<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	
		<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
			<title type="text">Whitechapel - Ugly Fonts, and Reading</title>
			<updated>2013-05-17T23:01:15-07:00</updated>
			<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/</id>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en"
				href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9435&amp;page=1"/>
			<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"
				href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9435&amp;Feed=ATOM&amp;page=1"/>
			<generator
				uri="http://getvanilla.com/"
				version="1.1.4">
				Lussumo Vanilla &amp; Feed Publisher
			</generator>
			<entry>
		<title>Ugly Fonts, and Reading</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9435&amp;Focus=279403#Comment_279403" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9435&amp;Focus=279403#Comment_279403</id>
		<published>2011-01-18T21:05:25-08:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-17T23:01:15-07:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Rootfireember</name>
			<uri>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/account.php?u=1551</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			There's been a recent explosion in my feed-reader about how Ugly Fonts may boost Reading Comprehension. Some have taken this to mean that fonts such as comic-sans should be used more often. Those ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[There's been a recent explosion in my feed-reader about how Ugly Fonts may boost Reading Comprehension. Some have taken this to mean that fonts such as comic-sans should be used more often. Those people haven't paid attention to the actual study. It's not ugly boosting the reading comprehension. It's the harder-to-read fonts doing it. The ones that make you stop, read slower and focus more on what you're reading instead of speeding through it like a cheetah on speed. <br /><br />Just because a font's ugly, doesn't mean it's great to use. Different fonts can convey different things -- and a font (such as comic sans) doesn't necessarily convey the "oh look, it's school, let us learn now" feeling. It's not a bad font, it's just a bit silly and goofy for a place such as a text book, and it's really not hard to read. Which is where websites seem to be mixing things up, equating all ugly fonts with proper fonts for any use now.<br /><br />Is it just me or has the media, in general, been taking a lot of rather bland stories, twisting them to the point where recognizing the sources is near impossible, and throwing a shitfit?  Tiger Mom, Comic Sans is for Educating! and the 13th Zodiac...<br /><br />or maybe it's just the local coffee shop keeping the tv on fox news and pissing me off with this crap in the morning.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	
		</feed>