<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Whitechapel - Religion in a drowned world</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:29:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
			<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>
				Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.4 &amp; Feed Publisher
			</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125228#Comment_125228</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125228#Comment_125228</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:21:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>dirtymc11</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think it would be interesting to see what has become of religion in the 'angels' world.  When things get bad man has always turned to religion (for better or worse).<br />  Especially interesting would be to see how some of the more desperate members of the 'angels' enclave view the 'angels themselves.  I am sure there have to be some who have an almost messianic view of them.<br />  I can see cults that view them as the 2nd coming of Christ.  Come to sit in judgement of the world and then to establish a thousand year reign.<br />  Even more interesting would be something like the cults in Ape and Essence (by Aldous Huxley).  HE had the people worshipping Satan not because they viewed him as good but because they understood the apocalypse to have been the victory of Satan over God.<br />  Remember that it has been the norm for most of religious history to view the supernatural and especially Gods as things to be feared and placated so that they do not inflict further suffering.  <br />  Maybe something like this has occurred in WhiteChapel.  <br />  Interesting to think about? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125231#Comment_125231</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125231#Comment_125231</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:34:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Val A Lindsay II</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'd say anyone who would approach the FreakAngels in this regard would be quickly eviscerated by KK, I'd imagine... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125234#Comment_125234</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125234#Comment_125234</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:37:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>dirtymc11</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ yes but in religious matters one does not often approach the object of veneration.  Mere humans do not touch the sacred.  Just because the object of veneration doesnt want to be venerated doesnt stop people from doing so.  <br />  Do you think Jesus would have appreciated the attention being taken away from his father? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125235#Comment_125235</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125235#Comment_125235</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:38:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>dirtymc11</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ and evisceration could be viewed as being judged unworthy by GOd ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125242#Comment_125242</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125242#Comment_125242</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:10:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Britain's largely a post-religious society, regardless of what a few newspapers would have you believe.  To the point where Tony Blair, when running for election, was instructed to NOT talk about his love for Jesus, because it'd cost him votes. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125248#Comment_125248</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125248#Comment_125248</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:19:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Jay Kay</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I could see it going either way--some people could see the death and devistation and believe there is no God, or they could think that they survived from the devistation for a reason and that there is a God. <br /><br />I'm not sure if the FA's are considered dieties yet, but if their powers are revealed, I'm sure some will believe they are. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125252#Comment_125252</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125252#Comment_125252</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:30:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Willow Bl00</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I can't wait for America to get to where Britain's at in terms of religion. It's so neat to look at sociological trends, and how we go along the same general trends as the countries that initially sent people here, but about 200 to 150 years later. We're still up on tech and such, but not mentality. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125269#Comment_125269</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125269#Comment_125269</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:12:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>dirtymc11</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Not talking about religion is one thing but I would be interested to see how many athiest serve in Parlaiment?  One can remain silent about ones religion but how often does seeking public office require one to act as if they have one.?  A society uncomfortable with discussions about religion in the public arena is not necessarily irreligious.  Just uncomfortable discussing it.  Also remaining silent on ones religion was probably more to not alienate voters of different religions.  Removing OVERT religious speech from the public arenas does not mean that religious ideas are not influencing the decisions made.<br />  America is a society where religion is not supposed to be a factor.  However noone has ever gotten elected to federal office of any kind if they have stated that they are atheist.  It is easier for a Muslim (my home state just sent the 1st to washington), or (gasp and horror) a gay man to be elected than someone who claims to not be religious.  For some reason somehow people got the idea in their head that one NEEDS God to be A good person.<br />  They forget the saying &quot;it is easy to get an evil man to do good things but in order to get a good man to do evil things you must have religion.&quot;<br />  I am an atheist myself but I find the idea of religion to be endlessly fascinating (especially how it gets morphed on the ground.) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125306#Comment_125306</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125306#Comment_125306</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:05:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>orwellseyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @dirtymc11:<br /><br />Speaking as a theist, albeit a Unitarian, I get very nervous when my secular leaders start chatting about Jesus. Mainly because their conception of Christianity is rooted in the Thrid Great Awkening, which if you think the fundies of today are crazy, woo boy. Temperance Leagues...yikes. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125311#Comment_125311</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125311#Comment_125311</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:41:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>agentarsenic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ If society goes to shit, people will split off into tribes, forget technology, worship animals or nature or something, and then revolve into monotheism. Civilization 4 taught me this so it must be true. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125322#Comment_125322</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125322#Comment_125322</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:29:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>nigredo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ dirtymc11<br /><br /><blockquote >Remember that it has been the norm for most of religious history to view the supernatural and especially Gods as things to be feared and placated so that they do not inflict further suffering. </blockquote><br /><br />Not to nitpick but that's not true unless you refer to specific pagan religious traditions before orthodox christianity and even then it's a levelling assumption. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125365#Comment_125365</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125365#Comment_125365</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:53:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Foley</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ When civilization comes to ruin and we're back to the days of sweat and toil without the innovation of electricity, religion is the absolute worst thing that could happen to the world.<br /><br />History teaches us that. If it wasn't a few organized religions making coppers off of gullible salvation-seekers, then it would be smaller denominations with less scruples. Either that, or outright cults. The last thing people would need on top of food searches, weapon hording, salvaging, and the constant struggle of procuring clean water are Jim Jones and David Koresh wannabes popping up left and right.<br /><br />Watch "The Mist". People will believe <em >anything</em> when the chips are down, and governments (or leaders in general, really) aren't around to hold their hand through life anymore. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125375#Comment_125375</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125375#Comment_125375</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:09:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Val A Lindsay II</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Foley<br /><br />   Religion was and, for more than a few in today's society, <em >is</em> the government. Scarier still, it's hard for me to believe that the rules of most religions are followed for any other reason than fear of <em >eternal damnation</em>, not moral nor ethical reasons. Otherwise there wouldn't be such an emphasis on "Hell" in most religious texts, eh?<br /><br />   The only problem with the "Mist" analogy is the story is fiction, so it only illustrates the point of view of one storywriter. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125380#Comment_125380</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125380#Comment_125380</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:45:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>orwellseyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ To be quarrelsome, what about the monastaries of the dark ages? Think of a sort of "Canticle for Liebowitz" approach. Pre-1800's some of the greatest scientific and mathematical learning was coming out of the Muslim traditions of scholarship, themselves passing down a line of learning from the greeks. A religious community might have many ideas that are disagreeable, but as an instituion they've often been means of transmitting knowledge as well, especially pre-industrial. <br /><br />Mind you, modern fundamentalism takes an even more askance view of science than the monks dotting the european countryside, but I could see certain religious traditions playing a community-organizing role in a drowned world. <br /><br />God, I could see the Jesuits all but rejoicing at the "oppurtunity" this would afford them. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125383#Comment_125383</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125383#Comment_125383</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:09:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Val A Lindsay II</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Orwellseyes<br /><br />    <em >A religious community might have many ideas that are disagreeable, but as an institution they've often been means of transmitting knowledge as well, especially pre-industrial.</em> <br /><br />     Yes, I wonder what happened to that practice? Maybe too much in the way of contradicting facts stepping into the picture? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125389#Comment_125389</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125389#Comment_125389</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:37:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>orwellseyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It's worth noting that I had 20+ years of Catholic education and every biology teacher I had taught us evolution without a whiff of creationism. Again, Jesuits.<br /><br />Step back from the ongoing back and forth about religion's place, or lack of one, in society and see it as a means to an end. Say you wanted to pass down information generationally, vital information like "Why is the world this way?" or "Don't go in the radioactive areas" why not use religion as a medium of communication. The "Damned lands must not be entered" or "the great fires, the air burst, wiped the earth clean" might survive longer than any book or organized system of learning. Turning facts into stories as a means of conveyance. Look at modern efforts to examine stories and events from the bible or Qur'an or Torah. People want to know the origins of the stories, the facts behind the legend. Maybe 2000 years after a drowned world scenario future humans would use their legends to suss out the truth. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125390#Comment_125390</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125390#Comment_125390</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:47:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>looneynerd</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think it's important to remember that complete atheism (I use that to refer to a general lack of religion, not in the strictest sense of meaning, i.e. belief that there is no god) is a relatively new world trend; most cultures throughout human history have been supported by a strong backbone of a religion, whether it be the organized mysticism of Tibet, the largely familial-run system of japan, the shamanistic animism in many pre-modern and American Indian cultures, etc. etc. <br /><br />@Val A Lindsay II<br /><br />As a means of transmitting culture and knowledge, they were largely replaced by governments in modern countries. But in many developing parts of the world, religion remains the primary means of education. Take for instance the religious missionary schools set up in many third world countries, or monasteries in the Himalayan regions where state-sponsored education is virtually non-existant. <br /><br /><br />The reason religions operated as a vehicle for education is because of their inherent organization. For instance, the education offered in Europe during the dark ages; while yes, there was a Feudal system of government in place, it offered in terms of infrastructure or organization in matters outside of taxes and the military. Religion, on the other hand, was highly organized allowing for easy transmission of learning. Further, to keep their own complex traditions alive, religious people had to be well educated. Once you've finished memorizing the bible and "holy" works, you have a lot of free time as a monk to play around with other things when there's little scribe work to be done.<br /><br /><br />This academic rant has been brought to you from a very tired Graduate student :P ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125398#Comment_125398</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125398#Comment_125398</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:56:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Kradlum</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Not talking about religion is one thing but I would be interested to see how many athiest serve in Parlaiment? One can remain silent about ones religion but how often does seeking public office require one to act as if they have one.?</blockquote><br /><br />No, we don't just not talk about religion, most of us don't actually care about religion. As far as I can see, a lot of people who pay lip service to religion in this country just do it to get their kids into a particular school. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125432#Comment_125432</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125432#Comment_125432</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:07:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Gekko</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ There is something I still don't understand, that's the utter belligerancy of believers facing non-believers: they can unite without a blink, they can instantly stop seeing other monotheisms as evil, whenever it comes to claim their being offended when a few atheists dare say the feel okay to not believe there's a god. Atheism is the enemy that generates hysterical attitude. <br />Look at those bus campaigns. Look at that driver who felt so offended with the atheist ad he didn't want to drive his bus. Look at those people who raise money to put counter-campaigns AND offer a bible. Offended they claim they are. Insulting they become.<br /><br />The don't care about what atheists feel, as if their believing there's no god was based on nothing as if non-believers had no reason to be respected then, not even heard.<br /><br />Why can't they accept atheism is not about shoving in their throat there is no god. Atheism is another manifestation of diversity which nevertheless needs to become a bit more radical. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125459#Comment_125459</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125459#Comment_125459</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:29:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @orwellseyes<br /><br /><i >It's worth noting that I had 20+ years of Catholic education and every biology teacher I had taught us evolution without a whiff of creationism. Again, Jesuits</i><br /><br />My wife put it like this when she was talking to her friend about her daughter's education: "<i >Catholic</i> schools generally educate first. <i >Christian</i> schools generally indoctrinate first."<br /><br />Having been in both, I agree with the statement. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125478#Comment_125478</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125478#Comment_125478</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:18:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>looneynerd</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Gekko, <br /><br />But to be fair, I think the same can be said of Atheists. Many of them that I've come across are as willing to proseltyze and disrespect others as the most insane evangelical (and that's coming from someone who lives in the American bible belt). Just look at the raving antics of someone like Richard Dawkins. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125480#Comment_125480</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125480#Comment_125480</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:28:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>icelandbob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ Kradium<br /><blockquote >No, we don't just not talk about religion, most of us don't actually care about religion. As far as I can see, a lot of people who pay lip service to religion in this country just do it to get their kids into a particular school</blockquote><br />I do agree, but i also feel that we as a society never used to talk about Athiesm either. I remember in 2006 when Richard Dawkins did his UK Documentary <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0774118/" >Root of all Evil?</a> about why essentialy all religion was a load of rubbish. It seemed explosive at the time, because really no one had ever (in my knowledge) gone on TV with a Documentary that said "all religion is bad". <br /><br />Mind you it did have a brilliant moment when he interviewed Yousef Al-Khattab, an ultra-radical Muslim who had once been a devout Jew. It showed perfectly the massive leaps in logic when speaking to a devout believer about athiesm.<br /><br />Yousef: So you do not belive in god then?<br />RD: Yes that is what i true. I do not believe in God or religion.<br />Yousef: Oh so you're ok to have your women naked, drunk and having sex in the middle of the street then? DO YOU???<br /><br />The look on Dawkins face when presented with this mindset was absolutely priceless! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125484#Comment_125484</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125484#Comment_125484</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:40:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Willow Bl00</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <strong >@nigredo</strong><br /><blockquote >@ dirtymc11<br />Remember that it has been the norm for most of religious history to view the supernatural and especially Gods as things to be feared and placated so that they do not inflict further suffering. <br /><br /><br />Not to nitpick but that's not true unless you refer to specific pagan religious traditions before orthodox christianity and even then it's a levelling assumption. </blockquote><br /><br />What do you think the Old Testament is, then? And while New Christians claim that their God is a loving one, why all the Homos Caused Katrina stuff? It's not as blatant as "sacrifice or be killed," but it's still explaining things we fear in terms of what we didn't do right.<br /><br /><br /><strong >@looneynerd</strong> Thank you for the academia. I miss my Old Testament classes and Sociology of Religion. These were the only things that allowed me to not view those in religion as complete nutcases. Religion really does serve a purpose, and those who choose to participate aren't necessarily weak or manipulative... it just makes sense to them. (I'm sure there <em >are</em> people who are into it for those reasons, but I don't think it's the majority of people).<br /><br />Religion is about community, about having an explaination, about having some (imagined) sense of control over the uncontrollable. I think if the conditions were right there would be religion in the FA world. Or maybe they're allowing the people enough security and community that they wouldn't need it. I think the starving people outside of Whitechapel would definitely have it to some degree. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125517#Comment_125517</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125517#Comment_125517</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:50:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Gekko</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @looneynerd<br />You might (or might not) be miffed by what I'm going to tell you but I don't see belligerent atheists as *true* atheists. I'm not really proud of, or feel on the side of people like Dawkins and Hitchens. They seem like fundamentalists to me. Enough with that.<br />I've always had the feeling that  aggressively proselyte non-believers, the one who are obsessed with proving you are wrong to believe, they are in fact people who fear the possibility of a deity, thus, who might parlty believe. See what I mean? (I hope)<br />There is a difference between akwardly trying to destroy other people's beliefs and trying to have believers respect your atheism per se. The latter only is my attitude, certainly not the former.<br />Atheists like me need to be respected and heard for the way the perceive reality, not respected as being a potential enemy.<br /><br />Back to the point:<br />What is interesting is that an angel is by definition a mystic character. There were angels in myths eons before the invention of monotheism (created by A<strong >k</strong>henaton)   Are Freakangels mystical freak creatures? Haven't scienctists (read Science) created our Freakangels? Is Science Itself God? O my, I'm getting discombobulated. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125520#Comment_125520</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125520#Comment_125520</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:59:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Doctor_Six</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I bet the poor bleeders in the last episode would see the FA's as literal "angels". <br /><em >"They saved us from certain doom, AND have glowy purple eyes to boot. "<br /></em><br />I think you could argue that the current Whitechapel residents could see the FA's as either being culpable for, or saviours from the current apocalypse - and there's probably a mixture of both.<br /><br />Bet the Freakangels take great exception to being deified, though. Great point dirtymc ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125525#Comment_125525</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125525#Comment_125525</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:27:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>Foley</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Val<br />Sad to say, I completely agree with the first paragraph. An internet comedian put it best: "a secular world is a sane world", and sanity is a necessity made that much more important with the downfall of everything as we know it. I shudder to think into the clusterfuck that is the politician's agenda in present day: install as many denominational beliefs into law so that people, regardless of their beliefs (or lack thereof), go through their days the way <em >their</em> religion would have wanted.<br /><br />With that said, the only purpose religion would really serve in post-apocalyptic times isn't that much different from what it serves today, on a global basis: coersion and the hoarding of money.<br /><br />(I cited "The Mist" because, while it's one standpoint, it's a loose example of many things that could happen in the scenario we're discussing.) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125529#Comment_125529</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125529#Comment_125529</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:37:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>dirtymc11</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well 1st off its a little linguistics here that the word angel means Messenger.  It did not necessarily imply a supernatural origin.  Just that one was sent  to deliver a message.  So the freakangels are here to deliver a message.  What it is is why I keep reading (hoping that it never gets delivered).<br /><br />The way I understand it noone but the 'angels knows that they caused the end of the world.  Therefore all the whitechapel folks see is these supremely powerful beings who watch over them and protect them.  This is exactly what the jews thought about yahweh.  <br /><br />While our scribe may never choose to delve into this aspect of whitechapel there are definitly folks who are either already doing so or forming the idea that the angels are gods.<br /><br />When the world doesnt make sense anymore we will grab any idea that seems to take the difficulty of asking questions away from us.  <br /><br />And I think some of the angels would definitely welcome and maybe already are encouraging worship.<br /><br />It would help the sheriff keep the piece.  It would turn anything into an act of worship so long as the diety commands it.<br /><br />Anyone who is out there trying to start a religion on the 'angels probably takes pains to get the flock to not speak about this openly.  Aftger all some of them would definitely smack down anyone who tried to do that.<br /><br />Religion has always been a tool of social control and in the history of mankind there have been long periods when it was the only one.  <br /><br />Diefication however usually waits until after those deified are no longer around to say 'I am not a God' (which as a believing and pracgticing Jew Jesus would have been appalled to see happen)a ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Religion in a drowned world</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125536#Comment_125536</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4952&amp;Focus=125536#Comment_125536</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:06:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Nutters be quiet now. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>