It was a good, little story. I'd suggest it to people. Interesting art, good ideas, might not make sense to everyone the first time around, but definitely worth the read. That being said, was it ideas I've read in comics before? Yes. but the comic points that out. Is it the best way I've seen the ideas described in comics? No, not really. Why did I like it though? It was the most condensed and lightest to read comic that discusses the idea held within.
Ales, for this being your first time out, I'd say you did a stand-up job! I haven't seen anything by the artist or colourist before so I can't comment on them, but the art really suited the story and the colour went well with the art.
What were the things I thought should be hidden? I know that they were around here somewhere....
[checks the couch]
No... not there...
Oh yeah! Okay, so, comments on parts of it: One of the things that I read into it right away was that the bullets weren't real because the characters lives weren't real. Their lives weren't real because they knew they were in a comic book. I really liked that bit. I also liked them taking the colour away from [looks for the name] Lotte.
Like I said earlier, I've seen similar ideas told in ways that I preferred, but I do really like how this one was done and I would probably suggest it over the other ones, mostly because there's a lot less investment in reading Wild Children compared to similar comics.
This next bit might seem a little weird and I can't quite figure out the right way to word it, but here we go: I think this comic is much better than I think it is.
Yep, that seems to be about the most concise way to describe my over-all feelings about it.
Ales -- Make sure you let us know of other writings you do. I'll buy them.
EDIT: Something in the hide thingie didn't work right... Also, more in order than I thought and not as much to hide...]]>
]]>
]]>