Not signed in (Sign In)
This discussion has been inactive for longer than 5 days, and doesn't want to be resurrected.
    •  
      CommentAuthorAlan Tyson
    • CommentTimeOct 15th 2012
     (10833.1)
    Watching Virginia's polls swing back and forth has been like getting a handjob, but every twenty tugs or so my foreskin tears a little bit.
    • CommentAuthorRenThing
    • CommentTimeOct 15th 2012
     (10833.2)
    And on that note I'm no longer hungry. Thanks, Alan! *puts down dinner, pushes it away*
    •  
      CommentAuthordorkmuffin
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2012
     (10833.3)








    Arrested Development makes everything better.
    • CommentAuthorRenThing
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2012
     (10833.4)
    The look on Obama's face screams, "God damn it, Bill..."
    •  
      CommentAuthoroldhat
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2012
     (10833.5)
    •  
      CommentAuthordorkmuffin
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2012
     (10833.6)
    @Oldhat, I know the girl who started that blog.
    •  
      CommentAuthordorkmuffin
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2012
     (10833.7)
    Welp. That was an appalling answer on gun control. I think the Economist liveblog said it best:

    "This gun-control debate is the debate equivalent of an Ornette Coleman solo."
  1.  (10833.8)
    As an Ornette Coleman fan I'm offended by that remark, but yeah both sides danced around the question big time. ;)

    At least Barack showed up this time.
  2.  (10833.9)
    I don't know, Obama was pretty straightforward in his response and, just in case you forgot, didn't suggest that guns don't kill people, giving birth out of wedlock kills people. Dancing around a question is one thing. That answer from Romney... was another thing entirely. I'm still kind of in awe at some of the more outright bizarre or alienating things he said.

    It was cool how both candidates were competing to see who could throw environmentalism in front of a bus more vigorously, though. That was charming.
    • CommentAuthorRenThing
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2012
     (10833.10)
    •  
      CommentAuthorDoc Ocassi
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2012 edited
     (10833.11)
    • CommentAuthorRenThing
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2012
     (10833.12)
    •  
      CommentAuthorFoamhead
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2012
     (10833.13)






    Josh Romney in the audience of the last debate.
    • CommentAuthorbadbear
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2012
     (10833.14)
    Umm...
    binders full of women
    • CommentAuthorkmcleod
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2012
     (10833.15)
    @The Mighty Foamhead--LOL
    •  
      CommentAuthorcjkoger
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2012
     (10833.16)
    @foamhead I actually, sitting home alone on my day off, laughed out loud when I saw that.
    •  
      CommentAuthoroldhat
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2012
     (10833.17)
    "Romney didn't suck. He was a better opponent against Obama than Obama was against him in the first debate. But he was trapped, man, so very trapped. Obama's had people say "Yes" to him for only the last four years. Romney has spent the last 40 getting his balls washed by everyone. The man can't stand it when he's challenged, especially with his own words used against him. His face gets flush, and he starts weirdly getting all breathy and frantic, as if he's about to blow a gasket. It's the face that Ann must see just before Mitt demands she bend over the antique sideboard and get ready for a Kolobian ass reaming. It's the look that must have terrified his five awful sons into eating their vegetables and washing the dog shit off the side of the car. It must be horrible to be his servant, since he considers everyone not in his class the help."

    The Rude Pundit, folks.
    • CommentAuthorStefanJ
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2012
     (10833.18)
    This . . . this is . . . Oh Myyyyyy.

    Mitt binds women
    •  
      CommentAuthorTF
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2012
     (10833.19)
    A couple of surprises here:

    OvR
    •  
      CommentAuthordorkmuffin
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2012
     (10833.20)
    Something about that graph seems vastly oversimplified and incorrect.

This discussion has been inactive for longer than 5 days, and doesn't want to be resurrected.