<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Whitechapel - Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:16:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
			<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>
				Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.4 &amp; Feed Publisher
			</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4140#Comment_4140</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4140#Comment_4140</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:14:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Elohim</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ So, I'm considering moving onto a freeware linux-kernel OS (probably Unbuntu from what I've seen, since I'm not hugely computer-literate). I'm currently on Windows XP, but with mainly freeware applications (only really use Firefox, OpenOffice and WinAmp)<br /><br />Does anyone have any thoughts on this? I suspect I'll have a massive reduction in the games I'll be able to play, but apart from that?<br /><br />Much appreciated. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4148#Comment_4148</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4148#Comment_4148</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:30:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>bschory</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I leave to majority of the advice to the more well versed linux gurus out there, but I'm a huge fan of Ubuntu. It was incredibly easy for me to install, and the latest version came included with drivers for my Broadcom chipset based wireless card, which is usually a nightmare and a half to get running. I've had no real problems with it, though occassionaly settings I take for granted as easy to find in Windows are buried deep in Ubuntu. <br /><br />Those games you can play on windows could be played through an emulator on linux, or you could always dual boot. You'll get some reduction in performance, but it should still be workable. I personally dual boot Ubuntu and Windows 2003 Server on my PC. From a personal perspective, other than games and the Adobe Creative Suite, I have no reason to ever run Widows over Linux. Professionally I develop code in C#, and it ties in to MS SQL, so I need Visual Studio and SQL Server.<br /><br />The other nice thing about Ubuntu are the Kubuntu and Xubuntu side projects, so you can play with KDE and xfce, or switch to them permanently. I favor Gnome currently, so Ubuntu itself is just fine for me, but KDE has its strong points as well.<br /><br />If this post ends up inadvertently turning this discussion in to a KDE versus Gnome debate, I apologize in advance. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4153#Comment_4153</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4153#Comment_4153</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:34:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Doctor Pockets</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I gave up any notion of going the Linux route when I found out it took too much work tinkering with the system to make sure things like mp3 players and printers work. I'm not computer-geeky enough and too lazy that if if I plug a gadget into the computer and the gadget doesn't go, I say fuck it and go find a computer that works. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4154#Comment_4154</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4154#Comment_4154</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:35:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>lazarus corporation</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I made the move a few years ago from Windows XP to Kubuntu (I always preferred the KDE desktop) via a brief flirtation with Fedora.  I was worried at the time, but I soon felt totally at home.<br /><br />Advice:<br /><a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download" >download a copy of Ubuntu</a> (or <a href="https://shipit.ubuntu.com/" >request a copy to be sent to you</a>) and run it as a live CD first (boot from the CD without installing it).  This is a great way to test that all your hardware works with Ubuntu without altering your current Windows XP installation.  Have a play using the live CD and get a feel for it. When you've got a few hours spare, back-up all your user files (I burnt mine onto CD), insert your Ubuntu disk, do a clean install and say goodbye to Windows.<br /><br />Kubuntu has been great for me - it's plug and play.  I plugged my digital camera in and Kubuntu immediately detected it and gave me access to the pics. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4157#Comment_4157</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4157#Comment_4157</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:37:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Telecart</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Ubuntu is a glorious distro. I think everybody should play around a bit with Linux, if only to experience what is possible to do with a computer entirely for free.<br /><br />Then go out and buy a macbook, cuz srsly, it's awesome. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4159#Comment_4159</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4159#Comment_4159</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:47:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Elohim</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Sounding good. Looks like I've got something to get up to during my Christmas break. Anyone else got anything to add?<br /><br />btw, @ Lazarus corporation - is there any way by which to test Unbuntu without using a CD? Just to see if game CDs work with it. Also, how could I nab an emulator? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4163#Comment_4163</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4163#Comment_4163</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:54:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Nil</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've played around with a few Linux distros before, as well as various other free OSes (I have an ancient box at home somewhere still running NetBSD), but I've always had problems with them. I gave Ubuntu a shot a while back, and almost everything worked perfectly - I could play mp3s, watch videos, access my external harddrive, etc. The only reason I'm still running Windows is because I'm not sure if I can get Ubuntu to work with my uni's ridiculous network setup - in order to possibly get it working I would have to commit to a full install which I don't want to do because it quite possibly won't work.<br /><br />Not sure if that's any help, but meh. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4168#Comment_4168</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4168#Comment_4168</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:59:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>lazarus corporation</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ Elohim - if you've got 2 CD drives then I guess you could do it that way.<br /><br />I've got <a href="http://www.winehq.org/" >Wine</a> installed to run a couple of bits of software I use which are only available for Windows.  It's fine for me. YMMV - I'm sure other posters will have opinions. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4196#Comment_4196</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4196#Comment_4196</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:48:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>ken</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ What do you do with your computer? If you're really only doing web browsing, word processing, and music listening, then you'll be fine on any platform. The trouble comes when you need specific software that's only available for one OS. Like say, video games. Wine works for some stuff, but it tends to fail in annoying places.<br /><br />Definitely try Ubuntu out with the live CD (they make it really easy to do that) before installing it. And I agree with lazarus about Kubuntu being the Ubuntu of choice, but that's very much a matter of opinion. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4271#Comment_4271</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4271#Comment_4271</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:56:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Sarpedon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've installed Ubuntu a couple of times, I was dual booting with Vista Ultimate for most of this summer and at the end of the day, I found that I was so used to doing things in a windows environment I got lazy and booted into vista more than not.  Ubuntu's a great platform that seem to perform really well 90% of the time in my experience and doing any sort of software management is so much easier via the various package mangers in Linux it's ridiculous.  I might have switched over if not for Adobe Lightroom and the occasional video game.  I'm curious about the possibility of a decent windows port of Amarok when the new version comes out.  (I read somewhere that they're rewriting it in some way that'll make porting it feasible.) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4280#Comment_4280</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4280#Comment_4280</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:11:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>WilliamDanger</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I just switched to Ubuntu. My hard-drive was corrupted and the only bootable disk I had was the newest Ubuntu release. <br />So fuck it, I'm on Linux. <br /><br />I was able to make Steam work using WINE as well, so I can still play Portal and Team Fortress 2. <br />Next step is to try install the Adobe CS2 suite. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4283#Comment_4283</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4283#Comment_4283</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:20:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Mark W</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ one thing you could try is using virtualization to try out ubuntu.  this will require some pretty hefty requirements for your machine though, I wouldnt suggest it as a good test unless you have at least 1 GB of memory on your system, plus however much hard drive space you want the virtual machine to use.  If you want to try this, you can download VMWare's free virtual machine player <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/player" >here</a>, and use the website <a href="http://www.easyvmx.com" >Easy VMX</a> to create the virtual machine file you need. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4412#Comment_4412</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4412#Comment_4412</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:25:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Elohim</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Sounding good. To be honest, I only really play video games to purge my burning desire to see people die, and that's getting less frequent as I become more well adjusted/deathly tired.<br />And for "research" purposes, of course...<br />I think Wine might be the answer. I checked out a guy who lives a few floors above me, and Ubuntu seemed rather swish on his. I may pick up some programming know-how over the Christmas break. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4424#Comment_4424</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4424#Comment_4424</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:51:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>munin218</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Going to try Ubuntu soon, myself.<br /><br />Windows is teh eeeeebilll........ ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4567#Comment_4567</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=4567#Comment_4567</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 05:28:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>kperkins</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Been using Ubuntu for everyday computing, for almost 3 years (before that various other flavors of Linux, intermittently), it's an excellent, and very friendly distro.  Not hard to get various Media working (some doesn't work "out of the box", but media players actually ask you if you want to enable the codecs for those that don't.<br />I've been using a <a href="http://www.system76.com/" >System76</a> laptop, preinstalled with Ubuntu, for about 4 months now, and everything works great, including wireless networking (there is a problem with the card reader, but it is pretty much usable now).<br />Games are probably what would keep you from using Linux (I'm not a big gamer, so no big deal for me), since there are very few FPSs, etc. made for it, but there are some, and all sorts of other games included in the distro ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5201#Comment_5201</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5201#Comment_5201</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:17:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Gnosus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eTguZ5OzJ4&feature=related" ></a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5211#Comment_5211</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5211#Comment_5211</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:38:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Elohim</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ haha.<br />Like it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5216#Comment_5216</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5216#Comment_5216</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:49:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Gnosus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ nice... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5236#Comment_5236</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5236#Comment_5236</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 08:36:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>daiosho</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Slackware!<br />Just say no to package management.<br />It'll take you a couple of months longer to become properly proficient, but you'll end up on a first name basis with your computer. <br />I started using it in 1996 and it has hardly changed at all (this is intended as a positive point).<br />It'll seem a little daunting at first, but when you've got slackware down, you'll have linux, and for the most part unix down. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5476#Comment_5476</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5476#Comment_5476</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:21:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Vespers</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @daiosho<br /><br />Slackware is what I intend for my third OS. Currently running Debian, but once I get another box and have both Debian working for an everyday box and windows running for gaming, then I'll get another drive for that box and start setting up slackware. It's not something you really wanna do on your only computer for the first time. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5489#Comment_5489</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5489#Comment_5489</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:36:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>hmobius</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I don't want to spark off any religious debates here but I really tried to get into Linux a few years ago - think I was using Mandrake Linux then - but stuff just never clicked for me and getting help wasn't a great experience. I found a level of newbie disdain from forums which i dislike and went back to Windows. OK so Vista really does suck, but it does Work and so did 2000 and XP before it. <br /><br />Has Linux changed that much? Is it worth the pain? I hear great things about Ubuntu but what's the selling point? Why not use FreeBSD or OpenBSD even for that matter? I really liked BeOS when it was around and was sad when it died. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5525#Comment_5525</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5525#Comment_5525</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:26:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Elohim</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ To be honest, a religious debate backed up with facts would be awesome for me right now. Actually, does it count as religious if backed up with facts?<br /><br />Hmph. Anyway, let the battle commence... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5537#Comment_5537</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5537#Comment_5537</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:53:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ hmobius: It's gotten a bit better. This, based on my experience with Fedora. The install went fine; I understand that Ubuntu is even slicker.<br /><br />Support is still mostly via discussion boards. I saw a few newbie brush-offs, but mostly of people who didn't try searching for an answer first.  If you start your question "I tried X based on what I read on thread Y, but I still have a problem," people will respect that you did your homework.<br /><br />Mind you, I use XP on my "main" productivity and fun machine. I think XP is pretty good. Vista . . . Vista could suck a honeydew melon through a garden hose. My laptop came with Vista and I have half a mind to put Ubuntu on it.<br /><br />My Fedora box is what a friend calls a "TiFaux" system . . . a MythTV television PVR. It's great! I think I used my VCR for recording once this year. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5558#Comment_5558</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=5558#Comment_5558</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:25:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Kostika</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I don't use Linux on my PC, I can't. I need to be able to play games without any hassles. But I do use it on my MicroPC. I have a Sharp Zaurus and it runs it's own Linux build. I've been considering changing the distro, but I'm still too scared of screwing it up and ending up with a £300 brick. I'll get the courage eventually.<br /><br />Linux does have its benefits though. It certainly doesn't need a lot of the power to run wonderfully unlike Windows. It is a good OS. I agree that everyone should give it a go if they can. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6332#Comment_6332</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6332#Comment_6332</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:49:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Elohim</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Cool. I reckon I'm almost definitely going to boot up in the next couple of days. Anyone want to throw their hat in the ring before I do it? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6469#Comment_6469</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6469#Comment_6469</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 22:01:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Josh T.</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ All of this conversation got me looking into Ubuntu and when i get back to my house on Friday I'm going to switch over. Tried out Kubuntu too but Gnome just feels better than KDE. Good luck on your linux exploits Elohim. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6837#Comment_6837</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6837#Comment_6837</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:28:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Elohim</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I tried out the LiveCD once I got back from Uni and loved it. I'm going to do a bona fide install once I can get my drive partitioned.<br /><br />@ Josh T. - How are you liking it so far? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6878#Comment_6878</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6878#Comment_6878</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:59:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>hank</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Try Mint.. It is pretty much as close to a *poof* done distro as I have found. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6913#Comment_6913</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6913#Comment_6913</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:11:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>iangil</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've been running Ubuntu for a year or so on my dual-boot laptop. The other partition is Windows XP, but I haven't run it in months. I only ever boot up XP when I get an overwhelming desire to play Starcraft or something, which is not often at all<br /><br /> Ubuntu nearly completely converted me when I first installed it—it's the easiest and simplest OS to install <em >ever</em>. But the thing that ensured that I would never go back to Windows was <a href="http://amarok.kde.org/" >Amarok</a>. I was feeling extreme frustration at the sparse functionality, intentional incompatability, and unseemly bloat that is iTunes, and I don't care what you say about WinAmp or Foobar2000, they're (nearly) just as shit. Amarok is hands-down the best music program I've ever used. It has every feature that I've always wished those other programs had.<br /><br />Also, the <a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/" >Ubuntu forums</a> is a wonderfully helpful—and free—resource that has consistently provided solutions to every problem I've encountered in Ubuntu.<br /><br />The thing I love most about Linux is that if there's some feature that you wish it had, either:<br />a. it's there, and you just haven't found it yet, or<br />b. some nerd thought the same thing, built the feature, and it's available free online.<br /><br />That said, the switch can be tough, and the new interface can get some getting used to. Some computer know-how (or willingness to learn) is really helpful, even with Ubuntu. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6988#Comment_6988</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=6988#Comment_6988</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:46:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>rfrancis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I will say only this:  I run Linux machines for a living.  I've been a UNIX administrator professionally for a bit of the 80s, most of the 90s and 00s.<br /><br />I run Windows XP on my desktop and my laptop.<br /><br />Linux is swell, but seriously, right tool for the right job.  Firefox's Linux port is bloody slow and always has been, sadly.  OpenOffice is all right, I suppose, although there again I find it to be a pig.  I wish X-windows had been taken out and killed years ago and replaced with something sensible.  And yeah, I do my share of PC gaming, so that matters, too.<br /><br />I dunno.  I've tried it and don't care for it to this day.  Tried it on my daughter's machine and gave up there, too.  Mind you, I've always got a Linux server running in my house and it's crucial to my day to day.  But not as my interface, no. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=7066#Comment_7066</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=7066#Comment_7066</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:32:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>bpepple</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Unless you are dependent of playing Windows games, I'd say go for it.  Obviously, I'm a bit biased since I'm a <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple" >developer</a> for Fedora, but for most users, Linux has gotten to a point where almost anyone can use it without problems. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=7072#Comment_7072</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=7072#Comment_7072</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:11:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>hmobius</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @bpepple : Is Fedora ok running in a virtual pc? (specifically MS Virtual PC 2007) I tried installing Open BSD the other day and it completely hated the virtual display drivers. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=7091#Comment_7091</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=7091#Comment_7091</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:58:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>bpepple</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @hmobius: I'm not 100% sure, since I've never ran MS Virtual PC (or Windows since the mid-90's), but a quick google search shows that others have had success with a little bit of work.  Most likely your display problem was due to MS Virual PC only having 16-bit color resolution, while Open BSD & Linux tend to default to 24-bit color resolution.  Here's a link that might help you: <a href="http://davidbrunelle.com/2006/09/23/installing-fedora-core-on-microsoft-virtual-pc-2004/" >Fedora on MS Virtual PC</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8015#Comment_8015</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8015#Comment_8015</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:58:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>hmobius</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @bpepple : Excellent stuff. Thanks ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8020#Comment_8020</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8020#Comment_8020</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:10:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Unsub</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I run XP on my PC but had an old pentium2 laptop I stuck Puppy linux on instead of 95 and the difference was quite incredible. <br />I was able to do 90% of the stuff I use a computer for like forums etc. Even sites with lots of pics came up way faster. <br />I use a lot of freeware on my XP system but I think for most people who just want to experience what linux is like an older PC with a smaller distro like DSL(damn small linux or puppy is a great way to go. It will also give you a very secure place to put all that boring spreadsheet stuff away from all your porn/games etc. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8062#Comment_8062</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8062#Comment_8062</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:56:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>rfrancis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Unsub: I've messed a bit with Puppy on an ancient (early 2000) laptop I have lying around.  I'm a bit weirded out by how it wants to be booted off of CD exclusively.  As far as I can tell, anyway.  Sure is fast, though, I agree. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8097#Comment_8097</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8097#Comment_8097</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 04:44:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>eggzoomin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ "Unless you are dependent of playing Windows games, I'd say go for it. Obviously, I'm a bit biased since I'm a developer for Fedora, but for most users, Linux has gotten to a point where almost anyone can use it without problems."<br /><br />Unless you need any sort of specialised hardware support, or rely on Windows software. For musicians, Linux is less than useless. No Pro Tools, no Nuendo, no Cubase, no Logic, no Sonar and no plugins of any note. No support for proper soundcards - I don't mean anything manufactured by Creative, I mean professional multichannel interfaces. I'm well aware of Audacity, but to be honest, I've tried the 'doze version and it's nowhere near as good as the commercial packages. XP for me, then - it's fair to say that, at the moment, Vista is similarly useless. I've not looked into the subject in depth, as video editing is not my thing, but I suspect the same things are true for those who want to hack up great lumps of vids using specialised kit.<br /><br />Also worth noting is that I installed SUSE 10.1 on its release and it wouldn't recognise my graphics card, a Radeon 9700, no matter how I twisted and turned. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8103#Comment_8103</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8103#Comment_8103</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:05:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I will have to disagree with you here eggzoomin, as with regard to hardware support have a look at the <a href="http://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Matrix:Main" >ALSA soundcard matrix</a> you will see plenty of multichannel devices listed, you will have the same setup problems and learning curve with any linux install.  You have distros built for sound, like <a href="http://64studio.com/" >Studi64</a> which is already at Version 2.0. The software you can get for linux is not as bad as you say, for example <a href="http://jackaudio.org/" >Jack</a> is a great tool, you have to watch your hardware when building a multimedia box, but that is no different than any OS. <a href="http://ardour.org/" >Ardour</a>, <a href="http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/" >RoseGarden</a> and <a href="http://www.hydrogen-music.org/" >Hydrogen</a> are professional level tools, of course you only get what you pay for, but if you aren't willing to pirate very expensive software, these are all freely available. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8105#Comment_8105</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8105#Comment_8105</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:41:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>eggzoomin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Seems things have improved in the last year or two as regards hardware support, then. I'll still be sticking with Nuendo and ProTools though - looking at the packages you mentioned, the functionality still isn't as good as the commercial equivalents. The other problem for me is one of market inertia - any files I receive to work on from my clients - unless they're just .wavs - are either ProTools or Nuendo, so I'd either need to keep them installed on a 'doze box or change my working requirements to .wav only. Still, as you say, it's better than it was. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8126#Comment_8126</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8126#Comment_8126</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Elohim</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ You know, if you really need to run Windows programs, WINE can probably sort it for free, and there are higher end emulators if you're willing to shell out a small amount of cash. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8144#Comment_8144</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8144#Comment_8144</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:42:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ That's true Elohim, but I wouldn't advise it when dealing with low-latency applications especially ones that deal heavily with specialised hardware, dual-booting would probably be a better idea. If you have to do professional audio it is probably better to use the apps eggzoomin mentions, due in no small part to them being more mature and the ability to recognise industry accepted formats. I have heard there are more small recording studios turning to Jack/Ardour just from a cost aspect, because the don't have the funds for a professional suite. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8164#Comment_8164</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8164#Comment_8164</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:39:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Elohim</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ That's fair enough...<br /><br />I do both :p ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8174#Comment_8174</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8174#Comment_8174</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:14:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Doc Ocassi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I dualboot but haven't used any emulators or VMs, never really had the need to, I did have a little play with VMware but I only ever got it to load grub then it would just stop, I never found out what the problem was. I only boot into windows for final testing of websites in IE, may it suffer a quick but excruciatingly painful departure from desktops, everywhere!<br /><br />I presume it's going well for you, which distro did you go for? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8196#Comment_8196</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8196#Comment_8196</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:39:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Josh T.</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ A couple days into Ubuntu and it's going pretty well. Amarok is still being a bit of a jerk but i think thats more me just getting used to it (tomorrow we try to get my ipod to work, oh joy!). Other than that, everything i need is in the Add/remove programs list and if you can't find something (like Google Earth for instance) the forums are good about getting you set up. I'm happy so far, anyone else take the plunge? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8548#Comment_8548</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8548#Comment_8548</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:51:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Elohim</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I did, and it's been awesome so far...<br />I love the list of applications ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8587#Comment_8587</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8587#Comment_8587</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:17:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Josh T.</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ the list of applications is pretty sweet ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8597#Comment_8597</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8597#Comment_8597</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:22:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Dirk Deppey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I flirted with Mandrake three years ago, but gave it up as being too buggy (and its parent company too eager to dig into my wallet). A network-administrator friend asked me to give Ubuntu a try, since he'd installed it on one of his company machines and liked it a great deal. I went with a dual-boot box at first, but when refurbishing my computer for the new TCJ job, I ditched the Windows partition two years ago and haven't looked back since.<br /><br />Ubuntu's free, all the software is free, it does everything I need it to do, and generally kicks ass. What more do you want? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8676#Comment_8676</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8676#Comment_8676</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:45:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>lazarus corporation</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Elohim - glad you're loving it so far.<br /><br />@ Josh T. - <a href="http://www.simplehelp.net/2007/07/04/how-to-use-amarok-to-manage-your-ipod-in-ubuntu/" >How to use Amarok to manage your iPod in Ubuntu</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8716#Comment_8716</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8716#Comment_8716</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:05:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Josh T.</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yeah, I've been thumbing through forums and getting the same lists, thats a pretty good link though, thanks for it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8754#Comment_8754</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8754#Comment_8754</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:01:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>lofidelity</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ If your interested, there is also a program in fairly early beta called Songbird, it's actually based off the Mozilla stack.  It has a plugin for ipod support, and seems to work fairly smoothly, and the skin looks pretty slick.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.songbirdnest.com/" > Linky here </a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8779#Comment_8779</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8779#Comment_8779</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:28:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>jcfiala</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm on a dual boot with Ubuntu at both work and home, and I'm generally pretty happy with it.  Easy enough to set up, and only a little work figuring out how to handle some of the obscure bits.  One thing though - dual monitor support on Ubuntu is cruddy - a coworker was trying to get it to work and got nowhere. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8790#Comment_8790</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8790#Comment_8790</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:16:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>hmobius</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Just a note on Songbird. It's got a lot of experience in media players behind it and Mozilla as a base. It's a little odd using it as a media player at the mo. The interface is iTunes-y but the USP is the app's instant playlist creation for anything it finds on a website. For example, just pop over to piccadillyrecords.com and then any page. For some reason it's still only at v0.3 with v0.4 due in Jnaury now I'd guess but its an interesting mashup and should becoem more so if they start to integrate some of VLC into it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8880#Comment_8880</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8880#Comment_8880</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:34:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>stevel</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ (full disclosure: I work for Songbird)<br /><br />We just released 0.4rc1 last night.  We're hoping to make 0.4 final by the New Year.  On Windows/Mac, we already use VLC for our media core playback.  On Linux we use GStreamer for all the media decoding.  Is there something specific you think VLC would provide us on Linux that GStreamer doesn't?<br /><br />cheers, and thanks for the comments. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8889#Comment_8889</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8889#Comment_8889</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:30:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>hmobius</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @stevel: Sorry - it wasn't a specific comment \ critique of VLC vs GStreamer per se. First I'd heard of GStreamer actually. My big wish for it at the moment is for RSS (Podcast) subscription for auto-downloads. If it's already there I haven't found it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8920#Comment_8920</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8920#Comment_8920</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:24:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>stevel</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @hmobius: No worries, wasn't interpreted as a critique :)  We have subscription support for music blogs, but no current way to subscribe to podcasts for auto-downloads.  That's definitely on our roadmap though, I think in the next release or two (we're on 6-8 week release cycles, so that's not as far off as it sounds :)) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pros and cons of taking up a Linux system</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8959#Comment_8959</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=145&amp;Focus=8959#Comment_8959</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:15:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>jwelcher</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm a professional Unix guy since the 80s, etc, used and supported most major Linux variants (rpm-style RedHat/CentOS/SuSe, debian-style, from source-style, and other deviants) and Win and Mac. I think the questions boil down to what you want to do with your computer. Gamers who care about refresh rate and optimal rendering are going to need Win, video producers are going to need a Mac. Scientists running compute clusters will need Linux.<br /><br />The Pro and Con question is hard to answer. I think a more telling question is: what linux distro is the best "modern" desktop replacement and what are the downsides?<br /><br />Two years ago, I would have said SuSE. It included the more software and config choices than say Red Hat/Fedora/CentOS, the YaST gui admin was decent, and things like USB devices and multimedia formats and tools worked better and looked good. SUSE slid a bit in the transition from the Germans to Novell in the last 2 years it was just plain eclipsed by Ubuntu.<br /><br />I am extremely impressed with Ubuntu 7.10. The "Synaptic Package Manager" is very simple to use. Admin interfaces simple. Support for all manner of USB devices is impressive. Attach a camera or a USB stick and the right stuff happens. There are still "typical" linuxism, but Ubuntu and it's wonderful support forums knock them down quickly. One example of a current issue is support for the latest Flash 9 player in web browsers under 64-bit installs. It doesn't "just work", but there are FAQs out there to help. But it took me a bit of tweaking to make it work and I do this for a living. Once it was working, I was watching the newly launched <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540" >MSNBC video player</a> and it worked as well in Ubuntu as it did under Mac or Linux. (Well, except for full screen...).<br /><br />So I would have to say if you are a Win/Mac type person looking to get into Linux, I will third and fourth the recommendations of this board and suggest Ubuntu. Instead of the pain of configuring dual-booting, note that there is a VMWare player included in the packages for free. VMWare will host guest operating systems in a slightly slower virtual host. So you can run Windows apps and Microsoft software. Also check out <a href="http://www.parallels.com/en/products/workstation/" >Parallels for Linux</a>. Intel Core 2 Duo chips support hardware virtualization which avoids the software slowness by passing commands directly to the CPU from guest OSes. You can run REAL Windows at native speeds under Linux. Graphics hardware is lagging a bit, some gamers probably still need to dual-boot.<br /><br />[RELIGIOUS MODE ENGAGE] What is the BEST desktop platform right now?<br /><br />Mac on Intel. Here's why.<br /><br />It is UNIX and based largely on FreeBSD (my favorite OS). You get UNIX tools and software free, the best GUI interface, and you get the vastly awesome mac Multimedia capabilites: sound, graphics, video. You can expect your cameras, scanners and printers to "just work" (Ubuntu still lags). Leopard is VERY NICE and innovations like the total backup solution Time Machine are compelling.<br /><br />But the killer sale is using Parallels and BootCamp.  BootCamp is a Windows dual-boot partition, but installed via an Apple supported installer that could walk your Grandma through the process. Making a dual-boot computer has wrecked more hardened sysadmins than I can count but BootCamp is easy. Install Parallels 3.0 you have the COMPLETE PACKAGE. You can now use the DISK PARTITION of bootcamp as your "virtual Windows Machine". Translation: you can run windows inside Mac as a virtual host running at near native speeds. The new "coherence" mode of Parallels shares your desktop and cut and paste buffers transparently between Windows apps and Mac apps. It is mind blowing to see it work. I have my Mac Doc at the bottom of the screen, and the Windows Start menu at the top. BUT, if you need to play BioShock, you just go to preferences and select your Windows disk and reboot. At that point, you have a full-fledged Windows Only machine and Gamers will be very satisfied with the frame rates. To put the dollop of whipped creme on top, I also run an Ubuntu guest operating system under Parallels. There are differences between the UNIX/*BSD origins of Mac's OS X and Linux, so it's nice to crank up a pure Linux environment esp for certain Open Source software. <br /><br />So there you go. If you get a Mac with Parallels, you get UNIX/*BSD/Linux/Max OS X/Windows, all at native speeds.<br /><br />I'll save talking about the built in Green Screen technology in the Leopard version of iChat for later... but iChat is certainly the Mac Killer App. It's worth having a Mac just so you can do the 3 or 4 person round-the-world iChat conference. I do an Australia/California/Michigan iChat a couple times a month and it is so much better than a phone call. Now that I can have fish swimming around my head during the call, I feel like my life has reached some kind of pinnacle. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>