<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	
		<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
			<title type="text">Whitechapel - Software takes feedback out of live music?</title>
			<updated>2013-05-20T15:25:03-07:00</updated>
			<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/</id>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en"
				href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1661&amp;Focus=37312&amp;page=1"/>
			<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"
				href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1661&amp;Focus=37312&amp;Feed=ATOM&amp;page=1"/>
			<generator
				uri="http://getvanilla.com/"
				version="1.1.4">
				Lussumo Vanilla &amp; Feed Publisher
			</generator>
			<entry>
		<title>Software takes feedback out of live music?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1661&amp;Focus=36108#Comment_36108" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1661&amp;Focus=36108#Comment_36108</id>
		<published>2008-04-03T04:54:48-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T15:25:03-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>liquidcow</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=2027</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			&quot;Is this the end for feedback? New software aims to take the buzz and screech out of live music&quot;

Link

I don't really see how this is not just a certain form of compression, but it's ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA["Is this the end for feedback? New software aims to take the buzz and screech out of live music"<br /><br /><a href="http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2270314,00.html" >Link</a><br /><br />I don't really see how this is not just a certain form of compression, but it's kind of interesting.  Worth reading just for the comment about Mogwai.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Software takes feedback out of live music?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1661&amp;Focus=36241#Comment_36241" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1661&amp;Focus=36241#Comment_36241</id>
		<published>2008-04-03T14:02:49-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T15:25:03-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>offtandiscord</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1628</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			interesting idea, but like it says at the end, fill an empty room with people and the calibrations would be thrown off...

i have a real problem with feedback whenever i do solo gigs as i use ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[interesting idea, but like it says at the end, fill an empty room with people and the calibrations would be thrown off...<br /><br />i have a real problem with feedback whenever i do solo gigs as i use looped stuff an acoustic guitar and a mic with other instruments, so even at very low volumes the feedbacking frequencies build up over every loop which just turns into a nightmareish noise... still trying to work out how to avoid this, as it's also essential that i can hear what i've played so i can loop ontop of it. might just give in and plus some earphones into the mixer, even if it does sound completly different to th monitors...]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Software takes feedback out of live music?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1661&amp;Focus=37255#Comment_37255" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1661&amp;Focus=37255#Comment_37255</id>
		<published>2008-04-06T19:35:19-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T15:25:03-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>rickiep00h</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=2930</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			The easiest way to combat feedback is to have your gain stage working properly. It's caused by having a reproduced sound hitting the microphone just as loud or louder than the original source (like a ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[The easiest way to combat feedback is to have your gain stage working properly. It's caused by having a reproduced sound hitting the microphone just as loud or louder than the original source (like a voice or an acoustic guitar). That's why it's important to be as close to possible to the mic. After that it's a matter of equalizing (equalising for you Brit folk) to remove the offending frequencies from the mix. And every room is different.<br /><br />There are lots of products on the market that claim to "fix" feedback. Some are good, some are bad, but I think a good sound person with a good set of ears, a good EQ, and a good mixer can do just as good of a job.<br /><br />(Being a one-time audio production student, I know all sorts of stupid shit about feedback...)]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Software takes feedback out of live music?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1661&amp;Focus=37312#Comment_37312" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1661&amp;Focus=37312#Comment_37312</id>
		<published>2008-04-07T01:07:53-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T15:25:03-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>howyadoin</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1675</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Take the feedback out?

Why?
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[Take the feedback <strong >out</strong>?<br /><br />Why?]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	
		</feed>