<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Whitechapel - DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:19:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
			<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>
				Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.4 &amp; Feed Publisher
			</generator>
			<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296300#Comment_296300</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296300#Comment_296300</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 13:58:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Vornaskotti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <strong >DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</strong><br /><br /><em >Starting this summer, the publisher will re-number its entire DC Universe of titles, revamping famous characters such as Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman and others from its 76-year history for a more modern and diverse 21st century.</em><br /><br /><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/comics/2011-05-31-dc-comics-reinvents_n.htm" >http://www.usatoday.com/life/comics/2011-05-31-dc-comics-reinvents_n.htm</a><br /><br />I'm not much of a superhero comic person myself, but this really got my attention:<br /><br /><em >In an even more important move in the competitive comics industry, DC is making issues of all the renumbered titles available digitally via apps and a DC website the same day they arrive in comic shops. It marks the first time a major comics publisher has done so with its popular superhero titles.</em><br /><br />These guys understand the digital marketplace, it seems. Day-and-date multiformat is the best way to combat piracy, I would say. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296304#Comment_296304</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296304#Comment_296304</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 14:09:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>gzapata</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I haven't liked the last half decade of what they've been doing so I don't see myself liking any of this other stuff either. I do like that Superman finally is getting those undies off though ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296305#Comment_296305</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296305#Comment_296305</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 14:17:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>joe.distort</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ STOKED<br /><br />besides morrison and a few little things here and there (current DETECTIVE run, paul cornell/pete woods ACTION run up until 901 etc) i think DC desperately needs to do something like this. im a huge geek and i barely even read their mainline books anymore! thats a bad sign. gimme gimme gimme some new shit ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296306#Comment_296306</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296306#Comment_296306</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 14:18:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>3millionyears</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Day and date - great, as if my blog isn't enough!<br />Seriously though - from my point of view, this is a massive change from the DC of 12-18 months ago where they were dumping Zuda and not looking at anything digital! Now lets see the others follow suit!<br /><br />Any news on Avatar? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296307#Comment_296307</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296307#Comment_296307</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 14:29:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Morac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Interesting news. I never got in to mainstream DC, and this may change that, which I believe is exactly the response they are looking for.<br /><br /><blockquote >Day-and-date multiformat is the best way to combat piracy, I would say.</blockquote><br />It may not be the best way to shut down piracy, but it is probably the best way to make money in an era of piracy. I think too many companies focus on the former rather than the latter. Besides, I would like to think that piracy after the original purchase isn't that much worse that people reading physical copies that have been left lying around (though there are probably many numbers out there to prove me wrong). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296309#Comment_296309</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296309#Comment_296309</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 15:09:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.comicsreporter.com/index.php/dc_renumbering_everything_from_the_beginning_will_include_day_and_date_digi/" >Spurgeon has interesting commentary.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296310#Comment_296310</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296310#Comment_296310</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 15:24:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Cunningham</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It's sad but I'm so completely removed from DC that I honestly don't know where I'd begin looking at any of the revamped titles.  I'm also not sure I'd trust DC to handle characters I'd care about.  The post-Identity Crisis DC isn't anything I want to read.  They've got a lot of trust to rebuild. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296311#Comment_296311</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296311#Comment_296311</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 15:31:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>icelandbob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The digital thing is what interests me as my LCS has an interminable delay for getting their singles to shelf and while i do buy TPB's, this delay often means that i have on many an occasion, downloaded certain issues. If they get the pricing right, then this would be something i would definitely get into.<br /><br />As for <strong >50 </strong>relaunched titles though? i don't know. even if it works for them, there's going to be a lot of pain and stress on the creative team. i wonder how many of them were aware that this relaunch was going to be so big?<br /><br />And same thing with 3millionyears - Any news on Avatar's digital formats? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296315#Comment_296315</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296315#Comment_296315</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 15:51:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Having 50 simultaneously released titles speaks more of a lack of quality control and bad editorial judgment.  Unless DC's new editorial policy follows the crap on the wall principle. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296324#Comment_296324</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296324#Comment_296324</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 16:21:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Boy, this will be the most exciting two year long return to the 1980s status quo yet!<br /><br />And when they finally get around to retelling Invasion!, I bet it'll just as good as the original. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296325#Comment_296325</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296325#Comment_296325</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 16:23:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>chris g</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The chip on DC's shoulder has not been as obvious as it is today! They could have just launched their own Ultimate style imprint (had their chance with All-Star and only managed to make that version of Superman truly great) rather than relaunch everything for the benefit of newcomers/movie going audiences curious about superheroes but just can NOT be bothered to check out of a few choice trades to learn what a guy like Superman or Batman are all about. It simply HAS to be #1 or it's not worth jumping into. It's like some fucking nerd club and you have to be there in line or be left out until the next time they relaunch! Anyway, good luck with all that. I'm just waiting for Batwoman to ship already :D ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296331#Comment_296331</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296331#Comment_296331</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 17:03:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>BrianMowrey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >there's going to be a lot of pain and stress on the creative team.</blockquote><br /><br />as opposed to having to work within decades of schizophrenic canon every word and every panel? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296332#Comment_296332</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296332#Comment_296332</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 17:17:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Beamish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This sort of excites me, I've stopped reading many DC books because they seem tired.  I'm not going to say it's a good idea until it happens though.  I find it to be interesting considering that so many people expected them to renumber under the legacy system of totally volume numbers like Marvel has been.  Being a comic nerd I have seen a lot of relaunches to number 1 and I've seen very little effect if the talent is not up to the task and even then as soon as the talent leaves the title many readers quickly follow (see any title Johns has left).  I wish them the best.  What they need to do is land a Matt Fraction or a Jonathan Hickman, that would help a bunch. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296342#Comment_296342</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296342#Comment_296342</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 17:53:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>HEY APATHY!</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I kind of figured that Superhero stories all recycled themselves every two or three years anyways. You know X-Men fight Apocalypse,  Xavier disappears,X- men fight Sentinels, Xavier Returns, X-Men fight Magneto then it starts all over again. If they just started back at # 1 ever three years then the audience would know that they are teenagers now and could move on to  mature reader graphic novels, creator owned or alternative books, letting the next generation of wee ones start fresh? I really don't know anything though in 1988 I thought Peter Parker was a photographer in college trying to make his way in the world in the world but it turns out he's still in high school?. <br /><br />When I a kid reading this stuff the continuity issues where really confusing, so if Kids are still the main audience maybe starting fresh will work? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296350#Comment_296350</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296350#Comment_296350</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 18:08:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>jimmyjungle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'll get behind it more once i hear a word or two from Grant Morrison on the subject.<br /><br />alot of the american guys at dc just think like buisnessmen ,but if Batman inc gets fucked with...and who sees Batman and Superman as 22 year olds or whatever?<br /><br />if it's as extreme as Dick Grayson being robin again?  damn strange, probably won't be that extreme.<br /><br />I've always disliked continuity obsessed folk who fear change and now i feel like i'm split down the middle on this...makes ya feel a little old.<br /><br />Radical changes and evolution within the existing continuum seems the healthiest approach to any saga or tapestry.<br /><br />The mighty DC oaktree goes under the chainsaw... gonna take a while to grow a tree fulla stories that big again. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296355#Comment_296355</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296355#Comment_296355</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 18:41:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>joe.distort</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ ive seen so much bitterness and rancor on this in the five or so hours its been official that it makes me think EVEN MORE that its the right thing to do if its pissing off the hardline folks.<br /><br />and, sadly, for the people saying 'if you are upset by this, read stuff like INFINITE VACATION or NONPLAYER instead!'<br />sorry, thats not really gonna happen. the kind of serious superhero geek that gets mad about this kinda stuff ints gonna totally drop all the stuff they love in order to read two comics with a combined 3 issues in a 7 month span. that will definitely not scratch the itch ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296363#Comment_296363</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296363#Comment_296363</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:13:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>jimmyjungle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well after a spliff I'm much more inclined to just shut it and go with the flow anyway.<br /><br />There's 'daytime stressed spinetroubles me' and 'aaaah i love dis comics man me' and i just transitioned from one to the other in under an hour...heh<br /><br /><br />COMICS!  <br /><br />Night Y'all ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296365#Comment_296365</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296365#Comment_296365</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:53:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This could be 1990s-issue-?-1 bullshit all over, but with DRM to make things really fugly. But I'm going to be optimistic and hope that, for the first time in my life, someone will be publishing comprehensible superhero comics that don't require a constantly growing storage space. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296366#Comment_296366</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296366#Comment_296366</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:53:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>KPatrickGlover</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I stay away from the internet for a couple of days and when I come back the folks at DC have lost their fucking minds. This whole thing reads like a fake April Fools Day story.<br /><br />I guess I need to wait and see how this shakes out, but if it does what it says on the tin, this is bad news for the few really interesting books DC has put out in recent years, most notably the Batman line, which would be crippled by a rollback to an earlier status quo.<br /><br />(EDITED TO ADD: The above comments refer, obviously, to the creative relaunch of the line and not to the day and date digital stuff, which is a splendid idea. Unfortunately, It is not beyond the realm of corporate excuses to imagine a scenario where the whole thing goes down and flames and the suits blame the digital aspect instead of the relaunch. Which could result in others being very sceptical of digital publishing. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296372#Comment_296372</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296372#Comment_296372</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 21:01:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Upon reading this news:<br /><br />Day and date digital: Yay! (sorry brick and mortar stores, thems the breaks)<br /><br />Rebooting the entire DCU with 50 titles:  Seriously?  <em >Again?</em><br /><br />Jim Lee redesigning everybody's costumes: Oh, for fuck's sake.<br /><blockquote >as opposed to having to work within decades of schizophrenic canon every word and every panel? </blockquote> I'd rather have the decades of schizophrenic canon to mine and weave into stories (a la Morrison) then have to work under the constant threat that any groundwork for a longform story I'm trying to tell will have to be thrown out because Geoff Johns has decided he wants to re-write every superhero's origin for the fourth fucking time in under ten years.<br /><br />Beyond how this may or may not effect Morrison's Batman run, does this kill 'Multiversity,' too?<br /><br />And the following quote just throws up a giant 'wtf?': <blockquote >Geoff Johns promised USA Today "a focus on the interpersonal relationships within DC's trademark superteam." "What's the human aspect behind all these costumes?" he tells the publication. "That's what I wanted to explore."</blockquote>  Isn't that exactly what he was doing with JLA post-Infinite Crisis/52?  And it lasted, what, two years before he had Red Arrow shooting heroin and <a href="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.comicsalliance.com/media/2010/06/arsenal4.jpg" >fucking dead cats in back alleys</a>?<br /><br />This wouldn't bother me if I didn't think that DC will in all likelihood take the wrong lesson from this inevitable failure and, rather than adding some additional reigns on Johns and loosening up on the <em >actual</em> creatives in the company, they'll just retreat from the digital space again and continue to let Johns do whatever he wants. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296377#Comment_296377</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296377#Comment_296377</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 21:31:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Neila</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Honestly I'm not sure how this will pan out. From my experience, even the better written DC comics are kinda hard to follow, since they seem to rely heavily on the distant history of the characters, and more or less assume you know who/what plot point that ties into issue number whatever is. I worked as a flatter on a couple DC books last year, which lead me to buying copies of said books, some were good, some were confusing but I didn't really keep reading after the books I helped on. <br /><br />The idea of tossing everything out and starting over seems like it might be a somewhat good idea, but all the titles at once seems a little extreme. I guess its "Go big or go home"? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296383#Comment_296383</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296383#Comment_296383</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 23:13:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>COOP</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Oh, they'll drag all the old shit back out of the closet after 18 months or so. Superhero comics need byzantine continuity like gangster rap needs guns and misogyny. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296384#Comment_296384</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296384#Comment_296384</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 23:15:36 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>frequentcontributor</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Well, it's certainly fucking crazy. I don't read much DC now, but I'll probably check out a few new titles if they seem interesting or have some creators I like doing them. Looks like a new Grant Morrison Superman title is on the way, which is cool, but Batman Incorporated isn't even a year old yet and it's either getting a reboot or just going away? Not loving the new costumes, but I guess, since I really just have no investment in DC books at all, I really don't care that much. As more of a Marvel guy, though, I guess I'd be wary if every book in the entire line got shuffled around, continuity-wise, and started over at #1 (even though Marvel does start their books over quite a bit, only to change the numbering back once another "milestone" issue is hit...).<br /><br />Anyway, it's a ballsy move, but they're still basically the same thing -comic books - which is part of the problem why they don't sell in the first place, I guess. If DC had scrapped single issues altogether and only done online and original graphic novels, that would be something...<br /><br />Oh, and 52 new first issues is way too damn many. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296395#Comment_296395</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296395#Comment_296395</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:33:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>manglr</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I can't say that I've bought a mainstream DC floppy nearly ever in my comic reading life.  And this isn't likely to break that streak.  But this does continue to reinforce my happiness switching to following creator-owned titles more exclusively.  (My Marvel output is down to a mere one or two titles at the moment.)<br /><br />I'm more curious to see how the day and date digital impacts the industry as that's something that might get me back into more of a monthly periodical mode.  I've been dumping floppies for trades mostly due to storage and reuse issues...but am about ready to climb onto the tablet bandwagon and could be checking out more digital issues as a result. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296397#Comment_296397</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296397#Comment_296397</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:59:24 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>texture</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Can't we just make Geoff Johns fight Jeph Loeb to death in a big pile of money? I'd buy that for a dollar. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296400#Comment_296400</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296400#Comment_296400</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:39:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>IsaacSher</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm willing to see where they go with this.<br /><br />If it turns out to be a giant pile of fuckup ala I'm The Goddammned Batman, they can always pull the plug on it, bring back the old post-Final Crisis multiverse, and have Lois wake up to find Kal-El in the shower, still happily married, and complain about the weird dream they had last night.   <br /><br />Or it might actually turn out to be good, and be the sort of restructuring that DC needed for long-term survival, by drawing in newer and younger readers who were afraid or disinterested in continuity baggage, but loved superhero stuff in general.  Also, creating the online channel and heavily supporting it might bring in new readers who would never, ever, EVER step foot in a comic store.<br /><br />Geoff Johns isn't a perfect writer, but I've found his work better than most.   Jim Lee giving everyone a fresh coat of costume paint isn't too horrible -- he's got about a 65-35 hit/miss ratio with me on designs, and even his bad designs aren't horrid, just not great.   I'm very surprised that they're even having him do a redesign on Superman, as DC usually seems to prefer gradual costume shifts for him, as to maintain the iconic image as much as possible (Mountain Dew Blue Voltage Superman notwithstanding).<br /><br />But yeah, if it works, great!  If it doesn't, they can always hit the cosmic reset-retcon button again and go back to business as usual, and the fandom would very likely forgive them again. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296402#Comment_296402</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296402#Comment_296402</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:05:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This is probably what Flashpoint crossover is leading into right?<br /><br />So it's another universe reset like we've seen multiple times already. Technically, it will still all fit within DC's continuity. <br /><br />I'm afraid it all sounds a bit gimmicky. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296403#Comment_296403</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296403#Comment_296403</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:05:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Ananzitusq</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm a hardcore DC fan and I am both fucking stoked for all of this but at the same time I'm left wondering who spiked the water cooler. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296408#Comment_296408</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296408#Comment_296408</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:53:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>gzapata</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I kind of find it weird that they let an artist that is clearly from the 90s redesign everything for 2011. I would have preferred maybe Frank Quitely. What do you guys think?<br /><br /><br />From the perspective of attempting to improve the industry as a whole though it is a great idea. Reboot and make the universe shine at the same time they begin releasing digital comics in a way that I (and even more important new readers) can hopefully get behind. I do hope they won't be $2.99 though. Any word yet on pricing and any thoughts on it? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296410#Comment_296410</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296410#Comment_296410</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:13:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The dream of the 90's is alive in DC. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296412#Comment_296412</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296412#Comment_296412</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:31:21 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>texture</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I would have preferred maybe Frank Quitely. </blockquote><br /><br />Always, definitely. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296416#Comment_296416</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296416#Comment_296416</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:37:24 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Ananzitusq</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ how about they just reboot Doc Savage too and let me write him and his iron crew. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296418#Comment_296418</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296418#Comment_296418</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:41:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote > I would have preferred maybe Frank Quitely. What do you guys think?</blockquote><br /><br />Oh hells yeah! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296419#Comment_296419</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296419#Comment_296419</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:55:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>3millionyears</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >The dream of the 90's is alive in DC.</blockquote><br /><br />Are they all going to have foil covers too?! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296421#Comment_296421</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296421#Comment_296421</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:34:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >I kind of find it weird that they let an artist that is clearly from the 90s redesign everything for 2011.</em><br /><br />It might make sense if they're trying to bring back lost customers instead of find new ones. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296422#Comment_296422</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296422#Comment_296422</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:36:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Are they all going to have foil covers too?!</em><br /><br />Maybe there will be fifty foil variants of issue 0 books. Hell, they could even resurrect Wizard and do fifty different covers! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296424#Comment_296424</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296424#Comment_296424</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:06:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This sort of shit is the reason why millions of people will go to see a Batman or X-men film but don't read the comics. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296427#Comment_296427</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296427#Comment_296427</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:29:24 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doctor Pockets</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ On one hand, it's wild to see the #2 superhero comics publisher reach the point of creative bankruptcy to the point where they think they have to just give up and start over.<br /><br />On the other, it's a bit sad to see them still believe so strongly in the myth of the "new reader." For the most part, when it comes to superhero comics there are no new readers, or at least not enough to make any significant change in the market. Stunts like this aren't going to bring a flood of people who previously weren't reading superhero comics into stores. All it will do will lure a relatively small, and mostly temporary, boost in sales to DC's comics. Most of those customers will give up on them within a short time.<br /><br />Superhero comics are a habit hobby that appeals less and less to fewer and fewer people. Stunts like this don't get you a bigger, loyal audience. <br /><br />Personally, I think the superhero comic audience would be happy with a quality product that came out on a regular, reliable schedule. They just want a decent Batman comic on the second Wednesday of every month. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296428#Comment_296428</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296428#Comment_296428</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:32:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Miranda's Eyes</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ If this stunt leads to the long-delayed release of the BATWOMAN comic, I'll be happy.  NOT turning Renee Montoya's The Question straight would also be nice. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296430#Comment_296430</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296430#Comment_296430</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:55:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ This is top-down bad news for shops, and for once it's not their fault. up to 50% of their weekly comics stock just got impossible to anticipate, more expensive & riskier to stock, and harder to sell. Even good shops will be hurt by this, and maybe it's the retail blood in me or nostalgia, but I don't see this as a good thing. This may actually put some struggling shops out of business, which may seem doom and gloom, but this is the start of a long-coming reprisal in comics retailing that will hurt the little guy the most. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296432#Comment_296432</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296432#Comment_296432</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:08:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Neil Ofsteel</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm just excited to see ol' Supes rocking the mullet again. <br /><br />I assume that's what's going to happen, right? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296438#Comment_296438</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296438#Comment_296438</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:54:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Beamish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I just read bleedingcools article stating that Barbara Gordon will be Batgirl again.  That is not a story that I would mess with.  The character was made strong through its history.  I am guessing there will be equal amounts of disapointment to the excitement of new stories. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296446#Comment_296446</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296446#Comment_296446</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:39:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>gaveedra</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I haven't bought a DC comic for years. I am going to pick them up digitally and see if I want to continue. Seems like a good think on a personal level, that is DC will gain sales for at least a month from one reader.That is really all I can comment on as I have not been following the industry and mechanics of comic sales and distribution. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296465#Comment_296465</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296465#Comment_296465</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:15:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mjmartinejohn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I posted these on the other Flashpoint thread, but thought you might enjoy this here too. Any other ideas that DC could use to modernize their characters?<br /><br />So I decided to tweet some ideas for DC to use yesterday in their relaunch and thought I would share them here.<br /><br />Superboy title - hipster with huge mustache falls in love while dealing with psychic powers. #modern<br /><br />Firestorm. An undercover chinese agent in America meets an ancient mathematical problem and can rearrange time in 5 min chunks<br /><br />Super-Lantern. Mash-up title involving a hybrid of John Stewart and Kal-el fighting against Satanic magic-eating aliens.<br /><br />Flash can be a self-aware virus that causes the carrier to have super speed...until they die. #modern<br /><br />Outsiders can be a series of fringe political activists that gain powers and fight against the system...and each other. #modern<br /><br />Green Lantern can now be a woman named JaM, a slam poet with a mind that smashes out the craziest light constructs<br /><br />Teen Titans can be in a correctional program and get hit by lightning. #modern<br /><br />Robin can now be a robot ninja assassin with a heart made out of green tights and trapeze wire.<br /><br />Let's make Deadman Aliveman and dress him in purple and gold and make him have dancing powers.<br /><br />Let's relaunch Batman with a ponytail and a hole in his mask for it. That will be modern!<br /><br />Jet Ski Aquaman is the next gen Auquaman. Starring Jellly the jellyfish, and Fin, the tuna in a can! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296471#Comment_296471</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296471#Comment_296471</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:30:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Brad McLoughlin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Is it just me, or can DC kind of say goodbye to their back catalogue for some time? One thing I've never understood is why the Big Two aren't presenting their digital material in such a way that gives potential readers a sufficient structure to encourage picking up the current books (print or otherwise).<br /><br />If you go to Marvel's digital library, it's easily as impenetrable as LCS, if not more so, because there's nobody to talk to. What they should be doing is giving people the collected Jonathan Hickman run on Fantastic Four for 20 bucks, just in time for them to go out and pick up the new Future Foundation book, and replicating that for all their major series. They should be bundling all those oft-referenced "classic" stories together for cheap(-er than trades), make them an impulse purchase so that it's not too much of a financial burden if you're just reading it for continuity's sake (a shitty concept to have to facilitate, but I think it'd work).<br /><br />I don't read any DC mainstream books at the moment, but could potentially be interested in a few digital books with the reboot, but only if they actually offer up a proper "download and do as you will" model, which I can't see happening for some time. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296473#Comment_296473</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296473#Comment_296473</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:50:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>gzapata</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ My biggest thing for digital is allowing for many platforms and one standard file type. I really just don't like flash and would prefer to continue reading with CDisplay or something similar ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296474#Comment_296474</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296474#Comment_296474</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:59:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Their digital releases will be the same price as the print versions.<br /><br />Regular folks not wanting to pay five bucks for five minutes of reading is a good part of their current woes. Having it on your iPad isn't going to change that. They're either going to have to drop the price significantly, or up the amount of content significantly. There are no shipping costs and no storage costs to be met. And Apple's cut can't be that big.<br /><br />That is, IF they really want it to be a jumping on point for new readers. I'm willing to bet there's something else at play (Their imminent loss of Superman? Their probably correct view that the fanboys will keep buying no matter what? A cutting-nose-off-to-spite-face attempt to kill the digital market?) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296476#Comment_296476</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296476#Comment_296476</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:10:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SJD</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I work at a store and the owner doesn't think this is bad for shops, nor does he think its worth worrying about as a longtime fan. I asked him about the 50+ title launch and honestly most are taking the place of existing titles and he was quick to point out that Marvel puts out MORE titles than that every month. DC still won't touch the sheer number of books Marvel throws out every month. <br /><br />I'm not happy about this, but at least everyone is talking about DC again. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296480#Comment_296480</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296480#Comment_296480</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:56:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I wish I had some modicum of artistic talent so I could bring the Jim Lee redesign of John Constantine I pitched on twitter earlier today to life... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296482#Comment_296482</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296482#Comment_296482</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:08:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Brian Schirmer</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ My first reaction: DC is desperate.  Then, I refined this to...<br /><br />My second reaction: This will have little to no impact. This mythical audience they are seeking to lure in, this "new generation" they're looking to entice with an entry point AND day-and-date digital releases - they have no reason to jump on board. Truly. Every semester I ask my students - aged 19-25, roughly - what they read and where they get it. At least half have zero interest in superhero books, while close to 90% download them already - as scans. Day-and-date digital releases really won't change this. Again, why would someone who's been getting a product for free for months or years suddenly decide to pay $3-$5 a pop when they can STILL get it for free?<br /><br />My final reaction: I don't follow characters. I buy my books based on who's writing. Period. If that means in six months I'll be reading an Aquaman monthly by Morrison, Paul Cornell's take on the Metal Men, or Warren's take on Hawkworld - then, so be it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296487#Comment_296487</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296487#Comment_296487</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:46:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Peter Kelly</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Like most of I find this more interesting then anything.<br />The influx of #1 won't change what I buy....though it does seem like a good place to stop collecting monthlies and switch to trades.<br /><br />As for digital release, what I'd love to see, and I have no idea on how to make this work, would be a way to get comics digitally and then a trade at a discounted price. Something like Flashpoint or Fear Itself or any "Event" comic practically begs to be read as a monthly as they so often tie into other titles. I'd love to read Flashpoint for...i dunno a dollar or 2 an issue, but then get some of that back if I wanted the trade. <br />Or maybe I order the trade at full price before issue 1 ships, and I get it all digital versions as it is released, and then the trade shipped to me a few months later.<br />Anyone trying anything like that? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296504#Comment_296504</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296504#Comment_296504</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 07:01:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em > If that means in six months I'll be reading an Aquaman monthly by Morrison, Paul Cornell's take on the Metal Men, or Warren's take on Hawkworld <br /></em><br /><br /><br />I can unequivocally guarantee you that I'm not working for DC.<br /><br />I know you were using me as an example, but I don't need it to turn into Internet Chinese Whispers...! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296506#Comment_296506</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296506#Comment_296506</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 07:35:42 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Neila</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @mjmartinejohn Your tweet about the Flash sounds like it'd be an interesting book to read. <br /><br />@DavidLejeune Dare I ask what "Jim Lee's John Constantine" looks like? Does he have a high collar and a short leather biker jacket?<br /><br />I think, if DC wanted to capture "new readers" they'd need to advertise better. Not just this "Oh we're making news by relaunching EVERYTHING AT ONCE". All I've noticed, advertising wise, is stuff for Superman, Batman, and sometimes Wonder Woman. Basically any character they have a big movie coming out for or TV series pitch. I'm sure there are people out there that JUST found out that Green Lantern is a DC character. But still, they don't advertise the comics themselves that I've noticed, outside of ads in their own comics >_> that are often placed in the middle of the book, breaking up the action and making me grumpy. D: I haven't read a lot of DC comics, only a few, maybe they're not all set up that way.<br /><br />Anyway, I think there's loads of potential with the DC's cavalcade of heroes, but I'm not sure relaunching the books should be handled like pulling off a bandaid (all at once, real fast get it over with).  Especially if no one out side their regular readership finds out about it. Not a lot of "non comics readers" have heard about the news of DC's relaunch from what I've noticed. But then, maybe they're just trying to get "new readers" from established comic book readers of other companies? <br /><br />I dunno, maybe the books will be less dependent on events that happened in the books in the 1980s that I didn't read? If they don't advertise though, it'd be like, "If a comic company redoes all their comics at once in the forest and there's no one to hear but their current readers, will they get new readers?" ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296513#Comment_296513</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296513#Comment_296513</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:22:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Sonny</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Ultimately it comes down to the quality of the comics, and therefor the creative teams behind them (and probably, to some extent, the editors pushing for certain directions).  If nothing changes in that sense, then this is a trivial and useless undertaking.  I guess I'll reserve judgement for now. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296516#Comment_296516</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296516#Comment_296516</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:29:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>manglr</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm on the side of useless and trivial undertaking...after all, the 'hard line' between the new and old universe is only as good as the creative teams willingness not to reference the old continuity.  That sort of thing (if prior reboots are any indication) is only good for a very limited amount of time.<br /><br />Plus, I'm not sure that flooding the market with 50 first issues in a month is going to do meaningful things to your sales.  It may even hurt books like Batwoman who may get lost in the shuffle.<br /><br />But again, I'm not playing the game any longer anyway...so good luck and more power to them. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296525#Comment_296525</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296525#Comment_296525</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:13:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://dcu.blog.dccomics.com/2011/06/02/the-new-justice/" >eightiestastic</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296532#Comment_296532</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296532#Comment_296532</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:37:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ralf.haring</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Azzarello and Chiang on Wonder Woman sounds good. Their Doctor Thirteen was superb. The rest don't excite me. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296540#Comment_296540</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296540#Comment_296540</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:12:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ebullientsoul</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The very definition of wait and see, I think. Spurgeon nailed my gut feeling, too. I'm queasy rather than pumped.<br /><br />That said, I'm stoked that Azzarello is on Wonder Woman. Where he'll go with it, I don't know, but I trust he's got a story to tell. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296550#Comment_296550</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296550#Comment_296550</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:26:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pow</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ hurrah, even if all the books suck there will be 2 series worth of JT Krul instanity to enjoy on Scans_daily ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296562#Comment_296562</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296562#Comment_296562</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:52:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doctor Pockets</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Rich Johnston's reporting that Duane Swierczynski will be writing the new Batman comic. <br /><br />All of the sudden, this whole thing sounds like a perfectly good idea to me, thank you. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296565#Comment_296565</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296565#Comment_296565</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:08:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>darrylayo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I eagerly anticipate this change and hope that it'll be permanent <br /><br />I like how Wonder Woman looks to be the strongest team, out of the gate. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296577#Comment_296577</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296577#Comment_296577</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:45:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Robson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm planning on sampling a bunch of these, though the Simone/van Sciver FIRESTORM is the only title (of the ones announced) I'm adding to the pull-list. Hoping for an anthology book of self-contained stories (though I'm keen on looking at the Deadman arc that's kicking off DC UNIVERSE PRESENTS). Picking up the first issues of DCUP, JL, JLI (I really like the Donna Troy costume here), THE SAVAGE HAWKMAN, and MISTER TERRIFIC (and I'd love to see the latter two work). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296594#Comment_296594</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296594#Comment_296594</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:54:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Edwin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It seems Jim Lee gets to de Heroes Reborn again, but with a much bigger cast. And Grant Morrisons “Multiversity.” is about a year from now, so I'm guessing a years worth of stories. <br /><br />DC is always more fun when they get to do weird stuff. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296608#Comment_296608</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296608#Comment_296608</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:01:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>3millionyears</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ DC have released some info on the Justice League digital/print combo - with decreasing digital prices over time too!<br /><blockquote >On Wednesday, August 31st, DC Comics will make publishing history again with their first-ever comic book combo pack. Each issue of JUSTICE LEAGUE, by New York Times bestselling writer and DC Entertainment Chief Creative Officer Geoff Johns and bestselling artist and DC Comics Co-Publisher Jim Lee, will be available in a convenient combo pack including a print edition and digital version of the comic book.<br /><br />Those who want a physical copy of JUSTICE LEAGUE to read and collect, as well as the ability to download it onto their favorite device for easy transport, get ready. Each print edition of the comic book and an individual code for digital download will be wrapped in a poly bag and available for $4.99. Separately, the standard version will retail for $3.99 and the digital version will retail for $3.99.<br /><br />“As we continue to expand our readership and make our titles more accessible to readers everywhere, we’re excited to provide our comic shop retail partners and their consumers with multiple formats of JUSTICE LEAGUE in one convenient place,” said John Rood, EVP Sales, Marketing and Business Development.<br /><br />Not only will Johns and Lee be collaborating for the first time, but their contemporary take on the origin of the comic book industry’s premier superhero team will be available in DC Comics’ historic first comic book combo pack.<br /><br />Both digital and print editions of DC’s comics will have parity pricing for the first four weeks of release; thereafter, the digital titles drop in price down to our standard 1.99 digital price point. Oversized issues, including JUSTICE LEAGUE #1, will start at $3.99 and drop to $2.99 after four weeks.</blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296611#Comment_296611</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296611#Comment_296611</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:28:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Doctor Pockets</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Bob Wayne said:<br /><blockquote >And by the way, let me just reiterate this point:  this is the launch of the New DCU.  It is not a “reboot.”  I think you will soon discover why that is.</blockquote><br />So, what about the Old DCU? Sounds more and more like Heroes Reborn. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296639#Comment_296639</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296639#Comment_296639</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:31:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SBarrett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I have not been reading much DC stuff recently, but this might actually get me to buy some more.<br /><br />Azzarello/Chiang on Wonder Women sounds excellent. I am looking forward to reading Sciver & Simone on Firestorm (a character I normally don't care about). I like Hawkman so I will probably give that a shot. Always like Mr. Terrific in JSA (when I read it) so I will give that a try as well. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296672#Comment_296672</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296672#Comment_296672</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:53:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think there's a reasonable gut reaction to anything that sounds like Heroes Reborn, but I also think that anyone whose heart sinks when they make that realization should pick it back up and understand that top-talent now means something different from top-talent at Marvel in 1996, and while I doubt that all (perhaps most?) of these titles will be successful (creatively, financially, etc), there <em >will be</em> good material that comes out of here, and if you're used predisposed toward capes, you're going to find something you like. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296682#Comment_296682</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296682#Comment_296682</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:21:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>King Crabclaw</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Frankly, I rarely buy singles anymore anyway, so this doesn't affect me too much. Much like others here, I tend to buy based on the writer, not the character. I've loved, loved, loved arcs on Green Lantern and Batman and Aquaman and Superman and Green Arrow and way more obscure teams (not obscure to you guys, but you know, definitely not Trinity-level names). However, this was either because the story itself sounded crazy enough to work, or the writer on it was someone I trusted/had been told to trust by trustworthy people. And the stories I want to read tend to either be in trades already or pre-destined for trades. For instance, Blackest Night, which was one of the best and most berzerker strange GL story in a long, long time, could be pre-ordered in trade form something like two issues in or something equally absurd. It seems to me that a better model might be to perhaps jack the cost of trades a bit, lower the cost of books and downloads, and offer something special within the trade like sketches or essays or stuff like that which is already covered by nicer ends. Then, offer a little code in each physical/download copy that allows you to get a discount on the trade for each issue within it you've purchased, or alternatively lets you acquire a digital copy of individual issues as they come out if you pre-purchase the trade.<br /><br />Why do I bring this up in this thread? Because this all seems to me to be a ploy, and I don't mean that in a negative sense, to get readers back into comics. The numbers are shrinking slowly but surely and DC has been on the losing end for a while. But from what I know being a recent college student is that kids my age tend to buy collections. There is this feeling that you don't want to have to scour for the beginning of your story and you don't want to have to make ten trips for the same loaf of bread, so to speak. As a long-time reader, I know the unique positions of reading a serial month-to-month and all at once and how neither is better than the other by necessity, but most people at least my age seem to skew towards wanting all the issues right now. This is a huge gamble for them to keep getting people to buy the monthlies, but the demographic they are chasing doesn't seem to be interested in monthlies at all.<br /><br />Now, younger kids I see in shops go for single issues without fail. I think we all remember that time for ourselves; you go in a shop and you find the absolute coolest cover with hopefully the coolest name and you buy it, because what matters is being taken away for 22 pages to a different place. And older buyers (saying late 20s and up, from my experience) tend to do similar, but on a more regimented following of books or story threads or writers. But still, even with digital, I can't read sign up for a prescription to have the new Batman Inc downloaded onto my Kindle every first Wednesday. I still have to manually purchase each chapter, typically in a store or a devoted website, and then I have to read it in their formats on my computer screen and not the easy-on-the-eyes Kindle.<br /><br />Their pricing strategy and release of day-and-date digital will earn them some sales and rightfully so. That change has been a long time coming. But this feels overblown in the wrong parts and half-assed in others. I mean, they took back Madame Xanadu, Constantine, and (god above) Swamp Thing, only to reboot everything. They just finished a year-long special to ressurrect Swamp Thing in order to imbue him with the White Entity to protect all life forever, and it feels rather abrupt from a narrative point of view to have a miniseries set in an altered past of the same universe be the transition away from that.<br /><br />I don't mean for this to sound like I'm complaining that comics continuity changes or shifts in weird ways. Hell, I am an unabashed fan of Crisis on Infinite Earths pretty much because of how it turned everything on its ear relatively quickly, definitely permanently, and in a way that historically was unheard of. And I hold hope that the business end of this isn't written in stone yet and can adapt a bit more and that we get some great stories out of it (I'm a closet Aquaman fan, so I'm hoping they give me more fantasy writing with him; that's always great stuff). But I have some series worries.<br /><br />Also, thank god Wonder Woman got rid of that fucking mini-jacket. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296683#Comment_296683</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296683#Comment_296683</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:22:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oddcult</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ After my initial cynical comments, and on reflection, this is going to cause me to spend hundreds on it.<br /><br />Cuz, I think I'll get an iPad and then steal it all to read. <br /><br />(not serious, but I do wonder if that's what a significant number of people will do when faced with this) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296686#Comment_296686</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296686#Comment_296686</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:49:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Seantaclaus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >"Also, thank god Wonder Woman got rid of that fucking mini-jacket."</em><br /><br />All this, just so Jim Lee can mea culpa that Wonder Woman design and make it better. ;) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296688#Comment_296688</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296688#Comment_296688</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 02:15:40 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>donnie darko</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Hitler has an opinion about the reboot:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpUh_Yl49l4" ></a><br /><br />Der Untergang has been fertile ground for fanboy outrage/parody... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296699#Comment_296699</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296699#Comment_296699</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 03:19:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>biglig</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Hmm, once I got over the collars on that new Justice League picture, I was struck with a thought.<br />"I'm Superman. I have an oath against killing."<br />"I'm the god-damned Batman. I have an oath against killing."<br />"I'm Green Lantern. I have a machine gun I made with my mind."<br /><br />I mean seriously, Supes is OK standing next to someone who's machinegunning people? I'm sure Aquaman managed to bullshit him with something like "No, no, it's just the light here in the Hall of Justice that makes this look like a razor-sharp spear. It's my..er.. kingly sceptre. I have no intention of using it to decapitate people." But you think he'd notice a glowing green machine gun. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296724#Comment_296724</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296724#Comment_296724</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:07:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Man, DC Comics not only doesn't know what it's doing, it never knew what it was doing. (I can prove this with charts and graphs.) Superman and Wonder Woman are irreparably broken, Batman's not much better, the Flash and Green Lantern have also run out of interesting things to do or say and the B-List of the DC Universe is alternately quirky and annoying. Remember when DC used to have war comics (Sgt. Rock, the Haunted Tank, the Losers, the Unknown Soldier, Blackhawk) and Western comics (Jonah Hex*, Scalphunter, Firehair, Bat Lash, El Diablo, Cinammon) and fantasy comics (um, Amythist?) and romance comics? Yeah, they cancelled all that so they could focus on beating Marvel at their own game and then failing at that. Any of the titles I listed above (yes, even Firehair - google it, Joe Kubert worked on it) would be preferable to more tinkering with continuity and announcing a bold new direction to nowhere. Whatever happened to the Milestone revival and the Red Circle heroes? Oh, right, they failed or never even happened to begin with. Stay classy, DC. <br /><br />* So the only DC Comic I buy is Jonah Hex and the latest issue (#68) has a teaser comic for SUPER 8 AND a teaser comic for John Constantine's return to the Main DCU. I know DC wants me excited by their product but I purposefully avoid it and only buy Jonah Hex because fucking Batman isn't likely to intrude upon it. They did this a while back with a preview of, of all things, Power Girl in Jonah Hex and it just seemed .... kinda stupid. Granted, the writing team was the same so I could see why they did it but man! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296786#Comment_296786</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296786#Comment_296786</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:23:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>nleavitt</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Mister hex, they put the same previews in every. single. comic. There isn't any targetting at all, just every DC book on the shelf with Super 8 in the middle, John Contantine at the back, and a Green Lantern movie banner accross the top of the damn cover. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296787#Comment_296787</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296787#Comment_296787</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:59:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>hedmeat</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Christ, I'm drunk. Swear I read this as DC unleashing a universe's worth of superhero titties. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296793#Comment_296793</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296793#Comment_296793</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:27:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Superman and Wonder Woman are irreparably broken, Batman's not much better, the Flash and Green Lantern have also run out of interesting things to do or say and the B-List of the DC Universe is alternately quirky and annoying.</em><br /><br />Isn't this, to some extent, the problem with the entire superhero genre? Even with generational updates every decade or so it's still just superheros being super and it affecting their personal lives. Too bad DC doesn't try cooking up a universe <em >without</em> superheros. Something like the Vertigo stuff from back when Vertigo was still great. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296806#Comment_296806</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296806#Comment_296806</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 03:31:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Digital would have been perfect for their Minx line. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296807#Comment_296807</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296807#Comment_296807</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 03:36:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Neila <blockquote >Dare I ask what "Jim Lee's John Constantine" looks like? Does he have a high collar and a short leather biker jacket?</blockquote>Got it one, just about.  Basically:  '90's era post-Death of Superman Superboy's costume, but with blond hair, earring, cigarette, and instead of the leotard, one of those douchey shirt and tie print t-shirts and supertight black hipster jeans. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296809#Comment_296809</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296809#Comment_296809</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:33:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>J.Brennan</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Jame Puckett: I think that's exactly right, and sad to say, that's exactly what most of the steady readers want.  They piss and moan and keep right on buying the books.  I like the day and date digital delivery in theory, but not at the same price-point as the print version.  Also, do those digital copies have ads slapped in them?<br /><br />@DavidLejeune: You're fucking with us, right?  (Please be fucking with us). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296812#Comment_296812</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296812#Comment_296812</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 05:55:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>donnie darko</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote ><blockquote >Superman and Wonder Woman are irreparably broken, Batman's not much better, the Flash and Green Lantern have also run out of interesting things to do or say and the B-List of the DC Universe is alternately quirky and annoying.</blockquote><br /><br />Isn't this, to some extent, the problem with the entire superhero genre? Even with generational updates every decade or so it's still just superheros being super and it affecting their personal lives. Too bad DC doesn't try cooking up a universe without superheros. Something like the Vertigo stuff from back when Vertigo was still great.</blockquote><br /><br />I wouldn't necessarily blame it on superheroes, but on how they're written. Writers work (have to work, want to work, or whatever else you can cook up) within a set of stringent parameters and deliver the work we're seeing. More freedom would be a good thing, but will the fucking fanboys want it?<br />Besides you can run anything into the ground, even if it doesn't have superheroes in it. Look at Fables, I loved that series, now I couldn't care less (yes, even before they started with the superhero-thing).<br /><br />I like my superhero comics, by the way, and am genuinely looking forward to what the DCU has in store for me. If it's good,I'll keep buying it. If it's not, well there's a million other books I can keep reading.<br /><br />I don't agree with the statements that certain characters are irreparably broken. What does that even mean in a medium where you can start over infinitely? If it's broken you really can fix it, just start over.<br /><br />Concerning Vertigo, I still buy a lot of their books and they're really good (Hellblazer, DMZ, Northlanders, Scalped,...). No disrespect intended, but aren't you a little hard on present Vertigo or looking at past-Vertigo through rose-tinted glasses? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296814#Comment_296814</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296814#Comment_296814</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 06:21:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Mister Andersen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Seantaclaus: Yeah, losing the jacket is a good thing, but it seems Lee's reacted to the "give the ladies pants" directive by removing the 1 element from the JMS costume that needed to be kept: the shoulder straps, the lack of which was the #1complaint about the bathing suit.<br /><br />The big test of the digital component is whether ot not that money is going to get you a physical file that lives on your computer and is yours to do with as you want, or whther they're going to go the cloud model with the file kept on a remote server that they can alter or remove as they please. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296825#Comment_296825</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296825#Comment_296825</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 08:05:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Phoenyx</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ AWESOME SAUCE! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296834#Comment_296834</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296834#Comment_296834</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 08:42:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I don't think any of the big superhero characters is "irreparably broken". Good writers can still use them to tell their stories.<br /><br />Also continuity is not a problem I think as long as writers aren't paralyzed by it; what Morrison is doing in his Batman books is using the entire history of the character to his advantage. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296839#Comment_296839</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296839#Comment_296839</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 08:52:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>joe.distort</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ saying that the  problem with dc is that they need to  have a relaunch without superheroes is like saying that MLB baseball should start playing football because you personally have gotten bored with baseball?<br /><br />i think a lot of the problems people have with the DCU is that they have 'outgrown' it as adults but keep reading, and so dc is doing these weird, half assed 'mature' stories with characters where that doesnt work. i hate to admit it because it would mean i dont care about a lot of the new line, but these books arent really FOR us. i mean shit, im 30 years old. if super-comics start skewing a bit younger than my tastes, thats where they SHOULD be really. its probably why i dropped almost all DC stuff in the past few years... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296857#Comment_296857</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296857#Comment_296857</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:49:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I stand by my statement about Superman and Wonder Woman being "irreparably broken" and can offer further insights into what exactly I mean by this. Wonder Woman has had so many "bold new directions" and changes to her status quo that there's nothing that can really be done with her anymore that hasn't been done already. Is she still an ambassador of peace? Is she still a warrior-woman? Does she still have a connection to mythology or to the world of espionage? I'll admit that there may have been fine WW comics recently - I obviously haven't read them but from what I can gather, people liked Greg Rucka and Gail Simone's runs - and I used to read WW waaaay back when it was frankly terrible (I'm talking well before the first Crisis). Her character has been so muddled, there isn't anything there anymore. <br /><br />Superman is a slightly different story. When John Byrne rebooted him 25 years ago (jeez, I'm OLD), he got rid of all the extraneous elements that have all since been brought back by various writers(no Beppo the Super Monkey yet but I'm hoping). Now, I love me some goofy old Silver Age Superman but trying to make him "relevant" has destroyed my interest in the character. JMS's "walkabout" storyline was pretty dumb and the story in Action 900 (where he renounces his citizenship) was risible in linking the protests of the Arab Spring to a goofy superhero. Real people are being killed protesting for freedom and I scarcely think that's fodder for a Superman story. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296861#Comment_296861</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296861#Comment_296861</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:10:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Verissimus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ But mr Hex , I think the character, like for instance Wonder Woman, is a cypher. it doesn't really have any quality of its own, it can be everything you describe and more: ambassador of peace, warrior woman, Greek goddess, BDSM enthusiast, international mysterious espionage lady, whatever. The fact that a lot of people have written a lot of bad stories about her, really shouldn't matter for a new writer. Just take any of the directions that are possible with the character if they fit within the story you want to tell, and go from there. For a talented writer, these characters can be molded in whatever way you please. They're never broken, except maybe for the really bad characters, like Tyroc, or Armless Tiger Man.<br /><br />I sometimes feel there's a difference between the American view of these characters and the European view; for the American public, the stories have to be "true" to the character, and the character has some intrinsic meaning, some relevance which the writer has to express. Whereas European readers like the iconoclastic treatment of the character; put a slightly different spin on it,  take it in some odd new direction. I have no interest in any character as long as they're being written badly. But when it's announced that Brian Azzarello and Cliff Chiang are going to do Wonder Woman, I start getting interested. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296865#Comment_296865</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296865#Comment_296865</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:26:42 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>jimmyjungle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ There's something up at Bleeding Cool that claims the reboot was forced on them from above by corporate cretins...and that Johns and Didio and Morrison have been fighting to stop it from happening...sounds unlikely,but can you imagine?<br /><br />Fine ,it's the way of the fucking world but C'mon!When will the talent get the upper hand?<br /><br />Maybe the creators were all for it,but this seems fishy.<br /><br />It'd turn you off writing comics man, you've got us baffled readers at one side sounding off and constant pestering by management on the other...guess piping up just adds to it.<br /><br />If they've messed with Morrison's 5 year labour of love they're scum.<br /><br />Alan Moore's first reaction to this reboot was funny i bet.just guessin. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296866#Comment_296866</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296866#Comment_296866</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:33:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >There's something up at Bleeding Cool that claims the reboot was forced on them from above by corporate cretins</em><br /><br />You should actually go and re-read that piece. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296871#Comment_296871</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296871#Comment_296871</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 14:05:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>MaC</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm not too excited. From the announcements so far it just looks like DC is shuffling around the writers and artists it already had. Which is not at all exciting. And not worth losing Morrison's Batman Inc for. Maybe I'll be less annoyed if they allow Inc to continue separately as an elseworlds companion to this nuDC but for the most part I'm really frustrated that the story that's basically the reason I even go into a comic store anymore is getting shut down so the Justice League can have a bunch of V-Necks and Wonder Woman can have a choker that gives her a V-Neck.<br /><br />I dunno, waiting to see the creative teams on the remaining titles, cause that's what matters.  But from what I am seeing here, the NuDC doesn't seem worth the potential price of admission, losing Batman Inc. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296874#Comment_296874</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296874#Comment_296874</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 14:16:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>chris g</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ 52 new titles. 52 Earths. the "Leviathan" thing-y in Morrison's Batman run probably has ties to the ReBootening. Then again maybe not! Maybe it is one big ballsy strategic "fuck you, we're One More Day'ing this whole universe!" ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296875#Comment_296875</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296875#Comment_296875</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 14:19:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>jimmyjungle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Naw Warren, I'm aware Rich says it's bullshit,and Senior Execs say it's bullshit,that's why I peppered my comments with 'maybes'....it's just i don't trust the megacorporations and marketeers and I was basically just trying to back up you and the rest of the talented dudes. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296878#Comment_296878</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296878#Comment_296878</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 14:54:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @J.Brennan: Of course I am. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296880#Comment_296880</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296880#Comment_296880</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:15:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Listen all, it's a mistake to associate this with some perceived problem with superheroes.  The problem with superheroes is that you never get to end their story.  Ever.  They're stuck in a permanent 2nd act, and the writer has to wring some dramatic blood from that stone.  All the Crisis, crossover absurdity is the only sane reaction to getting stuck with those characters for fifteen odd years of your life.  Y'all know why Dark Reign was (on the whole) good?  Because Osborn followed a dramatic arc.  It was predictable, but it was still there.  You don't get to do that with Superman.  Morrison managed to turn that into a strength, but that's because he's a genius.  Guys like Ed Brubaker get around that by putting minor characters in lead roles, letting them tell actual story.<br /><br />Nextwave did not care about such pittances.  Nextwave punched your character arc in the dickhole.<br /><br />I'll tell you what I'd do if I suddenly had superhuman control over the industry.   <br /><br />I know you're curious.  Come closer. <br /><br />First, I'd fold as many titles into each other as possible.  The whole Bat Family would get one, maybe two books. Then I'd make the books come out weekly, juggling writers the same way 52 did.  Of course, 52 almost killed the writers, but that was just because the system wasn't set up for it.  There's be skip weeks, of course, and down times. TV writers do it all the time.  David Simon hears your whining and cares not.  Each book would be internally consistent, but there'd be no great pressure to make the Superman line jibe with the Batman line.  If you want to launch a big event book, it's its own book and you advertise in the respective lines.  If the Batman team wants to have an A plot with Superman, there's no need to make sure Superman isn't punching space-Hitler into Tau Ceti that month, just have him show up. <br /><br />At the end of the month, or the end of the quarter, you publish a big old Shonen Jump style paperback trade and let it go to the few remaining bookstores.  That's your bread and butter.  This way, you can have your high profile creators, your Warrens and Grants and Gregs writing stand-alone takes on characters without fucking with your beloved continuity.  <br /><br />There.  I am genii. Give me gold. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296887#Comment_296887</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296887#Comment_296887</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:29:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I like your ideas, John Wake. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296895#Comment_296895</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296895#Comment_296895</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:36:07 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>icelandbob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Jon that's so fucking crazy it could probably just work! <br /><br />They'll never do it of course, but the idea of wrapping say the Batman environment into two books (say, the Bat Family in one book, and the police/birds of prey/The question in the other), would be a lot more interesting. Each week would concentrate on a certain character arc, so batman one week, Nightwing another, Batgirl the next. It would allow each character to get their space (albeit with a smaller issue size), but i could probably find myself buying the singles  especially if they were, say, issues digitally with a slightly cheaper price. Which is what they want don't they. And this whole container line could allow for many character to properly die off i hope...<br /><br />It would probably kill the writers/ artists, but maybe it could start DC properly fostering some decent new talent. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296896#Comment_296896</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296896#Comment_296896</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:43:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>icelandbob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ alas... i've now just realised that the digital price will be the same price as the print price. This IMHO completely now fucks the whole point of the having digital in the first place....<br /><br />Bugger... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296901#Comment_296901</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=296901#Comment_296901</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:04:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jon Wake</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @icelandbob<br /><br />It would also give new creators a launchpad to work with, without risking a whole line on an unknown property.  Currently, a handful of writers write the vast majority of books.  How many books a month does Bendis write?  Geoff Johns? That makes big name writers into disproportionately big fish in a teeny tiny pond.   But it's a business, and the big guys know that if they get to put 'written by Warren Ellis' then a certain number of people will show up.  But a similar number of people will show up to Batman just because it's a guy in a blue cape with pointy ears.  You can afford to have someone screw up a little with Batman, so long as you have a writing team that can train up the new kid.  <br /><br />Now, I'm not sure how the artists would handle it.  Those people are machines as is.  I'd hate to drive comic artists to suicide. I guess you'd have a different artist for each week, or sometimes two or more artists on a book. (You illustrate plot 'a', you've got the b plot, you do the backup story art.) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297240#Comment_297240</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297240#Comment_297240</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:57:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Anyone remember Jason Bard? Anyone? I'll give you all a minute. Jason Bard. <br /><br />No? <br /><br />He was a lame detective (as in, "he had a bum leg and walked with a cane", not the usual DC definition of "lame") and he dated Barbara Gordon. As far as I know, he survivied the Crisis (the first one, the only one that really matters). He used to appear regularly in the Bat-Family books. Hell, he was practically the model for the Gotham Precinct stuff that has revitalized the Batman franchise (and never, ever forget that it is a franchise and must be treated as such.) and he dated Batgirl. While she could still walk. <br /><br />DC has always excelled at the anthology format and I approve of Jon Wake's plans. <br /><br />Too bad he's not running DC. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297245#Comment_297245</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297245#Comment_297245</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:20:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Akiramich</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Since they just announced the cancellation of NORTHLANDERS my interest in any new DC titles has gone very very low. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297246#Comment_297246</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297246#Comment_297246</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:25:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Beamish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I was pretty shocked when they said that Jeff Lemire is off Superboy, but when they announced he was on Animal Man and Frankenstein my anxiety calmed. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297277#Comment_297277</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297277#Comment_297277</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:27:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Colby</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Personally, I don't really care what DC comics is doing, especially since The Question is still dead.  I mean will it work, maybe or maybe not. Who knows, it might boost DC comics to new heights or whatever. Be honest I hope they don't fuck around with Green Lantern continuity too much but to be fair it is like their cash cow at this point so I doubt it. The new Aquaman looks really cool, definitely want to check that out. <br /><br />Would like to point out however that here:<br />http://dcu.blog.dccomics.com/files/2011/06/jlifinalcover1.jpg<br /><br />and here:<br />http://dcu.blog.dccomics.com/files/2011/06/jla_cv11.jpg<br /><br />appear to be two different batmen so take that at what you will. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297315#Comment_297315</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297315#Comment_297315</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 06:59:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pow</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/06/08/dc-relaunch-guessing-the-teen-titans-makeup/<br /><br />DC WINS<br /><br />FLAWLESS VICTORY<br /><br />I hate to get down to fatbeard style internet hating cos I'm never going read any of these underpants-punching books anyway but that Superboy costume is proper comedy gold. He has a Super tattoo made up to look like a barcode  and then another Super symbol attached to his t-shirt with stickytape? Batman was insane and homeless and he managed to put together a less ridiculous outfit. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297323#Comment_297323</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297323#Comment_297323</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:30:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I knew the publishers all wanted to rewind the world to 1991. But just drawing all their comics that way and pretending it is 1991 is somewhat admirable. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297330#Comment_297330</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297330#Comment_297330</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:43:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Ben Gwalchmai</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ They <em >actually </em>have Rob Liefeld working on a title.<br /><br />Yes, really.<br /><br />[eta: this both amuses and bemuses me to no end.] ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297337#Comment_297337</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297337#Comment_297337</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:35:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>arklight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ My head hurts.<br /><br />I've said it before. It's like watching a slo mo rewind <br />as we get back to that weird pre-final crisis swamp of a mess.<br /><br />Are there really no new ideas left?<br /><br />When ever i have picked a Geoff Johns book,<br />I get a weird feeling that he has a strong nostalgia for that period<br />just before final crisis in the 1980s. <br /><br />Maybe it's part of the weird retconning of the 1980s I<br />keep seeing all round us in all media, culture ,<br />music and fashion...<br /><br />"it wasn't all bad, we had shoulder pads!"<br /><br />I say this because when alot of new writers come on board they <br />usually re-do the look of books. But from the legion to superman<br />Johns has been doing basically an 80s make over.<br /><br /><br />Heri Mkocha<br />http://www.youtube.com/thearklight ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297355#Comment_297355</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297355#Comment_297355</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:48:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>jonah</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Jon Wake I had a similar idea. Less books, weekly, stories that end, but I'd take it one step one step beyond and not put out books staring that character for 6 months or however long it takes to craft a really good story. They have enough of a cast of characters to draw from.<br /><br />I wouldn't bother trying to compete with the internet for quick fix "disposable" stimulation. Absence also builds anticipation. Part of the  reason reboots/deaths work is because 6 months or a year later you get to hype up the return. Why not do it in a non-cheesy, soap opera-esque fashion and give the creators more time to work to boot? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297356#Comment_297356</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297356#Comment_297356</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:52:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>chris g</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ those Teen Titans designs are so horrible they were visibly trending on twitter for a moment! Would it kill them to consult Tim Gunn? Dean Trippe & Project Rooftop? This is what happens when complacent nerds grow up to run the asylum.<br />I'm just relieved they did not change that lovable bastard Damien, he's got Tim's OYL cape now. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297371#Comment_297371</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297371#Comment_297371</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:21:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>256</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It's unfortunate that, whatever the merits of the stories, creative teams, continuities, etc. <em >after</em> Flashpoint, all we're getting right now is the costume redesigns. And the costume redesigns are, as far as I've seen, universally shitty.<br /><br />@Colby - to me, that looks a lot like the same Batman drawn by two different people. All the details (black cape, grey suit, yellow belt, black armour-ish gloves) seem the same.<br /><br />@Ben - if they're going to employ Liefeld, I'm glad it's on a completely worthless property like Hawk & Dove.<br /><br />Edit: A different Superboy look <a href="http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/06/09/dc-relaunch-a-brand-new-look-for-superman-supergirl-and-superboy/" >here</a> (is this the leaked cover to Superboy #1?) which looks a hell of a lot better than the Teen Titans one previously seen. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297546#Comment_297546</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297546#Comment_297546</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:58:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SBarrett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Most of the costume redesigns have been pretty bad. Though I am liking that Supergirl one. At least the miniskirt and tube top are gone. Superman's is pretty horrible though. Knee pads? Really? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297555#Comment_297555</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297555#Comment_297555</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:17:15 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Superman with kneepads. To protect his knees from…? They should have just let Platt come in and give him a few dozen extra super muscles and a super cannon. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297562#Comment_297562</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297562#Comment_297562</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:01:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>ScottS</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ George Perez on Superman?  I worship at the altar of Perez, so this is so very tempting.  That being said, the costume still sucks.  Why does Superman need armor?  <br /><br />Other than that, I really just can't bring myself to care about any of this.  I don't expect this "reboot" is going to do anything in the long-term for DC, so perhaps in a year or so, they'll realize that this was just a bad mistake and go back to the "real" characters... though again, I'm not reading any DC books at this time anyway, so it won't really bother me one way or another I suppose. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297563#Comment_297563</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297563#Comment_297563</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:11:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>oldhat</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Although I've been pretty indifferent to the changes, I have to say that Harley Quinn's Suicide Girl makeover annoys me.<br /><img src="http://i.newsarama.com/images/SuicideSquad_cover_02.jpg" alt="" > ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297564#Comment_297564</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297564#Comment_297564</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:16:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>tedcroland</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Wait, that's Harley Quinn? Wow. That is...D: ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297587#Comment_297587</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297587#Comment_297587</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:21:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pow</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <img src="http://dcu.blog.dccomics.com/files/2011/06/storm_cv11n98day23.jpg" alt="" ><br /><br />poor Apollo and Midnighter, nobody deserves that. That said Cornell should make the book a whole lot of fun, even if he seems to think the guy with the big sun on his chest is actually Jack Hawksmoor. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297588#Comment_297588</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297588#Comment_297588</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:53:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>COOP</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Maybe Martian Manhunter will get it on with Apollo & the Midnighter... or have they been hetero-retconned? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297601#Comment_297601</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297601#Comment_297601</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:32:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SilentObjector</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Barbara Gordon is giving up the role of Oracle, getting her legs back, and going back to Batgirling full-time. I should never have had to write that sentence. Fuck you, DC. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297605#Comment_297605</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297605#Comment_297605</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:47:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Solario</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ The Gathering of the Jokerz.<br /><br />Good to see Cornell get more work though. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297629#Comment_297629</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297629#Comment_297629</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:13:36 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DavidLejeune</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ That Harley Quinn design looks like Jim Lee saw the design for her in <a href="http://images.wikia.com/batman/images/d/d9/Harley.jpg" >Batman: Arkham City</a> and said 'Nope.  Not slutty enough!'  <br /><br />Also:  She seems to be carrying Mjolnir, which is just confusing. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297637#Comment_297637</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297637#Comment_297637</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:50:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>chenryhen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Apollo is not great, but loads better than Midnighter I think, who looks a bit like a Death Race refugee. He has a metal spike goatee, which must make nodding sort of difficult.<br /><br />The Superman reminds me of - I think - the Project Rooftop remake contest. And one of the points that the judges made there was that it's silly to make his costume look armored because with Superman, whatever he's wearing is guaranteed to be less durable than he is. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297639#Comment_297639</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297639#Comment_297639</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:52:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oxbrow</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Paul Cornell has since confirmed that (a) yes that's Apollo, he was rather tired when he blogged that and (b) they're still a couple. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297674#Comment_297674</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297674#Comment_297674</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:32:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>SBarrett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Good Lord, Midnighter looks horrible. Really really horrible.<br /><br />Apollo's costume doesn't look particularly bad, but I am disappointed he has a shaved head instead of his awesome golden curls.<br /><br />Re: That Harley - God awful. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297676#Comment_297676</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297676#Comment_297676</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:45:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I worry that any of this might genuinely matter to people who otherwise appear human. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297681#Comment_297681</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297681#Comment_297681</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:01:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>King Crabclaw</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Since I've always approached comics with the mindset that the only canon continuity is whatever is needed to explain what is going on in the exact issue I am reading, this whole thing doesn't phase me much. To be honest, aside from the stuff Morrison was doing with Batman and a couple miscellaneous titles, there wasn't a great deal of interesting stories going on in the DCU. Clearing out the muck and starting fresh is something that should and does happen on a regular basis and, yes, we're losing some cool things because of it. But we're getting Cornell on a bunch of great titles, Morrison on Superman, he still gets to finish his Batman arc, Jeff Lemire on Animal Man, JL Dark... Lots of goodies coming from this. And, to be honest, the moment they announced the Flash accidentally running into an alternate universe, we should have known the jig was up.<br /><br />You know what happened the first time the Flash did something like this? That's right. Crisis on Infinite Earths. We should feel lucky that red fucker didn't blow up the other 51 universes with his little jaunt this time. Same god damn Flash, too. He has a terrible problem doing things like this. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297749#Comment_297749</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297749#Comment_297749</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:13:40 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>icelandbob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Meanwhile in the world of TV......<br /><br /><a href="http://www.toplessrobot.com/2011/06/robs_wonder_woman_tv_pilot_faq.php" >The FAQ behind NBC's aborted Wonder Woman TV pilot....</a><br /><br />Wow, this makes the comics reboot seem completely reasonable and well thought out.... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297760#Comment_297760</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297760#Comment_297760</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:40:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alberto</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Here's something I've been wondering for the last couple days. They have Constantine, Swamp Thing and the rest of the Vertigo heroes back under the DCU brand. But still, there's something I miss. Do you think DC's plan was to have a Watchmen #1 on shelves next September? I think that would make sense, considering the rumours of a <a href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=7694&page=1" >Watchmen sequel</a> a few months ago. <br /><br />Also, the lack of a Floronic Man #1 is simply disappointing. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297789#Comment_297789</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297789#Comment_297789</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:35:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Do you think DC's plan was to have a Watchmen #1 on shelves next September?</em><br /><br />I doubt it. A new <em >Watchmen</em> comic would go nowhere. The first couple issues would sell like hotcakes, but then everyone would remember that what makes <em >Watchmen</em> really matter is that it was a brilliant exploration and comment on the medium that was totally relevant at the time and is unnecessary today. In the long run I think the DC bean counters can probably figure out that continued sales of the original TPB are worth far more than a few sudden sales blips from a sequel that's doomed to fail unless they can convince Alan Moore to write it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297792#Comment_297792</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297792#Comment_297792</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:53:49 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Anyone who worked on any hypothetical object of that nature would be so shat on by the creative community, if not the audience, that they wouldn't work again for a long, long time.<br /><br />Grant will take his shots at Alan from time to time, but even Grant wouldn't do that, even as a joke. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297793#Comment_297793</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297793#Comment_297793</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 14:14:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>chris g</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ It occurred to me the other day how most DC characters have "sigils" on their chests and they have been charging them up to this point to get them ready to withstand the advancement of the 21st Century but even Morrison would probably think that's total BS and this entire circus really is just a big marketing circle jerk.<br />I do like the new Supergirl out of all the shit-tastic redesigns though! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297794#Comment_297794</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297794#Comment_297794</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 14:26:02 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ peek-a-knee ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297796#Comment_297796</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297796#Comment_297796</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 14:35:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Cunningham</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I like the facial expression on the new Supergirl most.  She has the look of a person I'd enjoy reading about.  A complete lack of faith in DC means I'll be checking the reviews first, though.<br /><br /><img src="http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/supergirl1.jpg" alt="" > = <img src="http://www.breederretriever.com/photopost/data/721/pekingese4.jpg" alt="" >? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297800#Comment_297800</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297800#Comment_297800</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 14:56:27 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>chris g</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >peek-a-knee</blockquote>I seee yooou<br /><br /><img src="http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/supergirl1.jpg" ><br />those things are cute and sexy. she pulls it off b/c she's indestructible :P ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297804#Comment_297804</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297804#Comment_297804</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:23:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>icelandbob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ hey, that looks similar to some knee support braces that we make at my work!<br /><br /><img src="http://www.ossur.co.uk/library/11874&proc=3/CTi%20OA.jpg" alt="" > ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297808#Comment_297808</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297808#Comment_297808</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:41:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>chris g</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ She's bringing them back! I think the last person to really make a fashion statement out of those was Stone Cold...<br /><img src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/si/multimedia/photo_gallery/1103/wrestlemania.photos/images/wrestlemania-17.jpg" > ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297817#Comment_297817</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297817#Comment_297817</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:26:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Steroids destroyed her knees too? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297835#Comment_297835</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297835#Comment_297835</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:15:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Morac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Turns out that Earth's yellow sun causes slow joint deterioration. Who knew? <br /><br />This also might explain the kneepads on Supe's costume. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297839#Comment_297839</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297839#Comment_297839</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 00:02:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ In all honesty, I like the costume. It's far better than the last one. <br /><br />It's about the only new costume I like. Mind you, I prefer the hotpants outfit of the 70s. Or was it the 80s? It was a long time ago. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297844#Comment_297844</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297844#Comment_297844</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:32:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>government spy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Supergirl should probably get out of the way of those meteors. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297845#Comment_297845</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297845#Comment_297845</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:31:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Oxbrow</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Based on the shin guards and the holding the big Daily Planet ball, clearly Superman is playing cricket. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297851#Comment_297851</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297851#Comment_297851</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 07:01:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>twentythoughts</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Wait, Apollo and Midnighter are part of the DC lineup now? Huh. Since... 2007, apparently, according to Wikipedia. I guess I should read more comics or something, amirite guys? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297854#Comment_297854</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297854#Comment_297854</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 07:34:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Mister Andersen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Based on the weird panelling on their costumes and the nature of the Superboy cover, I've seen speculation that this version of Kryptonian life may not be entirely organic. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297867#Comment_297867</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297867#Comment_297867</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:01:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Alastair</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Siegel & Shuster ain't nothin' to fuck with ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297891#Comment_297891</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297891#Comment_297891</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:13:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>arklight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ All this is the FLASH'S fault..??..again....<br /><br />Somebody should trip him up every time he starts running...:-)...<br /><br />It's one crisis too far...<br /><br />You know what's more scary. <a href="http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9298" >Remember the marketing Comics thread?</a><br />It's been noted that the comics industry, a media industry it's size, <br />doesn't market to the general public.Just to people who buy the stuff anyway.<br /><strong ><br />But guess what's going to be marketed with TV ads and everything???This stuff. </strong><br /><br />So this reboot may end up being their most  successful financial  venture to date.<br />Even if it gets panned creatively.<br /><br /><br /><br />Heri Mkocha<br />http://www.youtube.com/thearklight ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297893#Comment_297893</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297893#Comment_297893</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:25:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >So this reboot may end up being their most successful financial venture to date.</em><br /><br />Only if the ads are any good. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297894#Comment_297894</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297894#Comment_297894</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:54:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>RenThing</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <i >Only if the ads are any good. </i><br /><br />Agreed. I think it'll take a <i >lot</i> of effort to not only overcome the perceptions of comics as a kids' thing or the purview of stereotypes like the Comic Book Guy on the Simpsons as well as build enough interest for people to shell out $2.50 US a pop and make them keep coming back each month.<br /><br />Now, with the e-versions, if they set up a monthly subscription that's cheaper than the dead tree print copies that could work better as it takes a lot less effort to download the latest edition than it does to get in your car, drive to your local store, and pick up your copies, especially if you weren't already doing that. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297900#Comment_297900</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297900#Comment_297900</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:38:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >But guess what's going to be marketed with TV ads and everything???This stuff.</em><br /><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraverse" >Trying to mainstream comics with advertising doesn't have an especially successful history.</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297910#Comment_297910</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297910#Comment_297910</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:39:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Mister Andersen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ So, any word on whether you get to own your legitimate download outright like you do the dead tree version, or if it's going to really belong to DC on a cloud you're only just being allowed to pay to access? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297922#Comment_297922</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297922#Comment_297922</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:56:37 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Talesin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I just can't see this being a good idea. As much as comic fans are always talking about wanting something new, the fact is people want comics like a ratty old pair of comfortable slippers. I do hope it works out for them but really I can see a bunch of old fans becoming grumpy because they are not the characters as they remember them (or the series they like have been gotten rid of or fundamentally changed eg Secret Six, Birds of Prey). It does seem very 90s. I know DC is not matching it with Marvel in terms of the top 100 etc but I don't know if this is the right way to solve it. I suppose as long as the stories are good then they will hook the readers in and they will build up the titles just like Marvels titles like The Mighty Th...oh um Runawa...ok...Captain Britain and M....GODDAMIT ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297928#Comment_297928</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297928#Comment_297928</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:33:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Darkest</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Just had to turn down a talk on BBC Regional about Superman's new threads due to not being able to make it/ driving lesson. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297940#Comment_297940</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297940#Comment_297940</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:58:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>moali</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ meh. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297941#Comment_297941</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297941#Comment_297941</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:17:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Solario</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I think the main problem isn't that comics readers are afraid of change; it's that the change we're given here isn't especially different from what we've had before. That's not change or risk.<br /><br />I hope it turns out well for DC. Especially the resurgence of horror- and war-themed superhero comics. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297956#Comment_297956</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297956#Comment_297956</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:49:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pow</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ hmm, there's a story in one of the shitty glasgow tabloids about Superman getting rid of his underpants thanks to the influence of Grant Morrison and DC adding more black and hispanic heroes. The local shop owners are going to be millionaires come september..... ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297957#Comment_297957</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297957#Comment_297957</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:51:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Trying to mainstream comics with advertising doesn't have an especially successful history.</em><br /><br />Well, that's no reason not to try it. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297988#Comment_297988</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297988#Comment_297988</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:47:27 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >Well, that's no reason not to try it. </em><br /><br />Very true. But this seems to be less try and more betting the farm. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297998#Comment_297998</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=297998#Comment_297998</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:05:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Beamish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I remember several months ago Vertigo putting out an commercial for Fables.  I am sure DC was using that as a guage to see if it was worth the money, and it must have been.  Also, it think it is a good move to let people know, who are not aware, were they could go to buy the comics.  Although, as I think this I am reminded that Barnes and Noble are now selling some comics day and date, I would hate for the commercials to be B&N specific.<br /><br />As to the content, I hope the best for DC, my purchasing of their titles have been dwindling of late.  Also, good luck to Flash not dying a slow death like every other title that Johns leaves (see his last Flash run for example). ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298052#Comment_298052</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298052#Comment_298052</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:20:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Cunningham</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Now that details are coming out, I'm thinking Grant Morrison's Superman is a must-read.  If one can trust those shifty sorts over at <a href="http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/06/13/the-twelve-dc-relaunch-books-we%E2%80%99re-most-excited-about-here-at-bleeding-cool/" >Bleeding Cool</a>, it's the Superman I've been wanting for a long while- a character based on the first volume or two of the Action Comics Archives, who bears only the slightest similarity to the character we call Superman today.<br /><br />Also, if that description of Blue Beetle is accurate, I should track down some back issues.  I think I may have missed something I'd have enjoyed quite a bit. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298072#Comment_298072</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298072#Comment_298072</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 03:49:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>256</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Beamish - <blockquote >I remember several months ago Vertigo putting out an commercial for Fables. I am sure DC was using that as a guage to see if it was worth the money, and it must have been.</blockquote><br />I haven't seen the ad (I wonder if it's on youtube?) and I'm not at all up to date on the book, but it seems unfortunate that in the last few months I've heard several people say that they've dropped Fables because it seems to have lost its way.<br /><br />@James <blockquote >the Superman I've been wanting for a long while- a character based on the first volume or two of the Action Comics Archives</blockquote><br />Interestingly, I read a suggestion somewhere on Twitter Rumour Mill that the Superman costume redesign is (partially) motivated by ongoing legal conflict with the Siegel family. Wandering into the realms of pure speculation: Perhaps the logic is that, if DC are publishing a character who acts more like the Siegel & Shuster Superman, they have to make him look different to avoid some qualification for derivativeness? <br /><br />If anyone has more insight/knowledge of the S&S vs. DC saga, I'd be very interested to hear.<br /><br />Also, continuing on the Supertheme, the two things I actually like about the redesigns so far are: The bio-robotic Superboy (I have a soft spot for non-Clark Kent Superboys, though) and the fact that Supergirl and Superman now both have matching S-shield-shaped belt buckles... Details, details. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298074#Comment_298074</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298074#Comment_298074</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:18:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Seantaclaus</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @256 - <br /><blockquote >Interestingly, I read a suggestion somewhere on Twitter Rumour Mill that the Superman costume redesign is (partially) motivated by ongoing legal conflict with the Siegel family. Wandering into the realms of pure speculation: Perhaps the logic is that, if DC are publishing a character who acts more like the Siegel & Shuster Superman, they have to make him look different to avoid some qualification for derivativeness? </blockquote><br />I was wondering something along the same lines. There was an article I read the other day involving the movie rights and that after the 2012 Superman movie, it's entirely possible that we may see 2 different movie franchises, due to split movie rights. The S&S version would have the outfit and original abilities, such as leaping buildings in a single bound, etc., whereas the Warner/DC version would have rights to any later developments of the character by DC (I believe Lex Luthor was created by DC).<br /><br />That said, a few hours ago my brain started mulling over the possibility that this whole new version might be in part out of prep for when those rights shift. No clue about the comic rights themselves, but if they change the primary character now to better reflect what they'll have the movie rights to later, then in theory people may be more receptive to their version that will appear in any movies once the rights split. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298081#Comment_298081</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298081#Comment_298081</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:32:42 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Beamish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ruCWzUWDFU" >ad</a> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298091#Comment_298091</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298091#Comment_298091</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:14:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>johnjones</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I'm probably talking out of my ass on this one, but I'd like to do comics like porn.  Think about porn circa 1990 or so.  You had adult bookstores, movie houses, mailing lists and the like.  Back in 1990, do you really think there'd have been a huge uptick in people going to those places due to an advertising campiagn?  I'm thinking no.<br /><br />The thing for me is that perception tends to be reality.  The likelihood of shifting American culture away from the comics are for children/cat-piss men is about as likely as rehabilitating the swastika as a symbol.  You're just not going to convince most people who aren't already into comics to try them in the traditional sense.<br /><br />Now think about porn today.  It exploded because of the web.  Hell, as I understand it,  many of the conveniences like high graphics and secure purchasing were developed for the web at the behest of the porn industry.  So, make getting comics convenient, inexpensive and anonymous.  And if somebody wants a collection they can order a POD trade paperback.  Like that.  Sure, keep the LCS, keep the monthlies if they earn their keep, but overall gradually shift the nature of production to a digital form. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298105#Comment_298105</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298105#Comment_298105</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:11:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>brianwood</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I wish people needed comics like they need porn.  We'd all be rich. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298108#Comment_298108</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298108#Comment_298108</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:16:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>icelandbob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Who says we don't use comics AS porn? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298109#Comment_298109</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298109#Comment_298109</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:25:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>nikoboivin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Some of us d oneed it as much (or more than) porn, and the rise of tablet pcs and micropaiment is a blessing for this field.  You start a series (say the walking dead, since they're already using it) at 2$ per issue, it's no big deal, only 2 bucks.  You finish it?  Buy the next one, even if you're on the bus, in a lunch break, at 2AM at home, it's there, and the one after that is also there.  First thing you know, you're up to date (and it just cost you near 200$ worth of comics...)<br /><br />And it does not render the paper comics useless, as they can still be bought for the feel of it, and to &quot;convert&quot; others to the media.  Plus you'll never go to a con and get your ipad signed... ;)<br /><br />And I really hope it would make writers rich, since you guys clearly deserve it for the kind of entertainment you provide us ;) ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298120#Comment_298120</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298120#Comment_298120</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:12:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>gzapata</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Johnjones- Speaking as someone from a younger generation (Gen Y or whatever name we're given) the idea of comics has been drastically reformed. With video games, tv shows and movies, the characters that appear in american comics are a norm and are very much loved. The Walking Dead gets passed around like hotcakes and even women (haha for having to even say it this way) are at the least not adverted to the idea of reading a comic especially when they'll happily watch a movie or tv show based on the same character ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298143#Comment_298143</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298143#Comment_298143</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:01:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>johnjones</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I wish people needed comics like they need porn. We'd all be rich. </blockquote><br /><br />It was never about need, not really.  It's not like America suddenly gained a compulsion to whack-off circa 1995 or so.  It's that porn became cheap, easily available and anonymous.  Suddenly, you didn't have to make the drive of shame to the adult bookstore, hoping to Christ you weren't seen by somebody you knew.  Suddenly, you could sit at your desk in the privacy of your home (or job or whatever), send some credit info and get anything you wanted to see right then and there.<br /><br />Do that for comics and you may well find that people "need" them a lot more than you thought. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298156#Comment_298156</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298156#Comment_298156</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:31:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>James Puckett</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >It's that porn became cheap, easily available and anonymous.</em><br /><br />Actually it was that the DOJ effectively abandoned porn prosecutions during the Clinton years and the Bush DOJ found it nearly impossible to convict anyone on porn obscenity charges. That, combined with the internet, created a porn bubble. Which, like the comic and internet bubbles of the 1990s, popped a long time ago. I suspect that if comics went online to the degree porn has many people will still prefer them in the three-and-four panel helpings typical of newspapers. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298209#Comment_298209</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298209#Comment_298209</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:23:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>brianwood</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Wait, porn was invented in 1995?  I think America (and everywhere) can trace that wack-off compulsion back a few thousand years previous.<br /><br />And no one will convince me that, even if comics were free and available everywhere, people would develop the same compulsion to consume them as they do porn.  Although I wish that were the case.  And I know you're talking about digital delivery systems, but comparing the two is absurd.  <br /><br /> @nikoboivin I believe that you might need your comics more than you need porn, but can you tell me you need your comics more than you need orgasms? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298219#Comment_298219</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298219#Comment_298219</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:23:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>256</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @Beamish - cheers <br /><br />That's <em >really</em> not the advert I would have made for Fables. Not by a long shot. I also can't think of a single comics title that would be easier to market to a wider-than-comics audience than Fables. It's got an elevator pitch premise, half the characters are iconic, the art is great, it's had some of the best cover art of modern times, and (perhaps best of all) it doesn't have a single one of the genre features that push people away from comics - garish lycra costumes, balloon tits, full-body-snarl postures, <em >etc.</em><br /><br />If that's the best they can do, we're fucked.<br /><br /><br />@brianwood<blockquote >can you tell me you need your comics more than you need orgasms</blockquote>No, but I can tell you which I <em >get</em> more of.<br /><br /><br />Sigh. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298220#Comment_298220</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298220#Comment_298220</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:30:19 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>DC</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ @brian-There's always that middle ground provided by nerdgasms.<br /><br />...<br /><br /><br />Ok, I'll shup up now and go back to lurking. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298266#Comment_298266</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=298266#Comment_298266</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:55:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>HOT_RIGHTEOUS_DEATH</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I was at the comic book store today, looked at all the DC titles and thought "Why should I even bother? Shouldn't I just wait for all this relaunch nonsense to get started?" <br /><br />DC has achieved a supreme amount of buzz all over the web, which I'm sure is one reason they're doing this. Bleeding Cool has about 90% of their stuff covering the relaunch. The remaining 10% surrounds Rob Granito's whereabouts. <br /><br />I honestly love Morrison's stuff on Batman Incorporated, but not really a DC fan. I'm way into Marvel's stuff, but hope this "FEAR ITSELF" thing gets done and over with in a hurry. As I said in another thread related to this, I tire of the "big event" comics very, very quickly, even when creators I like are behind them. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299024#Comment_299024</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299024#Comment_299024</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:56:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Gordon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ As comics that drown in continuity just piss me off, I'm happy to see a publisher reboot their titles and start afresh. I just wish DC was doing this in a natural fashion as and when titles demanded it, rather than this 'all in one' headline-and-money-grabber. Wonder how many of these titles will still exist this time next year? ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299028#Comment_299028</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299028#Comment_299028</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:01:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>epalicki</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >I was at the comic book store today, looked at all the DC titles and thought "Why should I even bother? Shouldn't I just wait for all this relaunch nonsense to get started?" </blockquote><br /><br />Go read this <a href="http://www.newsarama.com/comics/supergirl-kelly-sue-deconnick-110620.html" >interview</a> with Kelly Sue DeConnick. She answers that question rather passionately. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299031#Comment_299031</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299031#Comment_299031</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:32:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>warrenellis</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <em >"Why should I even bother? Shouldn't I just wait for all this relaunch nonsense to get started?" </em><br /><br />Because a lot of these relaunches aren't relaunches.  The Green Lantern and Batman books aren't breaking continuity step, for example. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299060#Comment_299060</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299060#Comment_299060</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:56:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>HOT_RIGHTEOUS_DEATH</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ DC done gone and pissed off George Perez.<br /><br />http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/06/22/the-superman-story-that-will-be-published-later/<br /><br />Not that it's his fault necessarily, but there's never a dull moment with Bob Harras in charge! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299061#Comment_299061</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299061#Comment_299061</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:21:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Also, eat Subway Sandwiches. <br /><br />I miss the fruit pie and twinkie ads. Instead of PSAs that tell you not to smoke pot. THAT'S what's ruining comics! ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299087#Comment_299087</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299087#Comment_299087</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:26:14 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>jimmyjungle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ I know...pot and comics are a match made in absolute heaven.<br /><br />The wise know this.<br /><br />jah bless ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299119#Comment_299119</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299119#Comment_299119</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:01:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jay Kay</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <blockquote >Because a lot of these relaunches aren't relaunches. The Green Lantern and Batman books aren't breaking continuity step, for example.</blockquote><br /><br />Exactly--so far the only one that looks like is going to get a full-fledged reboot is Firestorm by Gail Simone and Ethan Van Sciver...and you might be able to count Wonder Woman, but the whole point of the Odyssey jacket era was to fix/change the timestream back for her, so I don't know if that counts. Morrison's probably going to do a lot of interesting things with Superman's past with Action, but considering the guy's the king of "continuity as a living organism and everything counts," I don't think it'll fare too badly.<br /><br />But yeah, I'm into this--sad that some of my favorite comics, like Secret Six, are being nixed for it, but it looks like they're going to be doing a lot more interesting, varied stuff, including stuff that isn't straight-up super-heroics (which, I haven't read the whole tread, but I'm sure pleases our current Overlord to some extent). It's kinda scary--there's so many new things I want to try, I don't think I can afford it all. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299168#Comment_299168</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299168#Comment_299168</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:42:27 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>mister hex</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ So Superman isn't allowed to get kittens out of trees anymore? <br /><br />Curt Swan must be rolling in his grave. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299212#Comment_299212</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299212#Comment_299212</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:54:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>William George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ That explanation is only slightly less shameful than them killing the story over having Superman talk to brown people. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299274#Comment_299274</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299274#Comment_299274</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:31:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Gordon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Brown kittens are really fucked. ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299297#Comment_299297</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299297#Comment_299297</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:31:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Jay Kay</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Kurt Busiek over at the Comic Book Resources forum, while not scooping any dirt, did give some solid common sense reasoning as to why the cat explanation doesn't work:<br /><br /><blockquote >Keep in mind that if there really was a problem with an issue because it opened with a kitten-rescuing scene, <strong >it would be easier, less controversial and more cost-effective to redraw the scene than to turf the whole issue.</strong><br /><br />And it's not as if the folks at DC don't know that. Redrawing scenes is not a bizarre or unusual idea.<br /><br />Turfing an issue over a scene with a kitten, though? It takes a special kind of dopiness for someone who knows much about comics production to buy that explanation -- or try to sell it.<br /><br /><strong >Particularly in the same breath as they try to sell the idea that DC was so embarrassed at the thought of something as corny as Superman saving a kitten that they replaced it ... with a sentimental story about Krypto the Superdog.</strong><br /><br />I'm not going to discuss why the issue was replaced, but I can tell you that it had nothing to do with any kittens.<br /><br />I sympathize with Chris Roberson (hey, I've been there), but glad my story finally saw print. I expect his will, too, in time.</blockquote> ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DC Comics unleashes a new universe of superhero titles</title>
		<link>http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299586#Comment_299586</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=9904&amp;Focus=299586#Comment_299586</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:15:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<author>Pow</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ Eddie Campbell is blogging again (w00t) and commented on comic cancellations and relaunches:<br /><br />*****<br />My local paper had an article about the long running Uncanny X-MEN being put to rest. It was very salutational. The press pays so little interest to comic books that it doesn't realize how these things work. They're just closing down the one X-men comic so they can start up again with two. It will be a pincer tactic. One goes downwind of the readers with the bucket of shit, while the other creeps up behind and holds their mouths open for the first one to drop it all in. They could just have handed out knives and forks.<br />***** ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>