Not signed in (Sign In)
  1.  (10301.341)
    Pop blues isn't really my thing, but I figure that some of you will dig the purty colors here.

  2.  (10301.342)
    • CommentTimeNov 15th 2011
    • CommentAuthorDC
    • CommentTimeNov 15th 2011
  3.  (10301.345)
    From the always-worth-a-look Supernature.

    Siamese Nightmare

    Silly Bear
    • CommentTimeNov 15th 2011
    Who's up for some Starbucks?

  4.  (10301.347)
    Folks - just want to draw your attention to what went down on pages 12 and 13 of this thread. I've deleted an image posted by @Greasemonkey because I felt it crossed a line. Several people have contacted me off-board to make the same complaint. Alas, lack of direct Internet access at the moment has delayed me receiving those messages, so - if you're one of the people who was offended - mea culpa.

    I'm aware the whole issue is muddied by the nature of Satire, and the "anything goes" flavour of this thread, so if it helps you to think of me as a hypocritical prudish tyrant by deleting this, go right ahead. I'd simply ask that you give a little bit of thought to the people who are visiting this thread for the first time, and not frightening them away with what - ostensibly - appears to be paedo-wretched nastiness. Even if you're flag-waving something horrific along those lines, I'd ask that you refrain from cross-posting actual eye-scarring visuals, and - if you're still inclined to post a link after all - definitely give as much context as you possibly can.
  5.  (10301.348)
    @Si: Don't worry about being a benevolent tyrant. Warren sure as hell was when he ran the board, and now it's your right as it was his.
    • CommentAuthorRenThing
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2011 edited
    Agreed. You and Ariana are the moderators and if anyone gets their knickers in a twist over you doing your "jobs" (which is not to say that Greasemonkey will) then this may not be the place for them.
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2011 edited
    Si, sincerely:


    This isn't IDNNTST and I much prefer it to that old thread, I check it daily even if I don't contribute much. That visual was pretty un-necessary.
  6.  (10301.351)
    Is there any reason why IDNNTST couldn't start again, I got a nice kick to the morning from it? If, of course, "there's no crying in Whitechapel" was enforced...
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2011 edited
    My knickers remain untwisted. It's Si's sandbox, he makes the rules.

    Future questionable images will be nonvisually linked.
    • CommentAuthorFlabyo
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2011 edited
    @Vorn - I suspect Avatar might have issues playing host to some of the stuff that used to crop up in there...
  7.  (10301.354)
    That lousy IDNNTST is the reason the #1 google image search result for my name is entitled "Horse-Fucker."

    Everyone knows I prefer goats.
  8.  (10301.355)
    Can I just doff my cap to all involved for dealing with this in a mature and level-headed manner?

    Personally, I found the image pretty funny, but then, ya know, I have an odd sense of humour, as do many of us here. However, I can see the wisdom of not having the images directly on this site, especially given the hysteria surrounding the issue.

    Much respect to all involved for not letting the mole-hill become a particularly nasty mountain.

    (Sidenote - Doff? Dof?)
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2011 edited
    And just so we're on the same page, I'm in favour of applying red-hot pokers to the genitalia of all producers and consumers of actual kiddy porn.
  9.  (10301.357)
    a disagreement on the internet settled in a civilised manner, that gobshite Harold Camping hasn't predicted another rapture has he?
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2011
    • CommentAuthorRenThing
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2011

    Welcome to White Chapel. We're polite here. Or else.
  10.  (10301.360)
    @renthing, i know but sometimes you just feel outta place around here without a top hat, in fact i better get a monocle