<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Whitechapel - J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:08:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
			<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>
				Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.4 &amp; Feed Publisher
			</generator>
			<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140066#Comment_140066</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140066#Comment_140066</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:32:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>orwellseyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Joe Straczynski, creator of Babylon 5 and writer of "Changeling" <a href="http://www.jmsnews.com/msg.aspx?id=1-17768&topic=Marvel%20Comics" >wants you to resurrect a word.</a><br /><br /><blockquote >So here's the deal. I'm calling on everybody in sight to help me<br />bring back a word. It's a conspiracy, see, and you're all part of it<br />if you choose to be.<br /><br />I want to bring back the word "anon." As in, "I'll call you anon," or<br />"See you anon."<br /><br />It isn't as specific as "see you tomorrow," when you may not, or "I'll<br />call you later" which is even more ill defined and inelegant..."anon"<br />means simply again..."I'll see you again" or "I'll call you in the<br />fullness of time."</blockquote><br /><br />A curious little experiment. What would you bring back? Or create from whole cloth? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140068#Comment_140068</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140068#Comment_140068</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:36:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Fauxhammer</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm with bringing back "anon". It's classy.<br /><br />Me, I want to hear more people saying "Saaaaaay, what's the big idea?!" ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140069#Comment_140069</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140069#Comment_140069</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:38:36 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Blanche</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ If I had my way, people the world over would say "Jaws" instead of "Cheers".<br /><br /><br />Long story short, my friends put on bad fake english accents, and made it sound as if they were saying "Chyaahs" instead of "cheers".<br /><br />I thought they said "Jaws" and got excited; I was wrong.<br /><br />I'm determined not to be. I would like to see "anon" make a comeback, though. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140073#Comment_140073</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140073#Comment_140073</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:43:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SteadyUP</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm working on "bully", myself. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140078#Comment_140078</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140078#Comment_140078</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:50:27 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Rachæl Tyrell</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think the English language needs a non-gender specific singular pronoun.  "S/he" is clumsy, and the overusage of "they" to fill this niche really bothers me. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140081#Comment_140081</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140081#Comment_140081</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:53:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mybrainhurts</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I think the English language needs a non-gender specific singular pronoun</blockquote><br /><br />I thought we already had 'motherfucker'.<br /><br /><em >I went and saw and Joe at the bar. He ordered a pint and then he spilled it all over me.</em><br /><br />becomes<br /><br /><em >I went and saw and Joe at the bar. Motherfucker ordered a pint and then motherfucker spilled it all over me.</em> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140083#Comment_140083</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140083#Comment_140083</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:59:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oxbrow</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Writer of "Dreamers, Shapers, Singers, and Makers" speech likes unduly florid language, film at eleven... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140091#Comment_140091</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140091#Comment_140091</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:10:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>orwellseyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @oxbrow:<br /><br />Troll Hates Clever Idea, Uses Onion Style Joke to Sound Clever, Fails. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140104#Comment_140104</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140104#Comment_140104</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:40:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ENGINE</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @SteadyUP<br /><br />I, too, am working on "bully". BULLY FOR YOU! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140105#Comment_140105</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140105#Comment_140105</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:42:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oxbrow</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Never mind, then, I shan't trouble you further. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140107#Comment_140107</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140107#Comment_140107</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:51:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ you mean anon ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140108#Comment_140108</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140108#Comment_140108</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:51:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>WordWill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.savethewords.org/" >http://www.savethewords.org/</a><br /><br />(You probably want to turn your sound off for that.) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140115#Comment_140115</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140115#Comment_140115</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:08:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Cat Vincent</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Waiting for Anonymous to be all over this... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140118#Comment_140118</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140118#Comment_140118</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:20:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>pico</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ "Remember me."  As in, "Remember me to one who lives there...."  Despite the sad-bastard-Simon-and-Garfunkel-ness of the phrase, it's classy and distinct. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140124#Comment_140124</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140124#Comment_140124</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:41:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The chans have been doing this for a while now anyway. Looks like he's cleverely picked something that'll happen easily, which he can take credit for.<br /><br />Smells a bit of a weird kind of backwards astroturf. Or whatever it is that you'd call 'takling the credit for something already happening'. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140126#Comment_140126</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140126#Comment_140126</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:42:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>epalicki</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think that modern sexual connotations have more or less ruined it, but I try to work "comely" into conversation whenever possible. As in: "Oh, my, she's a <em >comely </em>lass, isn't she?"<br /><br />...and, slightly off-topic, but I could really do WITHOUT the words "got," and "utilize," and I really wish people used "random" and "literally" correctly. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140130#Comment_140130</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140130#Comment_140130</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:49:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Paul Sizer</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ How about we get Americans to properly use the words we have before we start dropping in new ones?<br />My vote for "Can we PLEASE kill this now?" in terms of American phrases:<br /><br />"These ones" and "Those ones" (EXAMPLE: "I like these ones better than those ones, I think."<br /><br />I like THESE. I like THOSE.<br /><br />Fucking PERIOD.<br />Thanks. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140140#Comment_140140</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140140#Comment_140140</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:16:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>rickiep00h</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Oh man, Sizer, we should start a crotchety bastard grammar club. You could be president. It'll look good on a resume. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140143#Comment_140143</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140143#Comment_140143</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:32:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Brendan McGinley</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Personally, I like "alack" ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140144#Comment_140144</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140144#Comment_140144</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:36:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KitsuneCaligari</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I plan on bringing back Old English for feminist erotic novels and YouTube comments.  Also Twitter.... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140145#Comment_140145</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140145#Comment_140145</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:39:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ Fauxhammer - Yes. I also like "Pipe down!" when telling someone to be quiet. I love talking like a '30's gangster. <br /><br />@ SteadyUP - Yes. Bully for you. I also like talking like Teddy Roosevelt. <br /><br />@ mybrainhurts - Motherfucker serves all purposes. I once did a sketch where a character complained about "his motherfucking mother." It was based on reality. Sad, really.<br /><br />@ epalicki - It really bugs me to hear the degradation of the word "random". Also, "awesome", which I admit to overusing. Also, "dude". I once heard a stoner kid say "I'm a cowboy, dude!" and wanted very much to slap some sense into his fool head. <br /><br />I also am in the attempt of correctly imitating the vernacular of the Nineteenth Century, where the masses, largely uneducated by our modern lofty standards, were possessed of an elegance unknown in the cocksucking pig-fuckers of today. I believe this is a project that will last me well into my crotchety-old-manhood. <br /><br />@ Paul & Rickiep00h - Might a traveller join your grammar club? I am intolerant of fools and I own a parang. <br /><br />"Disagreeable" would be my addition. No one describes people as 'disagreeable' anymore. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140172#Comment_140172</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140172#Comment_140172</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:48:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>doclivingston</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I always find it surprising to see people gripe about what they perceive to be "incorrect" usages.  American English is not British English, get over it.  Language evolves, get over it.  If the words you're using are successfully communicating ideas, then you are correctly applying language.  PERIOD.  Variety and evolution are far more interesting to any true fan of language than would be a rigid adherence to a singular variety throughout time, which is so clearly impossible anyway, so clearly NOT HAPPENING NOW OR EVER, that it's silly to see people fight for it.<br /><br />Like, for instance, I am completely in love with the idea that a word that has all but died out in common usage might, through the wonders of modern communication and technology, potentially be resurrected simply for shits and giggles.<br /><br />See, language is weird and fun and alive.  Stop trying to make it boring and dead. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140184#Comment_140184</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140184#Comment_140184</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:05:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>orwellseyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @doclivingston:<br /><br />Evolution is great and I can appreciate David Milch turning "FUCK" into poetry as much as Oscar Wilde penning some biting phrase back at the dawn of the 20th century. Quality matters, content matters, character and ton matter. I know "guyz" from "da nort side" of "She-cah-go" who have an elegant short hand ("Over by dere" for any place distant) that's lively. Seeing it die out for yuppie talk in my life time has been sad. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140187#Comment_140187</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140187#Comment_140187</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:17:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>looneynerd</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've been trying to use more general old southern phrases, like "That dog won't hunt".  As in:<br /><br />Boss: I need that report by 5<br />Employee: Uh, I have a doctor's appointment...<br />Boss: That dog won't hunt! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140189#Comment_140189</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140189#Comment_140189</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:23:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>johnjones</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Can we start with curse words?  I want "frak" in our language for real. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140192#Comment_140192</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140192#Comment_140192</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:35:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alan Tyson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'll be part of any conspiracy Mr. Straczynski starts.<br /><br />I've been trying to use more creative alternatives for curses. Spider Robinson's 'fershligginer" is the current flagship of this operation, because of it's great variety of usages. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140199#Comment_140199</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140199#Comment_140199</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:47:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Rachæl Tyrell</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ johnjones - I'd prefer "frell" personally... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140202#Comment_140202</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140202#Comment_140202</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:52:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>johnjones</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @RachelNoel<br /><br />Well... okay, can we do a reverse-BSG and transform a toothpaste into a curse word?<br /><br />"If you say one more frelling word, I will beat the crest out of you!" ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140203#Comment_140203</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140203#Comment_140203</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:53:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Finagle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @johnjones - <a href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=4994" >Zounds</a>! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140206#Comment_140206</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140206#Comment_140206</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:56:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lazarus99</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I also am in the attempt of correctly imitating the vernacular of the Nineteenth Century, where the masses, largely uneducated by our modern lofty standards, were possessed of an elegance unknown in the cocksucking pig-fuckers of today. I believe this is a project that will last me well into my crotchety-old-manhood. <br /></blockquote><br /><br />Hell, yes...just look at the dialogue in Deadwood. They might swear every other word, but damn, they do it elegantly... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140219#Comment_140219</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140219#Comment_140219</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:04:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The Lincoln Douglas debates lasted 3-4 hours and consisted of each man making a prepared speech for 60 minutes followed by response by the other for 90 minutes and a closing rebuttal by the first speaker for a further 30 minutes.<br /><br />That's a hell of a way from five second soundbites and "town hall" meetings where one of the speakers refers to his opponent as "that one". ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140224#Comment_140224</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140224#Comment_140224</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:12:21 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Fauxhammer</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ OOH OOH OOH--"Prithee"! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140233#Comment_140233</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140233#Comment_140233</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:31:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>MShades</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I want to bring back "yon" and "yonder" for things that are farther away than just "there."  Pointless, I know, but it sounds good.<br /><br />And yes, language evolves, blah blah blah, but that doesn't make me feel less like braining someone when they call a car accident a "tragedy," a surprise escape from danger a "miracle," or a mass-produced handbag "unique."<br /><br />And "proactive?"  "Proactive" can suck shit in hell.... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140234#Comment_140234</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140234#Comment_140234</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:38:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Kosmopolit</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I used to use "anent" in written documents.<br /><br />For one thing it's shorter than "regarding" and I had an absolutely-not-be-exceeded one A4 page limit to adhere to. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140243#Comment_140243</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140243#Comment_140243</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:28:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lazarus99</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Fauxhammer<br /><br />Hows about "marry, nuncle"? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140285#Comment_140285</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140285#Comment_140285</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:54:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Richard Pace</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ DEADWOOD's colourful language was an anachronsism.  The curse words of the day were quaint or silly by our standards.<br /><br />Though, I do like yelling COCKSUCKAH!.  Good for the humors.<br /><br />~R ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140286#Comment_140286</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140286#Comment_140286</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:20:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ At first glance it sounds very silly, exactly like something I would expect from the chans, and I’m not surprised to see others point out that this happens on the chans. But I’d be quite happy for more words to entire the common English lexicon. I am tired of having to converse with people whose regularly stuff three or all of the following into every sentence they utter:  “like”, “you know”, “know what I mean” “the thing is”, and “basically”. I’m turning into one of those cranky fuckers who stops people mid-sentence to say “is it BASICALLY a house, or is it a HOUSE?”. So increasing people’s vocabulary can’t hurt, at least not in my opinion. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140291#Comment_140291</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140291#Comment_140291</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:39:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SteadyUP</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ A favorite from Sports Night - "momentarily" never actually meant "in a moment", but "<em >for</em> a moment".<br /><blockquote >Hell, yes...just look at the dialogue in Deadwood.</blockquote>I once decided to make a concerted effort to stop using "gay" interchangeably with "lame", and after a while, I actually succeeded - just in time for Deadwood to add to my lexicon the term "cocksucker" as a pejorative. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140298#Comment_140298</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140298#Comment_140298</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:52:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lazarus99</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ TALLY HO! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140309#Comment_140309</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140309#Comment_140309</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:25:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ENGINE</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've been trying to work myself into a mindset where I can use that, Lazarus, but sadly I have not been succeeding.<br /><br />James Puckett, it's a 20th Century thing, I think. I should know better, but I also commit these crimes in conversation. The brain endeavours in vain, but the mouth rattles off these placeholders unimpeded. Sorry. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140326#Comment_140326</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140326#Comment_140326</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:44:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I wouldn't chide people for their "the thing is"s and "basically"s. Even though I generally speak in a very direct manner, I always listen close when somebody starts rolling out the "basically"s, because that's when they're actually trying to say something they'd probably just as soon not tell you about.<br /><br />Conversely, if I find for example that I've tripped up in a phone conversation with a client at my old yob, I'd start rolling out down-home as a motherfucker with some "I means" and shit. Straight up dumping them into my sentences. I'd try to picture myself walking together with the client, my arm around her shoulder, being as charismatic as possible. Language is a tool and if keeping word-count down to a minimum were really that effective why the hell would there be message boards. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140335#Comment_140335</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140335#Comment_140335</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:24:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lazarus99</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ENGINE<br /><br />Okay, how about "Cheerio", possibly with a "pip-pip" on the end? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140377#Comment_140377</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140377#Comment_140377</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:20:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Cat Vincent</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ A message to the Conspiracy from Grand Master Straczynski, re. other suggested words and terms:<br /><br /><blockquote >No, no, no, no, no, no, no...you're missing the point.<br /><br />Egads is too twee, Fortnight is still in common use in the UK,<br />forsooth is silly, ye is a version of you which is also in use,<br />gadzooks just gets laughs...there's a simple poetry about "anon," it's<br />kind of self explanatory, there isn't a direct corrolary, and it won't<br />get laughs.<br /><br />Focus, people, focus...how can a conspiracy work if everybody's off<br />running in different directions.<br /><br />Will write anon.</blockquote><br /><br />Of course, one conspiracy inevitably spawns others... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140386#Comment_140386</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140386#Comment_140386</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:02:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Rictus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Gooch grab.<br /><br />Sadly underused.<br /><br />Both in word and deed. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140402#Comment_140402</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140402#Comment_140402</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:05:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Labyrinthine</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've used both yonder and tally ho before! anon, only in scrabble, where I had to argue for ages and nobody else had heard of the word :(<br /><br />My favourite is "jury-rig." I have had to explain this word to people several times, and once I had a lengthy argument with a friend who insisted that the correct spelling was "jerry-rig" when that is in fact merely a bastardisation that is common enough you can use it and people will get what you mean, but still not the original term!<br /><br />I also use "hence," "whence" and "onward!" a lot. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140416#Comment_140416</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140416#Comment_140416</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:10:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mybrainhurts</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @CatVincent: Americans don't use the word fortnight? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140429#Comment_140429</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140429#Comment_140429</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:41:24 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ZJVavrek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Not really, no.  I expect quite a few know what it means, though I am likely overestimating based on my social circle, but it's not actually in use in the USA. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140437#Comment_140437</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140437#Comment_140437</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:10:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yea, most of us know what it means.  I ran into it in a book in Junior High.  But we don't use it regularly.  Typically we say two weeks. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140474#Comment_140474</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140474#Comment_140474</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:57:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>johnjones</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ American don't divide the two units that precisely once it reaches that level.  We might say "a couple-three weeks" but not a "fortnight." ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140490#Comment_140490</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140490#Comment_140490</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:43:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ENGINE</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ You know, Labyrinthine, that's been killing me for ages, but I just haven't been able to figure it out! I see "jerry-rig" in press and I'm thinking, "that's just wrong." but for the life of me I cannot remember what the correct word is! I enjoy "hence".<br /><br />Lazarus, I've got you there! I <em >already</em> use Cheerio! And, uh, cool beans. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140496#Comment_140496</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140496#Comment_140496</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:07:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>aike</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ MY absolute hatred these days is people who insist on using voilà, and then type it walla or some other crap. If you are attempting to sound fancy, fine, make sure you know what the hell you are saying. <br /><br />I am all for elegant use of outdated words and phrases, but the point is much more: take care of your use of language, that includes, but is not restricted to, vocabulary. Evolution of language is great, again, but elegant and correct use of language is something to be appreciated and striven for. In my most humble (or not) of opinions. <br /><br />Oh, but... can we kill marketing speak, please? I will henceforth use anon, if none ever again uses phrases such as: "We aim to leverage the synergistic traction of interdepartmental out-of-the-box thinking to promote green grass opportunities and blue sky thinking." - I already feel the hatred boiling deep within my soul. <br /><br />P.S. BS Bingo! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140531#Comment_140531</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140531#Comment_140531</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:23:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>epalicki</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ aike<br /><br />Your post was not value-added. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140559#Comment_140559</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140559#Comment_140559</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:50:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Osmosis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It just goes to show you can't be too careful! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140573#Comment_140573</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140573#Comment_140573</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:38:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Dictionary Boy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @labyrinthine I also had that argument about jury-rig, one of my classmates tried to persuade me that is was jerry-rig, and I had a full blown argument with him in the middle of class while the lecturer was trying to hold presentations. oops.<br /><br />I also use "hence" a lot, I didn't think it was outdated, is it? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140632#Comment_140632</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140632#Comment_140632</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:01:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Corey Waits</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I really can't believe you Americans don't use 'Fortnight'... It astounds me.<br /><br />I get paid fortnightly, but if I was American I'd get paid 'once every two weeks'?<br />'Fortnight' is a great word people, embrace it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140646#Comment_140646</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140646#Comment_140646</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:14:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ZJVavrek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Many Americans get paid biweekly.  This can confusingly mean either twice a week or fortnightly.<br /><br />I just can't grasp combining "fort" and "night" into something describing weeks for actual use, even if I'm quite familiar with the word. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140660#Comment_140660</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140660#Comment_140660</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:54:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lani</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I vote "Eureka!!"  Let's take this word back from the vacuum cleaner company!<br /><br />I'm also a sucker for cheesy '80s slang: "Ace", "tubular", "radical"...and "dude" and "awesome" are part of my everyday vocabulary.  I blame the guy I dated in college for getting me to say them.<br /><br />Someone (can't remember who) said he had stopped using "gay" to mean bad or stupid.  I applaud you, sir!  I hate it when people use "gay" or "retarded" as a pejorative term (I used to work with clients with developmental disabilities and/or mental illness). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140666#Comment_140666</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140666#Comment_140666</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:28:50 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>orwellseyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I love fortnight. It's a simple, clear unit of time. "Once every two weeks?" in exact, messy, overly wordy. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140671#Comment_140671</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140671#Comment_140671</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:52:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ENGINE</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Wonder where it came from, though? Are nights longer in forts or somesuch? <br /><br />@racingpenguins: how, exactly, does one deploy "tubular"?<br /><br />What about overmuch? I think it's a word, but I do not know. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140677#Comment_140677</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140677#Comment_140677</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:21:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lani</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Engine - Observe:<br /><br />"Oh my god, have you seen the new CYNDI LAUPER VIDEO??  It's like, so totally tubular!"  "Like, fer sure!" ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140679#Comment_140679</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140679#Comment_140679</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:42:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SteadyUP</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @penguins - don't applaud me just yet. PC or not, I still cling desperately to "retarded" due to the fact that it actually <em >does</em> mean "bad" insofar as something is ineffective or a hindrance. The fact that it developed disparaging connotations regarding the mentally disabled doesn't change what it actually means.<br /><blockquote >I love fortnight. It's a simple, clear unit of time.</blockquote>Yeah, but what the hell ever happens every two weeks? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140687#Comment_140687</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140687#Comment_140687</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:55:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lazarus99</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well, some of us get paid. That's definitely something ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140691#Comment_140691</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140691#Comment_140691</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:13:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lani</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @SteadyUP - regarding "retarded", I would say that their diagnosis is a hindrance in some ways, but not necessarily in others.  It depends on what your evaluation criteria are.  *shrug* ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140697#Comment_140697</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140697#Comment_140697</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:44:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>poor_boy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ About the jury-rig/jerry-rig thing: They both sound good to me because either one is better than the version I used to hear.<br />When I was a kid, everybody always said that as, well...I'll post an example with the offensive part bleeped out. I'm pretty sure you'll know what I'm talking about.<br /><br />Billy Bob: You fix that radiator hose yet?<br />Bubba: It's gonna have to be replaced tomorrow when the garage opens, but I n*****-rigged it with some duct tape so you can make it home.<br /><br />I hate to admit it, but where I grew up, people really did say it just like that. After that, anything's an improvement. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140701#Comment_140701</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140701#Comment_140701</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:12:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oga</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ What about phenomenons like singlish or when people who can speak at least five languages slip in and out of them singlish style while they're talking.  I always wished I could do that. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140712#Comment_140712</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140712#Comment_140712</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:43:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>doclivingston</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I unfortunately have had a lengthy struggle killing "gay"-as-pejorative from my vocab, but a huge part of the problem is that gay relatives and gay friends of mine regularly use "gay" in the exact same way around me without hesitation and really don't give a crap when I follow suit.  It's hard to remember that it's actually a usage people get bothered by.<br /><br />Regarding "voila", the biggest thing I always see that pisses me off about that particular word is that nine times out of ten, I see it spelled "viola", as in the fucking instrument.  People are dumb.<br /><br />As to my earlier note about defending usages people might disagree with, I'm half a semester into studying the entire breadth of varieties of English across the world, and if you ever spend any time at all doing that sorta thing, you realize how ridiculous people sound when they go around declaring their particular manner of speech/vocab/grammar/pronunciation/spelling the emphatically "correct" way of going about things.  You're pretty much guaranteed to be in the minority no matter what you're talking about, because the variation is just that prevalent. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140721#Comment_140721</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140721#Comment_140721</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:28:36 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>poor_boy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ You guys are gay. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140782#Comment_140782</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140782#Comment_140782</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:03:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lee Matthews</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Balderdash! Possibly the coolest but most underused word ever ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140784#Comment_140784</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140784#Comment_140784</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:12:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Labyrinthine</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ lol tubular! That's a hilarious word. Have we mentioned "yonder" yet? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140793#Comment_140793</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140793#Comment_140793</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:44:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've never stopped using some of these. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140799#Comment_140799</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140799#Comment_140799</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:17:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>orwellseyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @steadyup<br /><br />I get paid. It's a good metric for planning projects ("I'd like this within a fortnight") <br /><br />The problem with "week" is the fuckery of capitalism. A week is seven days. But there are only 5 business days. Even though most businesses work on the weekend in some capacity. I deal with suppliers and contractors who pull this shit all the time to buy a couple days on an order, or fuck us on shipping. <br /><br />Fortnight, 14 days. Two proper weeks. That's solid. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140802#Comment_140802</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140802#Comment_140802</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:26:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Agreed. 'A week' can be pulled out to mean nine days, all too often. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140812#Comment_140812</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140812#Comment_140812</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:27:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ENGINE</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ oga: you live in Singapore? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140818#Comment_140818</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140818#Comment_140818</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:39:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SteadyUP</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Paychecks - of course. I'm dumb.<br /><br />@penguins-<br /><blockquote >I would say that their diagnosis is a hindrance in some ways, but not necessarily in others.</blockquote>No, that's not it at all. The word "retarded" has no inherent connection to mentally disabled people, it just means "slowed down" or "impeded". It came to be <em >used</em> to describe them, accurately or otherwise, but all I'm saying is that I'm not going to stop using a word accurately because of un-PC connotations that aren't my doing. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140836#Comment_140836</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140836#Comment_140836</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:54:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lani</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Steady - I think might be talking about different things.  I'm talking about when people say things like "Oh, you all look like a bunch of retards!" or "That movie was seriously retarded."  That usage frustrates me.  Using it according to the dictionary definition of slowed down is appropriate, and I didn't mean to imply that I thought it wasn't. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140910#Comment_140910</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140910#Comment_140910</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:09:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lazarus99</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ "Boxing" as an adjective/amplifier, as in the Placebo song Pure Morning:<br /><br />"...and when she's pressed she will undress and then she's boxing clever..." ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140924#Comment_140924</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140924#Comment_140924</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:51:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Don Hilliard</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Wonder where [fortnight] came from, though? Are nights longer in forts or somesuch?</em> <br /><br />Two weeks = fourteen nights = a "fourteen-night" > "fourt'-night" > fortnight.<br /><br />The complementary term for a single week was "sennight" (still in the dictionary but tagged as archaic.  I only know it from its use by the late Rex Stout in one novel.) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140930#Comment_140930</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140930#Comment_140930</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:14:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mybrainhurts</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Lazarus99: 'Boxing clever' is an idiom, they're not using 'boxing' as an adjective/amplifier, I fully support you if you want to try and make it that though. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140932#Comment_140932</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=140932#Comment_140932</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:15:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ... And a hearty Whitechapel welcome to the one and only Don Hilliard*! <br /><br />And yes. Ever spent a night in a fort? Bloody uncomfortable. <br /><br />*Seriously, mate. Welcome. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141007#Comment_141007</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141007#Comment_141007</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:42:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Rictus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Muck-raking.<br /><br />Rictus has never raked muck. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141012#Comment_141012</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141012#Comment_141012</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:36:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>EvJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ For recent developments that might not last, as opposed to old words on their unfortunate last legs, I'd propose these:<br /><br />Gazumping, as in waiting until a person has invested too much time and money into preparing for a purchase to pull out, then jacking up the price on a pretense.<br /><br />Gerrymandering, as in defining the boundaries of an issue, specifically an election, such that the result is a foregone conclusion.<br /><br /><br />I think humanity needs a subtle, versatile and complete vocabulary to describe the many ways in which we can screw each other. Just like the old &quot;Number of Inuit words for snow&quot; thing, the more vocabulary we have to articulate the ways we all screw each other, the more accurately we will be able describe and understand it. Did some jumped up rent-a-peeler cop a feel of your collar? Get on the blower to the local rag and give 'em the lowdown in words the y can understand. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141013#Comment_141013</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141013#Comment_141013</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:41:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>LudwigTheurer</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I have been retarded from my sleep hours by all this fuckery I read, see you all anon, hence, not in a fortnight.<br /><br />Lets call this conspiracy "Englich" (English + Lich) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141017#Comment_141017</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141017#Comment_141017</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:08:24 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Audley Strange</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well me and my friends have been using "anon" for years so it doesn't seem that much of a conspiracy to me. Personally I'd like to see certain jargon phrases removed since they are either pointless baby talk or phrases many people use them without knowing what they mean at all, most recent of which have been the appalling "a big ask" and "sea change" which I heard most recently being used by some idiot woman on the news talking about how there had been a radical sea change in teaching over the last few months. Other phrases such as "get over it" or bizarre usage of words picked up from T.V. shows like some linguistic pox examples like "Hello???" or pointlessly adding "sooooo" to sentences also drive me up the wall though I don't mind them as much in conversational use as I do in written language. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141035#Comment_141035</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141035#Comment_141035</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:10:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mybrainhurts</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @EvJ: I don't think gazumping and gerrymandering are in danger of dying out. They're both in wide use within their own respective circles (the property market and politics).<br /><br />And gerrymandering has one of my favourite etymologies. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141043#Comment_141043</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141043#Comment_141043</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:51:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>EvJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ mybrainhurts: You think? I suppose you're right, but I've been given the strangest looks when using them. I suppose I mean I wish they would grow into widely understood and used terms, rather than they might be in serious danger of dying. I'd hate to see them end up like, for instance, &quot;anon&quot; where most people kind of know they are real words, but they're not in everyday use. I want everyone to use the word gerrymandering all the time, because it sounds wonderful and can only be used to call bullshit on people.<br /><br />Anytime someone uses the word gerrymandering, they sound great, give the english language a little boost, and are socking it to some corrupt asshole. It might very well be the perfect word. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141060#Comment_141060</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141060#Comment_141060</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:27:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Elana</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I like to use "fie!" when I want to express deep remorse and disapproval without going off on my usual train of vulgarisms. Great word, that one! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141101#Comment_141101</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141101#Comment_141101</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:26:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mybrainhurts</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @EvJ: Well they're very specific words. If you were discussing politics with someone with some degree of knowledge in the field and mentioned gerrymandering they should understand it. In fact, it might be a half-decent litmus test to see if you're talking to someone who actually understands something of politics. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141138#Comment_141138</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141138#Comment_141138</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:46:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Solario</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I answer the phone by saying "A hoy hoy."<br /><br /><br /><br />To weigh in on the issue of using Retarded as a synonym for stupid:<br /><br />I would argue that being stupid is a mental disability, but not the kind of mental disability that is being discussed here. But in the end it's a discussion about the basis of the word: Whether you're using it as the social norm uses it, or using it as the dictionary defines it. <br /><br /><br />And I really don't think anyone should "bring back words" collectively. I just wish more people understood more words. To say someone has to say anon instead of now, seems stupid to me. Language is wonderful and should be more diverse, not just interchanging.<br /><br /><br />@Whoever was talking about Voilá: Let's not forget people spelling it Wallah are using an incorrect word for it, as Wallah is arabic and means "By God." ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141150#Comment_141150</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141150#Comment_141150</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:22:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oga</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ENGINE<br /> <br />Nah, I've been there a few times and I love Singlish lit, but I''m from NZ. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141190#Comment_141190</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141190#Comment_141190</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:25:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ Solario - Several of my friends use "a hoy hoy", generally after Mr Burns on the Simpsons. That's apparently what Thomas Edison wanted people to say instead of "hello". ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141200#Comment_141200</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141200#Comment_141200</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:04:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Solario</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @mister hex<br /><br />Yeah, though I think it was Graham Bell who wanted it to be common use. It's a ship greeting and because of primitive equipment it would have been easier to discern than "hello." ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141212#Comment_141212</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141212#Comment_141212</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:11:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ - Solario - I've been wrong on basic facts before. Alexander Graham Bell is claimed as a Canadian, even though he's Scottish. Thomas Edison was a bit of a bastard, too. But not Canadian. <br /><br />Anyways! Thread drift! <br /><br />Startling! And Remarkable! are words I'd soon see revived. Also "Oh my stars and garters!". But you have to drag it out, like Agnes Moorehead. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141215#Comment_141215</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141215#Comment_141215</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:19:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Dictionary Boy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Startling and remarkable have been gone? Since when? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141219#Comment_141219</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141219#Comment_141219</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:38:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ Dictionary Boy - When was the last time you heard someone say "Remarkable!" about something, like a fire or a fifty-foot tall monster? Never, probably. <br /><br />I want to live in a world where people say "Remarkable!". And MEAN IT. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141221#Comment_141221</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141221#Comment_141221</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:43:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lazarus99</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @misterhex<br /><blockquote >Thomas Edison was a bit of a bastard, too.</blockquote><br /><br />So was Bell... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141223#Comment_141223</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141223#Comment_141223</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:47:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @ Lazarus99 - I SAID he was Scottish. Comes wi' the' territory. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141238#Comment_141238</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141238#Comment_141238</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:36:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Lazarus99</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Now, now... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141242#Comment_141242</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141242#Comment_141242</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:58:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>city creed</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've always liked "By Jove!" but haven't heard anyone give it any real juice for a long time... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141297#Comment_141297</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141297#Comment_141297</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:45:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>EvJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ citruscreed, I had a science teacher in secondary school who always said &quot;By Jove!&quot; It's a nice phrase, and I'd hate to see it go. For a less classical alternative, people used to say &quot;Jesus wept!&quot; which was also great. When I was a kid it was the worst thing to hear when I was caught at something catchable. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141313#Comment_141313</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141313#Comment_141313</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:26:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Osmosis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ My dad is a big fan of "Jesus wept".  Also, "Gordon Bennett"! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141319#Comment_141319</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141319#Comment_141319</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:28:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Rictus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The phrase "Sit your monkey-ass down" will be popular for many many years. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141363#Comment_141363</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141363#Comment_141363</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:05:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Labyrinthine</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I've found myself saying "cripes!" a lot lately, which I don't hear often. It's because "Christ!" has a nice ring to it but when i realised I'd started using it I felt weird because I have never been within a Bacon of Christianity, and cripes sounds vaguely similar but less loaded. Anyone know where it's from? Is it like giblets?<br /><br />Also a phrase I use: "for to" as in "I went down to the markets for to buy some bread." I just like the rhythm. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141422#Comment_141422</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141422#Comment_141422</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:12:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Indigo Rose</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think the only real problem with the word retard, or retarded, is that it was used to indicate the mentally disabled in the first place. Granted it is true, but it was used in an insulting way. And people have become overly sensitive to it. Using it in everyday language, where it is appropriate, is not a problem. Even indicating that something is retarded, because you think it's stupid or bad, is a correct usage if the thing/event in question is not ... as good as it should be, not up to standard.<br /><br />Gay, as slang, is obnoxious because it can only be one of two things; "that's so happy!" or "that's such a homosexual". Thus, it IS insulting to homosexual people, unless used to indicate something possitive, whereas "retard" or "retarded" does not have to be.<br /><br />I do like anon. I actually use quite a few of the words and phrases mentioned here, but there is one phrase I wish people would use correctly. "I COULDN"T care less" rather than "I could care less"... enough said. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141423#Comment_141423</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141423#Comment_141423</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:16:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SteadyUP</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Rose - precisely. If I feel that, say, <em >Heroes</em> isn't at all living up to its potential, "that show is retarded" is a valid statement, and casts no aspersions on anyone other than the people who make it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141426#Comment_141426</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141426#Comment_141426</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:22:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Indigo Rose</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Thank you, good example. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141431#Comment_141431</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141431#Comment_141431</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:43:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ENGINE</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ While we're on the topic of emotional <em >ejaculations</em> (hurhur) I frequently yell "hellfire and damnation!" to puzzled looks all 'round, as well as "Christ on a crutch," which, to be honest, I don't know the origin of. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>J. Michael Straczynski invites you to a verbal conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141434#Comment_141434</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=5380&amp;Focus=141434#Comment_141434</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:56:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I like Joe Straczynski, but if he really thinks people stopped using "anon," then it really is time for him to get the fuck out of LA. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>