<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Whitechapel - The Flying Car</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:43:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
			<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>
				Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.4 &amp; Feed Publisher
			</generator>
			<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=227978#Comment_227978</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=227978#Comment_227978</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:36:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>NickDonald</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Moller International are well into development and prototyping on what they have dubbed "Skycar" [yep, all one word, no article]. <br /><br /><img src="http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac189/the_dqc/ban-right.jpg" alt="Skycar" ><br /><br />I have to say, I'm suitably impressed. All the info is on their site and they've even got videos of the freaking thing "flying"! Check it out: http://www.moller.com<br /><br />[sorry 'bout this, I'm having a lot of trouble getting the link to stick to the post: http://www.moller.com/index.php?option=com_jomtube&view=video&id=77&Itemid=79 - if anyone can help me out with that I'd be much obliged] ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=227986#Comment_227986</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=227986#Comment_227986</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:04:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ How do I put this?<br /><br />My college friends and I were just blown away by this when we heard about it and saw the pictures.<br /><br />I graduated in 1986.<br /><br />While the looks of the prototype changes every few years, Moller's sky car is still doing the same thing it has for twenty-five years: Hovering a few feet off the ground, making lots of noise, and causing young journalists who think they've got the story of the decade to gush FLYING CAR FINALLY HERE!!!! and recite the latest variation of the press release.<br />.<br /><br />Look carefully at that video. See that tether? That was supposed to be a temporary safety measure . . . as mentioned in press releases from 25 years back.<br /><br />This is more than vaporware, in that the guy actually builds things, but the actual flying car always seems a few years (and maybe some investor dollars?) away. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=227998#Comment_227998</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=227998#Comment_227998</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:10:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>NickDonald</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yeah, apparently they still have to use the tether for"insurance purposes". Well, 25 years just goes to show that funding for the flying car is really not a priority for governments or the private sector. <br /><br />It looks a lot nicer than it used to, though... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=227999#Comment_227999</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=227999#Comment_227999</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:12:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Brandon Seifert</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @StefanJ — Yeah, I was totally excited about this when I saw it in Popular Mechanics when I was a kid.  And... it looks exactly what I remember. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228007#Comment_228007</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228007#Comment_228007</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:37:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>StefanJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >"It looks a lot nicer than it used to, though... :"</em><br /><br />Cripes, to quote Groundskeeper Willy, "If it werrrrni't against the laws of nature I'd marry it." It's like a Gerry Anderson gizmo come to life. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228010#Comment_228010</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228010#Comment_228010</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:10:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>stsparky</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It maybe some sort of investment scam at this point. Some bored billionaire would have one for himself if the inventor would allow it off his property. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228016#Comment_228016</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228016#Comment_228016</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:10:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Brendan McGinley</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This is the future. You will never have a flying car. You may, however, have robot servants. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228035#Comment_228035</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228035#Comment_228035</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:22:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>callisto23</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Think about the idiots you see on the road every day. You really want them flying over your house? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228044#Comment_228044</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228044#Comment_228044</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 03:35:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>aike</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yeah, for a while back in the 90s you could preorder one of them for a cool half a million, or quarter of a million, or something. Same red one as above. Havent even updated the design since then. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228052#Comment_228052</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228052#Comment_228052</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:28:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Ben Klumaster</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think they were in court recently for that. Something about selling shares under false pretenses.<br />Oh no, my mistake. I read about it recently, but the actual fine was in 2003, for "fraudulent unregistered stock". The actual article was about them releasing a FlightSim plugin and asking for more investments. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228066#Comment_228066</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228066#Comment_228066</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:34:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>epalicki</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The wings are new. I remember the Popular Mechanics article from about 20 years ago; Moller originally theorized that the turbines alone would provide enough lift to get the sucker off the ground. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228090#Comment_228090</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228090#Comment_228090</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:30:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>aike</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Yes! The wings *are* new! It must work now... quick... where can I buy shares? :D<br /><br />But seriously, I still find this ever so disappointing, every time it comes up. <br /><br />*edited to remove snark* ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228118#Comment_228118</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228118#Comment_228118</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:44:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Emmymau</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm inclined to agree with Callisto.  Too many folks out there have enough trouble driving in two dimensions. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228132#Comment_228132</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228132#Comment_228132</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:40:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>epalicki</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ My point about the wings: at some point this ceases to be a flying car and becomes an airplane.<br /><br />As an object, the Skycar is remains very <em >pretty</em>, even 25 years later (and it amuses me that Skycars have appeared in Warren's run on Astonishing X-Men as well as in a few post-Alan Moore issues of TOP 10), but in terms of functionality, it's becoming less and less unique when compared to, say, a helicopter. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228141#Comment_228141</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228141#Comment_228141</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:12:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>stsparky</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ One of the battles was about whether it is a plane or a car supposedly. <br /><img src="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/wp-content/uploads/terrafugia.jpg" alt="" ><br />Carplanes are old tech and boring. Ask any James Bond fan.<br /><img src="http://www.oldclassiccar.co.uk/classic-car-images/convaircar.jpg" alt="" > ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228177#Comment_228177</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228177#Comment_228177</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:10:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>looneynerd</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ A huge number of people shouldn't be allowed to drive normal cars. The day flying cars become common is the day I'm locking myself in a bunker and hiding until the corpses are finished raining from the sky... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228185#Comment_228185</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228185#Comment_228185</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:29:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>NickDonald</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well, looks like I'm well behind the 8 ball on this whole flying car thing. <br /><br />But here's an idea, why don't they develop some sort of flying mass transit system? I'm a genius! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228344#Comment_228344</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228344#Comment_228344</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:54:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Ben Klumaster</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I still reckon we ought to have a municipal catapult/net system. It would be fast, entertaining, and would reduce congestion. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228347#Comment_228347</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228347#Comment_228347</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:15:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Nygaard</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Hmmm... yes; computerized aiming system, and ballasted, aerodynamic winged glider capsules to make the flight relatively safe and predictable. After all, you don't have to make it safe - you only need to reduce the number of causalties to something comparable to road traffic, right? Wolfram Alpha says that globally, 1 in 48 deaths annually are caused by road traffic accidents. Easy. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228348#Comment_228348</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228348#Comment_228348</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:19:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>NickDonald</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Don't forget "energy efficient" "environmentally sustainable" and the creation of jobs - Catapult Winder, Catapult Releaser, Net Untangler - and it'd be a much needed shot in the  arm for the beleaguered Aerodynamic-Crash-Helmet-with-Goggles and Elasticy-Circus-Type-Springy-Nets-that-You-Don't-Bounce-Out-Of manufacturing industries. <br /><br />The only drawback I can see is the possibility of an airborne collision with the Umbrella Crested Poppins. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228536#Comment_228536</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228536#Comment_228536</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:26:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Finagle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Here's the site that Stsparky's image came from, I didn't see it directly linked anywhere:<br /><br />http://www.terrafugia.com/ ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228602#Comment_228602</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=228602#Comment_228602</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:14:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>thud</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This version of the flying car has been around for years, and by the looks of it, just as inefficient as the automobile. A dangerous-looking design as well, with 4 engines/props. We all know what happens to a car when one of the tires goes flat. Lose one engine and you are flying an unstable craft, lose two engines and no matter what you do it crashes.<br />There are already very small helicopters, the old standby autogyro, and the new wave of ultralight aircraft that are more efficient than the flying car. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=231218#Comment_231218</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=231218#Comment_231218</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:38:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>roadscum</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/14/darpa_marines_flying_car/" >DARPA wants a flying Jeep:</a><br /><br /><blockquote >In this case, the federal techno bad boys of DARPA have decided to have a crack at a real, no-shit flying car: and probably not just an ordinary car, but an off-road one to boot. They don't want a light plane that you can drive on a road, like the Terrafugia Transition. They don't want a paramotor, either. According to the Transformer TX announcement issued yesterday:<br /><br />    The Government’s envisioned concept consists of a robust ground vehicle that is capable of configuring into a VTOL [Vertical Take Off and Landing] air vehicle with a maximum payload capability of approximately 1,000 lbs.<br /><br />The sky-jeep should be able to carry four fully-equipped troops, or alternatively one stretcher and one medic. It should be no bigger than 30 feet long by 8.5' wide and 9' high in ground configuration - on the order of two Hummers nose-to-tail - and should have wheels and suspension giving "road performance similar to an SUV" and "capable of handling light off-road travel".</blockquote><br /><br />Don't get too excited though, DARPA are better at planning than doing;<br /><br /><blockquote >Like all DARPA projects Transformer TX is unlikely to succeed at all. Even if US Marine rifle companies one day do ride to war in handy four-man sky jeeps rather than cumbersome choppers or Humvees, that doesn't necessarily mean flying cars for all any more than Harriers or Ospreys did.</blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Flying Car</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=231525#Comment_231525</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7961&amp;Focus=231525#Comment_231525</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:31:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>stsparky</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Autogyro? Next! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>