Not signed in (Sign In)
    • CommentAuthorzenbullet
    • CommentTimeFeb 12th 2008 edited
     (984.1)
    Thane Heins demonstrates his machine


    http://www.thestar.com/Article/300041
    • CommentAuthorKosmopolit
    • CommentTimeFeb 12th 2008
     (984.2)
    Sounds like yet another case of self-delusion to me.

    If I had a perpetual motion device I wouldn't go to the media. I'd build a bunch of them, keep the details secret and sell the power to the big electric companies. Once I had a few hundred megawatts of actual generating capacity I'd go to the media.
  1.  (984.3)
    Yup. These devices invariably turn out to be bogus. The Second Law pretty much has an iron grip.
  2.  (984.4)
    For once, a good youtube comment (says everything I was about to quite concisely):

    "I'm no expert on this stuff, but usually when I hear about these gadgets it turns out that they are basically running on the potential energy of one or? more magnets. Then the magnets will eventually de-magnetize, and the energy required to re-magnetize them exceeds the energy that was supplied. So before I consider this as anything special, I'd want to see a demonstration that shows more energy being supplied than exists in the potential energy of the magnets themselves."