Not signed in (Sign In)
    • CommentAuthorbuilttoill
    • CommentTimeJan 29th 2009

    i thought that he gave decent evidence to support his theory (i don't necessarily agree with it but i don't have to belittle him on a public forum)

    and if everyone lived by your mantra of:

    When I find something to be ridiculous, I tend to ridicule it.

    i doubt you would be able to get any time to yourself
      CommentAuthormister hex
    • CommentTimeJan 29th 2009
    A scant few hours till the next episode ... Miki's doing all the talking, which will be a window into her character. Although that devil Ellis has a way of defeating expectations. Internet Jesus only knows what will happen.

    (As an aside, does that make him St. Paul?)
    • CommentAuthorCassius
    • CommentTimeJan 30th 2009
    @ huwie lewie

    You're making a fair jump there, she's a doctor, she looks at people's guts, she calls them gutbuckets because that's pretty much what they seem to be sometimes. There is little to no evidence Connor used to be fat, he just doesn't like her I'm 'holierthanthou' tone because she knows what he looks like on the inside.
    • CommentTimeJan 30th 2009
    @ Cassius

    Actually, we do have some pretty compelling evidence. Alice's first trip to the Watchtower was where we learn that Conner once "lived on bran flakes and oat milk for a year" due to his "weight thing." In episode 42 we have Kirk flatly telling Alice that "Conner used to be really fat" and Conner's "You complete and utter cockmonkey" reaction. Add those to "Doctor" Miki's "getbucket" insult and yes, I'm willing to believe that Conner indeed used to be really fat.
  1.  (4828.65)
    Conner was fa, end of story. Gutbucket is hilarious, considering that he is twig thin, but obviously still has image issues. And KK tried to stand up for him, but even she has to admit its hypocritical to defend him, because he was the easy target as a kid and even now is a softie.

    I just wanna pinch his cheeks and coo, he's so darn cute.
    • CommentTimeJan 30th 2009
    Thanks for your apology - but no need, mate! You go ahead and use ridicule as a tool of argument - all part of healthy adult debate. I'm not at all offended. We will keep looking for evidence to support or disprove my theory - i certainly haven't seen any (yet). I will affectionately take the piss back if i don't agree with you.

    Thanks, chum

    I have now used up all my niceness for the next week....
  2.  (4828.67)
    When I'm trying to lose weight I have bran flakes for breakfast. They're actually not that bad. They taste better if you chuck a nice handful of raisins (or two) in and mix then around. Even lower fat than bran flakes is All-Bran, but I'm not even going into how boring that tastes. I mean, you can literally eat a massive heaped bowl of All-Bran and only consume about 90 freaking calories. The downside is that it tastes like crunchy cardboard and makes you do enormous poo's. The upside is that is fills you right up, but one couldn't really call it satisfying by any scope of the imagination.

    I have said enough on the topic.