#Comment_314524</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314524#Comment_314524</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:44:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ZJVavrek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I thought it was more about biting one's tongue.  Maybe a combination of both? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314532#Comment_314532</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314532#Comment_314532</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 06:53:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>andycon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yeah I thought Stefan was being sarcastic with <em >"Unlike investment bankers, who after getting bailed swore off basing their businesses on over-leveraged complex financial instruments and <strong >promised not to take huge bonuses out of respect for all of the people hurt by their past misdeeds.</strong>"</em><br /><br />Thanks James! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314546#Comment_314546</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314546#Comment_314546</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:36:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I was indeed being sarcastic. The alpha-male investment bankers are utterly shameless. We saved their heads from being stuck on pikes, and they continue business as usual.<br /><br />The people who bought too-large houses, or houses at all, most of them were at worst <em >saps</em>. But the idiot consensus blames them more than the confidence men who <em >sold</em> them the mortgages, took their commissions, and passed the risk up to the next group of confidence men. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314813#Comment_314813</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314813#Comment_314813</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 12:01:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0pX9LeE-g8" >Camera man, apparently doing nothing but filming, shot by a rubber bullet</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314826#Comment_314826</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314826#Comment_314826</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:52:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>nelzbub</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I read this, posted to me by a friend who's been involved in the occupy Oakland movement :<br /><a href="http://www.anarchistnews.org/node/16910" >thoughts on the Black Block</a><br />and I was put in mind of old scottish punks Oi Polloi (who brought us anti fascist classics like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHHozDlSJEw" >"let the boots do the talking"</a>) who often would say, regarding direct action "we are peaceful people, not pacifists" and seeing footage like this gets me in the mood to put on the balaclava and start waving the black and red flag again.<br /><img src="http://a4.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/134/1a7a00bbd80f4a4e9c9efc57c50042d5/l.jpg" alt="" > ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314827#Comment_314827</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314827#Comment_314827</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:52:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>William Joseph Dunn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I wondering how much longer this can go on before people start firing back. I'm not saying I condone that, but if you smack a dog with a rolled up newspaper every time you see him, eventually he'll bite you back. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314863#Comment_314863</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314863#Comment_314863</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:49:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm wondering that too.  This is how riots start.  <br /><br />I'm designing a cheap plastic shield that can double as a backpack frame.  It's not enough to stop a bullet, but it'll stop a rubber bullet or a truncheon.  The shield is the best defensive tool ever developed.  Forty guys with shields could hold a street against riot cops, provided the gas doesn't get them. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314865#Comment_314865</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314865#Comment_314865</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:30:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>lampcommander</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <img src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_hVOW2U7K4-M/SZUkDEk1itI/AAAAAAAA55Q/dtWOdoHGikM/sdfgdsfgsdfgsdfg.jpg" alt="" ><br />PREPARE. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314867#Comment_314867</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314867#Comment_314867</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:44:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Jamie Coville</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ That's exactly what the police want or at least the people giving them orders and undoubtedly some of the police. If the protestors get violent, the media story is shifted away on what & why they are protesting and instead on how the protesters were violent. It also works to discredit them.<br /><br />In the past the police have even as gone as far to go undercover into the protests and start the violence themselves by throwing stuff at the police, etc.., giving them the excuse they needed to march in and shut down the protest and blame it on the protesters for being violent. I suspect the organizations involved in all this have cotton on to that and now that there are cameras everywhere, including on masked people within who might be agitators (and possible undercover police). They are trying to find alternative ways to shut this down and well, if the protesters don't get violent, then they have a hard time justifying shutting it down. It's interesting to see the ways they are doing it. Some are using the homeless, directing them to go into the protest area knowing some have mental problems and drug addictions and hoping for something to happen that will justify shutting it down (in Vancouver it did, one OD'd and they are using that as the reason to shut down the protest, calling it 'dangerous'). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314870#Comment_314870</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314870#Comment_314870</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:52:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The California police force has a long, storied history of pushing people to the edge until a riot starts.  Oakland has shown considerable restraint, and I for one support the non-violence they've shown.  For the record, though, I don't count vandalism as violence.  That smacks of privileged nonsense.  However, breaking windows isn't terribly effective, and is a waste of effort.   Still, the police have the funds and ability to keep applying pressure, and eventually, more people are going to get hurt.  Then no one will be held accountable, and the kettle will boil over.<br /><br />I think a direct confrontation with fascist elements can diffuse that situation, a sort of safety valve for feelings of powerlessness. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314930#Comment_314930</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314930#Comment_314930</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:37:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Jon Wake If sending a non-violent veteran to the hospital with a skull fracture and slinging flash-bang grenades against unarmed protesters counts as restraint in the Oakland PD's eyes, do I really want to know what they'll do when they decide to get nasty? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314933#Comment_314933</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314933#Comment_314933</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:07:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ETA: Reading comprehension fail, thanks for the correction. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314934#Comment_314934</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=314934#Comment_314934</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:09:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>andycon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think he means the Oakland protesters have shown restraint in light of all the shit that the cops are doing to them. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315001#Comment_315001</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315001#Comment_315001</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 01:10:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-15646709" >Students protesting in London today</a> will complicate the whole thing, because the same protests last year attracting a significant group who were out to smash things. The police are lining up the baton rounds, and might well find a good excuse to shift the Occupy protestors along with any violent student protest that is going off.<br /><br />I hope it all goes off peacefully, but I suspect it's not going to. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315009#Comment_315009</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315009#Comment_315009</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:44:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>DC</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Meanwhile in New Zealand:~<br /><a href="http://www.3news.co.nz/Police-refuse-to-evict-Octagon-occupiers/tabid/423/articleID/232209/Default.aspx#ixzz1dDQSJ74O" >Police are refusing to evict protesters from Dunedin’s Octagon, despite claims from the City Council that the campers are there illegally.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315010#Comment_315010</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315010#Comment_315010</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:08:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ From the BBC: <br /><br />"Some protesters have left the march to set up tents in Trafalgar Square"<br /><br />Ooh, poor choice there fellas. Trafalgar is a drunk yobbo magnet on a Friday night. Rather them than me etc... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315060#Comment_315060</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315060#Comment_315060</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:07:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ A friend of mine who is part of Occupy San Diego is looking for submissions for his new site :<a href="http://soldiersforthecause.org/" >http://soldiersforthecause.org/</a><br /><br />As he put it to me: <blockquote >Do you know any military/veterans/police in Europe that would be willing to write an article on their view of the Occupy Movement? About 5 days ago one of my friends from the Navy contacted me because he started a blog with articles written by military pertaining to the movement. I bought a domain name yesterday, set the site up, and within 12 hours we had more than 2,500 hits and 2,100 unique visitors</blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315162#Comment_315162</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315162#Comment_315162</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:29:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/special/2011/11/10/366398/oakland-cop-supports-movement/" >Oakland PD outed as plain clothes undercover agent at OccupyOakland comes out in favor of movement, denounces police brutality.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315282#Comment_315282</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315282#Comment_315282</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:30:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>BOODOFFSTAGE</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ You know what I've been waiting for since this whole mess began? Peopl offering solutions, not political sound bytes, not empty rhetoric, or party aligned talking points, not accusations, or finger pointing,  not cynicism and whining,  but SOLUTIONS. Practical application of reason and knowledge to solve complex problems. LEADERSHIP!! NOT POLITICIANS OR OPPORTUNISTS!!<br /><br />All this god damm time and, everybody, including the republicans, agree that we have problems to solve, but no one is offering any solutions! It's maddening! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315335#Comment_315335</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315335#Comment_315335</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 07:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @BOODOFFSTAGE<br /><ol ><br /><strong ><li >Take you money out of the banks and put it into locally based credit unions, or under your bed.</li><li >Divest yourself of debt.</li></strong><br />These are not direct solutions but while the banks still have your money they will not give one shit about what you do on the street.<br /><br /><strong ><li >Share what knowledge you have about the problems we are facing, the ones you allude to above, the more people that know the better. </li><li >from these faults, derive solutions and try and get people to help you work them into existence, or actually find someone with a solutions that you would like to forward and work towards that.</li></strong><br />Different parts of the world will have to be dealt with using local solutions, there is no one size fits all, and the solutions will have to be generated where they are applied.<br /><br /><strong ><li >Forget political parties, they need to die.</li><li >Demand of politicians that they break up large banks, strip them of their limited liability and distribute personal savings to locally owned and managed houses.</li><li >Reform the monetary system so the generation of money is government run, not debt based and accountable to the population.</li></strong></ol><br />These may seem pie in the sky, and you may be right but if we want to change things why aim for half measures. These are things IMHO we need to do.<br /><br />As an example, this is what I do:<br /><ul ><li >I save all my money in workable assets, Credit unions, and cash, limiting my exposure to, and endorsement of, the global financial system.</li><li >I am involved in the transition movement where I live developing networks and knowledge to cope with peak energy and financial collapse.</li><li >I am also involved in building communication networks outside and opposing hierarchical control.</li></ul><br />To finalize, no-one will tell you the solution to these problems, because thinking that someone else can solve these problems and we don't need to worry about it, is what got us here in the first place. There are plenty of solutions out there, It may be worth reading <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/One-No-Many-Yeses-Resistance/dp/0743220277" >One No, Many Yeses: A Journey to the Heart of the Global Resistance Movement  - Paul Kingsnorth</a> Written in 2003, the last chapter is a stunning prediction of the occupy movement, or maybe the occupy movement is just the 1st world media wing of the global resistance movement. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315336#Comment_315336</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315336#Comment_315336</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 08:11:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Vornaskotti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Uhh... if he really is serious with this shit, from this moment on Frank Miller can go choke on a donkey dick for all I care.<br /><br />Well, it's not like he's done anything particularly good in a long time, so boycotting him is going to be easy...<br /><br /><a href="http://frankmillerink.com/2011/11/anarchy" >http://frankmillerink.com/2011/11/anarchy</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315341#Comment_315341</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315341#Comment_315341</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:04:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Fishelle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Occupy SLC is <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/52896438-78/occupy-park-protesters-pioneer.html.csp" >being shut down</a>, as a homeless man has died there. About half the protesters in Salt Lake are homeless. This doesn't surprise me, considering where the occupation has been happening. Pioneer Park is known as the place that homeless people tend to stay, and was some time before the Occupy movement started. I'm sure a quite few people die from issues relating to homelessness there each year. It was only a matter of time before one of those people was in a tent as part of this movement. I can't help but think going back to the way things were for these people is just going to make things worse for them, that shutting down the protest will just make it so they have to get rid of the tents that were keeping them from freezing, and there will be more people that die that won't cause any media noise at all. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315350#Comment_315350</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315350#Comment_315350</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:56:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>andycon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Miller just made a spike in the economy, good job! Got me some comics and movie to sell off tomorrow! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315352#Comment_315352</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315352#Comment_315352</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 12:02:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ What the HELL does Miller know about Al-Qaeda? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315357#Comment_315357</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315357#Comment_315357</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:16:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>William Joseph Dunn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >What the HELL does Miller know about Al-Qaeda?</em><br /><br />Probably as much as he knows about serving in the military and "fighting the enemy". ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315358#Comment_315358</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315358#Comment_315358</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:20:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Frank Miller's so cute when he's cranky. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315361#Comment_315361</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315361#Comment_315361</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:43:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The biggest surprise about Frank Miller weighing in on Occupy is that people are surprised that this is how he feels about it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315366#Comment_315366</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315366#Comment_315366</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:08:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Wood</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >What the HELL does Miller know about Al-Qaeda? </em><br /><br />Come on, haven't you read <em >Holy Terror</em> ?<br /><br />Frank Miller knows that Al Qaeda is a vast army of super-warriors with an immense subterranean headquarter under a major american city, and access to nuclear weaponry.<br /><br />As you can see, he's made some research on the subject. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315367#Comment_315367</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315367#Comment_315367</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:16:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>William Joseph Dunn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Do you think when he is alone and hears a bump in the night, he screams out "Al Qaeda!!!" and buries himself deeper under his blankets? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315369#Comment_315369</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315369#Comment_315369</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:33:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I was not ten feet from the man when he said to a room of a couple thousand that "Arabs" are "Barbaric" and could never have invented the microphone (the most evident object of technology in his vicinity). Apart from the deep stupidity it took to not realize that we wouldn't have a microphone had they not invented <em >math</em>, he came off to me as racist and self-centered. It's not surprising he's made an economic and social issue into his own racist political focus.<br /><br />For the record, there is quite the amazing flamewar in the comments section, featuring someone claiming to be an actual veteran being railed into by people that otherwise claim to honor the military. Maybe Miller is just the most subversive troll in the history of trolls. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315371#Comment_315371</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315371#Comment_315371</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:52:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>William Joseph Dunn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Frank Miller: the Mel Gibson of the comic book industry. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315372#Comment_315372</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315372#Comment_315372</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:05:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Morac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Frank Miller is one of those people I have ceased to be surprised at outbursts of crazy. I suppose it's a necessary precursor for the stuff he writes. Thankfully, liking a writer's work does not have to go with agreeing with (or even paying attention to) their politics. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315376#Comment_315376</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315376#Comment_315376</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:04:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Wood</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Except in the cases where said author puts his deranged and hateful politics all over his books. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315377#Comment_315377</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315377#Comment_315377</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:08:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Morac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Another thing I like to remember: just because I liked one thing a person created does not mean I have to like everything they have created. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315394#Comment_315394</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315394#Comment_315394</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:40:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Vornaskotti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well, I don't know - for me finding out an artist is a total douchebag often kills my appreciation for the stuff they do, and I certainly don't want to reward problem behavior by helping to fund it. (See Orson Scott Card). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315395#Comment_315395</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315395#Comment_315395</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:07:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Nygaard</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I liked 300 for the excellent way it portrayed a kind of summary of the pack of idiotic memes which started with the Greek's propaganda on the persian wars, and has run a stinking brown line trough european history ever since. Didn't occur to me that the writer had actually absorbed them all, hook line and sinker. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315397#Comment_315397</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315397#Comment_315397</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 04:39:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Vornaskotti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Hmm...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlzvtprnZiQ" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315410#Comment_315410</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315410#Comment_315410</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 08:36:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ Vornaskotti - Good rant. Not sure burning books is really the answer tho... :p ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315415#Comment_315415</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315415#Comment_315415</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:10:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>James Cunningham</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It sent a message.  My copy is still safe on my shelf, and nobody is telling me I shouldn't keep it.  All is good. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315425#Comment_315425</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315425#Comment_315425</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:02:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ David Brin opens actual history book to whack Miller's "300", defend OWS:<br /><br />http://davidbrin.blogspot.com/2011/11/move-over-frank-miller-or-why-occupy.html ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315426#Comment_315426</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315426#Comment_315426</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:20:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>James Cunningham</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://davidbrin.blogspot.com/2011/11/move-over-frank-miller-or-why-occupy.html" >http://davidbrin.blogspot.com/2011/11/move-over-frank-miller-or-why-occupy.html </a><br /><br />Why do people hate the Link button? :(<br /><br />-edit-  Also, fun read.  While I knew 300 was romanticized but entertaining bullshit, I hadn't yet read up on the details as to how/why. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315465#Comment_315465</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315465#Comment_315465</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:41:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>andycon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @James : Everytime I hit the link button it doesnt work for some reason..<br /><br />I think the video was entertaining but still the same type of hollow reactionary response that Miller's was, just this time it was 'on our side'. BUT the argument he made about Miller and others saying the protesters/unemployed/me that we need to just go get a job and stop bitching like they are hanging from trees is akin to telling starving Africans to just eat a god damn hamburger was spot on.<br /><br />That is what turned me off of Miller, not that he is against the protests/is a conservative. He has every right to be, I have no problem liking artists that I don't agree with philosophically (I LOVE Dave Sim's Cerebus/Glamourpuss but don't really agree with his gender politics) my problem is his hateful, argumentative and just flat out ignorant choices in expressing his opinions. <br /><br />This idea that there are millions of easy to find/entry level/come and get 'em jobs out there is just foolish. Having spent the better part of the past six months looking for work despite having a degree, a pretty good resume/work experience for a fresh out of college kid I am still coming up short. I'm not even cherry picking my choices, I just got a response in reference to an entry level janitor position telling me I wasn't qualified. TLDR; I actually WANT to work and not sit around on the computer looking at 4 different employment sites, working with 2 different temp agencies, I hate the idea that I am living on unemployment, thats not how I was raised. But it is what it is because everyone else I know isnt having much luck either. <br /><br />His plea that the real enemy isn't corporate greed  but Muslim terrorists that are camped out in our toilets just WAITING to kill us just reeks of tin foil hat craziness its hard to believe. For a man who was perfectly capable of serving his country but chose not to to bitch at others for not doing so is maddening. Never mind the fact that we live in a country that only partially cares about our troops while they are serving and could care less about them when they get back home. Seriously, we have to pass a bill to bribe companies with tax credits to hire veterans? The same country where after WWII is was a sense of pride to hire someone based on the sole quality that they served in the war.<br /><br /><br />ANYWAYS, that was too much thought/effort/emotion to throw at Frank WHORES!!!!! Miller. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315469#Comment_315469</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315469#Comment_315469</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:03:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I love this bit:<br /><blockquote >"The powerful worry far less about us seeing how bad things are than us speaking up about how good things could get. Cynicism is obedience." </blockquote>-- Alex Steffan ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315535#Comment_315535</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315535#Comment_315535</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:42:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>taphead</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @StefanJ - Thanks for that. It became something of a motto. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315588#Comment_315588</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315588#Comment_315588</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:59:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Occupy Oakland Raided.  Occupy Denver raided. Occupy Atlanta raided.  Occupy Portland raided. Occupy Wall Street Raided.<br /><br />Media barred from all during the raid. <br /><br />How's that First Amendment work again? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315596#Comment_315596</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315596#Comment_315596</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:50:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ As some people up thread suspected, they're using the '<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-15732661" >protecting people from themselves</a>' argument to justify the clearance.<br /><br />Seems to be going off mostly peacefully though so far. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315603#Comment_315603</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315603#Comment_315603</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:57:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ At most of the raids, they're telling people they can return to the venues, just not camp there.<br /><br />With winter coming in North America that may work in the protesters' favor: work out rotas so their are people there all day every day but people get to go home at night.<br /><br />Of course that only works for the people who have homes to go to. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315624#Comment_315624</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315624#Comment_315624</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:29:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Mayor Quan, who is quickly working herself out of any kind of a re-election chance, pretty much admitted that last night's action was a coordinated effort by the leadership of the cities effected. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315633#Comment_315633</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315633#Comment_315633</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:33:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Brendan McGinley</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yeah, god forbid the media be harmed by these violent hooligans. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315634#Comment_315634</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315634#Comment_315634</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:54:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ To celebrate the two-month anniversary of the start of the Occupy protests, <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/164612/occupy-everywhere-november-17" >here</a> is a handy guide to NYC actions as well as sympathy strikes in the US and overseas.  This will be a constantly updated list. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315638#Comment_315638</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315638#Comment_315638</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:01:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/11/02/1032624/-He-has-a-right-to-speak,-said-the-cop-to-the-banker" >"He has a right to speak" said the cop to the banker</a><br /><br />Comfort the afflicted, afflict the comfortable ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315782#Comment_315782</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315782#Comment_315782</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:05:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>William Joseph Dunn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AU_ZQKTbOTw&feature=share" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315857#Comment_315857</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315857#Comment_315857</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:45:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>RandomEntity</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @William I just came here to post that! Haha, man, Olbermann is becoming my new favorite news talky guy. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315861#Comment_315861</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315861#Comment_315861</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:01:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ So... I guess Kieth Olberman is a Superman fan? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315862#Comment_315862</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315862#Comment_315862</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:34:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Goddamn Batman lol<br /><br />He Knows. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315889#Comment_315889</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315889#Comment_315889</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:30:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>lampcommander</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ If you're watching Warren's twitter (or other newsfeeds obv) you know the NYPD just closed airspace over OWS. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315895#Comment_315895</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315895#Comment_315895</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>glukkake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @lamp - they didn't. It was a misunderstanding.<br /><br />Thus far the march has been peaceful, but MASSIVE. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315897#Comment_315897</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=315897#Comment_315897</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:44:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>William Joseph Dunn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ 99% Bat signal" on the Verizon building in N.Y. right now. I was wondering when someone was going to start doing projection graffiti. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316142#Comment_316142</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316142#Comment_316142</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 01:13:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Several of the Occupy camps in England are reporting getting raided and attacked by the EDL last night.  This is from Facebook, and doesn't appear to be getting any news time, so I can give you confirmation as yet, but I'll keep looking. <br /><br /><blockquote >Tonight at around 7pm Bristol's second Occupation camp was trashed and I was threatened to have my face bit off, by a male whom I presume was a member of Bristol's EDL firm. I was handed a note by a middle aged woman reading “people of Bristol eviction notice get off our green”. It was obvious from early on who they were so I attempted to engage with them. Nevertheless, I was told they have launched a campaign against Occupy Bristol, this wasn't news to me as its been acknowledged by us for several weeks. Several Occupations around the country have had repeated problems with EDL members. However, ironically the harder the EDL try to defeat the Occupy Movement, the stronger we grow in numbers, power and support. <br /><br />If trashing a few tents and issuing threats of violence is supposed to scare us into going back home, they sadly don't know the resolve, determination and outrage we share as an international movement. I've been screwed by this system of injustice and corruption since I was a kid and so long as this body of mine draws breath, I can guarantee I’ll fight with every ounce of determination and faith I can muster to bring it to an end. We don't have enough people at the moment to defend the second camp so its been temporarily disbanded. However, the actions of those who visited me tonight have made me determined without question to do what ever it takes, to inspire, promote, strengthen and spread Occupy Bristol to every corner of this city and beyond. I may be a pacifist but I promise you this, I will have justice for both myself and my family regardless of your ineffectual threats and attempts at intimidation. <br /><br />Long live the Occupation.</blockquote><br /><br />From "Occupy Bristol" Facebook page, 20/11/11 ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316298#Comment_316298</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316298#Comment_316298</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:18:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://gawker.com/5861197/uc-davis-students-creepy-powerful-protest-against-pepper+spray-chancellor" >Awesome silent protest of the UC Davis Chancellor re: the UCD Police action this weekend.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316500#Comment_316500</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316500#Comment_316500</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:11:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Regarding the UC Davis cop casually spraying mace in a sitting non-violent protester's face:<br /><br />I posted a comment on a <a href="http://gawker.com/5861100/heres-a-cop-just-casually-pepper-spraying-peaceful-protesters" >gawker article</a>, waiting to get off duty to confirm my posting.<br /><br />Hi.  I'm a law enforcement officer.  I've been working for the Federal Government for around 5 years.  I worked for the state for around 2 years.  I've also been a rent-a-cop in the past for a total of about 5 years as well.  (Being a rent-a-cop so far has been the most dangerous of these professions)<br /><br />In that time that I've been in my profession, which usually comes down to telling people to do something they don't want to do, or telling people to stop doing something they want to be doing, of course I've had to be physical with people.<br /><br />Now, I've solved more situations by talking them out than by using force.  A law enforcement officer has far more tools on their belt than weapons.  Some of the tools we use are: common sense, staying calm when people are spitting or throwing bodily fluids at you, listening, eye contact, stuff like that.<br /><br />In the dozen or so years in this profession, I have never caused violence to someone when they were not being violent to me (or fellow officers), themselves, or others in the area.  Never.  Not once.  I've definitely put handcuffs on someone that didn't want them on, I've used compliance holds on an unwilling participant, and I've held someone from attacking others.  I've never punched or kicked someone in a professional setting unless it was life or death, never used pepper spray or any other "less-than-lethal" tool on anyone who wasn't being violent.<br /><br />Yes, some protesters have been protesting illegally, but the majority have been non-violent.  The same cannot be said for the majority of the law enforcement community involved in these riot teams.  I know the types of orders given to officers during riot maneuvers; they are usually the types of orders where officers act in masse, forming a strong line or barricade, to protect a person or place, or to move violent protestors out of an area.<br /><br />To use pepper spray at that close a distance, to unarmed and non-violent persons is a choice an officer makes.  Legally, he may have been in the right.  That says more about the laws we pass and the people we are than it says about whether the protestor was in the legal right or not.  Regardless, as someone paid by the taxpayers to protect and serve, this officer made the wrong moral choice.  I am sickened by this action, and by other actions I've been hearing about.  A report of a pregnant woman beaten and pepper sprayed and ultimately suffering a miscarriage.  These stories sicken me.  <br /><br />Do you know what sickens me more?  Someone defending reprehensible behavior.  I'm on the police side of the blue line, and I disagree with the police's actions.  The sick people defending these actions are on the victim's side of the line, defending the aggressor.  <br /><br />I can aknowledge why an officer made the choice to do this.  I can look into my experience and understand the pressures these officers are under, and know that they are being ordered to do things they don't like doing.  I've been there.  Enough that it's kept me up at night before.  I fully understand what the officer is doing, and I am against it.  Those of you that are not law enforcement and haven't done this job, and don't understand what it's like, what gives you the right to assume the man beating you is justified for beating you? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316505#Comment_316505</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316505#Comment_316505</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:25:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Vornaskotti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ government spy:<br /><br />There's been talk about rent-a-cop brutality in Finland in the last couple of years, and some cases where they've been caught using excessive force by someone who's been filming what's been going on with a cellphone camera. When I've been discussing these cases and the job in general with people I know who work in the field, most of them echoed your sentiments in handling the situations. There are always young yahoos who start their work full of testosterone and ready to get physical with the problem cases. It's up to the more experienced guys to tell them, that yeah, they can do that, but before going down that route they may want to think of the fact that he'll probably be meeting the same guy at the same place next week, and the week after that, and the week after that... So, is it really wise to start and escalate... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316506#Comment_316506</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316506#Comment_316506</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:33:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>sneak046</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Gov Spy, great comment, and I wished that the person responsible for the story below showed your kind of restraint.<br /><br /><a href="http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/11/21/pregant-woman-blasted-with-pepper-spray-by-spd-reportedly-miscarries" >Pregnant Woman Blasted with Pepper Spray by SPD Says She Miscarried:</a><br /><br />"I was standing in the middle of the crowd when the police started moving in," she says. "I was screaming, 'I am pregnant, I am pregnant. Let me through. I am trying to get out.'" At that point, Fox continues, a Seattle police officer lifted his foot and it hit her in the stomach, and another officer pushed his bicycle into the crowd, again hitting Fox in the stomach. "Right before I turned, both cops lifted their pepper spray and sprayed me. My eyes puffed up and my eyes swelled shut," she says. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316507#Comment_316507</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316507#Comment_316507</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 02:39:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/22/us/police-officers-involved-in-pepper-spraying-placed-on-leave.html?_r=1&src=tp&smid=fb-share" >The young man with the "THIS" sign is my friend Nick, recent transfer to UCD.</a><br /><br />Proud to be his friend. He has a very reserved, sensible nature about politics. He likes getting as much info as possible before believing something, much less taking action. Fuck you, UCD Campus Police. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316513#Comment_316513</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316513#Comment_316513</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 03:35:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016829484_occupybaby23m.html" >If the girl who claimed the police kicked her and miscarried turns out to be a fraud, I will be very pissed.</a><br /><br /><blockquote >She also said she did not plan to pick up medical records at Harborview Medical Center that could document the miscarriage until after a planned memorial service Saturday, and she declined to sign a waiver allowing reporters to obtain the documents independently. She said the baby was a girl, to be named Miracle.<br /><br />"I have some stuff to do today," said Fox, who described herself as a homeless former foster child. "I have to get some stuff done."</blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316515#Comment_316515</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316515#Comment_316515</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 03:51:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>sneak046</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @gov spy, indeed...you will have every right to be too. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316516#Comment_316516</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316516#Comment_316516</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 04:46:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ You know, I understand that, perhaps in the protesters point of view, the very real and very terrible things that police are doing to the Occupy protests are being treated very lightly.  So I can understand that some might feel that exaggeration is in order.<br /><br /> <a href="http://bicyclebarricade.wordpress.com/2011/11/19/open-letter-to-chancellor-linda-p-b-katehi/" >Nathan Brown, a Davis faculty member who was on the scene, describes what happened </a><br /><blockquote >Police used batons to try to push the students apart. Those they could separate, they arrested, kneeling on their bodies and pushing their heads into the ground. Those they could not separate, they pepper-sprayed directly in the face, holding these students as they did so. When students covered their eyes with their clothing, police forced open their mouths and pepper-sprayed down their throats. Several of these students were hospitalized. Others are seriously injured. One of them, forty-five minutes after being pepper-sprayed down his throat, was still coughing up blood.</blockquote><br />I don't know wether I would prefer this to be true or to be an exaggeration.  I would prefer that it would be so preposterous to think it even possible that this could happen in our country.  I seriously hope no one just tacked this on because Lt. Pike's deplorable actions weren't bad enough.<br /><br />But if this is a falsehood, and pregnant girl turns out to be a fraud, then OWS takes a serious blow to what should be a tide-changing moment.  Instead of more people being made aware of the injustices commited by who are supposed to be our law enforcement professionals, all they will (still) think of is lazy, lying liberals.<br /><br />Let the truth speak for itself.  Don't make things worse. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316517#Comment_316517</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316517#Comment_316517</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 05:11:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Comicbookbunny</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ 84 year old woman activist pepper sprayed in Seattle, she has been through it all- WW2 in Germany, saying the same thing is happening here with the media?! That is scary.<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENfWJzXVD0Q" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316853#Comment_316853</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316853#Comment_316853</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:37:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Wood</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ By now, you might have read this piece by Naomi Wolf in the Guardian : <a href="http://gu.com/p/33thv" >"The shocking truth about the crackdown on Occupy"</a><br /><br /><blockquote >The picture darkened still further when Wonkette and Washingtonsblog.com reported that the Mayor of Oakland acknowledged that the Department of Homeland Security had participated in an 18-city mayor conference call advising mayors on "how to suppress" Occupy protests.<br /><br />To Europeans, the enormity of this breach may not be obvious at first. Our system of government prohibits the creation of a federalised police force, and forbids federal or militarised involvement in municipal peacekeeping. </blockquote><br /><br />But I also found a <a href="http://www.balloon-juice.com/2011/11/25/ows-the-shocking-truth-of-naomi-wolfs-journalistic-hackery/" >debunking of that story</a> :<br /><br /><blockquote >One of her key pieces of evidence is an unsupported and unverified report that 18 mayors coordinated their crackdowns with the Department of Homeland Security. There’s only one problem with that: It’s nothing more than innuendo. Here, let me show you.<br /><br />Here are the two links she provides as evidence: One to Wonkette; the other to Washingtonsblog.com. Both articles point back to this absurd article on the Examiner.com site (a very, very right-wing Phil Anschutz, write-out-of-your-butt-with-no-evidence kind of site). Washingtonsblog goes one step further, updating with this:<br /><br />(And for those who are understandably doubtful about Examiner.com as a news source, here’s an AP story from a couple hours ago that verifies everything except the specific mention of DHS coordination.)<br /><br />Got that? The headlines on both of these stories (Wonkette and WashingtonsBlog) were splayed across the sites in very large heading fonts: “Homeland Security Coordinated….” and yet the AP confirms everything BUT DHS coordination. Still, that didn’t stop Wolf from ignoring the AP story entirely and writing a piece for the Guardian that included links to bolster her argument that clearly don’t.</blockquote><br /><br />I'll leave both of these article here for your appreciation. Curious to hear your opinions. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316898#Comment_316898</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316898#Comment_316898</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 02:32:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-insiders/post/ows-is-over/2011/11/16/gIQAk5okRN_blog.html" >The Washington post says OWS is over.</a><br /><br /><blockquote >...the OWS movement supplied some comic relief, but they were never destined to survive the onset of inclement weather. Good riddance. </blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316899#Comment_316899</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316899#Comment_316899</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 03:05:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Seantaclaus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @magnusisasillyname - Another WP opinion article posted just minutes earlier <em >(cited/linked directly in the article above)</em> takes the opposite stance. As both writers are part of the same opinion column, my guess is the one that wrote the article you linked is the conservative, and the one that wrote the opposing article is a liberal. The answer is likely somewhere in the middle, but I suspect OWS is hardly dead. It's due to evolve into something more cohesive though, as it's starting to become more focused. Ironically, the very things being done to try and shutter the movement by law enforcement officials and city government are actually helping push the movement to become more focused.<br /><br />It will certainly be an interesting thing to watch, either way. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316901#Comment_316901</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316901#Comment_316901</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 04:03:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ For some reason, declaring this 'over' reminds me of <a href="http://store.theonion.com/product/drugs-win-drug-war-1998,189/" >this classic Onion headline</a>. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316928#Comment_316928</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=316928#Comment_316928</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 09:41:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/occupyseattle-protester-who-claimed-miscarr" >There's some evidence that the kicked-in-the-belly-miscarriage woman has some truthiness issues.</a><br /><br />For those unfamiliar, Crooks and Liars is a very liberal/liberally-biased news blog (think ThinkProgress and TPM if you follow Left-leaning US political news blogs) and have been very supportive of OWS in general. If they're reporting this then there's probably something fishy about the woman. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317187#Comment_317187</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317187#Comment_317187</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:58:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Jamie Coville</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5N5N8UzSRTQ" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317213#Comment_317213</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317213#Comment_317213</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 06:10:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>KeeperofManyNames</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I love that this movement is capable of poking fun at itself while still getting the message out. I feel like it's important, in the kind of cynical culture we have, to not take everything deadly seriously, even if the issues<em > are</em> literally deadly serious. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317236#Comment_317236</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317236#Comment_317236</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:07:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm still expecting there to be a reference to OWS in the new Grand Theft Auto game. It just strikes me as the sort of thing they'd do at Rockstar North. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317239#Comment_317239</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317239#Comment_317239</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:21:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ As OWS is what some have called an open source protest, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/11/a-guide-to-the-occupy-wall-street-api-or-why-the-nerdiest-way-to-think-about-ows-is-so-useful/248562/" >here</a> is an API which offers possibilities for protest innovation. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317249#Comment_317249</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317249#Comment_317249</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:35:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Flabyo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The LA eviction hasn't even gotten a mention on the news over here.<br /><br />Admittedly, we have had a massive public sector workers strike today, and we're currently involved in some sort of diplomatic pissing match with Iran, so it's not surprising. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317257#Comment_317257</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317257#Comment_317257</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:15:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ Flabyo Then again, it could be a question of <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/gallery/2011/nov/30/occupy-la-protesters-are-evicted-in-pictures" >which news sources</a> you consult. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317392#Comment_317392</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317392#Comment_317392</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:50:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Conservative co-worker passed this on to me.<br /><br /><a href="http://mrctv.org/videos/adam-carolla-explains-ows-generation" >Adam Corolloa calls OWS "Ass Douches"</a><br /><br />Just in general pisses me off, and I'm working on a witty response back to the same co-worker. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317396#Comment_317396</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317396#Comment_317396</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 11:09:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>MrMonk</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Who the hell is Adam Carolla?<br /><br />The highlight of his career was a TV show about puppets making crank phone calls. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317406#Comment_317406</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317406#Comment_317406</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 12:48:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>andycon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Didnt watch it (I just cant last more then 30 seconds on stuff like this before stabbing my ears) but from the comments it seems like the same Frank Miller stuff? Lazy kids, poor people don't pay taxes and something about Muslims? <br /><br />God I wish for the day that baseless talking points stop being the center of political discussion (that day being the day when the Earth swallows us whole) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317410#Comment_317410</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317410#Comment_317410</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:17:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @MrMonk<br /><br />Adam Carolla, if it is the same Adam Carolla I'm thinking of, was a late night radio disc jokey who was on a nationally syndicated show called Love Line, opposite Dr. Drew, which took calls regarding personal, relationship, and sex advice for a number of years. He also started the now defunct Man Show opposite Jimmy Kimmel. I think he might do stand up. He's mostly an obscure, slightly famous personality. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317415#Comment_317415</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317415#Comment_317415</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:20:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>William Joseph Dunn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @RenThing - you forgot to list "unfunny" in your description. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317425#Comment_317425</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317425#Comment_317425</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:41:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Oh yes, and unfunny. Very unfunny.<br /><br />And a total asshat. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317569#Comment_317569</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317569#Comment_317569</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:38:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Beamish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.honestpublishing.com/news/the-honest-alan-moore-interview-part-2-the-occupy-movement-frank-miller-and-politics/" >Alan Moore</a> on the Occupy movement and Frank Miller's blog. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317589#Comment_317589</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317589#Comment_317589</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 20:46:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Beamish: Thanks, that was great. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317996#Comment_317996</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317996#Comment_317996</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:39:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>lampcommander</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://culvercitycrossroads.com/2011/12/05/dear-editor-lapd-arrests-the-truth-at-occupy-la/" >yet another vivid description of arrests</a>, this time by a writer for Family Guy. Maybe, just maybe, the more reports come out, the closer people will come to actually doing something about it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317999#Comment_317999</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=317999#Comment_317999</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 08:07:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>DC</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGBTes_VHAk" >Occupy Melbourne avoids eviction by creative means</a><br /><br />Awesome trolling but since these police officers don't seem to have sense of humor they resorted to "dickhead behaviour".<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Da3h4LgvIc" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318014#Comment_318014</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318014#Comment_318014</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:02:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>William Joseph Dunn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/12/06/alan-moore-joins-david-lloyd-for-occupy-comics/" ><br /><br />Alan Moore has joined David Lloyd For Occupy Comic</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318016#Comment_318016</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318016#Comment_318016</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:07:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Argos</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://myoccupylaarrest.blogspot.com/" >First hand account of the Occupy LA arrests by one of the Family Guy writers</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318295#Comment_318295</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318295#Comment_318295</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:56:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>DC</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ So, Zuccoti Park is ocupied by the Occupy Wall Street movement, right? Right. <br />And Law and Order wants to shoot a scene at Zucccoti Park. What do they do? They build a fake Zuccoti Park.<br />What does the Occupy Wall Street movement does? They <a href="http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/12/breaking-ows-occupies-movie-set-replica-itself-real" >Mockupy</a> the false park.<br /><br /><blockquote >A few hours after television producers set up a replica of Occupy Wall Street for the filming of a new episode of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, the real Occupy Wall Street announced plans to occupy the fake one. (...) Located at nearby Foley Square, the fake camp includes a replica of the OWS kitchen and library as well as numerous tarps, tents, and signs. (...)<br />the police had begun to push protesters out of the park and dismantle the set. "NYPD does not respect Law and Order," the crowd chanted cheekily. At one point, an occupier asked an officer, "Are these real barricades, or a set piece?"<br />Within about an hour police had cleared out the protesters, which was less time than it took clear the real Zuccotti, but probably more than they'd need on a TV show. "You guys just cleared a fake Zuccotti Park," the tweeter @NewYorkist told a police officer, who countered that they'd done no such thing: "We didn't clear a fake Zuccotti," he insisted. "They're taking the set down."</blockquote>Such amazing trolling these days xD ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318297#Comment_318297</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318297#Comment_318297</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:33:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Can we have the 20th Century back now, please?<br /><br />This one's too confusing.<br /><br />(Lies. I wouldn't give this one up for the world.) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318387#Comment_318387</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318387#Comment_318387</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:52:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-bankers-are-the-dictators-of-the-west-6275084.html" >Robert Fisk gets it.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318389#Comment_318389</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318389#Comment_318389</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 12:36:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>roadscum</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Mr Magnus, Sir, thank you for that! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318390#Comment_318390</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318390#Comment_318390</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 12:43:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @DC: The thing was, L&O:SVU didn't create a fake version of Zuccoti to use as just a park, they created a fake version of the Occupy encampment at Zuccoti.  Implying that an in production episode of the show was being built around the bullshit rumours the right-wing blogosphere have been spreading that the Occupy encampments are rife with rapes that have been going unreported because the women are being pressured to stay quiet 'for the sake of the movement.'  Real Occupiers moved into the encampment to fuck with the L&O production. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318393#Comment_318393</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318393#Comment_318393</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:31:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>city creed</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >the bullshit rumours the right-wing blogosphere have been spreading that the Occupy encampments are rife with rapes</blockquote><br /><br />That's a dangerous road to start down. Rape has <a href="http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/gender/2011/12/05/occupy-lsxual-harrassment/" >indeed</a> proved to be a recurring problem at Occupy camps worldwide. In several of those cases the response of Occupiers has been less than wholly edifying. This is no manufactured controversy and treating it like one is to avoid dealing with a potentially fatal flaw in the ideology of the Occupy movement. If Occupy isn't prepared to take responsibility for protecting those vulnerable people that are drawn to its camps, then it fails on the same grounds as the system it is trying to topple. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318477#Comment_318477</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318477#Comment_318477</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:13:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I was unaware that it was actually as bad as that.  Though it should be noted that of the six cases the article cites <a href="http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2011/11/02/as-occupy-baltimore-rape-charge-fizzles-security-and-homeless-issues-remain/" >one actually <em >was</em> bs</a> (that's from the source link for the LSE article, which makes citing it kind of strange), and in another, <a href="http://cityhallblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/11/suhm-alleged-rape-at-occupy-da.html" >the camp has been cooperating fully with the police, and the police believe it to be an isolated incident.</a>  That's hardly 'rife.'   <br /><br />And given L&O's tendency toward sensationalism (this is the 'raped with a violin bow' show, remember), how likely is it that the show would portray the case of the episode as being perpetrated by a minority of people who are not actively involved in the organization of the camp? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318635#Comment_318635</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318635#Comment_318635</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:14:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Comicbookbunny</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ anyone else know anything more about this?  i'm dubious that the canisters were gas. but whats with the tent regardless?  <br />(having trouble embedding this.... grrrr)<br />http://westcoastportshutdown.org/content/houston-police-place-tent-over-restrained-protesters-and-gas-them ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318643#Comment_318643</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318643#Comment_318643</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:33:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>William Joseph Dunn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I guess the canister could be oxygen, but I don't know why you would need that in a tent. it's creepy whatever the cops are up to. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318664#Comment_318664</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318664#Comment_318664</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:28:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/20-Occupy-Houston-protesters-arrested-2398468.php" >They aren't getting gassed.</a><br /><br />The tent is inflatable, <a href="http://www.tradekorea.com/product-detail/P00059142/Air_tent_5_6m_x_7_2m.html" >here's a link to a similar one</a>.<br /><br />Look, I agree with OWS but it doesn't benefit anyone except the detractors by making things out to be more than it is. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318834#Comment_318834</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318834#Comment_318834</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 06:13:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>magnusisasillyname</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/14/us-protests-newyork-idUSTRE7BD2GG20111214" >The OWS courtroom show is beginning</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318850#Comment_318850</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318850#Comment_318850</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:25:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Comicbookbunny</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @renthing  i was thinking much the same.  there already is enough badness going on with all this to not try and make shit up out of nothing.. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street...And Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318914#Comment_318914</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=10239&amp;Focus=318914#Comment_318914</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:20:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ A Marine Tea Partier wrote an open letter to the Occupy movement. <a href="http://libertyspinnetwork.wordpress.com/2011/12/12/open-letter-from-a-marine-tea-partier-to-all-occupiers/" >It's... not what you might expect.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>