<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Whitechapel - On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:38:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
			<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>
				Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.4 &amp; Feed Publisher
			</generator>
			<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34435#Comment_34435</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34435#Comment_34435</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:47:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The tenor -- and, frankly, the informedness -- of online comics conversation over the last five years has changed to the point where I probably need to explain once again why I don't stay long on company-owned works.<br /><br />It's as simple as this -- if I don't own it, I'm not going to spend my life on it.  Joe Quesada and Dan Buckley know that, they're fine with that, and they hire me on that understanding.  EDITED TO ADD: I am work-for-hire exclusive to Marvel, and I move between projects at Marvel with their agreement.  I think a few people forgot that.<br /><br />Or, if you like: you can only paint someone else's house for so long before you start thinking that it might be nice to own your own house one day.<br /><br />I'm okay with painting other people's houses for short periods, because I'm good at it and it pays well and on nice days it's fun.  But I never ever confuse painting a house for owning that house.  And if I spent every waking hour painting other people's houses, I wouldn't be able to build houses of my own.<br /><br />The more creators who only took on housepainting as a part-time gig, the healthier this medium would be.<br /><br />For those of you who harbour a wish to write comics, consider this today: you're either on this side of the line, with me and Brian K Vaughan and Garth Ennis and Grant Morrison and Ed Brubaker and Matt Fraction... or you're not. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34453#Comment_34453</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34453#Comment_34453</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:18:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>orwellseyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'll confess, I generally don't go in for the non-creator owned stuff. My first comics experience came from reading Cerebus, so Dave Sim's wonderful crazy got in me pretty young. I really like the idea that if you said "That's it, no more 'Fell'" that would be that. In 60 years the estate of Warren Ellis (or your robot head) wouldn't be suing the hell out of Image to get some pittance. Some people buy "cruelty-free" products, I like comics that the creators own.<br /><br />Honestly, I'd really like to see more short runs by great creators. I'm not going to buy Green Lantern year in and out if it's terrible. If I knew that Garth Ennis was writing for a year, then a year of Brian K. Vaughn or someone new and talented, then I'd be interested. Especially if those creators weren't at the whim of "continuity" or crossovers or other such. Give me 12 issues of great stories. For every screaming jibbering fanboy who loses his lunchables because Spider-Man is wearing the wrong color socks you'd draw in people who haven't devoted themselves just to the character, but rather are drawn in by great writing. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34460#Comment_34460</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34460#Comment_34460</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:46:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Joe Paoli</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This is fine and a great way for you to strike a balance, as well as work on a fantastic variety of projects.<br /><br />It doesn't change the fact that it's likely reading Thunderbolts after you leave may very well likely be like watching West Wing after Sorkin left. Lamenting that is part of the grieving process, so please don't begrudge us that. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34464#Comment_34464</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34464#Comment_34464</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:14:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mrph</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ No complaints here. Although I'll be interested to see what Marvel do with your first arc antagonists afterwards - Thunderbolts has given a number of D-list heroes some credibility, a touch of cool and hard-earned anti-registration credentials, so I'll be a bit disappointed if they don't turn up again somewhere. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34465#Comment_34465</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34465#Comment_34465</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:20:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mojojoseph</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I have t admit, for a long time I was very much on the other side of the line. My own ideas were going to be all novels and films, and all my comic work would be on established characters. <br /><br />Now however...there are still books I would love to write for because they meant a lot to me in my formative years, like X-Men and any teen superheroes books. But now I also have a lot of my own stuff I want to do in comics. The first project is getting a five page introduction comic in an anthology series I'm publishing out later this year (you heard it here first, etc etc).<br /><br />I think for me it's because you just can't do the important stories that you would like or hope may define your career as a writer within the books of the big companies. It has to be your own stuff. For example, to take your work Mr.Ellis, I always consider comics like <em >Scars</em>, <em >Transmetroploitan</em> and <em >Desolation Jones </em>to be the ones that really define your own desired work, whereas the work you do for mainstream comics like <em >Iron Man </em>are fantastic and often the best the character has been done (Ihad absolutely no interest in Iron Man until <em >Extremis</em>) but it's as you say, it's a bit of fun and a job, the real creative fun comes out when your doing the work which all you and all your characters. <br /><br />I'm glad I came to that decision as I matured as a person and a writer, otherwise I would have been a chronic Mary Sue writer, writing absolute rubbish like Chuck Austen. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34471#Comment_34471</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34471#Comment_34471</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:42:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Greg SBB!</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Like you say, there's room for both and, I imagine, they fulfil different remits (unbridled creativity and longterm gain vs paying the mortgage now).<br /><br />While I'd happily trade your whole run on various WFH titles for new Desolation Jones, Doctor Sleepless or Lazarus Churchyard, without company-owned stuff I'd never have enjoyed the madcap ride of Nextwave or your excellent run on Excalibur or the bitter genius of Ruins. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34472#Comment_34472</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34472#Comment_34472</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:45:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>deadhuman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Mr. Warren Ellis<br />Thanx. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34474#Comment_34474</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34474#Comment_34474</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:07:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>The Rascal King</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ...Do you want someone to paint your house? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34475#Comment_34475</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34475#Comment_34475</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:08:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Joe Paoli</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yeah, thanks for your great work on the book should not go unsaid. Always looking forward to your next projects. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34479#Comment_34479</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34479#Comment_34479</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:17:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Ferburton</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I admittedly never actually picked up an issue of Thunderbolts. Thought about it, since it had Warrens name on it, but I didn't feel like I was familiar enough with the characters and it'd be like starting a book in the middle. Why I only read books that have a starting point that isn't 50 years ago, not that Thunderbolts is, but the characters in the story all have their own histories that I have no idea about. I need to know those things for some reason before I can enjoy a story.<br /><br />I only buy creator owned stuff though, because people running around in capes and the sort doesn't appeal very much to me. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34541#Comment_34541</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34541#Comment_34541</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:43:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >I'm glad I came to that decision as I matured as a person and a writer, otherwise I would have been a chronic Mary Sue writer, writing absolute rubbish like Chuck Austen. </em><br /><br />1) "Mary Sue" is a shortcut to thinking.  On the whole, people I see using the term "Mary Sue" never ever get to be working writers.<br /><br />2) Chuck Austen started out in creator-owned work. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34544#Comment_34544</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34544#Comment_34544</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:55:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>TacoHugsPHD</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Warren, thanks for the two awesome arcs. So far it's been a roller coaster ride full of pervert suits and breakneck twists. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34546#Comment_34546</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34546#Comment_34546</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:00:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>gdwessel</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >For those of you who harbour a wish to write comics, consider this today: you're either on this side of the line, with me and Brian K Vaughan and Garth Ennis and Grant Morrison and Ed Brubaker and Matt Fraction... or you're not.</em><br /><br />Nope, no issues here. I would love to work for Marvel and DC in my life, but I harbor no illusions of ownership of their stuff, nor do I feel they're the only options. I have plenty of ideas of My Own to cultivate outside of that in addition to ideas of Their Own too. I know (as much as I can without being In The Biz) what I'm setting myself up for and I welcome it all. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34548#Comment_34548</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34548#Comment_34548</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:03:27 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>joaomachado</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm used to just lurking at Whitechapel, but seeing as you are admitting questions, here's this one: when has the language changed from &quot;i don't do superhero comics&quot; to &quot;i don't stay long in superhero comics&quot;? I'm not judging, but I remember when Orbiter and a bunch of Wildstorm deals were flowing, and you said you had one or two superhero projects (maybe the 'Joey Cavalieri one'?), and then you'd be totally done with it? Why bother underlining these differences at all? As a reader I do consider your lengthy creator-owned work your 'tricks bible', and still, whenever I need to explain your style, I go back to the cape job.  You do not stay long on a said property, but if I had to measure what I've read in pages, I'd guess you've written more superheroes than creator-owned. Is this true? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34549#Comment_34549</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34549#Comment_34549</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:07:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SullyEliot</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >For those of you who harbour a wish to write comics, consider this today: you're either on this side of the line, with me and Brian K Vaughan and Garth Ennis and Grant Morrison and Ed Brubaker and Matt Fraction... or you're not.</blockquote><br />While I do harbor a desire to write comics and screenplays, I've got absolutely no idea how to go about getting on one side of the line or the other. Oh, sad, sad day.<br /><br />Would I be wrong in assuming that you do enjoy painting people's houses, just not for extended periods of time?  If I recall, you've expressed a desire to write more Nextwave, should Stuart Immonen become available, and when I read it, I got the feeling that you had a lot of fun writing it. On that same line of thought, do you consider it a good thing to write both creator-owned and not-creator-owned titles at some point in one's career, or is it better to do just the one or the other? It seems to me that the best creator-owned titles are by people like yourself and Brubaker, people who write on both sides of the industry. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34551#Comment_34551</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34551#Comment_34551</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:15:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >when has the language changed from "i don't do superhero comics" to "i don't stay long in superhero comics"?</em><br /><br />Years ago.  Keep up, son!<br /><br />When the market changed, to the point where non-superhero books weren't getting ordered in two-thirds of stores -- when that actually became a submarket of its own, in fact.  I've talked about this before.  I say what I think needs to be said at the time -- dogma is stupid, the environment around you changes all the time and you need to adapt with it.  Original work is still and always will be the only coin of value that a writer has -- my point always was and is that you need to be bringing something new to the table, and you can't do that if all you ever intended to do was write Spider-Man.<br /><br /><em >but if I had to measure what I've read in pages, I'd guess you've written more superheroes than creator-owned. Is this true?  </em><br /><br />I don't think so.  Possibly, possibly not.  Might be a close-run thing!  Having 1300 pages of TRANSMET in there makes it difficult to guess -- that's as many pages as my ULTIMATE FF, EXCALIBUR, THUNDERBOLTS, IRON MAN and ULTIMATE GALACTUS runs, right there...   Not particularly interested in the calculation, but I think it'd about balance out... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34554#Comment_34554</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34554#Comment_34554</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:22:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>brianwood</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >"On that same line of thought, do you consider it a good thing to write both creator-owned and not-creator-owned titles at some point in one's career, or is it better to do just the one or the other? It seems to me that the best creator-owned titles are by people like yourself and Brubaker, people who write on both sides of the industry."</blockquote><br /><br /><br />Jumping in here, just to put my name in the "only one side of the industry" column.  I've done company books here and there (Gen X in '00, Vampirella one-shot in '03) but what's gotten me where I am is pure creator-owned work, and it's what pays the bills and clothes my kid and feeds the Roth IRA accounts.  Not to say my choices are better or worse than any of my peers, just that it can be done the way I've done it.<br /><br />And I don't think that writing on both sides of the industry automatically makes someone a better writer.  But certainly Warren and Ed can write circles around me!  :)<br /><br />bri ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34555#Comment_34555</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34555#Comment_34555</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:23:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>NickMB</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Of the writers you listed, most of them have done at least one four or five year run on a company-owned series at some stage. Most extremely, I think Ennis will have done nearly a hundred issues of Punisher by the time he finally jacks it in later this year. Whereas I'm having trouble thinking of a work for hire job of yours, certainly lately, when you've done more than 12 or so issues. (15 or 16 for Ultimate Galactus, maybe.)<br />Do you think its a difference in your approach, or is it just that you're a hardliner in the movement? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34556#Comment_34556</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34556#Comment_34556</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:23:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Tony Lee</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Agreed. <br /><br />If I could afford to, I'd spend more time on creator owned, things like Hope Falls and Dodge & Twist are far more gratifying to me than the work for hire, but I have to say that unless you're a 'known' writer like pretty much everyone you state there (including Fraction these days), you have to take what you can get, and if that's a long term gig? Then you take the long term gig. Because creator owned makes me nothing until I gain the readership. And long term? That gets me the readership.<br /><br />Down the line? Sure. I'd love to be able to throw my own stuff out more. But currently? I'm not known enough to look for anything more than whatever I can get. And my short term with Marvel's spandex (approximately one ten pager every two years) is substantially shorter than yours...<br /><br />Still, agreed. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34557#Comment_34557</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34557#Comment_34557</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:25:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>jim_mayniam</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ thanks for the arcs, warren!  i generally follow writers not titles, so i'll be on board for whatever you do next. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34558#Comment_34558</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34558#Comment_34558</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:31:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ In hindsight, there is one thing that needs to be recapitulated here, as I guess memories are short:<br /><br />I actually had no intention of going back into WFH (work for hire).  The creator owned stuff was selling to expected numbers and things were ticking along fine.<br /><br />What happened was that Mark Millar and Brian Bendis got in touch -- they'd hit a scheduling wall and weren't able to service twelve issues of ULTIMATE FANTASTIC FOUR, and asked me to help them out.  And when your friends ask you for a favour, you do it, you know?  So I said yes, and got to work.<br /><br />That's how I ended up doing more superhero comics.<br /><br />The first odd thing happened after the first issue came out.  Now, remember, I'd been doing mostly original material for the previous few years, and doing fine.  But I was suddenly flooded with email from kids -- teenagers -- who had never heard of me before.  What was happening, it turned out, was that I was reaching seven or eight hundred stores at maximum, and there was anything up to a couple of thousand stores who just weren't ordering my stuff.  I remember talking this over with people at Marvel and particularly DC, and it turned out that this was in fact the case -- that two thirds of comics stores really don't order much other than superhero comics and a few licensed books.  And in those years of doing my own thing, the audience had turned over to the point where there were people who'd never read a thing by me.  It hadn't been all that long ago that I'd been selling 200,000 copies of DV8 and 150,000 copies of WOLVERINE, I thought...<br /><br />The second really odd thing came in some months later.  Sales of TRANSMET TPBs spiked massively.  And the only thing that had changed was that I was writing UFF.  What had happened was that these new readers had liked UFF, gone looking for other stuff by me, found nothing in their local store, gone to Amazon or bookstores, and picked up TRANSMET books.  A few months later, I saw numbers on all my other creator-owned TPBs pick up too.<br /><br />And now we can sell more than 12,000 copies of CRECY in a matter of months.<br /><br />And what's REALLY strange is that I discovered Marvel under Joe Quesada and Dan Buckley is in fact a really nice place to work. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34561#Comment_34561</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34561#Comment_34561</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:33:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lynn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well put, that's why I started with an indy comic. And now if all goes well I'm getting a paid gig. I suppose that would be like people paying to see round my house. <br /><br />And that's fine with me. It's a labour of love really. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34562#Comment_34562</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34562#Comment_34562</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:33:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Do you think its a difference in your approach, or is it just that you're a hardliner in the movement? </em><br /><br />Oh, it's just a difference in approach.  You didn't see Garth, for instance, doing much <em >other</em> WFH.  Three miniseries in five years, in addition to PUNISHER?  When Grant was doing NEW X-MEN at Marvel, he was <em >only</em> doing NEW X-MEN.<br /><br />I get wary of becoming instititionalised...! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34563#Comment_34563</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34563#Comment_34563</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:34:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Not to say my choices are better or worse than any of my peers, just that it can be done the way I've done it.</em><br /><br />Absolutely.  As I say above, if Mark hadn't emailed me, I'd probably be continuing in the pattern I had in 2001-2004... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34565#Comment_34565</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34565#Comment_34565</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:38:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Well put, that's why I started with an indy comic. And now if all goes well I'm getting a paid gig. I suppose that would be like people paying to see round my house. </em><br /><br />Garth and I used to call it "the Clint Eastwood model," back in the 90s.  Clint would do a film for the studio, because it meant he could do one for himself after.  So he did THE ROOKIE or whatever, and then did WHITE HUNTER BLACK HEART... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34569#Comment_34569</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34569#Comment_34569</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:46:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jonathan Hickman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Garth and I used to call it "the Clint Eastwood model," back in the 90s. Clint would do a film for the studio, because it meant he could do one for himself after. So he did THE ROOKIE or whatever, and then did WHITE HUNTER BLACK HEART...</em><br /><br />So, do you look at most of your mainstream work as short-term money and your creator-owned as long-term? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34574#Comment_34574</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34574#Comment_34574</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:53:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ScottBieser</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ DV8 sold 200,000 copies?<br /><br />I was right; you <em >have</em> signed a pact with Beelzebub. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34575#Comment_34575</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34575#Comment_34575</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:54:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >So, do you look at most of your mainstream work as short-term money and your creator-owned as long-term? </em><br /><br />That is actually what it amounts to, in fact.<br /><br />I mean, I find other benefits to working with Marvel.  But the fact of the matter is that the creator-owned work pays me far more, for far longer, than the work for hire.  The WFH continually introduces me to a new audience.  I consider myself to be writing for two different markets, at this time. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34576#Comment_34576</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34576#Comment_34576</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:54:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Muldrate</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well, I don't know if "congratulations" is the right word here, but Iike I lot of others, I'm personally excited about this.  There's a handful or writers that I'll follow onto any book for at least the first issue (and WE is one or I wouldn't be here), but as much I as I enjoyed Nextwave and Thunderbolts, Transmet and a few issues of Global Frequency are some of my favorite books of all time.  <br /><br />As someone with no ties to the comics industry, I don't have an extensive interest in who owns what, but I have found that creators in general seem to do their best work when the continuity/corporate restrictions are gone and they can work in an environment of pure freedom.  Indeed, who wouldn't work best under those conditions? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34577#Comment_34577</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34577#Comment_34577</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:54:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>brianwood</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think the seven variant covers might have had something to do with it!  Still, that was a hot book.<br /><br />bri ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34579#Comment_34579</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34579#Comment_34579</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:55:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>GregCarter</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >For those of you who harbour a wish to write comics, consider this today: you're either on this side of the line, with me and Brian K Vaughan and Garth Ennis and Grant Morrison and Ed Brubaker and Matt Fraction... or you're not.</blockquote><br />For a long time I only wanted to write my own stuff (and draw it). But that was while I was learning how it all works together. Now that I'm working with artists on my original titles, I started thinking I wouldn't mind writing other people's characters too. So I've done a little script doctoring for a few artists that don't work with a full-time writer but need a little help. I wanted to make comics but not be part of the comics business. This has confirmed that I'd like to be on the other side of the line. I wouldn't want to stay on any one title for very long, and not necessarily for the Big Two.<br /><br />My fanboy dream title? I would <em >kill </em>to write an arc of Buffy. Dear Joss, I know a guy... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34581#Comment_34581</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34581#Comment_34581</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:57:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >I think the seven variant covers might have had something to do with it! </em><br /><br />Noooo, surely not...!<br /><br /><br />If anyone was curious:<br /><br />Cover by Humberto Ramos & Sal Regla<br />Gluttony Cover by Glenn Fabry<br />Greed Cover by J. Scott Campbell & Alex Garner<br />Lust Cover by Kevin Nowlan<br />Pride cover by Adam Hughes<br />Wrath Cover by Liberatore<br />Envy Cover by Michael Lopez & Edwin Rosell<br />Sloth Cover by Jim Lee & J.D. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34583#Comment_34583</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34583#Comment_34583</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:04:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jonathan Hickman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >That is actually what it amounts to, in fact.</em><br /><br />Yeah, that's what I thought - thanks! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34585#Comment_34585</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34585#Comment_34585</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:08:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It makes perfect sense.  If you can make money and keep friends by doing stories that don't really belong to you, why not?  Especially if you're good at it.<br /><br />I enjoyed UFF, I LOVED Nextwave, but things like Transmet have so much more heart and intelligence to them, I wouldn't trade them for anything.<br /><br />Ennis' Punisher is fantastic, but it doesn't hold a candle to Preacher, to add an example of someone else's work. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34590#Comment_34590</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34590#Comment_34590</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:20:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SullyEliot</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Most extremely, I think Ennis will have done nearly a hundred issues of Punisher by the time he finally jacks it in later this year.</blockquote><br /><br />Er... the MAX title will finish in at just under 60 issues, if I recall correctly.<br /><br /><blockquote >And I don't think that writing on both sides of the industry automatically makes someone a better writer. But certainly Warren and Ed can write circles around me! :)</blockquote><br /><br />I'll rephrase. The writers I like the most seem to write on both sides of the industry. Their stories seem more fresh, largely because they are able to do whatever they want in their creator-owned works, whereas in 616 Marvel of the DCU they're limited by continuity. When someone tells me "Oh you can't write that, it's too __________," I think my writing as a whole takes a nosedive. Dunno, maybe I'm just looking at it funny.<br /><br />---<br /><br />My interest in you, Warren, stems from reading Desolation Jones, when a friend of mine accused me of mimicking your style and handed me a copy of "Made in England." It was one of the first comics I ever read, and will always be, in my opinion, one of the finest. All this talk about creator-owned titles has me wondering if Desolation Jones is one of them. I was always curious. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34592#Comment_34592</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34592#Comment_34592</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:21:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em > All this talk about creator-owned titles has me wondering if Desolation Jones is one of them.</em><br /><br /><br />Yes. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34594#Comment_34594</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34594#Comment_34594</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:26:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>TechnocratJT</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Er... the MAX title will finish in at just under 60 issues, if I recall correctly</blockquote><br /><br />He did <em >Welcome Back Frank</em>, the ongoing MK title and <em >Born</em> before that. Plus some specials. All together its safely over a 100 issues. Tom Peyer did do some fill in the MK run but I can't recall where. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34596#Comment_34596</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34596#Comment_34596</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:33:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pablo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Have you ever considered doing the other approach, the taking one company-owned book and only one book for a few years as a constant, stable source of income that keeps your name fresh among superhero comics readers while cranking out the creator-owned stuff? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34601#Comment_34601</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34601#Comment_34601</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:03:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>philnelson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Jumping back out of trolldom for the moment to say I'm really enjoying this conversation. <br /><br />Back to the shadows. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34602#Comment_34602</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34602#Comment_34602</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:12:11 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Have you ever considered doing the other approach, the taking one company-owned book and only one book for a few years </em><br /><br />That's less interesting to me. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34605#Comment_34605</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34605#Comment_34605</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:29:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>TF</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I find it interesting that there is still a need to explain the difference between "That's their's - this is mine".<br />Not everyone works in comics but everyone knows the difference between a day job and a long week end.<br /><br />I am curious what the minimum audience for a monthly, creator-owned title would be to make it worth the creator's time in the short term.  Specifically for the writer who is giving the lions share of the backend to the artist.<br /><br />I'm speaking as someone who has just found an artist to begin work on a pitch to Image.  If it works out I will do more creator-owned material simply because I don't think I have a good Spider-man or whoever story in me to save my life.<br /><br />Warren - I find it interesting comparing your pre-UFF business model of purely creator owned to something Brubaker said in an interview on Newsarama regarding Criminal - that he makes no money from that book - and in the odd month that it does make cash he has that money saved for the Art Team.<br /><br />It strikes me that a comic book writer is continuously paying their dues - either because they make their name in the shadow of an iconic character as one of many who've told part on their never ending story or because the majority of the comic buying public stop dead at familiar superheros. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34606#Comment_34606</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34606#Comment_34606</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:32:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>barrywynn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Just picked up the first trade, FAITH IN MONSTERS, last week. So I'm late to the party. Do you know if there will be another?<br /><br />Either way, thanks for a great read. I'd have never believed that anyone would make The Fernis Twins (or rather twin) interesting. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34608#Comment_34608</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34608#Comment_34608</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:47:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>MattAdler</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Understanding your comments about creator-owned vs. company-owned, is it your level of enjoyment that determines precisely how long you stick with a company-owned book? Did you ultimately get bored with the concept or characters of Thunderbolts? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34609#Comment_34609</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34609#Comment_34609</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:51:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>MaC</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This thread has been really great, I just recently read through Come in Alone on CBR and like many others I was curious about the attitude shift towards the work-for-hire stuff.  Always nice to get some insight in the comics world from you Warren.  With Astonishing coming up I figured something had to get the axe and your Thunderbolts arc seemed like it was buildings towards an end within a reasonable amount of time.  But I'm personally glad you don't spend much time in Marvel's sandbox.  I'd much rather have more Fell or another book like Orbiter then &quot;Warren Ellis on whatever.&quot; ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34611#Comment_34611</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34611#Comment_34611</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Brandon Seifert</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Hmm.  That's an excellent metaphor for it.  Thanks for that. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34615#Comment_34615</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34615#Comment_34615</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:05:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>wishlish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote ><br />2) Chuck Austen started out in creator-owned work.</blockquote><br /><br />And, to be fair, his creator-owned work is quite readable for porn comics. (That's meant to be a compliment, not damnation with faint praise.) His STRIPS and World-something-something superhero porn were no IRONWOOD or BIRDLAND, but they were readable, with interesting characters. You could do worse.<br /><br />I liked Warren's THUNDERBOLTS, and I'll miss it when it's gone. Reminded me of reading MARSHALL LAW in the early 90s. Good stuff. Thanks for doing it. Also: you got good work out of Deodato. Deodato's an interesting stylist, but I've seen some terrible frustrations in his storytelling skills manifest with other authors. Didn't see that here, which confirms my long-standing hypothesis that you are excellent at getting the best work out of your artists. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34619#Comment_34619</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34619#Comment_34619</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:28:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>CodyMelartin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well, I'm sorry to see you leave Thunderbolts. Your run with Deodato has been really outstanding.<br /><br />This discussion reminded me of Warren's old <a href="http://www.comicbookresources.com/columns/archive.cgi?column=cia" >Come In Alone column</a>, which frequently delved into the WFH vs Creator-Owned debate. CIA is very fascinating to read now, 8 years later, as a sort of comics industry time capsule. Warren's thoughts on the then-upcoming Ultimate Marvel line and Joe Quesada's rise to Editor-in-Chief are particularly interesting, given what would end up happening.<br /><br />EDIT: Damn, MaC beat me to the CIA citation. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34620#Comment_34620</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34620#Comment_34620</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:29:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Egon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I hate to say it, but I'm waaaaay late in boarding the Ellis party train. I'd heard of Transmet before, and you seemed to hang out in the same internet circles that I frequent but Thunderbolts was my first actual purchase with your name on it. Now I've got a growing library of your trades and hang out on WhiteChapel all day. <br /><br />I don't even think I'd be reading Marvel again if it weren't for seeing Bendis' work on Sam & Twitch and Powers beforehand. It's certainly a better place than when I left it back in `95. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34626#Comment_34626</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34626#Comment_34626</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:43:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Andre Navarro</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ My area has always been mature, non-superhero comics (especially Vertigo), so I know you from way back. I've read some good superhero stories ("The Ultimates"), but I can't stand most of them. No wonder one of my favorite single issues in superhero comics is Marvel Knights Punisher #2, where the Punisher uses Spider-Man as a human shield against the Russian. <em >Of course</em> the story was written by the brilliant Garth Ennis.<br /><br />I like the way there's no big gap in quality between your creator-owned work and WFH. Of course your creator-owned work will always be better, but it's nice to see you also do an excellent job on WFH comics too. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34628#Comment_34628</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34628#Comment_34628</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:49:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>kaiho</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ i think i'll stick to the title after Warren's departure but only because a fellow Greek will possibly take up the writing chores. I'll give him a couple of issues to "convince" me Thunderbolts can take my $3 per month.<br /><br />i wish the current creative team could stick for more issues though. It was not enough for me .... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34634#Comment_34634</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34634#Comment_34634</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:14:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>joe.distort</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ i thought t bolts was always going to be finite for you? either way, its been good, and gage is a pretty good writer, not in the same twisted way, but enough so that ill stick around. good knows i dont read superheroes for their ability to move the medium forward, they are just good rollicking no-budget-constraints fun 98% of the time. if i do ever get it together, i would want to stick to a majority of creator owned action-at the same time would i NOT want to write some maainstream dc/marvel things? are you shitting me? definitiely want to take some of those characters for a run through their paces. i dunno, it just seems strange to have to explain this kinda thing.dont people just know this stuff? this isnt the first time this weekend that i have realized that things i consider to just be assumed knoweledge are definitely not .also, for a good laugh, compare and contrast the thread on here with the newsarama thread. those kids/man children are soooo uptight is fucking amazing. <br /><br />ps: since i dont know what the hell a mary sue writer is, is that a good thing? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34639#Comment_34639</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34639#Comment_34639</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:36:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >i thought t bolts was always going to be finite for you? </em><br /><br />Yep. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34640#Comment_34640</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34640#Comment_34640</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:38:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KaraokeFanboy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This conversation on the heels of the Superman rights settlement.  The cosmos is listening.<br /><br />For what it's worth, a good writer can make a company-owned property and make you forget it isn't really theirs.  Consider "NextWave."  I can only imagine what fell to the cutting room floor, but that wasn't a B-list Marvel team book, it was an Ellis let loose on superhero camp book.  Thank God for it.<br /><br />I'm confused on the difference, though.  Does Warren OWN Spider Jerusalem?  If he wanted to continue Spider's gonzo adventures at Avatar, could he, no problems? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34641#Comment_34641</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34641#Comment_34641</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:38:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BClayMoore</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This is all interesting discussion, as it's something I've been kicking around of late with other creators.<br /><br />I've found that, financially speaking, I can make quite a bit more money on well-placed creator-owned projects, and, as a result, it's hard for me to rationalize not pursuing that work with some vigor.<br /><br />Of course, the advantages that come attached to work-for-hire are self-evident, and in many ways work-for-hire is much, much less taxing than creator-owned work. <br /><br />-BCM ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34643#Comment_34643</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34643#Comment_34643</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:38:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >i think i'll stick to the title after Warren's departure but only because a fellow Greek will possibly take up the writing chores</em><br /><br />Heh! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34644#Comment_34644</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34644#Comment_34644</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:41:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >I'm confused on the difference, though. Does Warren OWN Spider Jerusalem? If he wanted to continue Spider's gonzo adventures at Avatar, could he, no problems? </em><br /><br />Darick and I own TRANSMET and all that is included in that.  If the terms of the contract were met (and don't ask me what they are because I don't recall), certainly we could do new TRANSMET stories elsewhere. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34645#Comment_34645</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34645#Comment_34645</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:48:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>TechnocratJT</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I'll give him a couple of issues to "convince" me Thunderbolts can take my $3 per month.</blockquote><br /><br />Christos Gage is  good writer whose current role seems to be the pinch hitter. If you want a clear idea of what his work is like at its best, take a look at his <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Captain-America-London-Falling-Marvel/dp/0785121811/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1206924790&sr=8-2" >Union Jack</a> mini. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34647#Comment_34647</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34647#Comment_34647</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:52:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Christos Gage is good writer whose current role seems to be the pinch hitter. </em><br /><br />A lot of writers come up like that.  And Gage, I believe, has been a professional writer for some ten years.  I imagine he'll become a main guy in the Brevoort office. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34650#Comment_34650</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34650#Comment_34650</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:58:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>TechnocratJT</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >A lot of writers come up like that</blockquote><br /><br />Oh certainly. <br /><br />He also wrote some episodes of Law and Order: SVU I think, and I recall enjoying his Stormwatch cop procedural that was part of the last ill-fated Wildstorm relaunch. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34655#Comment_34655</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34655#Comment_34655</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:48:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>MaC</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I am personally wondering when the average fan and the companies themselves will start to realize that it isn't about the characters, but the characterizations.<br /><br />I had more of a point, but I'm having trouble wording it coherently now. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34657#Comment_34657</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34657#Comment_34657</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:51:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KaraokeFanboy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Darick and I own TRANSMET and all that is included in that. If the terms of the contract were met (and don't ask me what they are because I don't recall), certainly we could do new TRANSMET stories elsewhere. </em><br /><br />Cool, Warren, thanks for that.  Not to beat it to death, but does DC reserve similar rights, not that they'd make more comics, but in the marketing department?  Or do you oversee franchising stuff, too, like those kick ass Spider glasses, or the DC Direct action figure, etc.?  If DC decided, could they continue to produce supplemental Transmet stuff w/o your approval?<br /><br />I think these are the questions the Seigals are tackling... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34659#Comment_34659</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34659#Comment_34659</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:56:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Unsub</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think having creators like Warren on the mainstream comics not only gives their original work a boost but it makes for a much much better super hero genre.<br />I picked up the Gage ,Thunderbolts International Incident one shot and it had the plot driven story but a unique feel. I will definitly give it a chance when Warren leaves.<br />The guy they got to do a run of Punisher Max during the middle of the Ennis run(I forget the name but it was about crazy cab drivers)was good as well.<br />If the editors pick the right up and comer for the follow up it could help some people find new authors. I also enjoyed Gages run on Stormwatch ,not quite as much as Team Achilles but worth having. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34662#Comment_34662</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34662#Comment_34662</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:06:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Cool, Warren, thanks for that. Not to beat it to death, but does DC reserve similar rights, not that they'd make more comics, but in the marketing department?</em><br /><br />They're time-sensitive, as I recall, in the merch stuff.  They don't get to make more TRANSMET comics without me and Darick. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34681#Comment_34681</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34681#Comment_34681</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:29:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>AndrewMayer</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've made Batman video-games, and Batman never gave me a phone call to say thanks.<br /><br />The thing to remember in all this is that it in the long run it doesn't matter all that much to the big license books that much whether or not a name writer does or doesn't do a run on the book.  At best you can change the direction of the momentum, but the meteor still keeps hurtling through space.<br /><br />It's great that guys like Warren are showing up to make a buck on these titles, and I highly respect that he's using it as a marketing vehicle for his creator owned work, because at the end of the day these characters were around since we were born, and they'll keep going long after we're dead. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34685#Comment_34685</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34685#Comment_34685</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:53:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Zak_Kaveney</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'll admit that when I was first getting back into comics about four years ago I was confused as all hell at all these names floating around, and all the different books that were out there. A friend at college let me borrow his copy of Watchmen, as well as some other books that caught my attention. Then I found Neil Gaiman had written Sandman and started digging into that. But, my point with this paragraph is that when I was first figuring out the names of author's and artist's I enjoyed reading I was constantly confusing Warren Ellis with Garth Ennis. The E's just fucked me right up. <br /><br />My second confession is that I own not a single book written by Warren Ellis. I seem to go through phases. Specifically: Neil Gaiman, Grant Morrison, etc. <br /><br />Anyways, when one's faced with so much content out there, there's chance someone's work will never be found. I appreciate your analogy Mr. Ellis, and working both sides of the fence can benefit everyone involved when it's good stuff. I'd say the hardest part is finding someone to publish your work. And with writer and artist being rolled into one person by many people, it seems that the room for paintbrushless writers is becoming smaller. I'm sure getting started in comics is similar to getting started in any field of writing; Just write till you bleed from every pore. <br /><br />Well, here's to hoping a job driving a semi for a year or two will help in some fashion. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34686#Comment_34686</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34686#Comment_34686</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:06:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>johnjones</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >It's great that guys like Warren are showing up to make a buck on these titles, and I highly respect that he's using it as a marketing vehicle for his creator owned work, because at the end of the day these characters were around since we were born, and they'll keep going long after we're dead. </blockquote><br /><br />That both cheers me up and profoundly depresses me.  I mean, I'm genuinely glad the occasional work-for-hire gig helps introduce Warren and other talented creators (and their owned work) to a new group of fans.  Also, if Warren making a run on Iron Man or Thunderbolts or X-Beings means the market increases for Fell and Desolation Jones, I'm happy as hell.<br /><br />On the other hand, the idea that in the year 2408 Batman will still be here, and he'll still be Bruce Wayne whose parents got whacked in "Crime Alley" in Gotham City just makes me tired.  I know there's a kind of precedent.  People still write stories featuring Sherlock Holmes, after all.  But after literally decades of continuous publication how much more can anyone really say about this one obsessive rich guy who dresses in fetish gear and beats the shit out of criminals?  <br /><br />I admit to watching and liking the Batman Beyond TV-series.  It had it's flaws to be sure, but at least it was moving forward instead of servicing the same tired status quo. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34687#Comment_34687</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34687#Comment_34687</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:15:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Admiral Neck</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Grant Morrison's Batman run has been great so far, as he understands what the appeal of the character is and has gone back to that instead of getting bogged down in the soap operatics of the previous few years (which have their moments too, but GM is trying something different). He's managed to do something fresh just by understanding what Batman is and going from there.<br /><br />Same with Mr. Ellis and Iron Man. The Extremis arc is the only Iron Man I've read and really enjoyed, and it was because Internet Jesus remembered what the character was supposed to be (i.e. the ultimate futurist) and used that as a jumping off point for a modern take on it, all without having to use Ultimate Marvel style reboots. Well, that and going all <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Cosmic-Serpent-DNA-Origins-Knowledge/dp/075380851X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1206937010&sr=8-1" >Jeremy Narby</a> on us. Both these runs prove there are still stories to tell and new ways to use the characters (and I see the irony that the "new" approaches rely on going back to the roots).<br /><br />Sadly a lot of writers don't get a chance to do that, either because they don't think to do it or they don't have the clout to do something too bold, or the character is perceived to be working well enough to not need a revamp. A lot of characters that appear at the end of their natural lifespan might be revitalised somehow (if Geoff Johns can do it for Booster Gold, I think anything is possible). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34688#Comment_34688</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34688#Comment_34688</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:18:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>joe.distort</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I recall enjoying his Stormwatch cop procedural</blockquote><br /><br />STORMWATCH PHD was fucking brilliant. if tbolts can come even close it will be well worth yr monies. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34690#Comment_34690</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34690#Comment_34690</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:47:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>beginsinwonder</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I just wanted to go back to the earlier theme of finding a balance in your work.  With the blank page of a wholly original work, you do have more space for creativity, but I often find in m own (non-comic) work that working within constraints can also be a source and challenge for creativity, if one has a mind to do more than regurgitate cliches.  You can be a cummings and break all the rules, but there is something to be said for a well crafted sonnet.  Perhaps that is part of it - there is some craft to working with constraints, a touch of engineering, instead of unbridled expression. <br /><br />I am also curious at the parallels in other fields that can share this style of working.  The Client Eastwood model works in movies, house painting, and comics it seems, and I have seen a similar set of choices  amongst programmers; how do you think Open Source happened?  You can only be so creative in most day jobs, leaving teeming masses of folks to find a means to draw their creativity out on their own time. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34695#Comment_34695</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34695#Comment_34695</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:06:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Michael Woods</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I love writing my own stuff, but wouldn't mind painting someone else's house one day.  <br /><br />I think the short burst thing is a good strategy.  Get in and get out, leaving the poor bastard behind you plenty to play with and a lot to live up to.<br /><br />EDIT:  Any chance of a new Vertigo series or mini anytime in the near future? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34702#Comment_34702</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34702#Comment_34702</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:33:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It was a neat run.   <br />Maybe I'm a little divorced from fanboydom, because I never think of anyones WFH stuff as anything more than 'neat'.  All the really interesting stuff going on these days is in creator-owned books.<br /><br />I just don't get that sense of entitlement people get about work they have contributed nothing more than $3.50 to. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34731#Comment_34731</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34731#Comment_34731</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:08:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>David xvx Ludd</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Darick and I own TRANSMET and all that is included in that. If the terms of the contract were met (and don't ask me what they are because I don't recall), certainly we could do new TRANSMET stories elsewhere.</blockquote><br /><br />If you don't mind me asking a pretty tedious question...is there much of a continuum between the two poles (fully creator-owned and fully WFH) in comic books?  Are - for example - there examples where a writer is hired to write a certain existing book, but retains right to new IP created in that book (new characters etc), or where someone owns the IP of a book, but allows (or pays...) a publisher to hire new writers on it, or where someone owns the IP (and so receives royalties etc), but is heavily restricted through restraint of trade clauses etc?<br /><br />(Yes, I worked in a corporate law firm...though I find this interesting in terms of considering possible contracts, I'm intrigued by the existence of possible middle-ground works.  Was Strange Kisses etc WFH or creator owned (or a middle ground?)?  If the latter, could this perhaps be part of a developing middle road, where creators retain IP but licence it out...or is this already common place?) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34732#Comment_34732</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34732#Comment_34732</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:11:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>magmar</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I never ever assumed Warren would just do Thunderbolts indefinitely. It just didn´t make sense before his announcement, because there were other series he just jumped on and then left. I don´t have any problem with it. In truth, i am kinda glad. Because i have the strong feeling he just did was he wanted on Thunderbolts and more would be just the kind of distilled crap other writers are producing, the type of writer who do two or three WFHs and only ONE creator owned work. Kurt Busiek i would put there, but i don´t know exactly how many WFH series he did at the same time until now but it was more than one, i seem to remember dimly. It was after his success with ASTRO CITY. A fine comic, but his other works were truly  horrible. I remember picking up - i think - AVENGERS - and it was so devoid of ideas and originality, it was really apalling. <br /><br />I do believe the Garth Ennis - Warren Ellis stance is the better way. Nothing against whoring out, it pays the bills, it brings in some new readers, but it should be done with some restraint. Keeps you from getting too much blood on your ass... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34739#Comment_34739</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34739#Comment_34739</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:35:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Owsler</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm quite surprised you needed to explain the reasoning behind short stint work. It must be far more exciting for a writer to know you're free to maintain your own creations while being inspired in short bursts by a wide variety of pre-existing material. Surely that should be THE way rather than ONE way. As a test of your creative skills alone it must be very worthwhile.<br /><br />Admittedly I was slightly put off by the aggressive change in the Thunderbolts concept, but just as it is for many of your contemporaries, it's your ability to breath new life into old, kind of goofy characters, that is a huge draw along with a wealth of storytelling ideas that burst with potential. The whole psychic Trojan Horse (if I can call it that) was inspired. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34741#Comment_34741</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34741#Comment_34741</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:43:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >I'm quite surprised you needed to explain the reasoning behind short stint work.</em><br /><br />Judging by the email I was getting, some people weren't understanding. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34749#Comment_34749</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34749#Comment_34749</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:38:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>John Keats</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I understand because even if I have read you these last few years it was uneasy to really get the meaning of this work for hire stuff since UFF. at first I didn"t like it, especially this first gig, and I think that the ultimate books you made are the weakests, but for now I can tell that you've made great stories at marvel, Iron man, tbolts for example are very entertaining stories, even if I stay a creator owned afficionado.<br />by the wat I miss a lot Desolation Jones, the first issues were rock solid, I have less enthusiasm for the two issues made by Zezelj, but damn this book had potential. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34752#Comment_34752</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34752#Comment_34752</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:52:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Ted</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @David xvx Ludd<br /><br /><blockquote >Are - for example - there examples where a writer is hired to write a certain existing book, but retains right to new IP created in that book (new characters etc)</blockquote><br /><br />Yes, the obvious example coming to mind is the <a href="http://briefs.toddverbeek.com/gaiman-wins-characters-from-mcfarlane/" >dispute between Neil Gaiman and Todd MacFarlane</a> over some ownership of characters Gaiman created whilst writing an issue of Spawn. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34760#Comment_34760</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34760#Comment_34760</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:45:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Insect King</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ warrenellis di d write this:<br /><em >Judging by the email I was getting, some people weren't understanding.</em><br /><br />Direct them to Crecy and say you've hidden the answer in an elaborate code based on visuals and metaphor as you understand the comics industry currently to be.<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />Chris. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34809#Comment_34809</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34809#Comment_34809</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:38:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>dnwilliams</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ it's always made perfect sense to me that an author would want to write predominantly creator-owned work, but it's great that the WFH setup allows established company titles to benefit from the talents of those authors, albeit for a short period of time.<br /><br />i'm pretty sure the first ellis-penned book i read was <em >the authority</em>, although i was ignorant of who had written it at the time (being eleven years old and not caring), is that creator-owned? i'm not sure, but i do know the first ellis titles i read were picked up on the basis of word of mouth hype, borrowing <em >global frequency</em> from someone etc...not a surefire way to secure an audience, whereas doing a stint on a marvel title is.<br /><br /><em >thunderbolts </em> has been the only post-civil war book i've picked up that has been entrenched in the marvel u's new stat quo and it's been incredible thus far, i hope you're going out in a blaze of glory mr ellis! i look forward to more marvel work in the future ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34818#Comment_34818</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34818#Comment_34818</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:59:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >i'm pretty sure the first ellis-penned book i read was the authority, although i was ignorant of who had written it at the time (being eleven years old and not caring), is that creator-owned? </em><br /><br />No.  (Although DC does compensate Bryan and I for having created some of those characters.) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34821#Comment_34821</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34821#Comment_34821</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:03:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Bruce O. Hughes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ warren, if you were to wake up tomorrow and find your self as the EIC of Marvel (would that be a BIG stretch?)  who would be your choice as the new creative team on The Thunderbolts?<br /><br />just curious... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34829#Comment_34829</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34829#Comment_34829</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:12:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ No opinion, sorry.  And my even considering that in public would do a serious disservice to the new writer, Christos Gage. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34838#Comment_34838</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34838#Comment_34838</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:50:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>XIbalba2012</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I actually fell off of the Thunderbolts book shortly after your takeover. Mostly due to the loss of work, and lack of funds. Damn shame really, as I always liked the book (except when it was all &quot;Fight Club-esque.&quot; I hope it doesn't wind up being canceled, I'd like to jump back on, even though Warren's no longer going to be writing it. But then, I also wish DOOM 2099 was still around, but who gets what they wish? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34867#Comment_34867</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34867#Comment_34867</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:34:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Derleth</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Oddly enough, my personal favorite WTH work of your was <strong >RUINS.</strong>  I will <em >never</em> get the partially disemboweled Kitty Pride out of my skull. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34914#Comment_34914</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34914#Comment_34914</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:43:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>veryunderstated</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >No opinion, sorry. And my even considering that in public would do a serious disservice to the new writer, Christos Gage.</blockquote><br /><br />okay, how about we change up the question a bit. If you woke up as EIC of WildStorm, who would you want to work on The Authority? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34916#Comment_34916</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34916#Comment_34916</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:47:40 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >okay, how about we change up the question a bit. If you woke up as EIC of WildStorm, who would you want to work on The Authority?</em><br /><br />I believe that the response to this will be akin to the first one, especially since Christos Gage is also writing that book.  Not to mention the fact that Darick Robertson is penciling it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34923#Comment_34923</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34923#Comment_34923</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:06:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Malifer</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Ellis, <br /><br />You mentioned getting readers from UFF to Transmet. I thought I would share how I started following your work. I'm sure I had read DV8, Age of Apoc, maybe some the DOOM 2099 stuff but I wasn't paying attention to whom was making the books (I was young), but I was joining the Scifi Book Club for the second or third time and they had started giving the first two Transmet trades as a selection and "I figured what the hell, people said it was good I'll give a shot". <br /><br />I was hooked went comic store subscribed to Transmet around issue thirty something and I have been looking forward your books ever since. sfbc got you at least one fan.<br /><br />I actually prefer shorter stints for writers. I think you get more concise stronger stories. I remember in the 80s and maybe early 90s there was one guy who had written Captain America for like <em >10 years or something</em> and at first the were good stories but in the end I distinctly remember one where Cap turns into a werewolf and another one where Capt got cancer and dressed like Super-Pro. Less than the man best, but hell after cranking out tens years of stories for one character it was bound to happen.<br /><br />Speaking of Super-pro that is a comic book character I dare any writer to make cool. lol ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34966#Comment_34966</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34966#Comment_34966</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:24:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I haven’t read a superhero book in at least a year. I can’t say that I miss them much: trying to keep track of the Marvel universe over the last two decades just took too much effort. <br /><br />But when I was a kid, there were some really terrible books out there. It’s good to see that so many of the really great comic writers are doing the superhero books along with their own stuff. It gives me hope that at some point I’ll have kids who read comics, and there will be some really great writing there for them. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34980#Comment_34980</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=34980#Comment_34980</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:39:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>alwayscrashing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Just to be awkward I went the other way.<br /><br />I was very much a Vertigo (and similar) only person until fairly recently.... Then names like Warren Ellis, Neil Gaiman, Mike Carey and Grant Morrison got me picking up the pervert-suit comics as well, and while I will probably never rate X-Men, UFF, etc as being anywhere near as good as Transmet, Desolation Jones, Doktor Sleepless, etc, they can still be great fun if they have the right writer. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35035#Comment_35035</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35035#Comment_35035</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:24:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>epalicki</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I read the announcement over on Newsarama and then made the mistake of looking over the talk-back comments. <br /><br />Man, between this and the Superman copyright thread, comics has actually succeeded in making me dumber today. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35054#Comment_35054</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35054#Comment_35054</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:53:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>veryunderstated</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I believe that the response to this will be akin to the first one, especially since Christos Gage is also writing that book. Not to mention the fact that Darick Robertson is penciling it.</blockquote><br /><br />actually he isn't anymore. the miniseries he was doing is done now, so the question is rather appropriate if there hasn't been another writer picked for whatever is to come next for the authority ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35069#Comment_35069</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35069#Comment_35069</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:17:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jim Moore</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Judging by the email I was getting, some people weren't understanding.</blockquote><br /><br /><br />These must be, for the most part, the new readers you are attracting, so I would think that it's a positive, at least in terms of audience not knowing your MO.<br /><br />Hopefully this translates into good sales on your Avatar novellas. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35099#Comment_35099</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35099#Comment_35099</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:34:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>promethian</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >The second really odd thing came in some months later. Sales of TRANSMET TPBs spiked massively. And the only thing that had changed was that I was writing UFF. What had happened was that these new readers had liked UFF, gone looking for other stuff by me, found nothing in their local store, gone to Amazon or bookstores, and picked up TRANSMET books. A few months later, I saw numbers on all my other creator-owned TPBs pick up too.<br /><br />And now we can sell more than 12,000 copies of CRECY in a matter of months.</blockquote><br /><br />So Warren, translation... if you work in WFH for a while it gets all the new readers interested in your creator-owned/ independent/ superhero & non-superhero stuff... then that sells books and benefits you financially and allows you to do purely creator-owned work for a while... until it is time to introduce a new crop of (up to this point) superhero comics readers to your body of work... mission accomplished, you go back to WFH for a while... and the cycle continues... ? Sounds like an awesome system you got going on. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35111#Comment_35111</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35111#Comment_35111</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:01:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>promethian</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Warren, I must say that my interest in comics has waxed and waned a lot over the years, but your writing has constantly refreshed my interest in them. I remember reading an issue of Doom 2099 where the characters were discussing the lesser and greater eyes of Agamotto. Wow! Seeing the Asgardian Enchantress in opera gloves and thigh-high stockings with Thor. Wow! Doctor Strange returning from the war of the seven spheres with a giant alien flea in his clothes! Wow! these wow moments stuck out in my mind and I didn't even realize you wrote them all until I finally figured out who you were once I started reading Planetery. Which brings us to the total bad-assery and consummate villany of the Thunderbolts, and the way you make the reader care about unknown C-list characters like American Eagle. Wow! Even when you only write in WFH for a short run, you constantly reinvorgate WFH comics with originality and quality.<br /><br />I have seen a lot of praise for your Transmet series in this thread, but I gotta say that for me your creator-owned wildstorm series "Planetary" wasn't merely my favorite Ellis comic, but is actually my fave series of all time. And I know from following the Wildstorm message board for a while that it was the favorite series of quite a few readers. I don't read superhero stuff much anymore so the fact that you are gonna do a lot more creator owned stuff is fine in my books.<br /><br />Whatever you do will be interesting or awesome! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35116#Comment_35116</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35116#Comment_35116</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:12:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>promethian</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ PS one more thing: I love the way you portray villains, you write them as kick-ass bad.  some writers take classic villains, do stuff like make them disproportionally old relative to the main protagonist, sick, dying, or mentally incapacitated and seeking a wierd combination of revenge, redemption and death at the hands of their main hero. Or else the villain has a ton of potential but gets his ass-kicked in 5 seconds by the hero. I really don't like this style of writing because I feel it always demeans the character of the villain, and completely squanders their potential. And I am constantly pleased when I read your stories, because I never see that happen. Your villains are loaded for bear, 110% dedicated to whatever their twisted cause is (whether they are merely misguided, mentally ill, or straight up bad), and if they are shot down (ripped in half, dropped from miles above) they go out in flames with a giant metaphoric 'F-you world'. <br /><br />Example: in Thunderbolts, you totally resucitated the character of Mac Gargan, formerly the Spider-man villain the Scorpion. He was a great villain back in the classic Lee-Romita era of spiderman, but treated like a total loser who gets his ass kicked without a please or thank you by recent spiderman writers in the last decade. under your pen he is a once again a powerhouse, this time of brain chomping evilness. you have restored his dignity in villany! That is totally the way he should be written. thanks man! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35117#Comment_35117</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35117#Comment_35117</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:14:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Spiraltwist</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I can't believe this is two pages. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35120#Comment_35120</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35120#Comment_35120</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:28:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >I can't believe this is two pages. </em><br /><br />It's been one of those days. 501 messages posted in the last 24hrs... that's like 33% of the old WEF message velocity, and that place was huge and had three or four years under its belt at that point. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35131#Comment_35131</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35131#Comment_35131</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:21:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>chris g</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Hee-hee, you should see the newsarama posts about this (not really). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35132#Comment_35132</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35132#Comment_35132</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:37:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I can live without seeing what, or if, they think. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35134#Comment_35134</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35134#Comment_35134</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:42:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>seanarcher</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ So, just because I know I can't be the only one piqued by a few of your comments in the thread, what are the odds of you and Derrick actually finding yourselves <em >wanting</em> to revisit Transmet? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35140#Comment_35140</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35140#Comment_35140</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:06:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Zero.<br /><br />And it's "Darick." ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35145#Comment_35145</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35145#Comment_35145</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:52:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Spiraltwist</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @warrenellis<br /><em >It's been one of those days. 501 messages posted in the last 24hrs... that's like 33% of the old WEF message velocity, and that place was huge and had three or four years under its belt at that point.</em><br /><br />Off the subject for a second. Does this bother you, or make you ecstatic? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35166#Comment_35166</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35166#Comment_35166</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:27:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BClayMoore</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The truth is that at this point, Warren is a brand unto himself. He doesn't need the WFH to increase interest in his creator-owned work.<br /><br />But if you're sitting there as a fledgling creator trying to learn lessons from Warren's experiences, you're most likely barking up the wrong tree. There is no logic, nor rhyme or reason to the way things work. Do what you do, and do it well, and see how things shake out.<br /><br />Also: I have a very hard time believing that Warren's UFF work led to the massive spike in TRANSMET sales, for what it's worth. I can't fathom how that would correlate.<br /><br />-BCM ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35172#Comment_35172</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35172#Comment_35172</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:49:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>caseyvegas</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Hi Warren,<br /><br />Sure this has been answered before - but if Q and B know your stand on creator owned stuff, how come they have not offered to publish all this great new stuff you've been doing via Icon? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35173#Comment_35173</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35173#Comment_35173</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:54:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William Christensen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @caseyvegas - Why would Icon be a better home than Avatar? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35175#Comment_35175</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35175#Comment_35175</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:58:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SJD</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @William Christensen<br /><br />I know right?<br /><br />BTW: Thanks for giving all of Warren's recent creator-owned toys a wonderful new home. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35177#Comment_35177</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35177#Comment_35177</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:01:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>caseyvegas</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ No offense William - just thought that Marvel would go the extra step to try and keep Warren there with them...not meant to say Icon is better than Avatar... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35183#Comment_35183</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35183#Comment_35183</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:12:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Egon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Plant! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35185#Comment_35185</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35185#Comment_35185</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:17:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>caseyvegas</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm thinking this is the typical new guy hazing routine... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35188#Comment_35188</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35188#Comment_35188</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:42:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Egon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Totally. Welcome, friend! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35241#Comment_35241</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35241#Comment_35241</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:05:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Also: I have a very hard time believing that Warren's UFF work led to the massive spike in TRANSMET sales, for what it's worth. I can't fathom how that would correlate.</em><br /><br />There was nothing else happening that would explain a seriously unusual spike (which has pretty much stayed there).  And, later, the fanmail confirmed it.<br /><br />They were both science fiction works.  I wrote UFF as YA sf, and I think that's the correlation -- I think TRANSMET was the first "grown-up" sf graphic novel for a lot of them. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35257#Comment_35257</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35257#Comment_35257</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:59:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Insect King</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <strong >That BClayMoore guy wrote:</strong><br /><em >Also: I have a very hard time believing that Warren's UFF work led to the massive spike in TRANSMET sales, for what it's worth. I can't fathom how that would correlate.</em><br /><br />I don't. For the longest time Transmet vol 2 and 8 were out of print and getting 4 or 5 was troublesome and most times they were up two weeks late from order from Diamond. They were not getting reprinted - for another hideous Absolute edition, I suppose - when all of a sudden, they started coming in thick and fast, an indication in my mind of a new surge in popularity.<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />Chris. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35263#Comment_35263</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35263#Comment_35263</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:17:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >They were not getting reprinted - for another hideous Absolute edition, I suppose - when all of a sudden, they started coming in thick and fast, an indication in my mind of a new surge in popularity.</em><br /><br />There was never any question of an Absolute edition.  I guess they just weren't getting reprinted. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35452#Comment_35452</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35452#Comment_35452</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:12:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Would you be adverse to approving an absolute edition? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35505#Comment_35505</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35505#Comment_35505</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:25:24 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Admiral Neck</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Surely such a thing could only be bound in human skin. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35517#Comment_35517</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35517#Comment_35517</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:41:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Damn, that would make it expensive. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35518#Comment_35518</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35518#Comment_35518</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:42:21 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Z</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ And likely to smell like bacon. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35521#Comment_35521</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35521#Comment_35521</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:44:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>TechnocratJT</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >And likely to smell like bacon.</blockquote><br /><br />Which, all things considered - a selling point. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35522#Comment_35522</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35522#Comment_35522</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:45:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I don't think anyone here would be against owning an edition of Transmet bound in human skin.  I'd buy two! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35539#Comment_35539</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35539#Comment_35539</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:21:24 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Would you be adverse to approving an absolute edition? </em><br /><br />Yes.  I want those books as affordable as possible. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35551#Comment_35551</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35551#Comment_35551</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:36:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Z</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I realise this topic is getting old, so I'll assume this won't get answered:  <br />  <br />The Absolute edition of other books hasn't meant the removal or discontinuation of smaller volumes-  is this something you think would be the case for Transmet in particular?  I only ask this because a limited edition of <em >Crooked Little Vein</em> was produced, so I don't see 'limited' or 'special' editions being the concern.  <br />  <br />- Z ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35553#Comment_35553</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35553#Comment_35553</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:41:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >The Absolute edition of other books hasn't meant the removal or discontinuation of smaller volumes</em><br /><br />Given the trouble they seem to be having keeping the TPB version in print, I rather think as Absolute would be discontinuation-by-default.  Better they keep their focus on keeping the TPB version around. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35556#Comment_35556</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35556#Comment_35556</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:44:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Z</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Okay, thanks.  Subject dropped.  <br /><br />- Z ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35578#Comment_35578</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35578#Comment_35578</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:54:11 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Mark R</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The last four posts make lots about the idea of an Absolute Transmet more clear to me.<br /><br />Warren - While the idea of a hardcover set of Transmet is cool, thanks for keeping the working folk in mind.<br /><br />Now like Z said... Subject dropped. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35643#Comment_35643</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35643#Comment_35643</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:15:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>will_butler</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Keeping Transmet cheap is a very wise move.  When I was first getting back into comics as a cash-strapped college student, one of the main reasons I picked up Back on the Street was because it was really cheap.  It's now my favorite comic, and I've probably read about 90% of everything Ellis has ever written.  If there had only been a $100 Absolute edition, I'd almost certainly never have been able to check it out. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35657#Comment_35657</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35657#Comment_35657</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:01:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>orwellseyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em ><br />There was nothing else happening that would explain a seriously unusual spike (which has pretty much stayed there). And, later, the fanmail confirmed it.</em><br /><br />As an anecdote, I've often discovered new writers by asking my comic shop guy for "anything else by so-and-so". Seen more than a few other people doing the same. <br /><br />Really good comic shops will have displays up that highlight the other work by someone getting mainstream attention. I've seen "Other works by Warren Ellis" at least two comic shops around me. Good shops know how to sell. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35704#Comment_35704</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35704#Comment_35704</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:57:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>David xvx Ludd</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ On reprints: Wasn't there a (planned?) rejig of the numbering early last year?  Combining Vols 1 and 2 or something?  I was under the impression from a thread on The Engine that the discontinuation of #2 was to allow for that...<br /><br />On cross-pollination: I'm the opposite to the UFF->Transmet types: It was reading Transmet in the library that got me buying comics again (first Transmet, then across to Preacher, then...) and it was our Mister Ellis' name that got me back onto superhero stuff (Planetary (if that counts), then Stormwatch, then the Authority), through I'm still very, very wary of buying Marvell stuff.  They scared me off comics back in the Rob Liefield era, when I was barely approaching my teens...only Marvell books I've bought since were Nextwave. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35754#Comment_35754</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=35754#Comment_35754</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 06:15:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Insect King</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <strong >And warrenellis spoke thusly:</strong><br /><em >Given the trouble they seem to be having keeping the TPB version in print, I rather think as Absolute would be discontinuation-by-default. Better they keep their focus on keeping the TPB version around.</em><br /><br />I wish DC and Marvel would do an Avatar and release HCs and TPs simultaneously. The TPs are coming out sometimes a year and a half later than the annoyingly overpriced HC releases (or longer if you count in Marvel Zombies 1). Even HCs piss me off to such a point when the TP s released I've lost all interest in the title.<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />Chris. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=36290#Comment_36290</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=36290#Comment_36290</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:39:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BClayMoore</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >There was nothing else happening that would explain a seriously unusual spike (which has pretty much stayed there). And, later, the fanmail confirmed it.<br /><br />They were both science fiction works. I wrote UFF as YA sf, and I think that's the correlation -- I think TRANSMET was the first "grown-up" sf graphic novel for a lot of them. </blockquote><br /><br />I find that remarkable, if true.<br /><br />It's the kind of thing you always hope happens, but most evidence suggests it rarely does.<br /><br />I suppose the s/f correlation makes some sense.<br /><br />-BCM ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=36310#Comment_36310</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=36310#Comment_36310</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:18:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >It's the kind of thing you always hope happens, but most evidence suggests it rarely does.</em><br /><br />It freaked me out a little, too.  Marvel ended up making some calls and doing a bit of demographics on my UFF run.  I lucked into a sf-loving YA audience who were just on the cusp of moving on to something else -- as someone put it to me, "the smartest kids in the store". ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=37949#Comment_37949</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=37949#Comment_37949</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:51:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SullyEliot</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm in that UFF-crowd, sort of. Someone got me back into comics by reading USM and UFF, and I rather enjoyed Warren's run, but I don't think I pursued him avidly until someone said "you know that guy who did UFF? He did this really awesome thing called Desolation Jones, and some other stuff, like that shit book Transmetropolitan." So I read DJ and, having enjoyed it, moved right on to Transmet... then just about everything else I could locate, which admittedly isn't as much I'd like. I suppose I could go rob my local comics shop, but it's not like they have a great selection or anything. I doubt I could find Tokyo Storm Warning or even Crecy. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=37988#Comment_37988</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=37988#Comment_37988</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:21:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Brad McLoughlin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I came in through Thunderbolts and Newuniversal, basically having gotten back into comics with Civil War. Despite that event giving me some hopes that mainstream comics could be done well, my superhero buying habits quickly dropped off (aside from some choice titles by mssrs such as Fraction and Mr Ellis himself)<br /><br />I have to say, Extremis is still one of my favourite comic arcs, mainstream or not. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=37994#Comment_37994</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=37994#Comment_37994</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:44:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Spiraltwist</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @SullyEliot<br /><br />Unfortunately, TOKYO STORM WARNING is no longer in print. However, you LCS should be able to easily order CRECY for you. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=37998#Comment_37998</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=37998#Comment_37998</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:47:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Gilgurth</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I quit comics in 95, just out of college. Couldn't afford em, and most of my books (X books mainly) had started sucking badly. Spawn was showing no signs of getting to the point (I think it took 10 years to get that back on track), most of image had self destructed, some jackass had taken off stormwatch and revamped all the characters and so on and so forth.<br /><br />Two friends at work telling me of this comic where the FF were the badguys, all the things they've discovered, invented and found, but they couldn't put 15 minutes in to cure cancer or autism... hounding me to read them. Oldschool ties to ever work of sci fi and fantasy from doyle, wells, lovecraft and on through the early movies all the way to the golden and silver ages forward. Oddly, I gotta say thanks, man.<br /><br />Looking forward to AXM, Planetary 27, more stuff like Dr. Sleepless, Crecy and where you're going with Gravel. Luckily, in NY, I can get my hands on indy stuff if I know when it's comming out. Still took like a month to get Crecy. My friend got me the first 3 TPB of Transmet for xmas. Wait, was I supposed to ask a question? <br /><br />Um, Despite france having the All Black's #, do you think they really are the best side in the world, or did SA's weaker bracket have nothing to do with them winning the cup? ;) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=38020#Comment_38020</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=38020#Comment_38020</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:42:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SullyEliot</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Spiral, found TSW on Amazon tied with some other book I'd never even heard of. My shop sucks at getting me the books I ask for; I've waited two months for Scud 21. Now I must make the decision to forgo groceries for a week to buy it. It'll take me a few minutes, but I'm sure I'll come to it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=38468#Comment_38468</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=38468#Comment_38468</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:39:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ralf.haring</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ TOKYO STORM WARNING was published with another Ellis mini, RED. The same for RELOAD and MEK. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=38473#Comment_38473</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=38473#Comment_38473</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:46:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>joe.distort</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ooooooh, red is the genius. love it so much. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Leaving THUNDERBOLTS</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=38485#Comment_38485</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1606&amp;Focus=38485#Comment_38485</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 23:46:11 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Mark R</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Just re-read Red.  Love that book.<br /><br />I'm the monster... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>