<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	
		<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
			<title type="text">Whitechapel - Solar power from space?</title>
			<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
			<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/</id>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en"
				href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54531&amp;page=1"/>
			<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"
				href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54531&amp;Feed=ATOM&amp;page=1"/>
			<generator
				uri="http://getvanilla.com/"
				version="1.1.4">
				Lussumo Vanilla &amp; Feed Publisher
			</generator>
			<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54380#Comment_54380" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54380#Comment_54380</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T09:22:49-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>rickiep00h</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=2930</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			India contemplates space-based solar power.

Couldn't we just turn Mercury into a solar harvest area? It worked in Transmet...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/05/30/space.solar/index.html?eref=rss_space" >India contemplates space-based solar power.</a><br /><br />Couldn't we just turn Mercury into a solar harvest area? It worked in Transmet...]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54385#Comment_54385" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54385#Comment_54385</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T09:32:59-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Ben Gwalchmai</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=3030</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			How I wish we could.

This article and the reports it quotes from is incredibly encouraging but, unfortunately, I doubt politicians will listen. That isn't me being cynical. When the costs are huge ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[How I wish we could.<br /><br />This article and the reports it quotes from is incredibly encouraging but, unfortunately, I doubt politicians will listen. That isn't me being cynical. When the costs are huge and the tech's experimental, history's proven that most wont take the risk.<br /><br />Considering Obama's technocratic ways, is there any chance he might listen as - hopefully for all my American friends here & elsewhere and for the rest of us - the next president of the US? Does he have an email to send these things to? Wouldn't that be awesome, direct email contact with your next president - maybe a US citizen <em >should </em>email him...anyway, I digress.<br /><br />Wicked find, rickie.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54388#Comment_54388" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54388#Comment_54388</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T09:35:05-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>chenryhen</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=3517</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			I was talking to a friend about this, and he asked (and I didn't know the answer) &quot;wouldn't this create one hell of a no-fly zone?&quot;

Would that be a serious problem? Could it cause big ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[I was talking to a friend about this, and he asked (and I didn't know the answer) "wouldn't this create one hell of a no-fly zone?"<br /><br />Would that be a serious problem? Could it cause big problems if there's some alignment error?]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54394#Comment_54394" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54394#Comment_54394</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T09:47:40-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Kosmopolit</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1346</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Most designs involve the satellite sitting in geosynchronous orbit 23,000 miles above the Earth.

The limits of current antenna technology mean that by the time the power beam has crossed that ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[Most designs involve the satellite sitting in geosynchronous orbit 23,000 miles above the Earth.<br /><br />The limits of current antenna technology mean that by the time the power beam has crossed that distance you need a receptor bigger than a football field and the average field strength is probably lower than from your mobile phone.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54402#Comment_54402" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54402#Comment_54402</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T10:20:57-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Val A Lindsay II</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1680</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			I'm seeing the only advantage of space-based arrays being the absence of cloud cover. What am I missing here?
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[I'm seeing the only advantage of space-based arrays being the absence of cloud cover. What am I missing here?]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54419#Comment_54419" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54419#Comment_54419</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T11:08:43-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>nleavitt</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=503</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Yeah, I'm pretty sure it would make more sense, and cost about the same, to put solar panels and windmills on every building on earth. I can see it now: month-long blackouts caused by meteors.
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[Yeah, I'm pretty sure it would make more sense, and cost about the same, to put solar panels and windmills on every building on earth. I can see it now: month-long blackouts caused by meteors.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54453#Comment_54453" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54453#Comment_54453</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T12:19:18-07:00</published>
		<updated>2008-05-30T12:36:35-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dkostis</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=2538</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			@ Val A Lindsay II
   &quot;I'm seeing the only advantage of space-based arrays being the absence of cloud cover. What am I missing here? &quot;

Cloud cover absorbs about 1/3 of the solar energy ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[@ Val A Lindsay II<br />   "I'm seeing the only advantage of space-based arrays being the absence of cloud cover. What am I missing here? "<br /><br />Cloud cover absorbs about 1/3 of the solar energy that enters our atmosphere (I can't recall if that is just the visible spectrum of light  or all the energy), but the atmoshere reflects about 30% of all solar energy before it enters.<br /><br />There are also significant advantages in surface area and weight afforded by building arrays in zero-gravity.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54461#Comment_54461" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54461#Comment_54461</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T12:33:09-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Willow Bl00</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=604</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			We need to be more effient in actually collecting the energy we're hit with in order for such a thing to work. And if we figure that out, we might not need to go to such extremes to harvest said ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[We need to be more effient in actually collecting the energy we're hit with in order for such a thing to work. And if we figure that out, we might not need to go to such extremes to harvest said energy.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54468#Comment_54468" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54468#Comment_54468</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T12:49:25-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Val A Lindsay II</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1680</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Don't get me wrong. This may be one of those things that gets us into space. I'm just wondering about the cost of this versus how much we get back out of it. Is it logical to build this in space when ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[Don't get me wrong. This may be one of those things that gets us into space. I'm just wondering about the cost of this versus how much we get back out of it. Is it logical to build this in space when we have vast areas everywhere on the globe that see little cloud cover. The Southwest U.S. is a huge area that sees a tremendous amount of solar energy going straight into the Earth. I'd say building in places like that first would make more sense...]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54480#Comment_54480" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54480#Comment_54480</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T13:23:38-07:00</published>
		<updated>2008-05-30T13:27:26-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dkostis</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=2538</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			I can't agree that building on the relatively little undeveloped land we have remaining is worth the short term savings. In the long run building in space has consistently been cost effective (that ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[I can't agree that building on the relatively little undeveloped land we have remaining is worth the short term savings. In the long run building in space has consistently been cost effective (that means profitable). <br />     Orbital collectors also have other advantages including effectively unlimited expansion, around the clock exposure to solar energy and a relatively stable enviroment. The same can not be said for ground based arrays.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54487#Comment_54487" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54487#Comment_54487</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T13:58:07-07:00</published>
		<updated>2008-05-30T13:58:43-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Val A Lindsay II</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1680</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Undeveloped land? I don't know about that. We've got hundreds of square miles of land ready for solar farms in Nevada, Arizona and here in New Mexico alone. 

How big of an array are you thinking ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[Undeveloped land? I don't know about that. We've got <em >hundreds</em> of square miles of land ready for solar farms in Nevada, Arizona and here in New Mexico alone. <br /><br />How big of an array are you thinking can be in orbit?]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54531#Comment_54531" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54531#Comment_54531</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T16:08:57-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Adam</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=375</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			I'm just wondering about the cost of this versus how much we get back out of it.

See, this is why we need to develop and pony up the cash for a workable Space Elevator.  Once such a system is in ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[<blockquote >I'm just wondering about the cost of this versus how much we get back out of it.</blockquote><br /><br />See, this is why we need to develop and pony up the cash for a workable <a href="http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator" >Space Elevator.</a>  Once such a system is in place, collection and storage of resources (such as stored solar energy) could take place in space, and then just shimmied down while something else is on its way up, for next to no cost.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54537#Comment_54537" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54537#Comment_54537</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T16:26:41-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>rough night</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=2694</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			I just look forward to the day when I can affordably coat my roof entirely in solar panneling. You might think it's to save energy and be self sufficient, but really I think it'll help stop the ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[I just look forward to the day when I can affordably coat my roof entirely in solar panneling. You might think it's to save energy and be self sufficient, but really I think it'll help stop the fucker from leaking.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54547#Comment_54547" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54547#Comment_54547</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T17:29:15-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Verissimus</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=3379</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Why don't we just give every person currently living in Chad $ 100,000, buy them a nice house somewhere else, and cover the entire desert with solar panels?
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[Why don't we just give every person currently living in Chad $ 100,000, buy them a nice house somewhere else, and cover the entire desert with solar panels?]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54550#Comment_54550" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54550#Comment_54550</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T18:10:52-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Linsterg</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=2998</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Why don't we just give every person currently living in Chad $ 100,000, buy them a nice house somewhere else, and cover the entire desert with solar panels?

Do you think they would hold out for ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[<blockquote >Why don't we just give every person currently living in Chad $ 100,000, buy them a nice house somewhere else, and cover the entire desert with solar panels?</blockquote><br /><br />Do you think they would hold out for that much?]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54571#Comment_54571" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54571#Comment_54571</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T20:11:37-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Kosmopolit</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1346</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			&quot;I'm seeing the only advantage of space-based arrays being the absence of cloud cover. What am I missing here?&quot;

The atmosphere absorbs a lot of the solar energy so you get around that - ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA["I'm seeing the only advantage of space-based arrays being the absence of cloud cover. What am I missing here?"<br /><br />The atmosphere absorbs a lot of the solar energy so you get around that - basically microwaves are transmitted through air with much lower losses than light or IR radiation.<br /><br />As well as the lack of cloud cover a powersat in geosynchronous orbit is in day light for 99% of the time - plus there's no seasonal variations to worry about.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54573#Comment_54573" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54573#Comment_54573</id>
		<published>2008-05-30T20:20:54-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Kosmopolit</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1346</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Powersats in geosynchronous orbit have to be huge because they're transmitting energy across 23,000 miles.

There are lot of pros and cons but I think to begin with what we'll see is powersats in ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[Powersats in geosynchronous orbit have to be huge because they're transmitting energy across 23,000 miles.<br /><br />There are lot of pros and cons but I think to begin with what we'll see is powersats in low earth orbit (like 100 miles up).<br /><br />The pros -<br /> much lower transmission losses,<br /> lower launch costs  <br />the system is scaler, you can start with a small sat and add more if it works. With geosynchronous you're pretty much committed to a trillion dollar investment before you see watt one.<br /><br />The cons<br /><br /> - you'd spend much of the time in Earth's shadow losing one of the big advantages of going into space in the first place; <br /><br />- the risk of collision from space junk woudl be much higher;<br /><br />- you'd need multiple receivers on the ground although each one would be a lot smaller than for the geosynchronous version.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54728#Comment_54728" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54728#Comment_54728</id>
		<published>2008-05-31T09:29:33-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Val A Lindsay II</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1680</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			I can appreciate the advantages and all, but I can't help but see these problems...

1) The cost of getting said panels into space

2) Even if being in open space, I'm not sure with even 30% ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[I can appreciate the advantages and all, but I can't help but see these problems...<br /><br />1) The cost of getting said panels into space<br /><br />2) Even if being in open space, I'm not sure with even 30% extra efficiency  from having a panel in space outweighs the cost of a 30% more efficient solar cell.<br /><br />3) The damage/destruction potential of open space combined with the cost of repair adds up heavily at the moment.<br /><br />Again, don't get me wrong. If we did a space array, I wouldn't be against it. Hell, it's quite unlikely but it could be the political vehicle that adds to the foothold of getting into space. <br /><br />All this said, if Germany, one of the cloudiest places on Earth is putting up solar fields, we sure as heck should be doing it here, even if only to power the states in the southwest.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54825#Comment_54825" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=54825#Comment_54825</id>
		<published>2008-05-31T15:58:19-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Cyman</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1925</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			I think I agree mostly with Val. 
We have 'space' (heh) on Earth to do it, I don't see why we'd bother building solar panels on a space elevator before we have exhausted the solar panel tech here ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[I think I agree mostly with Val. <br />We have 'space' (heh) on Earth to do it, I don't see why we'd bother building solar panels on a space elevator before we have exhausted the solar panel tech here first.  <br />And how efficient would it really be to transport all that energy back down to us from thousands of feet in orbit? Especially considering 60% of that energy is just coming to Earth anyway...]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=146368#Comment_146368" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=146368#Comment_146368</id>
		<published>2009-04-14T06:12:04-07:00</published>
		<updated>2009-04-14T06:12:41-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Ginger Ian</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=4626</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			a step closer? 
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30198977/" >a step closer? </a>]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=146887#Comment_146887" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=146887#Comment_146887</id>
		<published>2009-04-15T21:54:49-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Kosmopolit</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1346</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			GI, I looked at that article and I'm a little skeptical.

Satellites in geosynchronous orbit need to orbit around the equator, leaving aside all the other risks, placing the ground antenna in ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[GI, I looked at that article and I'm a little skeptical.<br /><br />Satellites in geosynchronous orbit need to orbit around the equator, leaving aside all the other risks, placing the ground antenna in Fresno will mean a big reduction in power received compared with somewhere on or near the equator.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147586#Comment_147586" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147586#Comment_147586</id>
		<published>2009-04-18T13:28:05-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Osmosis</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=866</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			$5bn for 200MW capacity is ... kinda pricey.
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/apr/16/solarpower-spacetechnology" >$5bn for 200MW capacity is</a> ... kinda pricey.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147596#Comment_147596" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147596#Comment_147596</id>
		<published>2009-04-18T14:26:49-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>James Puckett</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=2911</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			$5bn for 200MW capacity is ... kinda pricey.

Yes, but if it can be done it offers a way to create new power stations without the NIMBY issues that make wind, coal, wave, and nuclear such a PITA. ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[<em >$5bn for 200MW capacity is ... kinda pricey.</em><br /><br />Yes, but if it can be done it offers a way to create new power stations without the NIMBY issues that make wind, coal, wave, and nuclear such a PITA. More importantly, it also offers a way to send power right down into a large city as opposed to building one of these theoretical twenty-first century electricity grids that politicians and futurists pretend will pop into being an obviate the laws of physics that make transmitting electric current over long distances so inefficient. To countries like China and India this would be a godsend—they provide power and create jobs without having to seize more farms to build polluting coal plants, while justifying space programs that are increasingly unpopular with the restless and disenfranchised lower classes. If the costs can be brought down to a profitable level over time the businesses building and maintaining them stand to make even more money than the companies doing nuke plants now.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147623#Comment_147623" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147623#Comment_147623</id>
		<published>2009-04-18T17:12:25-07:00</published>
		<updated>2009-04-18T17:13:18-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Kosmopolit</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1346</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			@Osmosis - it's a prototype. And running costs should be low.

Although you have to wonder what allowance has been made for ground gear maintenance and for in-space repairs and maintenance.
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[@Osmosis - it's a prototype. And running costs should be low.<br /><br />Although you have to wonder what allowance has been made for ground gear maintenance and for in-space repairs and maintenance.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147624#Comment_147624" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147624#Comment_147624</id>
		<published>2009-04-18T17:14:59-07:00</published>
		<updated>2009-04-18T17:33:38-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Kosmopolit</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1346</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			&quot;...these theoretical twenty-first century electricity grids that politicians and futurists pretend will pop into being an obviate the laws of physics that make transmitting electric current ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA["...these theoretical twenty-first century electricity grids that politicians and futurists pretend will pop into being an obviate the laws of physics that make transmitting electric current over long distances so inefficient...."<br /><br />No, the laws of physics say that long distance transmission of high voltage DC is far more efficient than AC and we have real world examples of 1,000-mile plus HVDC lines to back that up.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147666#Comment_147666" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147666#Comment_147666</id>
		<published>2009-04-18T20:56:30-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Kosmopolit</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1346</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			HVDC is a mature technology.

For example:

Swiss power and automation technology group ABB said that it has won an order worth around $140 million to deliver transformers to the State Grid ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[HVDC is a mature technology.<br /><br />For example:<br /><blockquote ><br />Swiss power and automation technology group ABB said that it has won an order worth around $140 million to deliver transformers to the State Grid Corporation of China for a high-voltage power corridor that will strengthen the Chinese electricity network and help meet rising demand in the Shandong coastal region.<br /><br />According to the company, the power link will transmit 4,000MW of electricity at 660kV over 1,350km, from the Ningxia province to Shandong. The corridor will use high-voltage direct current (HVDC) technology to maximize transmission efficiency.</blockquote><br /><a href="http://www.energy-business-review.com/news/abb_wins_order_to_supply_transformers_in_china_090409" ><br />link</a>]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147691#Comment_147691" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=147691#Comment_147691</id>
		<published>2009-04-19T01:09:41-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Osmosis</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=866</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			I understand that prototype != commercial version, and that every technology must begin somewhere.  I certainly see the benefits that James points out, and don't get me wrong, I'll be cheering ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[I understand that prototype != commercial version, and that every technology must begin somewhere.  I certainly see the benefits that James points out, and don't get me wrong, I'll be cheering Solaren et al if they can make this work.  My main problem with the concept is that I wonder, with orbital lift costing what it does, whether this will ever be cost-effective versus ground-based tech we have now.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=168736#Comment_168736" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=168736#Comment_168736</id>
		<published>2009-06-25T05:20:56-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Kosmopolit</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1346</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Interesting take on the problem:

1. A modular system with multiple satellites transmitting power to a single transmitter which then beams it to Earth - makes the whole thing more viable because ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[Interesting take on the problem:<br /><br />1. A modular system with multiple satellites transmitting power to a single transmitter which then beams it to Earth - makes the whole thing more viable because you can build it in stages and use existing rockets to put up all or msot of the components.<br /><br />2. In the first instance, rather than beaming the power ti Earth beam it to satellites in LEO with ion engines to propel them to GEO.<br /><a href="http://www.solardaily.com/reports/Viability_Of_Space_Solar_Power_Satellite_Systems_Get_A_Boost_999.html" ><br />link</a>]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=169408#Comment_169408" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=169408#Comment_169408</id>
		<published>2009-06-26T13:33:06-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>256</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=4827</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			@Kosmo
Although you have to wonder what allowance has been made for ground gear maintenance and for in-space repairs and maintenance. 
Other than manned space stations, the only thing that ever ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[@Kosmo<br /><blockquote >Although you have to wonder what allowance has been made for ground gear maintenance and for in-space repairs and maintenance. </blockquote><br />Other than manned space stations, the only thing that ever gets repaired in space is Hubble. Maybe if your power installation is a single entity, and the problem has put it completely offline, then it might make financial sense to go and repair it but it would have to cost a whole hell of a lot.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Solar power from space?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=169494#Comment_169494" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=2422&amp;Focus=169494#Comment_169494</id>
		<published>2009-06-26T17:52:47-07:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:41:50-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>looneynerd</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=5373</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			You also have a serious problem with space debris. Satellites get hit and pinged by stuff all the time. I can't imagine the fragile solar panels surviving terribly long, at least not without losing a ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[You also have a serious problem with space debris. Satellites get hit and pinged by stuff all the time. I can't imagine the fragile solar panels surviving terribly long, at least not without losing a ton of efficiency as the panels are scratched and cracked to hell by pieces of earth junk and meteorites.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	
		</feed>